21 research outputs found

    The impact of location-awareness on the perception of information services

    Get PDF
    It is presently unclear how much individual community members contribute to the overall metabolic output of a gut microbiota. To address this question, we used the honey bee, which harbors a relatively simple and remarkably conserved gut microbiota with striking parallels to the mammalian system and importance for bee health. Using untargeted metabolomics, we profiled metabolic changes in gnotobiotic bees that were colonized with the complete microbiota reconstituted from cultured strains. We then determined the contribution of individual community members in mono-colonized bees and recapitulated our findings using in vitro cultures. Our results show that the honey bee gut microbiota utilizes a wide range of pollen-derived substrates, including flavonoids and outer pollen wall components, suggesting a key role for degradation of recalcitrant secondary plant metabolites and pollen digestion. In turn, multiple species were responsible for the accumulation of organic acids and aromatic compound degradation intermediates. Moreover, a specific gut symbiont, Bifidobacterium asteroides, stimulated the production of host hormones known to impact bee development. While we found evidence for cross-feeding interactions, approximately 80% of the identified metabolic changes were also observed in mono-colonized bees, with Lactobacilli being responsible for the largest share of the metabolic output. These results show that, despite prolonged evolutionary associations, honey bee gut bacteria can independently establish and metabolize a wide range of compounds in the gut. Our study reveals diverse bacterial functions that are likely to contribute to bee health and provide fundamental insights into how metabolic activities are partitioned within gut communities.ISSN:1544-9173ISSN:1545-788

    Functionally Structured Genomes in Lactobacillus kunkeei Colonizing the Honey Crop and Food Products of Honeybees and Stingless Bees

    No full text
    Lactobacillus kunkeei is the most abundant bacterial species in the honey crop and food products of honeybees. The 16 S rRNA-genes of strains isolated from different bee species are nearly identical in sequence and therefore inadequate as markers for studies of coevolutionary patterns. Here, we have compared the 1.5Mb genomes of ten L. kunkeei strains isolated from all recognized Apis species and another two strains from Meliponini species. Agene flux analysis, including previously sequenced Lactobacillus species as outgroups, indicated the influence of reductive evolution. The genome architecture is unique in that vertically inherited core genes are located near the terminus of replication, whereas genes for secreted proteins and putative host-adaptive traits are located near the origin of replication. We suggest that these features have resulted from a genome-wide loss of genes, with integrations of novel genes mostly occurring in regions flanking the origin of replication. The phylogenetic analyses showed that the bacterial topology was incongruent with the host topology, and that strains of the same microcluster have recombined frequently across the host species barriers, arguing against codiversification. Multiple genotypes were recovered in the individual hosts and transfers of mobile elements could be demonstrated for strains isolated from the same host species. Unlike other bacteria with small genomes, short generation times and multiple rRNA operons suggest that L. kunkeei evolves under selection for rapid growth in its natural growth habitat. The results provide an extended framework for reductive genome evolution and functional genome organization in bacteria

    Extensive intra-phylotype diversity in lactobacilli and bifidobacteria from the honeybee gut

    Get PDF
    Background: In the honeybee Apis mellifera, the bacterial gut community is consistently colonized by eight distinct phylotypes of bacteria. Managed bee colonies are of considerable economic interest and it is therefore important to elucidate the diversity and role of this microbiota in the honeybee. In this study, we have sequenced the genomes of eleven strains of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria isolated from the honey crop of the honeybee Apis mellifera. Results: Single gene phylogenies confirmed that the isolated strains represent the diversity of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria in the gut, as previously identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Core genome phylogenies of the lactobacilli and bifidobacteria further indicated extensive divergence between strains classified as the same phylotype. Phylotype-specific protein families included unique surface proteins. Within phylotypes, we found a remarkably high level of gene content diversity. Carbohydrate metabolism and transport functions contributed up to 45% of the accessory genes, with some genomes having a higher content of genes encoding phosphotransferase systems for the uptake of carbohydrates than any previously sequenced genome. These genes were often located in highly variable genomic segments that also contained genes for enzymes involved in the degradation and modification of sugar residues. Strain-specific gene clusters for the biosynthesis of exopolysaccharides were identified in two phylotypes. The dynamics of these segments contrasted with low recombination frequencies and conserved gene order structures for the core genes. Hits for CRISPR spacers were almost exclusively found within phylotypes, suggesting that the phylotypes are associated with distinct phage populations. Conclusions: The honeybee gut microbiota has been described as consisting of a modest number of phylotypes; however, the genomes sequenced in the current study demonstrated a very high level of gene content diversity within all three described phylotypes of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria, particularly in terms of metabolic functions and surface structures, where many features were strain-specific. Together, these results indicate niche differentiation within phylotypes, suggesting that the honeybee gut microbiota is more complex than previously thought.De två förstaförfattarna delar förstaförfattarskapet.</p

