48 research outputs found
TIF1gamma, nouveau régulateur négatif de la voie de signalisation du TGFbeta
The cytokine TGFbeta regulates several cellular processes such as proliferation, differentiation, migration and apoptosis, from embryonic development to adulthood. TGFbeta is well described for its tumor suppressor role through antiproliferative and proapoptotic activities, in particular in epithelial cells. During tumor progression however, TGFbeta becomes a tumor promotor, favoring angiogenesis, immune suppression and inducing the epitheliomesenchymal transition. Binding of TGFbeta ligand to its receptors activate cytoplasmic messenger Smad2 and Smad3 to complex with Smad4 and shuttle into the nucleus to regulate TGFbetatarget genes expression. Recently, TIF1gamma has been described as a new negative regulator of TGFbeta signaling, through monoubiquitination of Smad4 or direct competition with Smad4 to bind activated Smad2/3. This signaling pathway has to be finely tuned to target an action dependent on a cellular context, which is why we analyze here the regulation of functional interactions between the TGFbeta canonical signaling and TIF1gamma. In this study, we show that TIF1gamma acts as a negative regulator of Smad4 functions in TGFbetasignaling during the epithelio-mesenchymal transition and during terminal differentiation of mammary epithelial cells and lactation. We are also interested in studying TIF1gamma SUMOylation as additional level of regulation of cell response to TGFbeta. Thus we characterized four functional SUMOylation sites in TIF1gamma and we found that this post-translational modification inhibits the formation of Smads transcriptional complex and is needed to temporally restrict Smad4 residence on the promoter of TGFbetatarget genes. Our results show the critical role of TIF1gamma SUMOylation in the regulation of TGFbeta- induced epithelio-mesenchymal transition. As a conclusion, our study unveils the major role of TIF1gamma in the regulation of TGFbeta transcriptional responses. Moreover, we show that TIF1gamma requires SUMOylation to exert its repressive activity on TGFbetasignalingLe TGFbeta intervient dans la rĂ©gulation de nombreux processus cellulaires comme la prolifĂ©ration, la diffĂ©renciation, la migration, l'apoptose, du dĂ©veloppement embryonnaire jusqu'Ă la vie adulte. Le TGFbeta est aujourd'hui bien dĂ©crit pour son rĂŽle de suppresseur de tumeur de par ses activitĂ©s anti-prolifĂ©ratives et pro-apoptotiques, en particulier sur les cellules Ă©pithĂ©liales. Cependant, au cours de la progression tumorale, le TGFbeta devient un promoteur de tumeur en favorisant l'angiogenĂšse, l'Ă©chappement de la tumeur vis-Ă -vis du systĂšme immunitaire et en induisant la transition Ă©pithĂ©lio-mĂ©senchymateuse. AprĂšs fixation du ligand TGFbeta , le complexe de rĂ©cepteurs active les protĂ©ines cytoplasmiques Smad2 et Smad3 qui s'associent Ă Smad4 pour former le complexe transcriptionnel qui se transloque alors dans le noyau pour rĂ©guler la transcription de nombreux gĂšnes cibles. RĂ©cemment, la protĂ©ine TIF1gamma a Ă©tĂ© dĂ©crite pour intervenir dans la rĂ©gulation nĂ©gative de la voie du TGFbeta , en monoubiquitinant Smad4 ou en interagissant avec Smad2/3 en compĂ©tition avec Smad4. Cette voie de signalisation devant ĂȘtre finement contrĂŽlĂ©e pour cibler son action en fonction du contexte cellulaire, nous analysons ici la rĂ©gulation des interactions fonctionnelles entre la voie canonique du TGFbeta et la protĂ©ine TIF1gamma. Dans cette Ă©tude, nous montrons que TIF1gamma agit comme un rĂ©gulateur nĂ©gatif des fonctions de Smad4 dans la voie de signalisation du TGFbeta au cours du processus de transition Ă©pithĂ©lio-mĂ©senchymateuse et au cours de la diffĂ©renciation terminale des cellules Ă©pithĂ©liales mammaires et de la lactation. Nous Ă©tudions Ă©galement la SUMOylation de TIF1gamma comme nouveau niveau de rĂ©gulation de la rĂ©ponse cellulaire au TGFbeta . Nous avons ainsi caractĂ©risĂ© les sites fonctionnels de SUMOylation de TIF1gamma et montrĂ© que cette modification post-traductionnelle inhibe la formation du complexe transcriptionnel Smad et est nĂ©cessaire pour rĂ©guler temporellement la rĂ©sidence de Smad4 au niveau du promoteur de gĂšnes cibles du TGFbeta . Nos rĂ©sultats montrent le rĂŽle important de la SUMOylation de TIF1gamma dans la rĂ©gulation de la transition Ă©pithĂ©lio-mĂ©senchymateuse induite par le TGFbeta . En conclusion, notre travail met en avant le rĂŽle majeur de TIF1gamma dans la rĂ©gulation de la rĂ©ponse transcriptionnelle au TGFbeta . De plus, nous montrons que la SUMOylation de TIF1gamma est nĂ©cessaire Ă son activitĂ© rĂ©pressive sur Smad
Dynamic Regulation of Tgf-B Signaling by Tif1Îł: A Computational Approach
TIF1Îł (Transcriptional Intermediary Factor 1 Îł) has been implicated in
Smad-dependent signaling by Transforming Growth Factor beta (TGF-ÎČ).
