25 research outputs found
Section 510 (b) of the Bankruptcy Code is to be Interpreted Broadly
(Excerpt)
One of the cornerstone principles of Chapter 11 under title 11 of the United States Code (“the Bankruptcy Code”) is section 510 (b). Under section 510 (b), a fraud claim by a purchaser of stock in a corporation that subsequently files a petition for relief under the Bankruptcy Code must be subordinated to general unsecured creditors. Although the application of section 510 (b) may seem straightforward, courts have struggled interpreting the ambiguous language of section 510 (b).
Prior to Congress enacting section 510 (b), there was significant confusion throughout the bankruptcy community regarding what claims must be subordinated. Many courts struggled in determining whether such claims should be treated pari passu with claims of general unsecured creditors or whether such claims should be subordinated. Congress sought to clarify these issues when it enacted section 510 (b).
When creating section 510 (b), Congress relied heavily on the law review article written by two prestigious law school professors, John J. Slain (“Slain”) and Homer Kripke (“Kripke”). According to Slain and Kripke, section 510 (b) was created to reflect “the different degree to which each party assumes a risk of enterprise insolvency.” Factoring in the general creditor’s need for protection, Congress’ rationale for section 510 (b) was that general creditors rely on a cushion of securities when they decide to extend credit. Furthermore, since creditors rely heavily on the protections from mandatory subordination in the event of bankruptcy, whereas security holders freely bargained for an equity interest rather than a debt interest when they decided to invest in the corporation\u27s stock, Congress sought to fairly balance these risks. Because security holders voluntarily forgo the risk of insolvency with the hopes of making a profit, Congress designed section 510 (b) with the intent to provide creditors with more protection
Homocysteine, S-adenosylmethionine and S-adenosylhomocysteine are associated with retinal microvascular abnormalities: the Hoorn Study
The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between homocysteine and homocysteine metabolism components and retinal microvascular disorders in subjects with and without Type 2 diabetes. In this population-based study of 256 participants, aged 60-85 years, we determined total plasma homocysteine, SAM (S-adenosylmethionine) and SAH (S-adenosylhomocysteine) in plasma and erythrocytes, total folate in serum and erythrocytes, 5-MTHF (5-methyltetrahydrofolate), and vitamins B12 and B6. Participants were examined ophthalmologically by means of indirect funduscopy and two-field 45° fundus photography, and were graded for retinopathy and retinal sclerotic vessel abnormalities. A computer-assisted method was used to measure retinal vessel diameters. Total plasma homocysteine was inversely associated with retinal arteriolar diameters {standardized β, -0.20 [95% CI (confidence interval), -0.33 to - 0.07]} or a decrease of 3.78 μm CRAEs (central retinal arteriolar equivalents) per 1 S.D. increase in homocysteine level (= 4.6 μmol/l). In addition, the SAM/SAH ratio in plasma was inversely associated with retinal sclerotic vessel abnormalities and retinopathy [odds ratios, 0.61 (95% CI, 0.39-0.96) and 0.50 (95% CI, 0.30-0.83) per 1 S.D. respectively]. The associations were independent of age, sex, glucose tolerance status, other homocysteine metabolism components and cardiovascular risk factors. In conclusion, the results of the present study support the concept that total plasma homocysteine and a low SAM/SAH ratio in plasma, which may reflect reduced transmethylation reactions, may contribute to the pathogenesis of (retinal) microangiopathy. © The Authors
Impact of COVID-19 on cardiovascular testing in the United States versus the rest of the world
Objectives: This study sought to quantify and compare the decline in volumes of cardiovascular procedures between the United States and non-US institutions during the early phase of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the care of many non-COVID-19 illnesses. Reductions in diagnostic cardiovascular testing around the world have led to concerns over the implications of reduced testing for cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality.
Methods: Data were submitted to the INCAPS-COVID (International Atomic Energy Agency Non-Invasive Cardiology Protocols Study of COVID-19), a multinational registry comprising 909 institutions in 108 countries (including 155 facilities in 40 U.S. states), assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on volumes of diagnostic cardiovascular procedures. Data were obtained for April 2020 and compared with volumes of baseline procedures from March 2019. We compared laboratory characteristics, practices, and procedure volumes between U.S. and non-U.S. facilities and between U.S. geographic regions and identified factors associated with volume reduction in the United States.
Results: Reductions in the volumes of procedures in the United States were similar to those in non-U.S. facilities (68% vs. 63%, respectively; p = 0.237), although U.S. facilities reported greater reductions in invasive coronary angiography (69% vs. 53%, respectively; p < 0.001). Significantly more U.S. facilities reported increased use of telehealth and patient screening measures than non-U.S. facilities, such as temperature checks, symptom screenings, and COVID-19 testing. Reductions in volumes of procedures differed between U.S. regions, with larger declines observed in the Northeast (76%) and Midwest (74%) than in the South (62%) and West (44%). Prevalence of COVID-19, staff redeployments, outpatient centers, and urban centers were associated with greater reductions in volume in U.S. facilities in a multivariable analysis.
Conclusions: We observed marked reductions in U.S. cardiovascular testing in the early phase of the pandemic and significant variability between U.S. regions. The association between reductions of volumes and COVID-19 prevalence in the United States highlighted the need for proactive efforts to maintain access to cardiovascular testing in areas most affected by outbreaks of COVID-19 infection
Section 510 (b) of the Bankruptcy Code is to be Interpreted Broadly
(Excerpt)
One of the cornerstone principles of Chapter 11 under title 11 of the United States Code (“the Bankruptcy Code”) is section 510 (b). Under section 510 (b), a fraud claim by a purchaser of stock in a corporation that subsequently files a petition for relief under the Bankruptcy Code must be subordinated to general unsecured creditors. Although the application of section 510 (b) may seem straightforward, courts have struggled interpreting the ambiguous language of section 510 (b).