    Synergies Between Division of Labor and Gut Microbiomes of Social Insects

    Get PDF
    Social insects maximize resource acquisition and allocation through division of labor and associations with microbial symbionts. Colonies divide labor among castes and subcastes, where the plasticity of caste roles decreases in clades with higher social grades. Recent studies indicate that specific castes may also foster distinct gut microbiomes, suggesting synergies between division of labor and symbiosis. The social organization of a colony potentially partitions evolutionary persistent microbial partners to optimize symbioses and complement division of labor. However, research in this area has received limited attention. To elucidate if a structured microbiota is adaptive, we present three testable predictions to address consistent community structure, beneficial functions, and selection for microbiota that support caste roles. First, we posit that social insect groups spanning lower to higher social grades exhibit increasingly distinct caste microbiomes, suggesting that structured microbiomes may have evolved in parallel to social complexity. Second, we contend that the development of these microbiomes during colony maturation may clarify the extent to which they support division of labor. Third, we predict that mature social insect colonies with the most extreme division of labor demonstrate the strongest distinctions between caste microbiomes, carrying the greatest promise of insight into microbiome composition and function. Ultimately, we hypothesize that caste-specific microbiomes may enhance symbiotic benefits and the efficiency of division of labor, consequently maximizing fitness

    Overview of metabolite changes explained by different community members of the bee gut microbiota.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Bar graphs show the fraction of the metabolic changes explained by mono-colonizations and hive bees for substrates (240 ions) and products (132 ions). The category “Total” indicates the total number of ions explained by mono-colonizations, thus excluding hive bees. Heatmap representation of enrichment <i>P</i> values (one-sided Fisher’s exact test <i>P</i> < 0.05) are provided for compound categories enriched in one or several mono-colonizations. (B–E) Z-score transformed ion intensities of selected substrate and product ions are shown for all treatment groups. (B) Four glycosylated flavonoid substrates. (C) Two substrates from the outer pollen wall. (D) Two products corresponding to host-derived metabolites. (E) Succinate, one of the major fermentation products. Groups depicted in color highlight treatment groups displaying a significant difference compared to MD bees in the same direction as the CL versus MD difference (one-way analysis of variance [ANOVA], Tukey honest significant difference [HSD] post hoc test at 99% confidence, <i>P</i> ≤ 0.05). Plots for all 372 ions are provided in <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003467#pbio.2003467.s008" target="_blank">S8 Data</a>. Ba, <i>B</i>. <i>apis</i> mono-colonized; Bi, <i>B</i>. <i>asteroides</i> mono-colonized; CL, colonized with the reconstituted microbiota; F4, Firm-4 mono-colonized; F5, Firm-5 mono-colonized; Fp, <i>F</i>. <i>perrara</i> mono-colonized; Ga, <i>G</i>. <i>apicola</i> mono-colonized; Hive, hive bees; MD, microbiota-depleted; Sa, <i>S</i>. <i>alvi</i> mono-colonized. The numerical results of the full enrichment analysis, bar graphs, and mono-colonization plots are provided in <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003467#pbio.2003467.s003" target="_blank">S3 Data</a>, <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003467#pbio.2003467.s001" target="_blank">S1 Data</a> and <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003467#pbio.2003467.s008" target="_blank">S8 Data</a>, respectively.</p

    Metabolite changes between microbiota-depleted (MD) and colonized (CL) bees.

    No full text
    <p>An Orthogonal Projection of Least Squares-Differentiation Analysis (OPLS-DA) based S-plot of metabolite changes shows the ions responsible for CL and MD separation. The inset shows OPLS-DA separation between CL and MD along the component that was used for correlating ion intensities. Experiment 2 data (see <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003467#pbio.2003467.s002" target="_blank">S2A Data</a>) was used for this plot, and annotated ions that were not robustly significantly different between CL and MD in both experiments are plotted in grey. Ions with a first annotation belonging to an enriched category (see <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003467#pbio.2003467.s003" target="_blank">S3A Data</a>) are plotted in color, except for the category “amino acids and derivatives”, which did not meet the significance threshold for enrichment but was deemed relevant. The “purine nucleosides and analogues” and “pyrimidine nucleosides and analogues” categories were combined into “nucleosides and analogs” for coloring only. The boxed areas show the <i>m/z</i> [M-H<sup>+</sup>]<sup>-</sup> of the ion and the first annotation name of the most discriminatory ions, sorted by covariance. Asterisks indicate ions with ambiguous annotations. The numerical data can be found in <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003467#pbio.2003467.s001" target="_blank">S1 Data</a>. Conjug., conjugates; Deriv., derivatives; FC, fold change; int., intensity.</p
    corecore