Acute Heart Failure Management

Acute heart failure (AHF) is a life-threatening medical condition, where urgent diagnostic and treatment methods are of key importance. However, there are few evidence-based treatment methods. Interestingly, despite relatively similar ways of management of AHF throughout the globe, mid-term outcome in East Asia, including South Korea is more favorable than in Europe. Yet, most of the treatment methods are symptomatic. The cornerstone of AHF management is identifying precipitating factors and specific phenotype. Multidisciplinary approach is important in AHF, which can be caused or aggravated by both cardiac and non-cardiac causes. The main pathophysiological mechanism in AHF is congestion, both systemic and inside the organs (lung, kidney, or liver). Cardiac output is often preserved in AHF except in a few cases of advanced heart failure. This paper provides guidance on AHF management in a time-based approach. Treatment strategies, criteria for triage, admission to hospital and discharge are described.Peer reviewe

Readmission following both cardiac and non-cardiac acute dyspnoea is associated with a striking risk of death

Readmission and mortality are the most common and often combined endpoints in acute heart failure (AHF) trials, but an association between these two outcomes is poorly investigated. The aim of this study was to determine whether unplanned readmission is associated with a greater subsequent risk of death in patients with acute dyspnoea due to cardiac and non-cardiac causes.; Derivation cohort (1371 patients from the LEDA study) and validation cohort (1986 patients from the BASEL V study) included acute dyspnoea patients admitted to the emergency department. Cox regression analysis was used to determine the association of 6 month readmission and the risk of 1 year all-cause mortality in AHF and non-AHF patients and those readmitted due to cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular causes. In the derivation cohort, 666 (49%) of patients were readmitted at 6 months and 282 (21%) died within 1 year. Six month readmission was associated with an increased 1 year mortality risk in both the derivation cohort [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 3.0 (95% confidence interval, CI 2.2-4.0), P < 0.001] and the validation cohort (aHR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4-2.2, P < 0.001). The significant association was similarly observed in AHF (aHR 3.2, 95% CI 2.1-4.9, P < 0.001) and other causes of acute dyspnoea (aHR 2.9, 95% CI 1.9-4.5, P < 0.001), and it did not depend on the aetiology [aHR 2.2, 95% CI 1.6-3.1 for cardiovascular readmissions; aHR 4.1, 95% CI 2.9-5.7 for non-cardiovascular readmissions (P < 0.001 for both)] or timing of readmission. CONCLUSION​S: Our study demonstrated a long-lasting detrimental association between readmission and death in AHF and non-AHF patients with acute dyspnoea. These patients should be considered 'vulnerable patients' that require personalized follow-up for an extended period

The effect of cardiac shock wave therapy on myocardial function and perfusion in the randomized, triple-blind, sham-procedure controlled study.

Background: Recent triple-blind sham procedure-controlled study revealed neutral effects of the cardiac shock wave therapy (CSWT) on exercise tolerance and symptoms in patients with stable angina. Current data about the effects of CSWT on global and regional myocardial contractility and perfusion is limited. Hereby we report the results of an imaging sub-study that evaluated the capacity of CSWT to ameliorate myocardial ischemia induced during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) and cardiac single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Methods: Prospective, randomized, triple-blind, sham procedure-controlled study enrolled 72 adult subjects who complied with defined inclusion criteria. The subjects were assigned to the OMT + CSWT and the OMT + sham procedure study groups with 1:1 ratio. Application of the CSWT covered all segments of the left ventricle. Imaging ischemia tests were performed in 59 study patients: DSE and SPECT before the CSWT treatment and after 6 months, with DSE carried out additionally at 3 months after randomization. Co-primary endpoints of the study were: change in wall motion score index (WMSI), representing the stress-induced impairment of regional myocardial function, and change in summed difference score (SDS), representing the amount of perfusion defect. Results: OMT + CSWT and OMT + sham procedure study groups included 30 and 29 patients, respectively. Regional myocardial contractility during DSE significantly improved at 3 months follow-up in OMT + CSWT group compared to baseline as shown by WMSI at stress (1.4 ± 0.4 vs 1.6 ± 0.4, p = 0.001), but not in OMT + sham procedure group (1.5 ± 0.3 vs 1.6 ± 0.4, p = 0.136). The difference in stress DSE results between both study groups disappeared after 6 months. SPECT results demonstrated a significant reduction of inducible ischemia in OMT + CSWT group compared to OMT + sham procedure group at 6 months follow-up (SDS dropped from 5.4 ± 3.7 to 3.6 ± 3.8 vs 6.4 ± 5.9 to 6.2 ± 5 respectively, p = 0.034). Conclusions: Cardiac shock wave treatment showed the ability to reduce stress-induced myocardial ischemia, as assessed by wall motion abnormalities and perfusion defects, compared to sham procedure

Temporal trends in mortality and readmission after acute heart failure: A systematic review and meta‐regression in the past four decades

