Targeted truncation of the ADAM17 cytoplasmic domain in mice results in protein destabilization and a hypomorphic phenotype

A disintegrin and metalloprotease 17 (ADAM17) is a cellsurface metalloprotease that serves as the principle sheddase for tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha), interleukin-6 receptor (IL6R), and several ligands of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), regulating these crucial signaling pathways. ADAM17 activation requires its transmembrane domain, but not its cytoplasmic domain, and little is known about the role of this domain in vivo. To investigate, we used CRISPR-Cas9 to mutate the endogenous Adam17 locus in mice to produce a mutant ADAM17 lacking its cytoplasmic domain (Adam17 Delta cyto). Homozygous Adam17 Delta cyto animals were born at a Mendelian ratio and survived into adulthood with slightly wavy hair and curled whiskers, consistent with defects in ADAM17/EGFR signaling. At birth, Adam17 Delta cyto mice resembled Adam17-/- mice in that they had open eyes and enlarged semilunar heart valves, but they did not have bone growth plate defects. The deletion of the cytoplasmic domain resulted in strongly decreased ADAM17 protein levels in all tissues and cells examined, providing a likely cause for the hypomorphic phenotype. In functional assays, Adam17 Delta cyto mouse embryonic fibroblasts and bone-marrow-derived macrophages had strongly reduced ADAM17 activity, consistent with the reduced protein levels. Nevertheless, ADAM17 Delta cyto could be stimulated by PMA, a well-characterized posttranslational activator of ADAM17, corroborating that the cytoplasmic domain of endogenous ADAM17 is not required for its rapid response to PMA. Taken together, these results provide the first evidence that the cytoplasmic domain of ADAM17 plays a pivotal role in vivo in regulating ADAM17 levels and function

PDBe: towards reusable data delivery infrastructure at protein data bank in Europe

© 2017 The Authors. Published by OUP. This is an open access article available under a Creative Commons licence. The published version can be accessed at the following link on the publisher’s website: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx1070The Protein Data Bank in Europe (PDBe, pdbe.org) is actively engaged in the deposition, annotation, remediation, enrichment and dissemination of macromolecular structure data. This paper describes new developments and improvements at PDBe addressing three challenging areas: data enrichment, data dissemination and functional reusability. New features of the PDBe Web site are discussed, including a context dependent menu providing links to raw experimental data and improved presentation of structures solved by hybrid methods. The paper also summarizes the features of the LiteMol suite, which is a set of services enabling fast and interactive 3D visualization of structures, with associated experimental maps, annotations and quality assessment information. We introduce a library of Web components which can be easily reused to port data and functionality available at PDBe to other services. We also introduce updates to the SIFTS resource which maps PDB data to other bioinformatics resources, and the PDBe REST API.Wellcome Trust [104948]; UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/M011674/1, BB/N019172/1, BB/M020347/1]; European Union [284209]; European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL). Funding for open access charge: EMBL.Published versio

IgA antibodies against β2 glycoprotein I in hemodialysis patients are an independent risk factor for mortality

Cardiovascular complications are the most important cause of death in patients on dialysis with end-stage renal disease. Antibodies reacting with b-glycoprotein I seem to play a pathogenic role in antiphospholipid syndrome and stroke and are involved in the origin of atherosclerosis. Here we evaluated the presence of anticardiolipin and anti-bglycoprotein I antibodies together with other vascular risk factors and their relationship with mortality and cardiovascular morbidity in a cohort of 124 hemodialysis patients prospectively followed for 2 years. Of these, 41 patients were significantly positive for IgA anti-bglycoprotein I, and the remaining had normal values. At 24 months, overall and cardiovascular mortality and thrombotic events were all significantly higher in patients with high antib- glycoprotein I antibodies. Multivariate analysis using Cox regression modeling found that age, hypoalbuminemia, use of dialysis catheters, and IgA b-glycoprotein I antibodies were independent risk factors for death. Thus, IgA antibodies to b-glycoprotein I are detrimental to the clinical outcome of hemodialysis patients.Fundacio´n Mutua Madrilena (2008-090), and from Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (PS09-02023

