Infective endocarditis in patients with heart transplantation

[Background] The incidence of nosocomial and health care-related infective endocarditis (IE) is increasing. Heart transplantation (HT) implies immunosuppression and frequent health care contact. Our aim was to describe the current profile and prognosis of IE in HT recipients.[Methods] Multicenter retrospective registry-based study in Spain and France that included cases between 2008 and 2019.[Results] During the study period, 8305 HT were performed in Spain and France. We identified 18 IE cases (rate 0.2%). Median age was 57 years; 12 were men (67%). Valve involvement did not have a predominant location and three patients (16.7%) had atrial or ventricular vegetations without valve involvement. The median age-adjusted Charlson index was 4 (interquartile range 3–5). Eleven IE cases (61%) were nosocomial/health care-related. Median time (range) between HT and development of IE was 43 months (interquartile range 6–104). The major pathogens were Staphylococcus sp. (n = 8, 44%), Enterococcus sp. (n = 4, 22%), and Aspergillus sp. (n = 3, 17%). Although eight patients (44%) had a surgical indication, it was only performed in three cases (17%). Three patients (17%) died during the first IE hospital admission.[Conclusions] IE in HT recipients has specific characteristics. Valve involvement does not have a predominant location and non-valvular involvement is common. Three fifths have a nosocomial/health care-related origin. The major pathogens were staphylococci (44%), enterococci (22%), and Aspergillus (17%). In-hospital mortality was 17%.Peer reviewe

Comparison of effective regurgitant orifice area by the PISA method and tricuspid coaptation gap measurement to identify very severe tricuspid regurgitation and stratify mortality risk

IntroductionVarious definitions of very severe (VS) tricuspid regurgitation (TR) have been proposed based on the effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) or tricuspid coaptation gap (TCG). Because of the inherent limitations associated with the EROA, we hypothesized that the TCG would be more suitable for defining VSTR and predicting outcomes.Materials and methodsIn this French multicentre retrospective study, we included 606 patients with ≥moderate-to-severe isolated functional TR (without structural valve disease or an overt cardiac cause) according to the recommendations of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Patients were further stratified into VSTR according to the EROA (≥60 mm2) and then according to the TCG (≥10 mm). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality and the secondary endpoint was cardiovascular mortality.ResultsThe relationship between the EROA and TCG was poor (R2 = 0.22), especially when the size of the defect was large. Four-year survival was comparable between patients with an EROA <60 mm2 vs. ≥60 mm2 (68 ± 3% vs. 64 ± 5%, p = 0.89). A TCG ≥10 mm was associated with lower four-year survival than a TCG <10 mm (53 ± 7% vs. 69 ± 3%, p < 0.001). After adjustment for covariates, including comorbidity, symptoms, dose of diuretics, and right ventricular dilatation and dysfunction, a TCG ≥10 mm remained independently associated with higher all-cause mortality (adjusted HR[95% CI] = 1.47[1.13–2.21], p = 0.019) and cardiovascular mortality (adjusted HR[95% CI] = 2.12[1.33–3.25], p = 0.001), whereas an EROA ≥60 mm2 was not associated with all-cause or cardiovascular mortality (adjusted HR[95% CI]: 1.16[0.81–1.64], p = 0.416, and adjusted HR[95% CI]: 1.07[0.68–1.68], p = 0.784, respectively)ConclusionThe correlation between the TCG and EROA is weak and decreases with increasing defect size. A TCG ≥10 mm is associated with increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and should be used to define VSTR in isolated significant functional TR

COVID-19 symptoms at hospital admission vary with age and sex: results from the ISARIC prospective multinational observational study

Background: The ISARIC prospective multinational observational study is the largest cohort of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. We present relationships of age, sex, and nationality to presenting symptoms. Methods: International, prospective observational study of 60 109 hospitalized symptomatic patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 recruited from 43 countries between 30 January and 3 August 2020. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate relationships of age and sex to published COVID-19 case definitions and the most commonly reported symptoms. Results: ‘Typical’ symptoms of fever (69%), cough (68%) and shortness of breath (66%) were the most commonly reported. 92% of patients experienced at least one of these. Prevalence of typical symptoms was greatest in 30- to 60-year-olds (respectively 80, 79, 69%; at least one 95%). They were reported less frequently in children (≤ 18 years: 69, 48, 23; 85%), older adults (≥ 70 years: 61, 62, 65; 90%), and women (66, 66, 64; 90%; vs. men 71, 70, 67; 93%, each P < 0.001). The most common atypical presentations under 60 years of age were nausea and vomiting and abdominal pain, and over 60 years was confusion. Regression models showed significant differences in symptoms with sex, age and country. Interpretation: This international collaboration has allowed us to report reliable symptom data from the largest cohort of patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19. Adults over 60 and children admitted to hospital with COVID-19 are less likely to present with typical symptoms. Nausea and vomiting are common atypical presentations under 30 years. Confusion is a frequent atypical presentation of COVID-19 in adults over 60 years. Women are less likely to experience typical symptoms than men

Cardiac remodelling in secondary tricuspid regurgitation: Should we look beyond the tricuspid annulus diameter?