Prior to Congress enacting section 510 (b), there was significant confusion throughout the bankruptcy community regarding what claims must be subordinated. Many courts struggled in determining whether such claims should be treated pari passu with claims of general unsecured creditors or whether such claims should be subordinated. Congress sought to clarify these issues when it enacted section 510 (b).
When creating section 510 (b), Congress relied heavily on the law review article written by two prestigious law school professors, John J. Slain (“Slain”) and Homer Kripke (“Kripke”). According to Slain and Kripke, section 510 (b) was created to reflect “the different degree to which each party assumes a risk of enterprise insolvency.” Factoring in the general creditor’s need for protection, Congress’ rationale for section 510 (b) was that general creditors rely on a cushion of securities when they decide to extend credit. Furthermore, since creditors rely heavily on the protections from mandatory subordination in the event of bankruptcy, whereas security holders freely bargained for an equity interest rather than a debt interest when they decided to invest in the corporation\u27s stock, Congress sought to fairly balance these risks. Because security holders voluntarily forgo the risk of insolvency with the hopes of making a profit, Congress designed section 510 (b) with the intent to provide creditors with more protection
Cognitive Biases and Entrepreneurial Under-Diversification
Cognitive biases lead entrepreneurs to overinvest in their own companies, over exposing themselves to idiosyncratic risk. Our novel theoretical model explains entrepreneurial under-diversification by measuring the amount of potential bias in entrepreneurs' portfolio allocations brought about by overconfidence and over optimism. Simulation analyses based on our model allow us calculating the implicit levels of overconfidence and over optimism from observable portfolio choices. Finally, using a unique dataset including cross-regional data on Italian entrepreneurs and a structural equation modeling approach, we test the effect of overconfidence and over optimism on entrepreneurs' portfolio allocations. Consistent with our theoretical predictions, we find a positive relationship between overconfidence and entrepreneur investments in their own companies. On the other hand, the role of over optimism seems to be negligible
Effect of genetic variation in the human S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase gene on total homocysteine concentrations and risk of recurrent venous thrombosis.
Contains fulltext :
57226.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)Hyperhomocysteinemia is an independent and graded risk factor for arterial vascular disease and venous thrombosis. It is still debated via which mechanism homocysteine (Hcy) causes vascular disease. S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase (AHCY) catalyses the reversible hydrolysis of S-adenosylhomocysteine (AdoHcy) to Hcy. As an increase in AdoHcy, a strong inhibitor of many methyltransferases, is observed in hyperhomocysteinemic individuals, AdoHcy may play a role in the development of cardiovascular diseases by inhibiting transmethylation reactions. We sequenced the entire coding region and parts of the untranslated regions (UTRs) of the AHCY gene of 20 patients with recurrent venous thrombosis in order to identify genetic variation within this gene. We identified three sequence variants in the AHCY gene: a C > T transition in the 5' UTR (-34 bp C > T), a missense mutation in exon 2, which mandates an amino-acid conversion at codon 38 (112 C > T; Arg38Trp) and a silent mutation in exon 4 (390 C > T; Asp130Asp). We studied the effect of the first two variants on total plasma Hcy and venous thrombosis risk in a case-control study on recurrent venous thrombosis. The two polymorphisms under study seem to have no evident effect on tHcy. The adjusted relative risk of venous thrombosis associated with the 112CT genotype compared with 112CC individuals was 1.27 (95% CI 0.55-2.94), whereas the -34CT genotype confers a risk of 1.25 (95% CI 0.44-3.52) compared with the wild-type genotype at this locus. However, the wide confidence intervals do not allow firm conclusions to be drawn
Intracellular S-adenosylhomocysteine increased levels are associated with DNA hypomethylation in HUVEC.
Contains fulltext :
48583.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)Hyperhomocysteinemia is a risk factor for atherosclerosis and vascular disease; however, the mechanism underlying this association remains poorly understood. Increased levels of intracellular S-adenosylhomocysteine (AdoHcy), secondary to homocysteine-mediated reversal of the AdoHcy hydrolase reaction, have been associated with reduced DNA methylation patterns and pointed as responsible for the hyperhomocysteinemia-related endothelial dysfunction. Methylation is an epigenetic feature of genomic DNA, which leads to alterations in gene expression. So far, the effect of intracellular AdoHcy accumulation on DNA methylation patterns has not yet been fully substantiated by experimental evidence. The present study was designed to evaluate, in cultured endothelial cells, the effect of AdoHcy accumulation on genomic global DNA methylation status. Experimental intracellular accumulation of AdoHcy was induced by adenosine-2,3-dialdehyde (ADA), an inhibitor of AdoHcy hydrolase. Increased concentrations of inhibitor were tested, and unsupplemented medium incubations were used as controls. Cytosolic and nuclear fractions were obtained from trypsinized cells after 72 h of incubation. Total homocysteine concentration was quantified (culture medium and cytosolic fractions) by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). S-Adenosylmethionine and AdoHcy concentrations were measured (cytosolic fractions) by stable-isotope dilution LC-tandem mass spectrometry method. Genomic DNA was obtained from the nuclear fraction, and global DNA methylation status was evaluated by the cytosine extension assay. The results showed that supplementation of the culture medium with ADA had no cytotoxic effect and increased the intracellular AdoHcy concentration in a dose-dependent manner. A significant negative correlation was observed between intracellular AdoHcy and genomic DNA methylation status. These findings strongly point to the importance of AdoHcy as a pivotal biomarker of genomic DNA methylation status