31 research outputs found

    Long Distance Contribution to sdγs \to d\gamma and Implications for ΩΞγ,BsBdγ\Omega^-\to \Xi ^-\gamma, B_s \to B_d^*\gamma and bsγb \to s\gamma

    Full text link
    We estimate the long distance (LD) contribution to the magnetic part of the sdγs \to d\gamma transition using the Vector Meson Dominance approximation (V=ρ,ω,ψi)(V=\rho,\omega,\psi_i). We find that this contribution may be significantly larger than the short distance (SD) contribution to sdγs \to d\gamma and could possibly saturate the present experimental upper bound on the ΩΞγ\Omega^-\to \Xi^-\gamma decay rate, ΓΩΞγMAX3.7×109\Gamma^{\rm MAX}_{\Omega^-\to \Xi^-\gamma} \simeq 3.7\times10^{-9}eV. For the decay BsBdγB_s \to B^*_d\gamma, which is driven by sdγs \to d\gamma as well, we obtain an upper bound on the branching ratio BR(BsBdγ)<3×108BR(B_s \to B_d^*\gamma)<3\times10^{-8} from ΓΩΞγMAX\Gamma^{\rm MAX}_{\Omega^-\to \Xi^-\gamma}. Barring the possibility that the Quantum Chromodynamics coefficient a2(ms)a_2(m_s) be much smaller than 1, ΓΩΞγMAX\Gamma^{\rm MAX}_{\Omega^-\to \Xi^-\gamma} also implies the approximate relation 23igψi2(0)mψi212gρ2(0)mρ2+16gω2(0)mω2\frac{2}{3} \sum_i \frac{g^2_{\psi_i}(0)}{m^2_{\psi_i}} \simeq \frac{1}{2} \frac{g^2_\rho(0)}{m^2_\rho} + \frac{1}{6}\frac{g^2_\omega(0)}{m^2_\omega}. This relation agrees quantitatively with a recent independent estimate of the l.h.s. by Deshpande et al., confirming that the LD contributions to bsγb \to s\gamma are small. We find that these amount to an increase of (4±2)%(4\pm2)\% in the magnitude of the bsγb \to s \gamma transition amplitude, relative to the SD contribution alone.Comment: 16 pages, LaTeX fil

    Risk profiles and one-year outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation in India: Insights from the GARFIELD-AF Registry.

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: The Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD-Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF) is an ongoing prospective noninterventional registry, which is providing important information on the baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, and 1-year outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). This report describes data from Indian patients recruited in this registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 52,014 patients with newly diagnosed AF were enrolled globally; of these, 1388 patients were recruited from 26 sites within India (2012-2016). In India, the mean age was 65.8 years at diagnosis of NVAF. Hypertension was the most prevalent risk factor for AF, present in 68.5% of patients from India and in 76.3% of patients globally (P < 0.001). Diabetes and coronary artery disease (CAD) were prevalent in 36.2% and 28.1% of patients as compared with global prevalence of 22.2% and 21.6%, respectively (P < 0.001 for both). Antiplatelet therapy was the most common antithrombotic treatment in India. With increasing stroke risk, however, patients were more likely to receive oral anticoagulant therapy [mainly vitamin K antagonist (VKA)], but average international normalized ratio (INR) was lower among Indian patients [median INR value 1.6 (interquartile range {IQR}: 1.3-2.3) versus 2.3 (IQR 1.8-2.8) (P < 0.001)]. Compared with other countries, patients from India had markedly higher rates of all-cause mortality [7.68 per 100 person-years (95% confidence interval 6.32-9.35) vs 4.34 (4.16-4.53), P < 0.0001], while rates of stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding were lower after 1 year of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Compared to previously published registries from India, the GARFIELD-AF registry describes clinical profiles and outcomes in Indian patients with AF of a different etiology. The registry data show that compared to the rest of the world, Indian AF patients are younger in age and have more diabetes and CAD. Patients with a higher stroke risk are more likely to receive anticoagulation therapy with VKA but are underdosed compared with the global average in the GARFIELD-AF. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01090362

    Feasibility of in vivo MR elastographic splenic stiffness measurements in the assessment of portal hypertension

    No full text
    10.2214/AJR.07.3504American Journal of Roentgenology1931122-127AJRO
    corecore