Paradoxically, TIF1Îł functions both as a transcriptional repressor or as an
alternative transcription factor that promotes TGF-ÎČ signaling. Using
ordinary differential-equation models, we have investigated the effect of
TIF1Îł on the dynamics of TGF-ÎČ signaling. An integrative model that
includes the formation of transient TIF1Îł-Smad2-Smad4 ternary complexes is
the only one that can account for TGF-ÎČ signaling compatible with the
different observations reported for TIF1Îł. In addition, our model predicts
that varying TIF1Îł/Smad4 ratios play a critical role in the modulation of
the transcriptional signal induced by TGF-ÎČ, especially for short
stimulation times that mediate higher threshold responses. Chromatin
immunoprecipitation analyses and quantification of the expression of TGF-ÎČ
target genes as a function TIF1Îł/Smad4 ratios fully validate this
hypothesis. Our integrative model, which successfully unifies the seemingly
opposite roles of TIF1Îł, also reveals how changing TIF1Îł/Smad4 ratios
affect the cellular response to stimulation by TGF-ÎČ, accounting for a
highly graded determination of cell fate
TIF1Îł interferes with TGFÎČ1/SMAD4 signaling to promote poor outcome in operable breast cancer patients
Matrix stiffness drives epithelialâmesenchymal transition and tumour metastasis through a TWIST1âG3BP2 mechanotransduction pathway
Matrix stiffness potently regulates cellular behavior in various biological contexts. In breast tumours, the presence of dense clusters of collagen fibrils indicates increased matrix stiffness and correlates with poor survival. It is unclear how mechanical inputs are transduced into transcriptional outputs to drive tumour progression. Here we report that TWIST1 is an essential mechano-mediator that promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in response to increasing matrix stiffness. High matrix stiffness promotes nuclear translocation of TWIST1 by releasing TWIST1 from its cytoplasmic binding partner G3BP2. Loss of G3BP2 leads to constitutive TWIST1 nuclear localization and synergizes with increasing matrix stiffness to induce EMT and promote tumour invasion and metastasis. In human breast tumours, collagen fiber alignment, a marker of increasing matrix stiffness, and reduced expression of G3BP2 together predict poor survival. Our findings reveal a TWIST1-G3BP2 mechanotransduction pathway that responds to biomechanical signals from the tumour microenvironment to drive EMT, invasion, and metastasis
Matrix Rigidity Controls Epithelial-Mesenchymal Plasticity and Tumor Metastasis via a Mechanoresponsive EPHA2/LYN Complex.
TIF1gamma, a new negative regulator of TGFbeta signaling
Le TGFbeta intervient dans la rĂ©gulation de nombreux processus cellulaires comme la prolifĂ©ration, la diffĂ©renciation, la migration, l'apoptose, du dĂ©veloppement embryonnaire jusqu'Ă la vie adulte. Le TGFbeta est aujourd'hui bien dĂ©crit pour son rĂŽle de suppresseur de tumeur de par ses activitĂ©s anti-prolifĂ©ratives et pro-apoptotiques, en particulier sur les cellules Ă©pithĂ©liales. Cependant, au cours de la progression tumorale, le TGFbeta devient un promoteur de tumeur en favorisant l'angiogenĂšse, l'Ă©chappement de la tumeur vis-Ă -vis du systĂšme immunitaire et en induisant la transition Ă©pithĂ©lio-mĂ©senchymateuse. AprĂšs fixation du ligand TGFbeta , le complexe de rĂ©cepteurs active les protĂ©ines cytoplasmiques Smad2 et Smad3 qui s'associent Ă Smad4 pour former le complexe transcriptionnel qui se transloque alors dans le noyau pour rĂ©guler la transcription de nombreux gĂšnes cibles. RĂ©cemment, la protĂ©ine TIF1gamma a Ă©tĂ© dĂ©crite pour intervenir dans la rĂ©gulation nĂ©gative de la voie du TGFbeta , en monoubiquitinant Smad4 ou en interagissant avec Smad2/3 en compĂ©tition avec Smad4. Cette voie de signalisation devant ĂȘtre finement contrĂŽlĂ©e pour cibler son action en fonction du contexte cellulaire, nous analysons ici la rĂ©gulation des interactions fonctionnelles entre la voie canonique du TGFbeta et la protĂ©ine TIF1gamma. Dans cette Ă©tude, nous montrons que TIF1gamma agit comme un rĂ©gulateur nĂ©gatif des fonctions de Smad4 dans la voie de signalisation du TGFbeta au cours du processus de transition Ă©pithĂ©lio-mĂ©senchymateuse et au cours de la diffĂ©renciation terminale des cellules Ă©pithĂ©liales mammaires et de la lactation. Nous Ă©tudions Ă©galement la SUMOylation de TIF1gamma comme nouveau niveau de rĂ©gulation de la rĂ©ponse cellulaire au TGFbeta . Nous avons ainsi caractĂ©risĂ© les sites fonctionnels de SUMOylation de TIF1gamma et montrĂ© que cette modification post-traductionnelle inhibe la formation du complexe transcriptionnel Smad et est nĂ©cessaire pour rĂ©guler temporellement la rĂ©sidence de Smad4 au niveau du promoteur de gĂšnes cibles du TGFbeta . Nos rĂ©sultats montrent le rĂŽle important de la SUMOylation de TIF1gamma dans la rĂ©gulation de la transition