17 research outputs found

    Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and insulin resistance in adults: a before and after pandemic lockdown longitudinal study

    Full text link
    Background: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is a chronic disease caused by the accumulation of fat in the liver related to overweight and obesity, insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, and high levels of triglycerides and leads to an increased cardiovascular risk. It is considered a global pandemic, coinciding with the pandemic in 2020 caused by the 'coronavirus disease 2019' (COVID-19). Due to COVID-19, the population was placed under lockdown. The aim of our study was to evaluate how these unhealthy lifestyle modifications influenced the appearance of metabolic alterations and the increase in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Methods: A prospective study was carried out on 6236 workers in a Spanish population between March 2019 and March 2021. Results: Differences in the mean values of anthropometric and clinical parameters before and after lockdown were revealed. There was a statistically significant worsening in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and in the insulin resistance scales, with increased body weight, BMI, cholesterol levels with higher LDL levels, and glucose and a reduction in HDL levels. Conclusions: Lockdown caused a worsening of cardiovascular risk factors due to an increase in liver fat estimation scales and an increased risk of presenting with NAFLD and changes in insulin resistance. Keywords: COVID-19; insulin resistance; non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

    Characteristics of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus newly treated with GLP-1 receptor agonists (CHADIG Study): a cross-sectional multicentre study in Spain

    Get PDF
    Objective: Several glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (GLP-1Ra) have been made recently available in Spain for type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) treatment. There are no published data on the clinical and sociodemographic profile of patients initiating treatment with GLP-1Ra in Spain. Our objective was to understand these patients' characteristics in a real-world clinical practice setting. Design: Cross-sectional observational study. Setting: Spanish specialist outpatient clinics. Participants: 403 adults with DM2 initiating GLP-1Ra treatment were included. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Sociodemographic and DM2-related clinical data, including treatment at and after GLP-1Ra initiation and comorbidities, were collected. Results: Evaluable patients (n=403; 50.9% female) were included ( July 2013 to March 2014) at 24 centres by 53 specialists (47 endocrinology, 6 internal medicine), with the following profile (value±SD): age (58.3±10.4 years), diabetes duration (9.9±7 years), body mass index (BMI; 36.2±5.5) and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c; 8.4±1.4%); 14% had HbA1c≤7%. Previous antidiabetic treatment: 53.8% only oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs), 5.2% insulin and 40% insulin and OAD; of those receiving OAD, 35% single drug, 38.2% 2 drugs and 24% 3 drugs. Concomitant to GLP-1Ra, 55.3% were only on OAD, 36.2% on insulin and OAD, and 7.2% only on insulin. Of those receiving OAD, the GLP-1Ra was mainly associated with 1 drug (65%) or 2 drugs (31.8%). GLP-1Ra are frequently added to existing antidiabetic drugs, with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors being the OAD most frequently switched (45% receiving 1 before starting GLP-1Ra, only 2.7% receiving it concomitantly). Conclusions: In Spain, GLP-1Ra therapy is usually started in combination with OADs or OADs and insulin. These drugs are used in relatively young patients often not reaching therapeutic goals with other treatment combinations, roughly a decade after diagnosis and with a relatively high BMI. The latter could be explaine

    GDF15 and ACE2 stratify COVID-19 patients according to severity while ACE2 mutations increase infection susceptibility

    Get PDF
    Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) is a persistent global pandemic with a very heterogeneous disease presentation ranging from a mild disease to dismal prognosis. Early detection of sensitivity and severity of COVID-19 is essential for the development of new treatments. In the present study, we measured the levels of circulating growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in plasma of severity-stratified COVID-19 patients and uninfected control patients and characterized the in vitro effects and cohort frequency of ACE2 SNPs. Our results show that while circulating GDF15 and ACE2 stratify COVID-19 patients according to disease severity, ACE2 missense SNPs constitute a risk factor linked to infection susceptibility

    Standardized incidence ratios and risk factors for cancer in patients with systemic sclerosis: Data from the Spanish Scleroderma Registry (RESCLE)

    Get PDF
    Aim: Patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) are at increased risk of cancer, a growing cause of non-SSc-related death among these patients. We analyzed the increased cancer risk among Spanish patients with SSc using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and identified independent cancer risk factors in this population. Material and methods: Spanish Scleroderma Registry data were analyzed to determine the demographic characteristics of patients with SSc, and logistic regression was used to identify cancer risk factors. SIRs with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) relative to the general Spanish population were calculated. Results: Of 1930 patients with SSc, 206 had cancer, most commonly breast, lung, hematological, and colorectal cancers. Patients with SSc had increased risks of overall cancer (SIR 1.48, 95% CI 1.36-1.60; P < 0.001), and of lung (SIR 2.22, 95% CI 1.77-2.73; P < 0.001), breast (SIR 1.31, 95% CI 1.10-1.54; P = 0.003), and hematological (SIR 2.03, 95% CI 1.52-2.62; P < 0.001) cancers. Cancer was associated with older age at SSc onset (odds ratio [OR] 1.22, 95% CI 1.01-1.03; P < 0.001), the presence of primary biliary cholangitis (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.18-4.68; P = 0.015) and forced vital capacity <70% (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.24-2.70; P = 0.002). The presence of anticentromere antibodies lowered the risk of cancer (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.45-0.97; P = 0.036). Conclusions: Spanish patients with SSc had an increased cancer risk compared with the general population. Some characteristics, including specific autoantibodies, may be related to this increased risk

