Correlation between impact factor and public availability of published research data in Information Science and Library Science journals

The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1868-7[EN] Scientists continuously generate research data but only a few of them are published. If these data were accessible and reusable, researchers could examine them and generate new knowledge. Our purpose is to determine whether there is a relationship between the impact factor and the policies concerning open availability of raw research data in journals of Information Science and Library Science (ISLS) subject category from the Web of Science database. We reviewed the policies related to public availability of papers and data sharing in the 85 journals included in the ISLS category of the Journal Citation Reports in 2012. The relationship between public availability of published data and impact factor of journals is analysed through different statistical tests. The variable "statement of complementary material" was accepted in 50 % of the journals; 65 % of the journals support "reuse"; 67 % of the journals specified "storage in thematic or institutional repositories"; the "publication of the manuscript in a website" was accepted in 69 % of the journals. We have found a 50 % of journals that include the possibility to deposit data as supplementary material, and more than 60 % accept reuse, storage in repositories and publication in websites. There is a clear positive relationship between being a top journal in impact factor ranking of JCR and having an open policy.This work has benefited from assistance by the National R+D+I of the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of the Spanish Government (CSO2012-39632-C02).Aleixandre-Benavent, R.; Moreno-Solano, L.; Ferrer Sapena, A.; Sánchez Pérez, EA. (2016). Correlation between impact factor and public availability of published research data in Information Science and Library Science journals. Scientometrics. 107(1):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1868-7S1131071Aleixandre-Benavent, R., Vidal-Infer, A., Alonso-Arroyo, A., Valderrama-Zurián, J. C., Bueno-Cañigral, F., & Ferrer-Sapena, A. (2014). Public availability of published research data in substance abuse journals. International Journal of Drug Policy, 25, 1143–1146.Alsheikh-Ali, A. A., Qureshi, W., Al-Mallah, M. H., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2011). Public availability of published research data in high-impact journals. PLoS One, 6(9), e24357.Anderson, B. J., & Merry, A. F. (2009). Data sharing for pharmacokinetic studies. Paediatr Anaesthes, 19(10), 1005–1010.Blahous, B., Gorraiz, J., Gumpenberger, C., Lehner, O., Stein, B., & Ulrych, U. (2015). Research data policies in scientific journals—An empirical study. Zeitschrift fur Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie, 62(1), 12–24.Borrego, A., & Garcia, F. (2013). Provision of supplementary materials in Library and Information Science scholarly journals. Aslib Proceedings, 65(5), 503–514.Cech, T. R. (2003). Sharing publication-related data and materials: responsibilities of authorship in the life sciences. www.nap.edu/books/0309088593/html . Accessed 24 November 2015CODATA. (2015). http://www.codata.org . Accessed 21 February 2015Conradie, P., & Choenni, S. (2014). On the barriers for local government releasing open data. Government Information Quarterly, 31, S10–S17.De Castro, P., Calzolari, A., Napolitani, F., Maria Rossi, A., Mabile, L., Cambon-Thomsen, A., & Bravo, E. (2013). Open data sharing in the context of bioresources. Acta Informatica Medica, 21(4), 291–292.Digital Curation Centre (DCC). (2015). http://www.dcc.ac.uk . Accessed 4 March 2015European Commission. (2015). Guidelines on open access to scientific publications and research data in Horizon 2020. European Commission, 2013. http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/oa_pilot/h2020-hi-oa-pilot-guide_en.pdf . Accessed 15 March 2015Fear, K. (2015). Building outreach on assessment: Researcher compliance with journal policies for data sharing. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 41(6), 18–21.González, L. M., Saorín, T., Ferrer, A., Aleixandre-Benavent, R., & Peset, F. (2013). Gestión de datos de investigación: infraestructuras para su difusión. Professional Information, 22, 414–423.Jones, R. B., Reeves, D., & Martinez, C. S. (2012). Overview of electronic data sharing: Why, how, and impact. Current Oncology Reports, 14(6), 486–493.Kaye, J. (2012). The tension between data sharing and the protection of privacy ingenomics research. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 13, 415–431.Leonelli, S., Smirnoff, N., Moore, J., Cook, C., & Bastow, R. (2013). Making open data work for plant scientists. Journal of Experimental Botany, 64(14), 4109–41017.National Institutes of Health (NIH). (2015). Data sharing policy. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/data_sharing/index.htm . Accessed 3 March 2015National Science Foundation (NSF). (2014). Dissemination and sharing of research results. NSF Data Sharing Policy. http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/dmp.jsp . Accessed 21 November 2014Nelson, B. (2009). Data sharing: Empty archives. Nature, 461(7261), 160–163.Open Knowledge Foundation. (2015). https://okfn.org/ . Accessed 3 March 2015Pisani, E., & AbouZahr, C. (2010). Sharing health data: Good intentions are not enough. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 88(6), 462–466.Piwowar, H. A., Day, R. S., & Fridsma, D. B. (2007). Sharing detailed research data is associated with increased citation rate. PLoS One, 2(3), e308.Piwowar, H. A., & Chapman, W.W. (2008). A review of journal policies for sharing research data. http://precedings.nature.com/documents/1700/version/1.hdl:10101/npre.2008.1700.1 . Accessed 11 December 2015Piwowar, H. A., & Todd, J. (2013). Data reuse and the open data citation advantage. PeerJ, 1, e175.Registry of Research Data Repositories (re3data). (2015). http://www.re3data.org/2014/03/re3data-org-from-funding-to-growing/ . Accessed 5 March 2015Savage, C. J., & Vickers, A. J. (2009). Empirical study of data saharing by authors publishing in PLOS journals. PLoS One, 4(9), e7078.Sayogo, D. S., & Pardo, T. A. (2013). Exploring the determinants of scientific data sharing: Understanding the motivation to publish research data. Government Information Quarterly, 30, S19–S31.Spencer, H. (2015). Thoughts on the sharing of data and research materials and the role of journal policies. http://web.stanford.edu/~vcs/Nov21/hilary_spencer_rdcscsJan2010.pdf . Accessed 11 December 2015Sturges, P., Bamkin, M., Anders, J., & Hussain, A. (2014). Journals and their policies on research data sharing. https://jordproject.wordpress.com/reportsand-article/journals-and-their-policies-on-research-data-sharing/ . Accessed 24 November 2015Tenenbaum, J. D., Sansone, S. A., & Haendel, M. (2007). A sea of standards for omics data: sink or swim? Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 21(2), 200–203.Tenopir, C., Allard, S., Douglass, K., Aydinoglu, A. U., Wu, L., Read, E., et al. (2011). Data sharing by scientists: Practices and perceptions. PLoS One, 6(6), e21101.The Royal Society Publishing. (2015). http://royalsocietypublishing.org/data-sharing . Accessed 15 March 2015Toronto International Data Release Workshop Authors. (2009). Prepublication data sharing. Nature, 461(7261), 168–170.Van Noorden, R. (2013). Data-sharing: Everything on display. Nature, 500, 243–245.Wellcome Trust. (2015). Data sharing. http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/About-us/Policy/Spotlight-issues/Data-sharing/ . Accessed 21 January 201

