The Grizzly, March 5, 2015

Student Senate Discusses Diversity on Campus • Sprinklers in Lower Cause Damage • Ursinus Continues to Globalize in Hong Kong • UC Relay for Life Makes Strides • Dawleys Follow Darwin • Poet Reads Her Work on Campus • Goldsmith Wins Fellowship • Opinion: Take Revenge Porn More Seriously; Marijuana Laws Should be Changed Nationwide • Rugby Teams Set to Tackle Spring • Leading Offhttps://digitalcommons.ursinus.edu/grizzlynews/1926/thumbnail.jp

The Grizzly, November 20, 2014

Instruments Stolen From Bomberger • Memorial Honors Ambassador Melrose • Senate Calls Emergency Meeting • Religious Realizations • Compost Company Shut Down • Transitioning from Undergrad to Corson • YAL Spreads Philosophy of Freedom Around UC Campus • Sycamore Tree Remembered in New Logo Shield Designs • Opinion: People Aren\u27t Listening to Victims of Rape; UC Website Emphasizes Students Too Much • Sans Seniors, Women\u27s Basketball Hopes to Improve • An Ocean Away • Stellar Hockey Season Endshttps://digitalcommons.ursinus.edu/grizzlynews/1917/thumbnail.jp

Novel Amdovirus in Gray Foxes

We used viral metagenomics to identify a novel parvovirus in tissues of a gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus). Nearly full genome characterization and phylogenetic analyses showed this parvovirus (provisionally named gray fox amdovirus) to be distantly related to Aleutian mink disease virus, representing the second viral species in the Amdovirus genus

Processing of the Escherichia coli leuX tRNA transcript, encoding tRNALeu5, requires either the 3′→5′ exoribonuclease polynucleotide phosphorylase or RNase P to remove the Rho-independent transcription terminator

Here we report a unique processing pathway in Escherichia coli for tRNALeu5 in which the exoribonuclease polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) removes the Rho-independent transcription terminator from the leuX transcript without requiring the RhlB RNA helicase. Our data demonstrate for the first time that PNPase can efficiently degrade an RNA substrate containing secondary structures in vivo. Furthermore, RNase P, an endoribonuclease that normally generates the mature 5′-ends of tRNAs, removes the leuX terminator inefficiently independent of PNPase activity. RNase P cleaves 4–7 nt downstream of the CCA determinant generating a substrate for RNase II, which removes an additional 3–4 nt. Subsequently, RNase T completes the 3′ maturation process by removing the remaining 1–3 nt downstream of the CCA determinant. RNase E, G and Z are not involved in terminator removal. These results provide further evidence that the E. coli tRNA processing machinery is far more diverse than previously envisioned

Adjacent single-stranded regions mediate processing of tRNA precursors by RNase E direct entry

The RNase E family is renowned for being central to the processing and decay of all types of RNA in many species of bacteria, as well as providing the first examples of endonucleases that can recognize 50 -monophosphorylated ends thereby increasing the efficiency of cleavage. However, there is increasing evidence that some transcripts can be cleaved efficiently by Escherichia coli RNase E via direct entry, i.e. in the absence of the recognition of a 50 -monophosphorylated end. Here, we provide biochemical evidence that direct entry is central to the processing of transfer RNA (tRNA) in E. coli, one of the core functions of RNase E, and show that it is mediated by specific unpaired regions that are adjacent, but not contiguous to segments cleaved by RNase E. In addition, we find that direct entry at a site on the 50 side of a tRNA precursor triggers a series of 50 -monophosphate-dependent cleavages. Consistent with a major role for direct entry in tRNA processing, we provide additional evidence that a 50 -monophosphate is not required to activate the catalysis step in cleavage. Other examples of tRNA precursors processed via direct entry are also provided. Thus, it appears increasingly that direct entry by RNase E has a major role in bacterial RNA metabolism

Mesenchymal Progenitor Cells and Their Orthopedic Applications: Forging a Path towards Clinical Trials