Ă©pithĂ©lio-mĂ©senchymateuse induite par le TGFbeta . En conclusion, notre travail met en avant le rĂŽle majeur de TIF1gamma dans la rĂ©gulation de la rĂ©ponse transcriptionnelle au TGFbeta . De plus, nous montrons que la SUMOylation de TIF1gamma est nĂ©cessaire Ă son activitĂ© rĂ©pressive sur Smad4The cytokine TGFbeta regulates several cellular processes such as proliferation, differentiation, migration and apoptosis, from embryonic development to adulthood. TGFbeta is well described for its tumor suppressor role through antiproliferative and proapoptotic activities, in particular in epithelial cells. During tumor progression however, TGFbeta becomes a tumor promotor, favoring angiogenesis, immune suppression and inducing the epitheliomesenchymal transition. Binding of TGFbeta ligand to its receptors activate cytoplasmic messenger Smad2 and Smad3 to complex with Smad4 and shuttle into the nucleus to regulate TGFbetatarget genes expression. Recently, TIF1gamma has been described as a new negative regulator of TGFbeta signaling, through monoubiquitination of Smad4 or direct competition with Smad4 to bind activated Smad2/3. This signaling pathway has to be finely tuned to target an action dependent on a cellular context, which is why we analyze here the regulation of functional interactions between the TGFbeta canonical signaling and TIF1gamma. In this study, we show that TIF1gamma acts as a negative regulator of Smad4 functions in TGFbetasignaling during the epithelio-mesenchymal transition and during terminal differentiation of mammary epithelial cells and lactation. We are also interested in studying TIF1gamma SUMOylation as additional level of regulation of cell response to TGFbeta. Thus we characterized four functional SUMOylation sites in TIF1gamma and we found that this post-translational modification inhibits the formation of Smads transcriptional complex and is needed to temporally restrict Smad4 residence on the promoter of TGFbetatarget genes. Our results show the critical role of TIF1gamma SUMOylation in the regulation of TGFbeta- induced epithelio-mesenchymal transition. As a conclusion, our study unveils the major role of TIF1gamma in the regulation of TGFbeta transcriptional responses. Moreover, we show that TIF1gamma requires SUMOylation to exert its repressive activity on TGFbetasignalin
Recommended from our members
Disordered protein interactions for an ordered cellular transition: Cdc2-like kinase 1 is transported to the nucleus via its SerâArg protein substrate
Serine-arginine (SR) proteins are essential splicing factors that promote numerous steps associated with mRNA processing and whose biological function is tightly regulated through multi-site phosphorylation. In the nucleus, the cdc2-like kinases (CLKs) phosphorylate SR proteins on their intrinsically disordered Arg-Ser (RS) domains, mobilizing them from storage speckles to the splicing machinery. The CLKs have disordered N termini that bind tightly to RS domains, enhancing SR protein phosphorylation. The N termini also promote nuclear localization of CLKs, but their transport mechanism is presently unknown. To explore cytoplasmic-nuclear transitions, several classical nuclear localization sequences in the N terminus of the CLK1 isoform were identified, but their mutation had no effect on subcellular localization. Rather, we found that CLK1 amplifies its presence in the nucleus by forming a stable complex with the SR protein substrate and appropriating its NLS for transport. These findings indicate that, along with their well-established roles in mRNA splicing, SR proteins use disordered protein-protein interactions to carry their kinase regulator from the cytoplasm to the nucleus
Recommended from our members
Mobilization of a splicing factor through a nuclear kinase-kinase complex.
The splicing of mRNA is dependent on serine-arginine (SR) proteins that are mobilized from membrane-free, nuclear speckles to the nucleoplasm by the Cdc2-like kinases (CLKs). This movement is critical for SR protein-dependent assembly of the macromolecular spliceosome. Although CLK1 facilitates such trafficking through the phosphorylation of serine-proline dipeptides in the prototype SR protein SRSF1, an unrelated enzyme known as SR protein kinase 1 (SRPK1) performs the same function but does not efficiently modify these dipeptides in SRSF1. We now show that the ability of SRPK1 to mobilize SRSF1 from speckles to the nucleoplasm is dependent on active CLK1. Diffusion from speckles is promoted by the formation of an SRPK1-CLK1 complex that facilitates dissociation of SRSF1 from CLK1 and enhances the phosphorylation of several serine-proline dipeptides in this SR protein. Down-regulation of either kinase blocks EGF-stimulated mobilization of nuclear SRSF1. These findings establish a signaling pathway that connects SRPKs to SR protein activation through the associated CLK family of kinases