International audienceBackground. - A better understanding of the mechanism of tricuspid regurgitation severity would help to improve the management of this disease. Aim. - We sought to characterize the determinants of isolated secondary tricuspid regurgitation severity in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Methods. - This was a prospective observational multicentre study. Patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation were asked to participate in a registry that required a control echocardiogram after optimization of medical treatment and a follow-up. Patients had to have at least mild secondary tricuspid regurgitation when clinically stable, and were classified according to five grades of tricuspid regurgitation severity, based on effective regurgitant orifice area. Results. - One hundred patients with tricuspid regurgitation (12 mild, 31 moderate, 18 severe, 17 massive and 22 torrential) were enrolled. Right atrial indexed volume and tethering area were statistically associated with the degree of tricuspid regurgitation (P= 50 mm, the probability of having severe tricuspid regurgitation or a higher grade was > 70%. For an increase of 10 mL/m(2) in right atrial volume, the effective regurgitant orifice area increased by 4.2 mm(2), and for an increase of 0.1 cm(2) in the tethering area, the effective regurgitant orifice area increased by 2.35 mm(2). The degree of right ventricular dilation and changes in tricuspid morphology were significantly related to tricuspid regurgitation severity class (P<0.001). No significant difference in right ventricular function variables was observed between the tricuspid regurgitation classes. Conclusions. - For tricuspid regurgitation to be severe or torrential, both right atrial dilatation and leaflet tethering are needed. Interestingly, right cavities dilated progressively with tricuspid regurgitation severity, without joint degradation of right ventricular systolic function variables. (C) 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved

Reproducibility of the 2016 American Society of Echocardiography-European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging Algorithm for Estimation of Left Ventricular Filling Pattern: Not Perfect but Good Enough

International audienceThe 2016 American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) guidelines for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function reported a new algorithm to assess diastolic function and to estimate left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP). At least five to six different parameters were necessary to conclude, each of them with their own inter-observer variability. This article examines the reproducibility of each parameter of the algorithm and its influence on the final decision of the clinician. Echocardiographic exams of 12 non-selected patients without any known cardiac disease or follow-up but addressed to the hospital for symptoms were analyzed by two readers (one junior and one senior) in five French cardiologic tertiary centers. Inter-observer reproducibility at each step of the algorithm and final decision were analyzed. There was mild agreement on the final decision. The main reasons of discrepancy were disagreement on the significance of mitral annular calcifications and measured values that are just around the cut-off (despite good reproducibility, a slight variation could lead to misclassification of a dichotomous choice between a normal measure and a pathologic measure). Without considering performance, this multicentric French study puts forward limits to the actual algorithm recommended for LVFP pattern assessment. Agreement is excellent in caricatural (easy) cases (left ventricular pressure clearly normal or clearly elevated) but a great discordance exists in the gray zone. Improvement in the algorithm and in the method for LVFP determination is proposed

Natural History of Isolated Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation

International audienceNo abstract availabl

Tip of the iceberg: a tertiary care centre retrospective study of left ventricular hypertrophy aetiologies

Aims To phenotype patients referred to a tertiary centre for the exploration of a left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) starting from 12 mm of left ventricular wall thickness (LVWT).Methods and results Consecutive patients referred for aetiological workup of LVH, beginning at 12 mm of LVWT were retrospectively included in this tertiary single-centred observational study. Patients presenting with severe aortic stenosis were excluded. Aetiological workup was reviewed for each subject and aetiologies were adjudicated by expert consensus.Among 591 patients referred for LVH aetiological workup, 41% had a maximal LVWT below 15 mm. LVH aetiologies were led by cardiac amyloidosis (CA, 34.3%), followed by sarcomeric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (S-HCM, 32.1%), hypertensive cardiomyopathy (21.7%), unknown aetiology (7.6%) and other (4.2%), including Anderson-Fabry’s disease (1.7%). CA and S-HCM affected over 50% of patients with mild LVH (12–14 mm); the prevalence of these aetiologies rose with LVH severity. Among patients with Anderson-Fabry’s disease, 4 (40%) had a maximal LVWT &lt;15 mm.Conclusions Mild LVH (ie, 12–14 mm) conceals multiple aetiologies that can lead to specific treatment, cascade family screening and specific follow-up. Overall, CA is nowadays the leading cause of LVH in tertiary centers