International audienceAims: Acute heart failure (AHF) is frequent and life-threatening disease. However, innovative AHF therapies have remained limited, and care is based on experts opinion. Temporal trends and benefits of long-term oral cardiovascular medications on AHF outcomes remain uncertain.Methods and results: This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018099885). A systematic review ranging from 1980 to 2017, searched AHF studies with more than 100 patients that reported death and/or readmission. Primary outcomes were temporal trends, assessed by meta-regression, for 30-day or one-year all-cause death and/or readmission rates. Secondary outcomes were temporal trends of oral cardiovascular therapies and their influence on primary outcomes. Among the 45143 studies screened, 285 were included, representing 15 million AHFs. In the past decades, though mortality and readmission remain high, there was a decline in 30-day all-cause death (OR for a 10-year increment: 0.74 (0.61-0.91); p=0.004) that persisted at one year (OR 0.86 (0.77- 0.96); p=0.007), while 30-day and one-year all-cause readmission rate remained roughly unchanged. Trends of primary outcomes were linear and did not differ among continents. Decline in one-year all-cause death rate correlated with high proportions of oral or beta-blockers, especially when combined with oral renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, but not with diuretics while trends in readmission remained unchanged with these therapies.Conclusions: Though AHF outcomes remain poor, the present study revealed global favorable trends of survival after AHF episodes probably associated with greater use of oral neurohormonal antagonists. The present study urges to implement the combination of oral renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and beta-blockers in patients at risk of AHF. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

Biologically Active Adrenomedullin (bio-ADM) is of potential value in identifying congestion and selecting patients for neurohormonal blockade in acute dyspnea

PURPOSE: . This study was designed to evaluate the role of bio-ADM in congestion assessment and risk stratification in acute dyspnea. METHODS: . This is a sub-analysis of Lithuanian Echocardiography Study of Dyspnea in Acute Settings. Congestion was assessed by means of clinical (peripheral oedema, rales) and sonographic (estimated right atrial pressure [eRAP]) parameters. Ninety-day mortality was chosen for outcome analysis. RESULTS: . 1188 patients were included. Bio-ADM concentration was higher in patients with peripheral oedema at admission (48.2 [28.2-92.6] vs 35.4 [20.9-59.2] ng/L, p 35.5 ng/L were at more than two-fold increased risk of dying (p<0.001). Survival in those with high bio-ADM was significantly modified by neurohormonal blockade at admission (p<0.05), especially if NT-proBNP levels were lower than the median (p = 0.002 for interaction). CONCLUSION: . Bio-ADM reflects the presence and the degree of pulmonary, peripheral, and intravascular volume overload and is strongly related to 90-day mortality in acute dyspnea. Patients with high bio-ADM levels demonstrated survival benefit from neurohormonal blockade

Improved cardiac and venous pressures during hospital stay in patients with acute heart failure: an echocardiography and biomarkers study

International audienceAims: Changes in echocardiographic parameters and biomarkers of cardiac and venous pressures or estimated plasma volume during hospitalization associated with decongestive treatments in acute heart failure (AHF) patients with either preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (HFPEF) or reduced LVEF (HFREF) are poorly assessed.Methods and results: From the metabolic road to diastolic heart failure: diastolic heart failure (MEDIA-DHF) study, 111 patients were included in this substudy: 77 AHF (43 HFPEF and 34 HFREF) and 34 non-cardiac dyspnea patients. Echocardiographic measurements and blood samples were obtained within 4 h of presentation at the emergency department and before hospital discharge. In AHF patients, echocardiographic indices of cardiac and venous pressures, including inferior vena cava diameter [from 22 (16-24) mm to 13 (11-18) mm, P = 0.009], its respiratory variability [from 32 (8-44) % to 43 (29-70) %, P = 0.04], medial E/e' [from 21.1 (15.8-29.6) to 16.6 (11.7-24.3), P = 0.004], and E wave deceleration time [from 129 (105-156) ms to 166 (128-203) ms, P = 0.003], improved during hospitalization, similarly in HFPEF and HFREF patients. By contrast, no changes were seen in non-cardiac dyspnea patients. In AHF patients, all plasma biomarkers of cardiac and venous pressures, namely B-type natriuretic peptide [from 935 (514-2037) pg/mL to 308 (183-609) pg/mL, P < 0.001], mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide [from 449 (274-653) pmol/L to 366 (242-549) pmol/L, P < 0.001], and soluble CD-146 levels [from 528 (406-654) ng/mL to 450 (374-529) ng/mL, P = 0.003], significantly decreased during hospitalization, similarly in HFPEF and HFREF patients. Echocardiographic parameters of cardiac chamber dimensions [left ventricular end-diastolic volume: from 120 (76-140) mL to 118 (95-176) mL, P = 0.23] and cardiac index [from 2.1 (1.6-2.6) mL/min/m2 to 1.9 (1.4-2.4) mL/min/m2 , P = 0.55] were unchanged in AHF patients, except tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) that improved during hospitalization [from 16 (15-19) mm to 19 (17-21) mm, P = 0.04]. Estimated plasma volume increased in both AHF [from 4.8 (4.2-5.6) to 5.1 (4.4-5.8), P = 0.03] and non-cardiac dyspnea patients (P = 0.01). Serum creatinine [from 1.18 (0.90-1.53) to 1.19 (0.86-1.70) mg/dL, P = 0.89] and creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate [from 59 (40-75) mL/min/1.73m2 to 56 (38-73) mL/min/1.73m2 , P = 0.09] were similar, while plasma cystatin C [from 1.50 (1.20-2.27) mg/L to 1.78 (1.33-2.59) mg/L, P < 0.001] and neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin (NGAL) [from 127 (95-260) ng/mL to 167 (104-263) ng/mL, P = 0.004] increased during hospitalization in AHF.Conclusions: Echocardiographic parameters and plasma biomarkers of cardiac and venous pressures improved during AHF hospitalization in both acute HFPEF and HFREF patients, while cardiac chamber dimensions, cardiac output, and estimated plasma volume showed minimal changes