Parentage test in broad-snouted caimans (Caiman latirostris, Crocodylidae) using microsatellite DNA

In this study, microsatellite markers, developed for Alligator mississipiensis and Caiman latirostris, were used to assess parentage among individuals from the captive colony of Caiman latirostris at the University of São Paulo, in Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil. Many of the females in the colony were full siblings, which made maternal identification difficult due to genotypic similarity. Even so, the most likely mother could be identified unambiguously among offspring in most of the clutches studied. Two non-parental females displayed maternal behavior which would have misled managers in assigning maternity based on behavior alone. This set of variable loci demonstrates the utility of parentage testing in captive propagation programs

An author keyword analysis for mapping Sport Sciences

[EN] Scientific production has increased exponentially in recent years. It is necessary to find methodological strategies for understanding holistic or macro views of the major research trends developed in specific fields. Data mining is a useful technique to address this task. In particular, our study presents a global analysis of the information generated during last decades in the Sport Sciences Category (SSC) included in the Web of Science database. An analysis of the frequency of appearance and the dynamics of the Author Keywords (AKs) has been made for the last thirty years. Likewise, the network of co-occurrences established between words and the survival time of new words that have appeared since 2001 has also been analysed. One of the main findings of our research is the identification of six large thematic clusters in the SSC. There are also two major terms that coexist ('REHABILITATION' and 'EXERCISE') and show a high frequency of appearance, as well as a key behaviour in the calculated co-occurrence networks. Another significant finding is that AKs are mostly accepted in the SSC since there has been high percentage of new terms during 2001-2006, although they have a low survival period. These results support a multidisciplinary perspective within the Sport Sciences field of study and a colonization of the field by rehabilitation according to our AK analysis.González-Moreno, L.; García-Massó, X.; Pardo-Ibáñez, A.; Peset Mancebo, MF.; Devis Devis, J. (2018). An author keyword analysis for mapping Sport Sciences. PLoS ONE. 13(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201435S13