    Impact of interstitial lung disease on the survival of systemic sclerosis with pulmonary arterial hypertension

    Get PDF
    To assess severity markers and outcomes of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) with or without pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH-SSc/non-PAH-SSc), and the impact of interstitial lung disease (ILD) on PAH-SSc. Non-PAH-SSc patients from the Spanish SSc registry and PAH-SSc patients from the Spanish PAH registry were included. A total of 364 PAH-SSc and 1589 non-PAH-SSc patients were included. PAH-SSc patients had worse NYHA-functional class (NYHA-FC), worse forced vital capacity (FVC) (81.2 +/- 20.6% vs 93.6 +/- 20.6%, P < 0.001), worse tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) (17.4 +/- 5.2 mm vs 19.9 +/- 6.7 mm, P < 0.001), higher incidence of pericardial effusion (30% vs 5.2%, P < 0.001) and similar prevalence of ILD (41.8% vs. 44.9%). In individuals with PAH-SSc, ILD was associated with worse hemodynamics and pulmonary function tests (PFT). Up-front combination therapy was used in 59.8% and 61.7% of patients with and without ILD, respectively. Five-year transplant-free survival rate was 41.1% in PAH-SSc patients and 93.9% in non-PAH-SSc patients (P < 0.001). Global survival of PAH-SSc patients was not affected by ILD regardless its severity. The multivariate survival analysis in PAH-SSc patients confirmed age at diagnosis, worse NYHA-FC, increased PVR, reduced DLCO, and lower management with up-front combination therapy as major risk factors. In conclusion, in PAH-SSc cohort risk of death was greatly increased by clinical, PFT, and hemodynamic factors, whereas it was decreased by up-front combination therapy. Concomitant ILD worsened hemodynamics and PFT in PAH-SSc but not survival regardless of FVC impairment

    Impact of interstitial lung disease on the survival of systemic sclerosis with pulmonary arterial hypertension

    Get PDF
    To assess severity markers and outcomes of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) with or without pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH-SSc/non-PAH-SSc), and the impact of interstitial lung disease (ILD) on PAH-SSc. Non-PAH-SSc patients from the Spanish SSc registry and PAH-SSc patients from the Spanish PAH registry were included. A total of 364 PAH-SSc and 1589 non-PAH-SSc patients were included. PAH-SSc patients had worse NYHA-functional class (NYHA-FC), worse forced vital capacity (FVC) (81.2 ± 20.6% vs 93.6 ± 20.6%, P &lt; 0.001), worse tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) (17.4 ± 5.2 mm vs 19.9 ± 6.7 mm, P &lt; 0.001), higher incidence of pericardial effusion (30% vs 5.2%, P &lt; 0.001) and similar prevalence of ILD (41.8% vs. 44.9%). In individuals with PAH-SSc, ILD was associated with worse hemodynamics and pulmonary function tests (PFT). Up-front combination therapy was used in 59.8% and 61.7% of patients with and without ILD, respectively. Five-year transplant-free survival rate was 41.1% in PAH-SSc patients and 93.9% in non-PAH-SSc patients (P &lt; 0.001). Global survival of PAH-SSc patients was not affected by ILD regardless its severity. The multivariate survival analysis in PAH-SSc patients confirmed age at diagnosis, worse NYHA-FC, increased PVR, reduced DLCO, and lower management with up-front combination therapy as major risk factors. In conclusion, in PAH-SSc cohort risk of death was greatly increased by clinical, PFT, and hemodynamic factors, whereas it was decreased by up-front combination therapy. Concomitant ILD worsened hemodynamics and PFT in PAH-SSc but not survival regardless of FVC impairment

