49 research outputs found
Validity and reliability of subjective methods to assess sedentary behaviour in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND: Subjective measures of sedentary behaviour (SB) (i.e. questionnaires and diaries/logs) are widely implemented, and can be useful for capturing type and context of SBs. However, little is known about comparative validity and reliability. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to: 1) identify subjective methods to assess overall, domain- and behaviour-specific SB, and 2) examine the validity and reliability of these methods. METHODS: The databases MEDLINE, EMBASE and SPORTDiscus were searched up to March 2020. Inclusion criteria were: 1) assessment of SB, 2) evaluation of subjective measurement tools, 3) being performed in healthy adults, 4) manuscript written in English, and 5) paper was peer-reviewed. Data of validity and/or reliability measurements was extracted from included studies and a meta-analysis using random effects was performed to assess the pooled correlation coefficients of the validity. RESULTS: The systematic search resulted in 2423 hits. After excluding duplicates and screening on title and abstract, 82 studies were included with 75 self-reported measurement tools. There was wide variability in the measurement properties and quality of the studies. The criterion validity varied between poor-to-excellent (correlation coefficient [R] range - 0.01- 0.90) with logs/diaries (R = 0.63 [95%CI 0.48-0.78]) showing higher criterion validity compared to questionnaires (R = 0.35 [95%CI 0.32-0.39]). Furthermore, correlation coefficients of single- and multiple-item questionnaires were comparable (1-item R = 0.34; 2-to-9-items R = 0.35; ≥10-items R = 0.37). The reliability of SB measures was moderate-to-good, with the quality of these studies being mostly fair-to-good. CONCLUSION: Logs and diaries are recommended to validly and reliably assess self-reported SB. However, due to time and resources constraints, 1-item questionnaires may be preferred to subjectively assess SB in large-scale observations when showing similar validity and reliability compared to longer questionnaires. REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018105994
Factors influencing sedentary behaviours after stroke:Findings from qualitative observations and interviews with stroke survivors and their caregivers
Background
Stroke survivors are more sedentary than healthy, age-matched controls, independent of functional capacity. Interventions are needed to encourage a reduction in overall sedentary time, and regular breaks in prolonged periods of sedentary behaviour. This study captured the views and experiences of stroke survivors and their caregivers related to sedentary behaviour after stroke, to inform the development of an intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour.
Methods
Mixed-methods qualitative study. Non-participant observations were completed in two stroke services, inclusive of inpatient and community settings in the United Kingdom. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with stroke survivors and their caregivers (if available) at six- or nine-months post-stroke. Underpinned by the capability, opportunity and motivation (COM-B) model of behaviour change, observational data (132 h) were analysed thematically and interview data (n = 31 stroke survivors, n = 12 caregivers) were analysed using the Framework approach.
Results
Observation participants differed in functional ability whereas stroke survivor interviewees were all ambulant. Six themes related to sedentary behaviour after stroke were generated: (1) sedentary behaviour levels and patterns after stroke; (2) the physical and social environment in the stroke service and in the home; (3) standing and movement capability after stroke; (4) emotion and motivation after stroke; (5) caregivers’ influence on, and role in influencing stroke survivors’ sedentary behaviour; and (6) intervening to reduce sedentary behaviour after stroke. Capability, opportunity and motivation were influenced by the impact of the stroke and caregivers’ inclination to support sedentary behaviour reduction. Stroke survivors reported being more sedentary than they were pre-stroke due to impaired balance and co-ordination, increased fatigue, and reduced confidence in mobilising. Caregivers inclination to support stroke survivors to reduce sedentary behaviour depended on factors including their willingness to withdraw from the caregiver role, and their perception of whether the stroke survivor would act on their encouragement.
Conclusions
Many stroke survivors indicate being open to reducing sedentary behaviour, with appropriate support from stroke service staff and caregivers. The findings from this study have contributed to an intervention development process using the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) approach to develop strategies to reduce sedentary behaviour after stroke
Sedentary bout durations and metabolic syndrome among working adults: a prospective cohort study
Does duration of physical activity bouts matter for adiposity and metabolic syndrome? A cross-sectional study of older British men
Associations of total amount and patterns of sedentary behaviour with type 2 diabetes and the metabolic syndrome: The Maastricht Study
On Your Feet to Earn Your Seat: pilot RCT of a theory-based sedentary behaviour reduction intervention for older adults
Background: Of all age groups, older adults spend most of the time sitting and are least physically active. This
sequential, mixed-methods feasibility study used a randomised controlled trial design to assess methods for trialling
a habit-based intervention to displace older adults’ sedentary behaviour with light activity and explore impact on
behavioural outcomes.
Methods: Eligibility criteria were age 60–74 years, retired, and ≥6 h/day leisure sitting. Data were collected across
four sites in England. The intervention comprised a booklet outlining 15 ‘tips’ for disrupting sedentary habits and
integrating activity habits into normally inactive settings, and eight weekly self-monitoring sheets. The control was a
non-habit-based factsheet promoting activity and sedentary reduction. A computer-generated 1:1 blockrandomisation
schedule was used, with participants blinded to allocation. Participants self-reported sedentary
behaviour (two indices), sedentary habit, physical activity (walking, moderate, vigorous activity) and activity habit, at
pre-treatment baseline, 8- and 12-week follow-ups and were interviewed at 12 weeks. Primary feasibility outcomes
were attrition, adverse events and intervention adherence. The secondary outcome was behavioural change.
Results: Of 104 participants consented, 103 were randomised (intervention N = 52, control N = 51). Of 98 receiving
allocated treatment, 91 (93%; intervention N = 45; control N = 46) completed the trial. One related adverse event
was reported in the intervention group. Mean per-tip adherence across 7 weeks was ≥50% for 9/15 tips. Qualitative
data suggested acceptability of procedures, and, particularly among intervention recipients, the allocated treatment.
Both groups appeared to reduce sedentary behaviour and increase their physical activity, but there were no
apparent differences between groups in the extent of change.
Conclusions: Trial methods were acceptable and feasible, but the intervention conferred no apparent advantage
over control, though it was not trialled among the most sedentary and inactive population for whom it was
developed. Further development of the intervention may be necessary prior to a large-scale definitive trial. One
possible refinement would combine elements of the intervention with an informational approach to enhance
effectiveness
The emergence of sedentary behaviour physiology and its effects on the cardiometabolic profile in young and older adults
It has recently emerged that sedentary behaviour is independent of a lack of physical activity as individuals can be sufficiently active, based on the recommended physical activity guidelines, but also spend the majority of their waking hours engaging in sedentary behaviour. Individuals who follow this pattern of physical activity and sedentary behaviour are known as ‘active couch potatoes’. Sedentary behaviour has been found to have detrimental effects on cardiometabolic markers associated with cardiovascular disease. Since the positive effects of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity do not necessarily negate the deleterious effects of sedentary behaviour on cardiometabolic markers, it is postulated that engaging in light physical activity is an intervention that will successfully reduce levels of sedentary behaviour and may hence improve health markers of quality of life. We propose that such lifestyle changes may be particularly relevant to older populations as these engage in sedentary behaviour for the majority of their waking hours, thereby adding to the negative aging effect on cardiometabolic markers