Using the 3D Facial Norms Database to investigate craniofacial sexual dimorphism in healthy children, adolescents, and adults

Background: Although craniofacial sex differences have been extensively studied in humans, relatively little is known about when various dimorphic features manifest during postnatal life. Using cross-sectional data derived from the 3D Facial Norms data repository, we tested for sexual dimorphism of craniofacial soft-tissue morphology at different ages. Methods: One thousand five hundred fifty-five individuals, pre-screened for craniofacial conditions, between 3 and 25 years of age were placed in to one of six age-defined categories: early childhood, late childhood, puberty, adolescence, young adult, and adult. At each age group, sex differences were tested by ANCOVA for 29 traditional soft-tissue anthropometric measurements collected from 3D facial scans. Additionally, sex differences in shape were tested using a geometric morphometric analysis of 24 3D facial landmarks. Results: Significant (p < 0.05) sex differences were observed in every age group for measurements covering multiple aspects of the craniofacial complex. The magnitude of the dimorphism generally increased with age, with large spikes in the nasal, cranial, and facial measurements observed after puberty. Significant facial shape differences (p < 0.05) were also seen at each age, with some dimorphic features already present in young children (eye fissure inclination) and others emerging only after puberty (mandibular position). Conclusions: Several craniofacial soft-tissue sex differences were already present in the youngest age group studied, indicating that these differences emerged prior to 3 years of age. The results paint a complex and heterogeneous picture, with different groups of traits exhibiting distinct patterns of dimorphism during ontogeny. The definitive adult male and female facial shape was present following puberty, but arose from numerous distinct changes taking place at earlier stages

CTP promotes efficient ParB-dependent DNA condensation by facilitating one-dimensional diffusion from parS

Faithful segregation of bacterial chromosomes relies on the ParABS partitioning system and the SMC complex. In this work, we used single-molecule techniques to investigate the role of cytidine triphosphate (CTP) binding and hydrolysis in the critical interaction between centromere-like parS DNA sequences and the ParB CTPase. Using a combined optical tweezers confocal microscope, we observe the specific interaction of ParB with parS directly. Binding around parS is enhanced by the presence of CTP or the non-hydrolysable analogue CTPγS. However, ParB proteins are also detected at a lower density in distal non-specific DNA. This requires the presence of a parS loading site and is prevented by protein roadblocks, consistent with one-dimensional diffusion by a sliding clamp. ParB diffusion on non-specific DNA is corroborated by direct visualization and quantification of movement of individual quantum dot labelled ParB. Magnetic tweezers experiments show that the spreading activity, which has an absolute requirement for CTP binding but not hydrolysis, results in the condensation of parS-containing DNA molecules at low nanomolar protein concentrations

CDH1 mutation distribution and type suggests genetic differences between the etiology of orofacial clefting and gastric cancer

Pathogenic variants in CDH1, encoding epithelial cadherin (E-cadherin), have been implicated in hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC), lobular breast cancer, and both syndromic and non-syndromic cleft lip/palate (CL/P). Despite the large number of CDH1 mutations described, the nature of the phenotypic consequence of such mutations is currently not able to be predicted, creating significant challenges for genetic counselling. This study collates the phenotype and molecular data for available CDH1 variants that have been classified, using the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics criteria, as at least ‘likely pathogenic’, and correlates their molecular and structural characteristics to phenotype. We demonstrate that CDH1 variant type and location differ between HDGC and CL/P, and that there is clustering of CL/P variants within linker regions between the extracellular domains of the cadherin protein. While these differences do not provide for exact prediction of the phenotype for a given mutation, they may contribute to more accurate assessments of risk for HDGC or CL/P for individuals with specific CDH1 variants

New reference ranges for interpreting forced expiratory manoeuvres in infants and implications for clinical interpretation: a multicentre collaboration