PDBe: improved accessibility of macromolecular structure data from PDB and EMDB

© 2015 The Authors. Published by OUP. This is an open access article available under a Creative Commons licence. The published version can be accessed at the following link on the publisher’s website: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1047The Protein Data Bank in Europe (http://pdbe.org) accepts and annotates depositions of macromolecular structure data in the PDB and EMDB archives and enriches, integrates and disseminates structural information in a variety of ways. The PDBe website has been redesigned based on an analysis of user requirements, and now offers intuitive access to improved and value-added macromolecular structure information. Unique value-added information includes lists of reviews and research articles that cite or mention PDB entries as well as access to figures and legends from full-text open-access publications that describe PDB entries. A powerful new query system not only shows all the PDB entries that match a given query, but also shows the 'best structures' for a given macromolecule, ligand complex or sequence family using data-quality information from the wwPDB validation reports. A PDBe RESTful API has been developed to provide unified access to macromolecular structure data available in the PDB and EMDB archives as well as value-added annotations, e.g. regarding structure quality and up-to-date cross-reference information from the SIFTS resource. Taken together, these new developments facilitate unified access to macromolecular structure data in an intuitive way for non-expert users and support expert users in analysing macromolecular structure data.The Wellcome Trust [88944, 104948]; UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/J007471/1, BB/K016970/1, BB/M013146/1, BB/M011674/1]; National Institutes of Health [GM079429]; UK Medical Research Council [MR/L007835/1]; European Union [284209]; CCP4; European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL). Funding for open access charge: The Wellcome Trust.Published versio

Gibberellin-mediated RGA-LIKE1 degradation regulates embryo sac development in Arabidopsis

