Gezonde, robuuste bodem en teeltsystemen gebaseerd op agro-ecologie en zonder schadelijke emissies naar grond- en oppervlaktewater

Aanleiding: missie gedreven innovatie. Het Ministerie van LNV heeft zes missies gedefinieerd om de maatschappelijke opgaven voor het thema Landbouw, Water, Voedsel aan te pakken. Eén daarvan is Gezonde, robuuste bodem en teeltsystemen gebaseerd op agro-ecologie en zonder emissies naar grond- en oppervlaktewater. De missies geven ambities voor kennis en innovatie: zij moeten prikkelen tot ambitieus onderzoek en doorslaggevende innovaties. Het Ministerie wil een goed beeld te krijgen van: het voor de missie noodzakelijke onderzoek, van lopende initiatieven, van betrokken partijen, en van beschikbare kennis. De maatschappelijke relevantie van dit onderwerp is groot, wat blijkt uit de recentelijk gepubliceerde “Toekomstvisie Gewasbescherming 2030 naar weerbare planten en teeltsystemen”, EU Kaderrichtlijn Water, het Deltaplan Biodiversiteit en de door de sectoren geformuleerde ambities en actieplannen op dit onderwerp (Actieplan Plantgezondheid)

EuReCa ONE—27 Nations, ONE Europe, ONE Registry A prospective one month analysis of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes in 27 countries in Europe

AbstractIntroductionThe aim of the EuReCa ONE study was to determine the incidence, process, and outcome for out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) throughout Europe.MethodsThis was an international, prospective, multi-centre one-month study. Patients who suffered an OHCA during October 2014 who were attended and/or treated by an Emergency Medical Service (EMS) were eligible for inclusion in the study. Data were extracted from national, regional or local registries.ResultsData on 10,682 confirmed OHCAs from 248 regions in 27 countries, covering an estimated population of 174 million. In 7146 (66%) cases, CPR was started by a bystander or by the EMS. The incidence of CPR attempts ranged from 19.0 to 104.0 per 100,000 population per year. 1735 had ROSC on arrival at hospital (25.2%), Overall, 662/6414 (10.3%) in all cases with CPR attempted survived for at least 30 days or to hospital discharge.ConclusionThe results of EuReCa ONE highlight that OHCA is still a major public health problem accounting for a substantial number of deaths in Europe.EuReCa ONE very clearly demonstrates marked differences in the processes for data collection and reported outcomes following OHCA all over Europe. Using these data and analyses, different countries, regions, systems, and concepts can benchmark themselves and may learn from each other to further improve survival following one of our major health care events

Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Abstract Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

Gezonde, robuuste bodem en teeltsystemen gebaseerd op agro-ecologie en zonder schadelijke emissies naar grond- en oppervlaktewater

Aanleiding: missie gedreven innovatie. Het Ministerie van LNV heeft zes missies gedefinieerd om de maatschappelijke opgaven voor het thema Landbouw, Water, Voedsel aan te pakken. Eén daarvan is Gezonde, robuuste bodem en teeltsystemen gebaseerd op agro-ecologie en zonder emissies naar grond- en oppervlaktewater. De missies geven ambities voor kennis en innovatie: zij moeten prikkelen tot ambitieus onderzoek en doorslaggevende innovaties. Het Ministerie wil een goed beeld te krijgen van: het voor de missie noodzakelijke onderzoek, van lopende initiatieven, van betrokken partijen, en van beschikbare kennis. De maatschappelijke relevantie van dit onderwerp is groot, wat blijkt uit de recentelijk gepubliceerde “Toekomstvisie Gewasbescherming 2030 naar weerbare planten en teeltsystemen”, EU Kaderrichtlijn Water, het Deltaplan Biodiversiteit en de door de sectoren geformuleerde ambities en actieplannen op dit onderwerp (Actieplan Plantgezondheid)

How Technology Features Influence Public Response to New Agrifood Technologies

New agrifood technologies are often difficult to grasp for the public, which may lead to resistance or even rejection. Insight into which technology features determine public acceptability of the technology could offer guidelines for responsible technology development. This paper systematically assesses the relative importance of specific technology features for consumer response in the agrifood domain in two consecutive studies. Prominent technology features were selected from expert judgment and literature. The effects of these features on consumer evaluation were tested in a consumer study (n = 745). Fictitious technologies were used to avoid any uncontrollable contextual influences that existing new technologies may evoke. Results show that technologies that were seen as more natural and newer were perceived less risky, more beneficial, and were evaluated more positively. Technologies applied to food were judged to be more beneficial, but also more risky than those applied to non-food. Technologies used in the production process were perceived to be less risky and evaluated more positively than those used in the product. Technologies owned by the market leader were perceived to be more beneficial, and evaluated more positively than those that were freely available. In a next study (n = 440), effects of the technology features on consumer response were tested for existing new agrifood technologies. This study replicated the results for perceived naturalness, perceived newness, and place in the production process where the technology is applied. However, in contrast to the first study, we did not find an effect of application area (food versus non-food) and technology ownership

How Technology Features Influence Public Response to New Agrifood Technologies

<p>New agrifood technologies are often difficult to grasp for the public, which may lead to resistance or even rejection. Insight into which technology features determine public acceptability of the technology could offer guidelines for responsible technology development. This paper systematically assesses the relative importance of specific technology features for consumer response in the agrifood domain in two consecutive studies. Prominent technology features were selected from expert judgment and literature. The effects of these features on consumer evaluation were tested in a consumer study (n = 745). Fictitious technologies were used to avoid any uncontrollable contextual influences that existing new technologies may evoke. Results show that technologies that were seen as more natural and newer were perceived less risky, more beneficial, and were evaluated more positively. Technologies applied to food were judged to be more beneficial, but also more risky than those applied to non-food. Technologies used in the production process were perceived to be less risky and evaluated more positively than those used in the product. Technologies owned by the market leader were perceived to be more beneficial, and evaluated more positively than those that were freely available. In a next study (n = 440), effects of the technology features on consumer response were tested for existing new agrifood technologies. This study replicated the results for perceived naturalness, perceived newness, and place in the production process where the technology is applied. However, in contrast to the first study, we did not find an effect of application area (food versus non-food) and technology ownership.</p

Herstel & benutten van biodiversiteit in de kringlooplandbouw : programmeringsstudie voor de kennis en innovatie agenda

Deze programmeringsstudie is uitgevoerd in opdracht van het ministerie van LNV en levert een bijdrage aan de Kennis en Innovatie Agenda (KIA) voor het thema Landbouw, Water, Voedsel. De KIA is onderverdeeld in 6 missies, waarvan kringlooplandbouw er één van is. Binnen de missie kringlooplandbouw is Herstel en benutten van biodiversiteit één van de sub-thema. Voorliggend rapport is tot stand gekomen door een literatuur studie en een kennisbijeenkomst Biodiversiteit in de Kringlooplandbouw