NT-proBNP and high-intensity care for acute heart failure: the STRONG-HF trial

Background and aims: STRONG-HF showed that rapid up-titration of guideline-recommended medical therapy (GRMT), in a high intensity care (HIC) strategy, was associated with better outcomes compared to usual care (UC). The aim of this study was to assess the role of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) at baseline and its changes early during up-titration. Methods: A total of 1077 patients hospitalized for acute heart failure (HF) and with a >10% NT-proBNP decrease from screening (i.e. admission) to randomization (i.e. pre-discharge), were included. Patients in HIC were stratified by further NT-proBNP changes from randomization to 1 week later as decreased (≥30% decrease), stable (10% increase). The primary endpoint was 180-day HF readmission or death. Results: The effect of HIC vs. UC was independent of baseline NT-proBNP. Patients in the HIC group with stable or increased NT-proBNP were older, with more severe acute HF and worse renal and liver function. Per protocol, patients with increased NT-proBNP received more diuretics and were up-titrated more slowly during the first weeks after discharge. However, by 6 months they reached 70.4% optimal GRMT doses, compared with 80.3% for those with NT-proBNP decrease. As a result, the primary endpoint at 60 and 90 days occurred in 8.3% and 11.1% of patients with increased NT-proBNP vs 2.2% and 4.0% in those with decreased NT-proBNP (p=0.039 and p=0.045, respectively). However, no difference in outcome was found at 180 days (13.5% vs. 13.2%; p=0.93). Conclusions: Among patients with acute HF enrolled in STRONG-HF, HIC reduced 180-day HF readmission or death regardless of baseline NT-proBNP. GRMT up-titration early post-discharge utilizing increased NT-proBNP as guidance to increase diuretic therapy and reduce the GRMT up-titration rate resulted in the same 180-day outcomes regardless of early post-discharge NT-proBNP change

Noncardiac comorbidities and intensive up-titration of oral treatment in patients recently hospitalized for heart failure: insights from the STRONG-HF trial

Aims: To assess the potential interaction between noncardiac comorbidities (NCCs) and the efficacy and safety of high intensity care (HIC) versus usual care (UC) in STRONG-HF trial, including stable patients with improved but still elevated NPs METHODS AND RESULTS: In the trial, 8 NCCs were reported: anemia, diabetes, renal dysfunction, severe liver disease, COPD/asthma, stroke/TIA, psychiatric/neurological disorders, and malignancies. Patients were classified by NCC number (0, 1, 2 and ≥3). The treatment effect of HIC versus UC on the primary endpoint, 180-day death or HF-rehospitalization, was compared by NCC number and by each individual comorbidity. Among the 1078 patients, the prevalence of 0, 1, 2 and ≥3 NCCs was 24.3%, 39.8%, 24.5% and 11.3%. Achievement of full doses of HF-therapies at 90- and 180-days in the HIC was similar irrespective of NCCs number. In the HIC, the primary endpoint occurred in 10.0%, 16,6%, 13,6% and 26,2%, in those with 0, 1, 2 and ≥3 NCCs, as compared to 19,1%, 25,4%, 23,3% and 26,2% in UC (interaction-p=0.80). The treatment benefit of HIC vs. UC on the primary endpoint didn't differ significantly by each individual comorbidity. There was no significant treatment interaction by NCC number in quality-of-life improvement (p=0.98) or the incidence of serious adverse events (p=0.11). Conclusions: In the STRONG-HF trial, non-cardiac comorbidities neither limited the rapid up-titration of HF-therapies, nor attenuated the benefit of HIC on primary endpoint. In the context of a clinical trial, the benefit-risk ratio favors the rapid up-titration of HF-therapies even in patients with multiple NCCs This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved