Regenerated optic fibers in goldfish reestablish a crude sectoral order in the visual pathway

The goldfish optic pathway is regenerated after an optic nerve crush. We have examined the axonal topography of the regenerated pathway by labeling, with horseradish peroxidase (HRP), axons originating from retinal sectors or annuli. The positions of the labeled axons in the cross section of the pathway were compared to the normal and related to the factors that may influence axonal pathfinding. The positions of retinal axons in the cross section of the normal pathway are predictable from the retinal addresses of the ganglion cells described by the polar coordinates r (the distance from the optic disc) and θ (the sectoral or clockface position). The two coordinates map orthogonally onto the cross section of the pathway; r varies monotonically along one axis; θ varies along a perpendicular axis. The normal r-order, present in the nonregenerated stump of the experimental nerve, was severely degraded and perhaps lost entirely in the regenerated optic nerve, tract, and brachia. Sectoral order was also lost as the axons passed the crush site, but it was reestablished, albeit crudely, in the regenerated tract and brachia where axons tended to occupy positions appropriate to their dorsal, ventral, nasal, and temporal retinal origins. The exit sequence of the regenerated axons from the stratum opticum into the tectal neuropil was normal: temporal first, nasal last. These results suggest that the regenerating fibers followed some θ specific cue located in the nonaxonal environment. It seems likely that the original axons probably followed the same cue. In contrast, the absence of r-order suggests that there is no r-specific cue for the regenerates to follow. It seems likely that the original r-order was a consequence of nonspecific influences—the orderly spatiotemporal growth of the retina and the existence of a permissive region for axonal growth.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/50041/1/902770306_ftp.pd

Effects of a conditioning lesion on bullfrog sciatic nerve regeneration: Analysis of fast axonally transported proteins

We have shown that bullfrog sciatic nerves respond to a conditioning lesion similarly to goldfish optic nerve and rat or mouse sciatic nerve; that is, following a crush the rate of regeneration is faster in nerves that have received a conditioning lesion compared to nerves that have not. Also, damaged nerve fibres show initial growth or sprouting earlier in a previously conditioned nerve compared to nerves that have not received a prior conditioning lesion. We have not detected changes in the transport of fast axonally transported proteins with the conditioning lesion paradigm, other than those changes seen in regenerating nerves after receiving a single lesion. However, more label was present in a few axonally transported proteins at the lesion site in conditioned nerves compared to nonconditioned nerves, and this difference is not apparently due to increased transport. It seems that changes in fast axonally transported proteins probably do not contribute directly to the mechanism underlying the conditioning lesion effect of higher out growth rates, although some of the fast transported proteins may be involved in functions, possibly at the growing tip of damaged fibres, which promote or result from the conditioning effect

Protein Synthesis and Rapid Axonal Transport During Regrowth of Dorsal Root Axons

: Damage to the sciatic nerve produces significant changes in the relative synthesis rates of some proteins in dorsal root ganglia and in the amounts of some fast axonally transported proteins in both the sciatic nerve and dorsal roots. We have now analyzed protein synthesis and axonal transport after cutting the other branch of dorsal root ganglia neurons, the dorsal roots. Two to three weeks after cutting the dorsal roots, [35S]methionine was used to label proteins in the dorsal root ganglia in vitro. Proteins synthesized in the dorsal root ganglia and transported along the sciatic nerve were analyzed on two‐dimensional gels. All of the proteins previously observed to change after sciatic nerve damage were included in this study. No significant changes inproteins synthesized in dorsal root ganglia or rapidly transported along the sciatic nerve were detected. Axon regrowth from cut dorsal roots was observed by light and electron microscopy. Either the response to dorsal root damage is too small to be detected by our methods or changes in protein synthesis and fast axonal transport are not necessary for axon regrowth. When such changes do occur they may still aid in regrowth or be necessary for later stages in regeneration