[Rezension zu:] F. Schneider (Hrsg): Psychiatrie im Nationalsozialismus – Erinnerung und Verantwortung

On 26th November 2010 around 3000 psychiatrists rose up for a minute's silence in the great hall of the International Congress Centrum in Berlin. What they had heard before, was deeply impressive and memorable to the audience. Professor Frank Schneider, president of the German Society for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Neurology (DGPPN) asked the psychiatric victims and their relatives of the Nazi era for forgiveness to an extent as only a few German Doctors done before. ...Am 26. November 2010 erhoben sich im großen Saal des Internationalen Congress Centrums in Berlin rund 3.000 Psychiaterinnen und Psychiater, um für eine Minute zu schweigen. Was sie zuvor gehört hatten, war zutiefst beeindruckend und blieb für die Anwesenden unvergesslich. Prof. Frank Schneider, der Präsident der deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Nervenheilkunde (DGPPN), bat bei den Psychiatrie-Opfern und deren Angehörigen aus der Zeit des Nationalsozialismus in einem Ausmaß um Verzeihung, wie wohl nur wenige deutsche Ärzte zuvor. ..

[Rezension zu:] F. Schneider (ed): Psychiatry under National Socialism – remembrance and responsibility

Am 26. November 2010 erhoben sich im großen Saal des Internationalen Congress Centrums in Berlin rund 3.000 Psychiaterinnen und Psychiater, um für eine Minute zu schweigen. Was sie zuvor gehört hatten, war zutiefst beeindruckend und blieb für die Anwesenden unvergesslich. Prof. Frank Schneider, der Präsident der deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Nervenheilkunde (DGPPN), bat bei den Psychiatrie-Opfern und deren Angehörigen aus der Zeit des Nationalsozialismus in einem Ausmaß um Verzeihung, wie wohl nur wenige deutsche Ärzte zuvor. ...On 26th November 2010 around 3000 psychiatrists rose up for a minute's silence in the great hall of the International Congress Centrum in Berlin. What they had heard before, was deeply impressive and memorable to the audience. Professor Frank Schneider, president of the German Society for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Neurology (DGPPN) asked the psychiatric victims and their relatives of the Nazi era for forgiveness to an extent as only a few German Doctors done before. ..

Phenotypic and measurement influences on heritability estimates in childhood ADHD

Twin studies described a strongly heritable component of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents. However, findings varied considerably between studies. In addition, ADHD presents with a high rate of comorbid disorders and associated psychopathology. Therefore, this literature review reports findings from population-based twin studies regarding the influence of subtypes, assessment instruments, rater effects, sex differences, and comorbidity rates on ADHD heritability estimates. In addition, genetic effects on the persistence of ADHD are discussed. By reviewing relevant factors influencing heritability estimates more homogeneous subtypes relevant for molecular genetic studies can be elicited. A systematic search of population-based twin studies in ADHD was performed, using the databases PubMed and PsycInfo. Results of family studies were added in case insufficient or contradictory findings were obtained in twin studies. Heritability estimates were strongly influenced by rater effects and assessment instruments. Inattentive and hyperactive–impulsive symptoms were likely influenced by common as well as specific genetic risk factors. Besides persistent ADHD, ADHD accompanied by symptoms of conduct or antisocial personality disorder might be another strongly genetically determined subtype, however, family environmental risk factors have also been established for this pattern of comorbidity

Untersuchungen zur Effizienz von Erdwärmesondenanlagen in Sachsen-Anhalt in Abhängigkeit von der Geologie des Untergrundes

Die vorliegenden Ergebnisse und Auswertungen sollen einen Beitrag zum Verständnis der Dimensionierungsgrundlagen für Erdwärmesondenanlagen darstellen und am Beispiel von Sachsen-Anhalt zeigen, dass es systematische Wechselwirkungen zwischen geologischer Untergrundsituation und den bundesweit eingeführten Richtwerten nach VDI 4640 gibt. Die gesamte Thematik bietet aufgrund der Varianz in den Berechnungsgrundlagen bei einer Anlagendimensionierung, auch bedingt durch die am Markt vorhandenen, verschiedenentechnischen Anlagensysteme, sowie wegen der Vielzahl maßgeblicher interner und externer Eingabeparameter einen großen Diskussionsbedarf und erhebliche Spielräume bei der Bearbeitung. Dennoch konnte durch die eingesetzte Arbeitsmethodik ein Ansatz geboten werden, mit dessen Hilfe Berechnungen zu Dimensionierungen von Erdwärmesondenanlagen mit einfachen Mitteln durchgeführt werden können. Diesem Ansatz folgend wurde eine Auswertung auf statistischer Grundlage versucht, um die Einwirkungen aus der geologischen Untergrundsituation abzuleiten und Schlussfolgerungen für die Praxis ziehen zu können. Die in die Berechnung einbezogenen 110 Anlagenstandorte wurden, zugeordnet zu regionalen Flächeneinheiten, mit ähnlichen geologischen Bedingungen, in einer Übersichtskarte dargestellt. Diese verdeutlicht, welche Gebiete eher unkomplizierte Planungs- und Dimensionierungsbedingungen aufweisen und in welchen Regionen erschwerte Planungsbedingungen in Sachsen-Anhalt herrschen. Es können somit für die Gebiete, die durch eine hohe Varianz der spezifischen Wärmeentzugsleistung gekennzeichnet sind, Einschätzungen und Empfehlungen gegeben werden, wie dort mit erhöhtem Erkundungsaufwand die Eignung für eine geothermischen Nutzung zu prüfen ist. Bei kritischen Standortbedingungen sollte die bestehende geologische Situation in der Planung und der technischen Umsetzung auf jeden Fall sorgfältig berücksichtigt werden

