46 research outputs found

    Modeled flux and polarisation signals of horizontally inhomogeneous exoplanets, applied to Earth--like planets

    Full text link
    We present modeled flux and linear polarisation signals of starlight that is reflected by spatially unresolved, horizontally inhomogeneous planets and discuss the effects of including horizontal inhomogeneities on the flux and polarisation signals of Earth-like exoplanets. Our code is based on an efficient adding--doubling algorithm, which fully includes multiple scattering by gases and aerosol/cloud particles. We divide a model planet into pixels that are small enough for the local properties of the atmosphere and surface (if present) to be horizontally homogeneous. Given a planetary phase angle, we sum up the reflected total and linearly polarised fluxes across the illuminated and visible part of the planetary disk, taking care to properly rotate the polarized flux vectors towards the same reference plane. We compared flux and polarisation signals of simple horizontally inhomogeneous model planets against results of the weighted sum approximation, in which signals of horizontally homogeneous planets are combined. Apart from cases in which the planet has only a minor inhomogeneity, the signals differ significantly. In particular, the shape of the polarisation phase function appears to be sensitive to the horizontal inhomogeneities. The same holds true for Earth-like model planets with patchy clouds above an ocean and a sandy continent. Our simulations clearly show that horizontal inhomogeneities leave different traces in flux and polarisation signals. Combining flux with polarisation measurements would help retrieving the atmospheric and surface patterns on a planet

    Looking for the rainbow on exoplanets covered by liquid and icy water clouds

    Full text link
    Looking for the primary rainbow in starlight that is reflected by exoplanets appears to be a promising method to search for liquid water clouds in exoplanetary atmospheres. Ice water clouds, that consist of water crystals instead of water droplets, could potentially mask the rainbow feature in the planetary signal by covering liquid water clouds. Here, we investigate the strength of the rainbow feature for exoplanets that have liquid and icy water clouds in their atmosphere, and calculate the rainbow feature for a realistic cloud coverage of Earth. We calculate flux and polarization signals of starlight that is reflected by horizontally and vertically inhomogeneous Earth--like exoplanets, covered by patchy clouds consisting of liquid water droplets or water ice crystals. The planetary surfaces are black. On a planet with a significant coverage of liquid water clouds only, the total flux signal shows a weak rainbow feature. Any coverage of the liquid water clouds by ice clouds, however, dampens the rainbow feature in the total flux, and thus the discovery of liquid water in the atmosphere. On the other hand, detecting the primary rainbow in the polarization signal of exoplanets appears to be a powerful tool for detecting liquid water in exoplanetary atmospheres, even when these clouds are partially covered by ice clouds. In particular, liquid water clouds covering as little as 10%-20% of the planetary surface, with more than half of these covered by ice clouds, still create a polarized rainbow feature in the planetary signal. Indeed, calculations of flux and polarization signals of an exoplanet with a realistic Earth--like cloud coverage, show a strong polarized rainbow feature.Comment: accepted for publication in Astronomy & Astrophysic

    Observing the Earth as an exoplanet with LOUPE, the Lunar Observatory for Unresolved Polarimetry of Earth

    Full text link
    The detections of small, rocky exoplanets have surged in recent years and will likely continue to do so. To know whether a rocky exoplanet is habitable, we have to characterise its atmosphere and surface. A promising characterisation method for rocky exoplanets is direct detection using spectropolarimetry. This method will be based on single pixel signals, because spatially resolving exoplanets is impossible with current and near-future instruments. Well-tested retrieval algorithms are essential to interpret these single pixel signals in terms of atmospheric composition, cloud and surface coverage. Observations of Earth itself provide the obvious benchmark data for testing such algorithms. The observations should provide signals that are integrated over the Earth's disk, that capture day and night variations, and all phase angles. The Moon is a unique platform from where the Earth can be observed as an exoplanet, undisturbed, all of the time. Here, we present LOUPE, the Lunar Observatory for Unresolved Polarimetry of Earth, a small and robust spectropolarimeter to observe our Earth as an exoplanet.Comment: 14 pages, 3 figures, submitted in special Issue of Planetary and Space Science on Scientific Preparations for Lunar Exploratio

