18 research outputs found

    Information disclosure in optimal auctions

    Get PDF
    This paper analyzes a situation in which the seller controls the accuracy of what potential buyers learn about their valu- ation of a go o d to b e sold. This setting is related to many real situations such as home sales, antique auctions, and digital platforms such as Google and Facebook selling online adver- tising slots. Two important questions arise: what is the op- timal selling mechanism, and what is the optimal disclosure policy of the seller. Under the assumption of private values, a simple auction with a reserve price is the optimal mechanism. What we show is that the amount of (costly) information pro- vided increases with the numb er of p otential bidders when using the optimal mechanism and is greater than when the object is always sold. Because information changes the distri- bution of a bidder’s expected valuations, the optimal reserve price also changes, so that the number of bidders (indirectly)Juan-José Ganuza gratefully acknowledges the support of the Barcelona GSE Research, the government of Catalonia, and the Agencia Estatal de Investigación through project ECO2017-89240-P (AEI/FEDER, UE). Jose Penalva acknowledges the support of the Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad through project ECO 2012–36559 and 2016/00118/001 (MINECO/FEDER, UE), and the Comunidad de Madrid S2015/HUM-3353 (EARLYFIN-CM)

    Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

    Get PDF
    Abstract Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

    El comportamiento estrategico en la contratacion publica

    No full text
    Centro de Informacion y Documentacion Cientifica (CINDOC). C/Joaquin Costa, 22. 28002 Madrid. SPAIN / CINDOC - Centro de Informaciòn y Documentaciòn CientìficaSIGLEESSpai
    corecore