[EN] Ovule development is essential for plant survival, as it allows correct embryo and seed development upon fertilization. The female gametophyte is formed in the central area of the nucellus during ovule development, in a complex developmental programme that involves key regulatory genes and the plant hormones auxins and brassinosteroids. Here we provide novel evidence of the role of gibberellins (GAs) in the control of megagametogenesis and embryo sac development, via the GA-dependent degradation of RGA-LIKE1 (RGL1) in the ovule primordia. YPet-rgl1.17 plants, which express a dominant version of RGL1, showed reduced fertility, mainly due to altered embryo sac formation that varied from partial to total ablation. YPet-rgl1.17 ovules followed normal development of the megaspore mother cell, meiosis, and formation of the functional megaspore, but YPet-rgl1.17 plants had impaired mitotic divisions of the functional megaspore. This phenotype is RGL1-specific, as it is not observed in any other dominant mutants of the DELLA proteins. Expression analysis of YPet-rgl1.17 coupled to in situ localization of bioactive GAs in ovule primordia led us to propose a mechanism of GA-mediated RGL1 degradation that allows proper embryo sac development. Taken together, our data unravel a novel specific role of GAs in the control of female gametophyte development.We wish to thank the IBMCP microscopy facility, and Ms J. Yun for technical assistance. We also thank Jennifer Nemhauser (University of Washington, USA) for the HACR sensor. Cambridge proofreading (https://proofreading.org/order/) provided proofreading and editing of this manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the Spanish Ministry for Science and Innovation-FEDER [BIO2017-83138R] to MAP-A and National Science Foundation [MCB-0923727] to JMA. MAP-A received a fellowship of the `Salvador de Madariaga' program from Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation. We acknowledge support of the publication fee by the CSIC Open Access Publication Support Initiative through its Unit of Information Resources for Research (URICI).Gomez, MD.; Barro-Trastoy, D.; Fuster Almunia, C.; Tornero Feliciano, P.; Alonso, JM.; Perez Amador, MA. (2020). Gibberellin-mediated RGA-LIKE1 degradation regulates embryo sac development in Arabidopsis. Journal of Experimental Botany. 71(22):7059-7072. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraa395S705970727122Bai, M.-Y., Shang, J.-X., Oh, E., Fan, M., Bai, Y., Zentella, R., … Wang, Z.-Y. (2012). Brassinosteroid, gibberellin and phytochrome impinge on a common transcription module in Arabidopsis. Nature Cell Biology, 14(8), 810-817. doi:10.1038/ncb2546Battaglia, R., Brambilla, V., & Colombo, L. (2008). Morphological analysis of female gametophyte development in thebel1 stk shp1 shp2mutant. Plant Biosystems - An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology, 142(3), 643-649. doi:10.1080/11263500802411098Beeckman, T., De Rycke, R., Viane, R., & Inzé, D. (2000). Histological Study of Seed Coat Development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Plant Research, 113(2), 139-148. doi:10.1007/pl00013924Bencivenga, S., Simonini, S., Benková, E., & Colombo, L. (2012). The Transcription Factors BEL1 and SPL Are Required for Cytokinin and Auxin Signaling During Ovule Development in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 24(7), 2886-2897. doi:10.1105/tpc.112.100164Brumos, J., Zhao, C., Gong, Y., Soriano, D., Patel, A. P., Perez-Amador, M. A., … Alonso, J. M. (2019). An Improved Recombineering Toolset for Plants. The Plant Cell, 32(1), 100-122. doi:10.1105/tpc.19.00431Clough, S. J., & Bent, A. F. (1998). Floral dip: a simplified method forAgrobacterium-mediated transformation ofArabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal, 16(6), 735-743. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.xCoen, O., Lu, J., Xu, W., De Vos, D., Péchoux, C., Domergue, F., … Magnani, E. (2019). Deposition of a cutin apoplastic barrier separating seed maternal and zygotic tissues. BMC Plant Biology, 19(1). doi:10.1186/s12870-019-1877-9Cucinotta, M., Di Marzo, M., Guazzotti, A., de Folter, S., Kater, M. M., & Colombo, L. (2020). Gynoecium size and ovule number are interconnected traits that impact seed yield. Journal of Experimental Botany, 71(9), 2479-2489. doi:10.1093/jxb/eraa050Davière, J.-M., & Achard, P. (2013). Gibberellin signaling in plants. Development, 140(6), 1147-1151. doi:10.1242/dev.087650Davière, J.-M., & Achard, P. (2016). A Pivotal Role of DELLAs in Regulating Multiple Hormone Signals. Molecular Plant, 9(1), 10-20. doi:10.1016/j.molp.2015.09.011Dill, A., Jung, H.-S., & Sun, T. -p. (2001). The DELLA motif is essential for gibberellin-induced degradation of RGA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(24), 14162-14167. doi:10.1073/pnas.251534098Ferreira, L. G., de Alencar Dusi, D. M., Irsigler, A. S. T., Gomes, A. C. M. M., Mendes, M. A., Colombo, L., & de Campos Carneiro, V. T. (2017). GID1 expression is associated with ovule development of sexual and apomictic plants. Plant Cell Reports, 37(2), 293-306. doi:10.1007/s00299-017-2230-0Fleck, B., & Harberd, N. P. (2002). Evidence that theArabidopsisnuclear gibberellin signalling protein GAI is not destabilised by gibberellin. The Plant Journal, 32(6), 935-947. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01478.xGallego-Bartolome, J., Minguet, E. G., Grau-Enguix, F., Abbas, M., Locascio, A., Thomas, S. G., … Blazquez, M. A. (2012). Molecular mechanism for the interaction between gibberellin and brassinosteroid signaling pathways in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(33), 13446-13451. doi:10.1073/pnas.1119992109Gallego-Bartolome, J., Minguet, E. G., Marin, J. A., Prat, S., Blazquez, M. A., & Alabadi, D. (2010). Transcriptional Diversification and Functional Conservation between DELLA Proteins in Arabidopsis. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 27(6), 1247-1256. doi:10.1093/molbev/msq012Gomez, M. D., Barro-Trastoy, D., Escoms, E., Saura-Sánchez, M., Sánchez, I., Briones-Moreno, A., … Perez-Amador, M. A. (2018). Gibberellins negatively modulate ovule number in plants. Development. doi:10.1242/dev.163865G�mez, M. D., Beltr�n, J.