    Characterizing exoplanetary atmospheres through infrared polarimetry

    Full text link
    Planets can emit polarized thermal radiation, just like brown dwarfs. We present calculated thermal polarization signals from hot exoplanets, using an advanced radiative transfer code that fully includes all orders of scattering by gaseous molecules and cloud particles. The code spatially resolves the disk of the planet, allowing simulations for horizontally inhomogeneous planets. Our results show that the degree of linear polarization, P, of an exoplanet's thermal radiation is expected to be highest near the planet's limb and that this P depends on the temperature and its gradient, the scattering properties and the distribution of the cloud particles. Integrated over the disk of a spherically symmetric planet, P of the thermal radiation equals zero. However, for planets that appear spherically asymmetric, e.g. due to flattening, cloud bands or spots in their atmosphere, differences in their day and night sides, and/or obscuring rings, P is often larger than 0.1 %, in favorable cases even reaching several percent at near-infrared wavelengths. Detection of thermal polarization signals can give access to planetary parameters that are otherwise hard to obtain: it immediately confirms the presence of clouds, and P can then constrain atmospheric inhomogeneities and the flattening due to the planet's rotation rate. For zonally symmetric planets, the angle of polarization will yield the components of the planet's spin axis normal to the line-of-sight. Finally, our simulations show that P is generally more sensitive to variability in a cloudy planet's atmosphere than the thermal flux is, and could hence better reveal certain dynamical processes.Comment: 9 pages, 5 figures, accepted for publication in Ap

    Earth-as-an-exoplanet: comparing earthshine observations to models of an exo-Earth

    Get PDF
    Traditional methods of exoplanet characterization that only make use of emitted or reflected flux lack the ability to fully distinguish between different physical features of the target, such as cloud layers, hazes, or surface features. Polarimetry, however, is a powerful, more sensitive technique that has this ability, as it measures light as a vector (by the orientation of the electric field) rather than a scalar intensity. It is therefore extremely sensitive to the composition and structure of the planetary atmosphere and surface, being affected by properties such as the mixing ratios of atmospheric absorbing gases, cloud optical thickness, cloud top pressure, cloud particle size, and surface albedo. Various groups have theoretically studied the optical linear polarimetric signals of Earth-like exoplanets as functions of both orbital phase and wavelength. With this project we assess the accuracy of these theoretical models against observations of the Earthshine, the only known observations of an Earth-like planet thus far. Using data of the atmosphere and surface taken by the MODIS instrument aboard the Terra and Aqua satellites, as well as surface reflectance spectra from the JPL EcoStress Spectral Library, we created a gridded model of the Earth. Then, using this model data as input for three separate radiative transfer algorithms, we generate the flux and linear polarization spectra for the model exoplanet-Earth across the optical to near-infrared wavelengths. We compare the results from all three codes to each other and to the observational linear spectropolarimetric data of the Earthshine obtained by a member of our group. We identify similarities and potential pitfalls between the codes, and make necessary adjustments to them, in an effort to improve our future characterizations of terrestrial exoplanets.Stars and planetary system

    Comparing models of an exoplanet-earth to earthshine observations

    Get PDF
    Polarimetry is widely becoming recognized as a powerful technique for enhancing the contrast between a star and an exoplanet, and thus improving upon the direct detection of exoplanets. The real power of polarimetry, however, is in its ability to characterize the physical properties of these worlds. This is because the state of the polarization of the light from the planet is very sensitive to the composition and structure of the planetary atmosphere and surface, being affected by properties such as the mixing ratios of atmospheric absorbing gases, cloud optical thickness, cloud top pressure, cloud particle size, and surface albedo. Various groups have theoretically studied the optical linear polarimetric signals of Earth-like exoplanets as functions of both orbital phase and wavelength. This project aims to validate the accuracy of these theoretical models against the only known observations of an Earth-like planet thus far: Earthshine. Using atmospheric and surface data taken by the MODIS instrument aboard the Terra and Aqua satellites, as well as surface albedo spectra from the EcoStress Spectral Library, we created a detailed model of the Earth. Then, using this model data as input for three separate radiative transfer algorithms, we generate the flux and linear polarization spectra for the model exoplanet-Earth from the optical to near-infrared wavelengths. We compare the results from all three codes to each other and to observational linear spectropolarimetric data of the Earthshine obtained by a member of our group. We identify similarities and potential pitfalls between these codes in an effort to improve our future characterizations of Earth-like exoplanets.Stars and planetary system

