Comparative Analyses by Sequencing of Transcriptomes during Skeletal Muscle Development between Pig Breeds Differing in Muscle Growth Rate and Fatness

Understanding the dynamics of muscle transcriptome during development and between breeds differing in muscle growth is necessary to uncover the complex mechanism underlying muscle development. Herein, we present the first transcriptome-wide longissimus dorsi muscle development research concerning Lantang (LT, obese) and Landrace (LR, lean) pig breeds during 10 time-points from 35 days-post-coitus (dpc) to 180 days-post-natum (dpn) using Solexa/Illumina's Genome Analyzer. The data demonstrated that myogenesis was almost completed before 77 dpc, but the muscle phenotypes were still changed from 77 dpc to 28 dpn. Comparative analysis of the two breeds suggested that myogenesis started earlier but progressed more slowly in LT than in LR, the stages ranging from 49 dpc to 77 dpc are critical for formation of different muscle phenotypes. 595 differentially expressed myogenesis genes were identified, and their roles in myogenesis were discussed. Furthermore, GSK3B, IKBKB, ACVR1, ITGA and STMN1 might contribute to later myogenesis and more muscle fibers in LR than LT. Some myogenesis inhibitors (ID1, ID2, CABIN1, MSTN, SMAD4, CTNNA1, NOTCH2, GPC3 and HMOX1) were higher expressed in LT than in LR, which might contribute to more slow muscle differentiation in LT than in LR. We also identified several genes which might contribute to intramuscular adipose differentiation. Most important, we further proposed a novel model in which MyoD and MEF2A controls the balance between intramuscular adipogenesis and myogenesis by regulating CEBP family; Myf5 and MEF2C are essential during the whole myogenesis process while MEF2D affects muscle growth and maturation. The MRFs and MEF2 families are also critical for the phenotypic differences between the two pig breeds. Overall, this study contributes to elucidating the mechanism underlying muscle development, which could provide valuable information for pig meat quality improvement

Understanding similarities and differences in land use visions for Scotland

The successful transition towards a global society that can live within planetary boundaries is one of the greatest challenges for the twenty-first century. Sustainable land use and land management will be essential to ensure the continued delivery of the ecosystem goods and services needed to support a rapidly growing global population. To support the transition towards sustainable development, decision-makers need to better understand how land use change affects people and the environment. However, these insights are of limited use without societal agreement on future land uses. Understanding synergies and differences between land use visions forms a first step in assessing and comparing alternative pathways towards a sustainable future. This thesis uses a range of methods to understand visions of future land use amongst professional land use stakeholders, society at large, and young people in Scotland. Twenty semi-structured interviews were held with policy experts from the Scottish land use sectors. A nationwide statistically representative web-based survey provided insight into the visions of the Scottish population. And finally, a novel visual interview methodology was used to interview 26 pupils from two high schools in Perthshire. Inductive content analysis and descriptive statistics were used to analyse the results and understand and compare the land use visions of these different groups. As expected, different groups had different visions of future land use. There was, however, general agreement on certain themes, in particular the desire for a more sustainable lifestyle and the importance of a healthy environment. The sectoral stakeholders would like to see more partnerships, dialogue and collaboration; a society that is more engaged and aware about land use; resilient local economies; and short-, medium-, and long-term policies that help to achieve these goals. One of the key challenges for these groups will be how to translate abstract concepts such as ‘healthy ecosystem’ and ‘dialogue and partnerships’ into practice. This clearly requires a shared understanding of what a ‘healthy ecosystem’ means to different stakeholders, as well as appreciation of what true dialogue means and how this can be used to co-create solutions – potentially a radical change from the traditional top-down approaches. The research also identified divisions in Scottish society between those who want to continue a ‘status quo’ lifestyle, and those – in particular younger people (who spent time in the natural environment, through either school or home life) and those from a higher socio-economic background – who want a more sustainable lifestyle and to be more connected with the natural environment. These results are important, as policy makers need to be able to identify the factors that have successfully engaged certain groups and to promote these factors. Programmes that provide access to the natural environment (such as the Duke of Edinburgh’s Award) need to ensure equal opportunities by targeting disadvantaged groups. Simultaneously, it needs to be explored how to encourage those who would like to continue a ‘status quo’ lifestyle into a more sustainable one. Past research has shown how preferences can be influenced and how changes can be initiated by incentives and restrictions in order to promote desired behaviours. The power of the media should be leveraged: programmes such as BBC’s ‘Blue Planet’ highlight how our lifestyle choices impact on the natural environment and can provide the motivation for change. The current issues surrounding Brexit and Climate Change require a national conversation; using methods such as those presented in the thesis to elicit land use visions can help identify the commonalties and differences between stakeholders’ views. This can provide a starting point for dialogue and critical reflection on current instruments and objectives, and how they might be adapted to better reflect Scottish preferences and conditions