Mesenchymal progenitor cells (MPCs) are nonhematopoietic multipotent cells capable of differentiating into mesenchymal and nonmesenchymal lineages. While they can be isolated from various tissues, MPCs isolated from the bone marrow are best characterized. These cells represent a subset of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) which, in addition to their differentiation potential, are critical in supporting proliferation and differentiation of hematopoietic cells. They are of clinical interest because they can be easily isolated from bone marrow aspirates and expanded in vitro with minimal donor site morbidity. The BMSCs are also capable of altering disease pathophysiology by secreting modulating factors in a paracrine manner. Thus, engineering such cells to maximize therapeutic potential has been the focus of cell/gene therapy to date. Here, we discuss the path towards the development of clinical trials utilizing BMSCs for orthopaedic applications. Specifically, we will review the use of BMSCs in repairing critical-sized defects, fracture nonunions, cartilage and tendon injuries, as well as in metabolic bone diseases and osteonecrosis. A review of www.ClinicalTrials.gov of the United States National Institute of Health was performed, and ongoing clinical trials will be discussed in addition to the sentinel preclinical studies that paved the way for human investigations

Intragenic suppressors of temperature-sensitive rne mutations lead to the dissociation of RNase E activity on mRNA and tRNA substrates in Escherichia coli

RNase E of Escherichia coli is an essential endoribonuclease that is involved in many aspects of RNA metabolism. Point mutations in the S1 RNA-binding domain of RNase E (rne-1 and rne-3071) lead to temperature-sensitive growth along with defects in 5S rRNA processing, mRNA decay and tRNA maturation. However, it is not clear whether RNase E acts similarly on all kinds of RNA substrates. Here we report the isolation and characterization of three independent intragenic second-site suppressors of the rne-1 and rne-3071 alleles that demonstrate for the first time the dissociation of the in vivo activity of RNase E on mRNA versus tRNA and rRNA substrates. Specifically, tRNA maturation and 9S rRNA processing were restored to wild-type levels in each of the three suppressor mutants (rne-1/172, rne-1/186 and rne-1/187), while mRNA decay and autoregulation of RNase E protein levels remained as defective as in the rne-1 single mutant. Each single amino acid substitution (Gly→Ala at amino acid 172; Phe → Cys at amino acid 186 and Arg → Leu at amino acid 187) mapped within the 5′ sensor region of the RNase E protein. Molecular models of RNase E suggest how suppression may occur

RNase E and the High-Fidelity Orchestration of RNA Metabolism.

The bacterial endoribonuclease RNase E occupies a pivotal position in the control of gene expression, as its actions either commit transcripts to an irreversible fate of rapid destruction or unveil their hidden functions through specific processing. Moreover, the enzyme contributes to quality control of rRNAs. The activity of RNase E can be directed and modulated by signals provided through regulatory RNAs that guide the enzyme to specific transcripts that are to be silenced. Early in its evolutionary history, RNase E acquired a natively unfolded appendage that recruits accessory proteins and RNA. These accessory factors facilitate the activity of RNase E and include helicases that remodel RNA and RNA-protein complexes, and polynucleotide phosphorylase, a relative of the archaeal and eukaryotic exosomes. RNase E also associates with enzymes from central metabolism, such as enolase and aconitase. RNase E-based complexes are diverse in composition, but generally bear mechanistic parallels with eukaryotic machinery involved in RNA-induced gene regulation and transcript quality control. That these similar processes arose independently underscores the universality of RNA-based regulation in life. Here we provide a synopsis and perspective of the contributions made by RNase E to sustain robust gene regulation with speed and accuracy.Wellcome Trus

Intragenic DNA methylation prevents spurious transcription initiation.

In mammals, DNA methylation occurs mainly at CpG dinucleotides. Methylation of the promoter suppresses gene expression, but the functional role of gene-body DNA methylation in highly expressed genes has yet to be clarified. Here we show that, in mouse embryonic stem cells, Dnmt3b-dependent intragenic DNA methylation protects the gene body from spurious RNA polymerase II entry and cryptic transcription initiation. Using different genome-wide approaches, we demonstrate that this Dnmt3b function is dependent on its enzymatic activity and recruitment to the gene body by H3K36me3. Furthermore, the spurious transcripts can either be degraded by the RNA exosome complex or capped, polyadenylated, and delivered to the ribosome to produce aberrant proteins. Elongating RNA polymerase II therefore triggers an epigenetic crosstalk mechanism that involves SetD2, H3K36me3, Dnmt3b and DNA methylation to ensure the fidelity of gene transcription initiation, with implications for intragenic hypomethylation in cance