    LOUPE: Observing Earth from the Moon to prepare for detecting life on Earth-like exoplanets

    Get PDF
    LOUPE, the Lunar Observatory for Unresolved Polarimetry of the Earth, is a small, robust spectro-polarimeter with a mission to observe the Earth as an exoplanet. Detecting Earth-like planets in stellar habitable zones is one of the key challenges of modern exoplanetary science. Characterising such planets and searching for traces of life requires the direct detection of their signals. LOUPE provides unique spectral flux and polarisation data of sunlight reflected by the Earth, the only planet known to harbor life. This data will be used to test numerical codes to predict signals of Earth-like exoplanets, to test algorithms that retrieve planet properties, and to fine-tune the design and observational strategies of future space observatories. From the Moon, LOUPE will continuously see the entire Earth, enabling it to monitor the signal changes due to the planet's daily rotation, weather patterns, and seasons, across all phase angles. Here, we present both the science case and the technology behind LOUPE's instrumental and mission design.Comment: 13 pages, 5 figures. Accepted for publication in Royal Society Philosophical Transactions A. Corrected typos in v

    Mapping Exoplanets

    Full text link
    The varied surfaces and atmospheres of planets make them interesting places to live, explore, and study from afar. Unfortunately, the great distance to exoplanets makes it impossible to resolve their disk with current or near-term technology. It is still possible, however, to deduce spatial inhomogeneities in exoplanets provided that different regions are visible at different times---this can be due to rotation, orbital motion, and occultations by a star, planet, or moon. Astronomers have so far constructed maps of thermal emission and albedo for short period giant planets. These maps constrain atmospheric dynamics and cloud patterns in exotic atmospheres. In the future, exo-cartography could yield surface maps of terrestrial planets, hinting at the geophysical and geochemical processes that shape them.Comment: Updated chapter for Handbook of Exoplanets, eds. Deeg & Belmonte. 17 pages, including 6 figures and 4 pages of reference

    Simultaneous, Multi-Wavelength Variability Characterization of the Free-Floating Planetary Mass Object PSO J318.5-22

    Get PDF
    We present simultaneous HST WFC3 + Spitzer IRAC variability monitoring for the highly-variable young (\sim20 Myr) planetary-mass object PSO J318.5-22. Our simultaneous HST + Spitzer observations covered \sim2 rotation periods with Spitzer and most of a rotation period with HST. We derive a period of 8.6±\pm0.1 hours from the Spitzer lightcurve. Combining this period with the measured vsiniv sin i for this object, we find an inclination of 56.2±8.1\pm 8.1^{\circ}. We measure peak-to-trough variability amplitudes of 3.4±\pm0.1%\% for Spitzer Channel 2 and 4.4 - 5.8%\% (typical 68%\% confidence errors of \sim0.3%\%) in the near-IR bands (1.07-1.67 μ\mum) covered by the WFC3 G141 prism -- the mid-IR variability amplitude for PSO J318.5-22 one of the highest variability amplitudes measured in the mid-IR for any brown dwarf or planetary mass object. Additionally, we detect phase offsets ranging from 200--210^{\circ} (typical error of \sim4^{\circ}) between synthesized near-IR lightcurves and the Spitzer mid-IR lightcurve, likely indicating depth-dependent longitudinal atmospheric structure in this atmosphere. The detection of similar variability amplitudes in wide spectral bands relative to absorption features suggests that the driver of the variability may be inhomogeneous clouds (perhaps a patchy haze layer over thick clouds), as opposed to hot spots or compositional inhomogeneities at the top-of-atmosphere level.Comment: 48 pages, 22 figures, accepted to A
    corecore