    Obesidad: visión actual de una enfermedad crónica

    No full text
    In 1926, Gregorio Marañón published in his book “Gordos y Flacos” the following reflection: “the word fatso summarizes many concepts of inheritance, customs, character, modalities of sensitivity and intelligence” . Many years ago, in 1760, the physiologist Malcolm Flemyng had written: “Not that all corpulent persons are great eaters; or all thin persons spare feeders. We daily see instances of the contrary. Tho’ a voracious appetite be one cause of Corpulency, it is not the only cause; and very often not even the conditio sine qua non thereof” . Following this way of thinking, which recognizes the multiplicity of factors responsible for obesity, it is not possible to maintain a simplistic vision, understanding it as a result of gluttony and lack of will, since this way of perceiving it represents an important barrier to its treatment. Obesity should be understood as a chronic disease, just like diabetes or hypertension; furthermore, a disease responsible for many other diseases, because it is difficult to find a pathology that is not more prevalent in the obese patient, nor a pathology whose condition does not get worse with the appearance of obesity . In fact, in 2013 the American Medical Association (AMA) recognized obesity as a disease . The AMA defended its action as a way to legitimize obesity, improve its treatment and facilitate its health coverage. With this approach as a disease, we review thEn 1926 Don Gregorio Marañón publicaba en su libro Gordos y flacos la siguiente reflexión: “la palabra gordo resume multitud de conceptos de herencia, de costumbres, de carácter, de modalidades de la sensibilidad y de la inteligencia” . Años antes, en 1760, el fisiólogo Malcom Flemyng había escrito: “no todas las personas corpulentas son grandes comedoras, ni todas las delgadas comen poco. Con frecuencia es al contrario. Un voraz apetito es causa de corpulencia, no como única causa y no es condición sine qua non de llegar a serlo” . Siguiendo esta línea de pensamiento, que reconoce la multiplicidad de factores responsables de la obesidad, no cabe mantener una visión simplista entendiéndola como resultado de la glotonería y la falta de voluntad, ya que esta forma de percibirla, supone una barrera importante para su tratamiento. La obesidad debe ser entendida como una enfermedad crónica, igual que la diabetes o la hipertensión; es más, una enfermedad responsable de muchas otras enfermedades, pues es difícil encontrar una patología que no sea más prevalente en el paciente obeso, ni una patología cuya condición no empeore con la aparición de una obesidad . De hecho, en 2013 la American Medical Association (AMA), reconoció la obesidad como una enfermedad . La AMA defendió su acción como una forma de legitimar la obesidad, mejorar su tratamiento y facilitar su cobertura sanitaria. Con esta visión de la enfermedad, se revisa el concepto y clasificación de la obesidad, su epidemiología, sus causas y consecuencias y, finalmente, las posibilidades de tratamiento

    Phytate Intake, Health and Disease: “Let Thy Food Be Thy Medicine and Medicine Be Thy Food”

    No full text
    Phytate (myo-inositol hexakisphosphate or InsP6) is the main phosphorus reservoir that is present in almost all wholegrains, legumes, and oilseeds. It is a major component of the Mediterranean and Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diets. Phytate is recognized as a nutraceutical and is classified by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS). Phytate has been shown to be effective in treating or preventing certain diseases. Phytate has been shown to inhibit calcium salt crystallization and, therefore, to reduce vascular calcifications, calcium renal calculi and soft tissue calcifications. Moreover, the adsorption of phytate to the crystal faces can inhibit hydroxyapatite dissolution and bone resorption, thereby playing a role in the treatment/prevention of bone mass loss. Phytate has a potent antioxidation and anti-inflammatory action. It is capable of inhibiting lipid peroxidation through iron chelation, reducing iron-related free radical generation. As this has the effect of mitigating neuronal damage and loss, phytate shows promise in the treatment/prevention of neurodegenerative disease. It is reported that phytate improves lipid and carbohydrate metabolism, increases adiponectin, decreases leptin and reduces protein glycation, which is linked with macrovascular and microvascular diabetes complications. In this review, we summarize the benefits of phytate intake as seen in in vitro, animal model, epidemiological and clinical trials, and we also identify questions to answer in the future

    Ensayo clínico, controlado con placebo, triple ciego, para evaluar la eficacia de una heparina de bajo peso molecular (bemiparina) en el tratamiento de las úlceras tórpidas del pie diabético, en atención primaria

    No full text
    Objetivos. Establecer el grado de eficacia del tratamiento con bemiparina durante 3 meses en la mejoría de las úlceras tórpidas del pie diabético. Secundariamente se evalúa la seguridad de la bemiparina, la calidad de vida y se compara la evolución de la retinopatía y nefropatía frente a placebo. Diseño. Ensayo clínico fase III de evaluación de eficacia y seguridad en una nueva indicación de un fármaco ya comercializado, paralelo de dos grupos, aleatorizado, triple ciego y controlado con placebo. Emplazamiento. Centros de atención primaria de Mallorca (España). Participantes. Un total de 42 pacientes por grupo, mayores de 18 años, con diabetes mellitus (DM) tipo 1 o 2, de más de 3 años de evolución, y una o más úlceras de grado 1 y 2 de la clasificación de Wagner, distal a la rodilla, que no ha curado en 3 meses de atención sanitaria. Asignación aleatoria por bloques de cuatro. Intervenciones. El fármaco experimental es la bemiparina (heparina de bajo peso molecular), en inyección subcutánea, 3.500 U/día los 10 primeros días y 2.500 U/día hasta los 90 días. Como fármaco de control se utilizó suero fisiológico en inyección subcutánea en volumen similar para su enmascaramiento. Mediciones principales. Se define como «efecto» una reducción en, al menos, un 50% en el área de su superficie y/o variación favorable del estadio en un grado entre el control al iniciar el tratamiento y a los 3 meses. Otras mediciones incluyen proteinuria, retinografías y calidad de vida (SF-36). Se llevó a cabo un análisis de eficacia por principio de intención de tratar
    corecore