-P., & Ca�as, L. A. (2004). The pea END1 promoter drives anther-specific gene expression in different plant species. Planta, 219(6), 967-981. doi:10.1007/s00425-004-1300-zGómez, M. D., Fuster-Almunia, C., Ocaña-Cuesta, J., Alonso, J. M., & Pérez-Amador, M. A. (2019). RGL2 controls flower development, ovule number and fertility in Arabidopsis. Plant Science, 281, 82-92. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.01.014Gomez, M. D., Ventimilla, D., Sacristan, R., & Perez-Amador, M. A. (2016). Gibberellins Regulate Ovule Integument Development by Interfering with the Transcription Factor ATS. Plant Physiology, 172(4), 2403-2415. doi:10.1104/pp.16.01231Hedden, P., & Sponsel, V. (2015). A Century of Gibberellin Research. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 34(4), 740-760. doi:10.1007/s00344-015-9546-1Khakhar, A., Leydon, A. R., Lemmex, A. C., Klavins, E., & Nemhauser, J. L. (2018). Synthetic hormone-responsive transcription factors can monitor and re-program plant development. eLife, 7. doi:10.7554/elife.34702Koorneef, M., Elgersma, A., Hanhart, C. J., Loenen-Martinet, E. P., Rijn, L., & Zeevaart, J. A. D. (1985). A gibberellin insensitive mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiologia Plantarum, 65(1), 33-39. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1985.tb02355.xKurihara, D., Mizuta, Y., Sato, Y., & Higashiyama, T. (2015). ClearSee: a rapid optical clearing reagent for whole-plant fluorescence imaging. Development. doi:10.1242/dev.127613Lee, S. (2002). Gibberellin regulates Arabidopsis seed germination via RGL2, a GAI/RGA-like gene whose expression is up-regulated following imbibition. Genes & Development, 16(5), 646-658. doi:10.1101/gad.969002Li, Q.-F., Wang, C., Jiang, L., Li, S., Sun, S. S. M., & He, J.-X. (2012). An Interaction Between BZR1 and DELLAs Mediates Direct Signaling Crosstalk Between Brassinosteroids and Gibberellins in Arabidopsis. Science Signaling, 5(244). doi:10.1126/scisignal.2002908Lieber, D., Lora, J., Schrempp, S., Lenhard, M., & Laux, T. (2011). Arabidopsis WIH1 and WIH2 Genes Act in the Transition from Somatic to Reproductive Cell Fate. Current Biology, 21(12), 1009-1017. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.05.015Lora, J., Herrero, M., Tucker, M. R., & Hormaza, J. I. (2016). The transition from somatic to germline identity shows conserved and specialized features during angiosperm evolution. New Phytologist, 216(2), 495-509. doi:10.1111/nph.14330Murashige, T., & Skoog, F. (1962). A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bio Assays with Tobacco Tissue Cultures. Physiologia Plantarum, 15(3), 473-497. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.xPeng, J., Carol, P., Richards, D. E., King, K. E., Cowling, R. J., Murphy, G. P., & Harberd, N. P. (1997). The Arabidopsis GAI gene defines a signaling pathway that negatively regulates gibberellin responses . Genes & Development, 11(23), 3194-3205. doi:10.1101/gad.11.23.3194Pinto, S. C., Mendes, M. A., Coimbra, S., & Tucker, M. R. (2019). Revisiting the Female Germline and Its Expanding Toolbox. Trends in Plant Science, 24(5), 455-467. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2019.02.003Schneitz, K., Hulskamp, M., & Pruitt, R. E. (1995). Wild-type ovule development in Arabidopsis thaliana: a light microscope study of cleared whole-mount tissue. The Plant Journal, 7(5), 731-749. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1995.07050731.xErbasol Serbes, I., Palovaara, J., & Groß-Hardt, R. (2019). Development and function of the flowering plant female gametophyte. Plant Development and Evolution, 401-434. doi:10.1016/bs.ctdb.2018.11.016Sun, T. (2011). The Molecular Mechanism and Evolution of the GA–GID1–DELLA Signaling Module in Plants. Current Biology, 21(9), R338-R345. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.02.036Tucker, M. R., Okada, T., Hu, Y., Scholefield, A., Taylor, J. M., & Koltunow, A. M. G. (2012). Somatic small RNA pathways promote the mitotic events of megagametogenesis during female reproductive development in Arabidopsis. Development, 139(8), 1399-1404. doi:10.1242/dev.075390Ursache, R., Andersen, T. G., Marhavý, P., & Geldner, N. (2018). A protocol for combining fluorescent proteins with histological stains for diverse cell wall components. The Plant Journal, 93(2), 399-412. doi:10.1111/tpj.13784Villanueva, J. M., Broadhvest, J., Hauser, B. A., Meister, R. J., Schneitz, K., & Gasser, C. S. (1999). INNER NO OUTER regulates abaxial- adaxial patterning in Arabidopsis ovules. Genes & Development, 13(23), 3160-3169. doi:10.1101/gad.13.23.3160Wen, C.-K., & Chang, C. (2002). Arabidopsis RGL1 Encodes a Negative Regulator of Gibberellin Responses. The Plant Cell, 14(1), 87-100. doi:10.1105/tpc.010325Wu, J., Mohamed, D., Dowhanik, S., Petrella, R., Gregis, V., Li, J., … Gazzarrini, S. (2020). Spatiotemporal Restriction of FUSCA3 Expression by Class I BPCs Promotes Ovule Development and Coordinates Embryo and Endosperm Growth. The Plant Cell, 32(6), 1886-1904. doi:10.1105/tpc.19.00764Yang, W.-C., Shi, D.-Q., & Chen, Y.-H. (2010). Female Gametophyte Development in Flowering Plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 61(1), 89-108. doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112203Yang, W.-C., Ye, D., Xu, J., & Sundaresan, V. (1999). The SPOROCYTELESS gene of Arabidopsis is required for initiation of sporogenesis and encodes a novel nuclear protein. Genes & Development, 13(16), 2108-2117. doi:10.1101/gad.13.16.2108Zhao, L., He, J., Cai, H., Lin, H., Li, Y., Liu, R., … Qin, Y. (2014). Comparative expression profiling reveals gene functions in female meiosis and gametophyte development in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal, 80(4), 615-628. doi:10.1111/tpj.12657Zhou, R., Benavente, L. M., Stepanova, A. N., & Alonso, J. M. (2011). A recombineering-based gene tagging system for Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal, 66(4), 712-723. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2011.04524.