Arthritis prevention in the pre-clinical phase of RA with abatacept (the APIPPRA study): a multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled clinical trial protocol.

TRIAL DESIGN: We present a study protocol for a multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial that seeks to test the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of a 52-week period of treatment with the first-in-class co-stimulatory blocker abatacept for preventing or delaying the onset of inflammatory arthritis. METHODS: The study aimed to recruit 206 male or female subjects from the secondary care hospital setting across the UK and the Netherlands. Participants who were at least 18 years old, who reported inflammatory sounding joint pain (clinically suspicious arthralgia) and who were found to be positive for serum autoantibodies associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were eligible for enrolment. All study subjects were randomly assigned to receive weekly injections of investigational medicinal product, either abatacept or placebo treatment over the course of a 52-week period. Participants were followed up for a further 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was defined as the time to development of at least three swollen joints or to the fulfilment of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) classification criteria for RA using swollen but not tender joints, whichever endpoint was met first. In either case, swollen joints were confirmed by ultrasonography. Participants, care givers, and those assessing the outcomes were all blinded to group assignment. Clinical assessors and ultrasonographers were also blinded to each other's assessments for the duration of the study. CONCLUSIONS: There is limited experience of the design and implementation of trials for the prevention of inflammatory joint diseases. We discuss the rationale behind choice and duration of treatment and the challenges associated with defining the "at risk" state and offer pragmatic solutions in the protocol to enrolling subjects at risk of RA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials, ID: ISRCTN46017566 . Registered on 4 July 2014

BHPR research: qualitative1. Complex reasoning determines patients' perception of outcome following foot surgery in rheumatoid arhtritis

Background: Foot surgery is common in patients with RA but research into surgical outcomes is limited and conceptually flawed as current outcome measures lack face validity: to date no one has asked patients what is important to them. This study aimed to determine which factors are important to patients when evaluating the success of foot surgery in RA Methods: Semi structured interviews of RA patients who had undergone foot surgery were conducted and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis of interviews was conducted to explore issues that were important to patients. Results: 11 RA patients (9 ♂, mean age 59, dis dur = 22yrs, mean of 3 yrs post op) with mixed experiences of foot surgery were interviewed. Patients interpreted outcome in respect to a multitude of factors, frequently positive change in one aspect contrasted with negative opinions about another. Overall, four major themes emerged. Function: Functional ability & participation in valued activities were very important to patients. Walking ability was a key concern but patients interpreted levels of activity in light of other aspects of their disease, reflecting on change in functional ability more than overall level. Positive feelings of improved mobility were often moderated by negative self perception ("I mean, I still walk like a waddling duck”). Appearance: Appearance was important to almost all patients but perhaps the most complex theme of all. Physical appearance, foot shape, and footwear were closely interlinked, yet patients saw these as distinct separate concepts. Patients need to legitimize these feelings was clear and they frequently entered into a defensive repertoire ("it's not cosmetic surgery; it's something that's more important than that, you know?”). Clinician opinion: Surgeons' post operative evaluation of the procedure was very influential. The impact of this appraisal continued to affect patients' lasting impression irrespective of how the outcome compared to their initial goals ("when he'd done it ... he said that hasn't worked as good as he'd wanted to ... but the pain has gone”). Pain: Whilst pain was important to almost all patients, it appeared to be less important than the other themes. Pain was predominately raised when it influenced other themes, such as function; many still felt the need to legitimize their foot pain in order for health professionals to take it seriously ("in the end I went to my GP because it had happened a few times and I went to an orthopaedic surgeon who was quite dismissive of it, it was like what are you complaining about”). Conclusions: Patients interpret the outcome of foot surgery using a multitude of interrelated factors, particularly functional ability, appearance and surgeons' appraisal of the procedure. While pain was often noted, this appeared less important than other factors in the overall outcome of the surgery. Future research into foot surgery should incorporate the complexity of how patients determine their outcome Disclosure statement: All authors have declared no conflicts of interes