Natural history of functional tricuspid regurgitation: impact of cardiac output

International audienceAIMS: Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) was long forgotten until recent studies alerting on its prognostic impact. Cardiac output (CO) is the main objective of heart mechanics. We sought to compare clinical and echocardiographic data of patients with TR from inclusion to 1-year follow-up according to initial CO. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with isolated secondary TR and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥40% were prospectively included. All patients had a clinical and echocardiographic evaluation at baseline and after 1 year. Echocardiographic measurements were centralized. The patients were partitioned according to their CO at baseline. The primary outcome was all-cause death. Ninety-five patients completed their follow-up. The majority of patients had normal CO (n = 64, 67.4%), whereas 16 (16.8%) patients had low-CO and 12 (12.6%) had high-CO. right ventricular function was worse in the low-CO group but with improvement at 1 year (30% increase in tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion). LVEF and global longitudinal strain were significantly worse in the low-CO group. Overall, 18 (19%) patients died during follow-up, of which 10 (55%) patients had abnormal CO. There was a U-shaped association between CO and mortality. Normal CO patients had significantly better survival (87.5% vs. 62.5% and 66.67%) in the low- and high-CO groups, respectively, even after adjustment (heart rate 2.23 for the low-CO group and 9.08 for high-CO group; P = 0.0174). CONCLUSION: Significant isolated secondary TR was associated with 19% of mortality. It is also associated with higher long-term mortality if CO is abnormal, suggesting a possible role for evaluating better and selecting patients for intervention

Brain imaging determinants of functional prognosis after severe endocarditis: a multicenter observational study

International audienceObjective We developed a detailed imaging phenotype of the cerebral complications in critically ill patients with infective endocarditis (IE) and determine whether any specific imaging pattern could impact prognostic information. Methods One hundred ninety-two patients admitted to the intensive care units of seven tertiary centers with severe, definite left IE and neurological complications were included. All underwent cerebral imaging few days after admission to define the types of lesions, their volumes, and their locations using voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping (VLSM). We employed uni- and multi-variate logistic regression analyses to explore the associations among imaging features and other prognostic variables and the 6-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Results Ischemic lesions were the most common lesions (75%; mean volume, 15.3 +/- 33 mL) followed by microbleeds (50%; mean number, 4 +/- 7.5), subarachnoidal hemorrhages (20%), hemorrhagic strokes (16%; mean volume, 14.6 +/- 21 mL), and hemorrhagic transformations (10%; mean volume, 5.6 +/- 11 mL). The volume of hemorrhagic transformations, the severity of leukopathy, and the compromises of certain locations on the motor pathway from the VLSM were associated with a poor 6-month mRS score on univariate analyses. However, upon multivariate analyses, no such specific imaging pattern independently predicted the mRS; this was instead influenced principally by age (OR = 1.03 [1.004-1.06]) and cardiac surgery status (OR = 0.06 [0.02-0.16]) in the entire cohort, and by age (OR= 1.04 [1.01-1.08]) and Staphylococcus aureus status (OR= 2.86 [1.19-6.89]) in operated patients. Conclusions In a cohort of severely ill IE patients with neurological complications, no specific imaging pattern could be highlighted as a reliable predictor of prognosis

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance May Avoid Unnecessary Coronary Angiography in Patients With Unexplained Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction: A Retrospective Diagnostic Pilot Study

International audienceBackground: Coronary angiography (CA) is usually performed in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to search ischemic cardiomyopathy. Our aim was to examine the agreement between CA and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging among a cohort of patients with unexplained reduced LVEF, and estimate what would have been the consequences of using CMR imaging as the first-line examination.Methods: Three hundred five patients with unexplained reduced LVEF of ≤45% who underwent both CA and CMR imaging were retrospectively registered. Patients were classified as CMR+ or CMR- according to presence or absence of myocardial ischemic scar, and classified CA+ or CA- according to presence or absence of significant coronary artery disease.Results: CMR+ (n = 89) included all 54 CA+ patients, except 2 with distal coronary artery disease in whom no revascularization was proposed. Among the 247 CA- patients, 15% were CMR+. CMR imaging had 96% sensitivity, 85% specificity, 99% negative predictive value, and 58% positive predictive value for detecting CA+ patients. Revascularization was performed in 6.5% of the patients (all CMR+). Performing CA only for CMR+ patients would have decreased the number of CAs by 71%.Conclusions: In reduced LVEF, performing CA only in CMR+ patients may significantly decrease the number of unnecessary CAs performed, without missing any patients requiring revascularization