Leptin Does Not Directly Affect CNS Serotonin Neurons to Influence Appetite

Serotonin (5-HT) and leptin play important roles in the modulation of energy balance. Here we investigated mechanisms by which leptin might interact with CNS 5-HT pathways to influence appetite. Although some leptin receptor (LepRb) neurons lie close to 5-HT neurons in the dorsal raphe (DR), 5-HT neurons do not express LepRb. Indeed, while leptin hyperpolarizes some non-5-HT DR neurons, leptin does not alter the activity of DR 5-HT neurons. Furthermore, 5-HT depletion does not impair the anorectic effects of leptin. The serotonin transporter-cre allele (Sert(cre)) is expressed in 5-HT (and developmentally in some non-5-HT) neurons. While Sert(cre) promotes LepRb excision in a few LepRb neurons in the hypothalamus, it is not active in DR LepRb neurons, and neuron-specific Sert(cre)-mediated LepRb inactivation in mice does not alter body weight or adiposity. Thus, leptin does not directly influence 5-HT neurons and does not meaningfully modulate important appetite-related determinants via 5-HT neuron function

Genomic, Pathway Network, and Immunologic Features Distinguishing Squamous Carcinomas

This integrated, multiplatform PanCancer Atlas study co-mapped and identified distinguishing molecular features of squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) from five sites associated with smokin

Pan-Cancer Analysis of lncRNA Regulation Supports Their Targeting of Cancer Genes in Each Tumor Context

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are commonly dys-regulated in tumors, but only a handful are known toplay pathophysiological roles in cancer. We inferredlncRNAs that dysregulate cancer pathways, onco-genes, and tumor suppressors (cancer genes) bymodeling their effects on the activity of transcriptionfactors, RNA-binding proteins, and microRNAs in5,185 TCGA tumors and 1,019 ENCODE assays.Our predictions included hundreds of candidateonco- and tumor-suppressor lncRNAs (cancerlncRNAs) whose somatic alterations account for thedysregulation of dozens of cancer genes and path-ways in each of 14 tumor contexts. To demonstrateproof of concept, we showed that perturbations tar-geting OIP5-AS1 (an inferred tumor suppressor) andTUG1 and WT1-AS (inferred onco-lncRNAs) dysre-gulated cancer genes and altered proliferation ofbreast and gynecologic cancer cells. Our analysis in-dicates that, although most lncRNAs are dysregu-lated in a tumor-specific manner, some, includingOIP5-AS1, TUG1, NEAT1, MEG3, and TSIX, synergis-tically dysregulate cancer pathways in multiple tumorcontexts