The raised volume rapid thoracoabdominal compression (RVRTC) technique is commonly used to obtain full forced expiratory manoeuvres from infants, but reference equations derived from 'in-house' equipment have been shown to be inappropriate for current commercially available devices

How citation boosts promote scientific paradigm shifts and Nobel Prizes

Nobel Prizes are commonly seen to be among the most prestigious achievements of our times. Based on mining several million citations, we quantitatively analyze the processes driving paradigm shifts in science. We find that groundbreaking discoveries of Nobel Prize Laureates and other famous scientists are not only acknowledged by many citations of their landmark papers. Surprisingly, they also boost the citation rates of their previous publications. Given that innovations must outcompete the rich-gets-richer effect for scientific citations, it turns out that they can make their way only through citation cascades. A quantitative analysis reveals how and why they happen. Science appears to behave like a self-organized critical system, in which citation cascades of all sizes occur, from continuous scientific progress all the way up to scientific revolutions, which change the way we see our world. Measuring the "boosting effect" of landmark papers, our analysis reveals how new ideas and new players can make their way and finally triumph in a world dominated by established paradigms. The underlying "boost factor" is also useful to discover scientific breakthroughs and talents much earlier than through classical citation analysis, which by now has become a widespread method to measure scientific excellence, influencing scientific careers and the distribution of research funds. Our findings reveal patterns of collective social behavior, which are also interesting from an attention economics perspective. Understanding the origin of scientific authority may therefore ultimately help to explain, how social influence comes about and why the value of goods depends so strongly on the attention they attract.Comment: 6 pages, 6 figure

Evaluating the Quality of Research into a Single Prognostic Biomarker: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 83 Studies of C-Reactive Protein in Stable Coronary Artery Disease

Background Systematic evaluations of the quality of research on a single prognostic biomarker are rare. We sought to evaluate the quality of prognostic research evidence for the association of C-reactive protein (CRP) with fatal and nonfatal events among patients with stable coronary disease. Methods and Findings We searched MEDLINE (1966 to 2009) and EMBASE (1980 to 2009) and selected prospective studies of patients with stable coronary disease, reporting a relative risk for the association of CRP with death and nonfatal cardiovascular events. We included 83 studies, reporting 61,684 patients and 6,485 outcome events. No study reported a prespecified statistical analysis protocol; only two studies reported the time elapsed (in months or years) between initial presentation of symptomatic coronary disease and inclusion in the study. Studies reported a median of seven items (of 17) from the REMARK reporting guidelines, with no evidence of change over time. The pooled relative risk for the top versus bottom third of CRP distribution was 1.97 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.78–2.17), with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 79.5). Only 13 studies adjusted for conventional risk factors (age, sex, smoking, obesity, diabetes, and low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol) and these had a relative risk of 1.65 (95% CI 1.39–1.96), I2 = 33.7. Studies reported ten different ways of comparing CRP values, with weaker relative risks for those based on continuous measures. Adjusting for publication bias (for which there was strong evidence, Egger's p<0.001) using a validated method reduced the relative risk to 1.19 (95% CI 1.13–1.25). Only two studies reported a measure of discrimination (c-statistic). In 20 studies the detection rate for subsequent events could be calculated and was 31% for a 10% false positive rate, and the calculated pooled c-statistic was 0.61 (0.57–0.66). Conclusion Multiple types of reporting bias, and publication bias, make the magnitude of any independent association between CRP and prognosis among patients with stable coronary disease sufficiently uncertain that no clinical practice recommendations can be made. Publication of prespecified statistical analytic protocols and prospective registration of studies, among other measures, might help improve the quality of prognostic biomarker research

A Fokker-Planck formalism for diffusion with finite increments and absorbing boundaries

Gaussian white noise is frequently used to model fluctuations in physical systems. In Fokker-Planck theory, this leads to a vanishing probability density near the absorbing boundary of threshold models. Here we derive the boundary condition for the stationary density of a first-order stochastic differential equation for additive finite-grained Poisson noise and show that the response properties of threshold units are qualitatively altered. Applied to the integrate-and-fire neuron model, the response turns out to be instantaneous rather than exhibiting low-pass characteristics, highly non-linear, and asymmetric for excitation and inhibition. The novel mechanism is exhibited on the network level and is a generic property of pulse-coupled systems of threshold units.Comment: Consists of two parts: main article (3 figures) plus supplementary text (3 extra figures