Enhanced Antigen-Specific Antitumor Immunity with Altered Peptide Ligands that Stabilize the MHC-Peptide-TCR Complex

AbstractT cell responsiveness to an epitope is affected both by its affinity for the presenting MHC molecule and the affinity of the MHC-peptide complex for TCR. One limitation of cancer immunotherapy is that natural tumor antigens elicit relatively weak T cell responses, in part because high-affinity T cells are rendered tolerant to these antigens. We report here that amino acid substitutions in a natural MHC class I–restricted tumor antigen that increase the stability of the MHC-peptide-TCR complex are significantly more potent as tumor vaccines. The improved immunity results from enhanced in vivo expansion of T cells specific for the natural tumor epitope. These results indicate peptides that stabilize the MHC-peptide-TCR complex may provide superior antitumor immunity through enhanced stimulation of specific T cells

Colorectal cancer in patients of advanced age is associated with increased incidence of BRAF p.V600E mutation and mismatch repair deficiency

IntroductionThe highest incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is in patients diagnosed at 80 years or older highlighting a need for understanding the clinical and molecular features of these tumors. Methods. In this retrospective cohort study, 544 CRCs underwent next generation sequencing and mismatch repair (MMR) evaluation. Molecular and clinical features were compared between 251 patients with traditional-onset CRC (50-69 years at diagnosis) and 60 with late-onset CRC (>80 years at diagnosis).ResultsLate-onset CRC showed a significantly higher rate of right-sided tumors (82% vs 35%), MMR deficiency (35% vs. 8%) and BRAF p.V600E mutations (35% vs. 8%) and a significantly lower rate of stage IV disease (15% vs 28%) and APC mutations (52% vs. 78%). Association of these features with advanced age was supported by stratifying patients into 6 age groups (<40, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79 and >80 years). However, the age-related rise in MMR deficient (dMMR) CRC was only seen in the female patients with an incidence of 48% (vs. 10% in the male patient) in the >80y group. In addition, BRAF p.V600E was significantly enriched in MMR deficient CRC of advanced age (67% in late-onset CRC). Categorizing CRC by mutational profiling, late-onset CRC revealed a significantly higher rate of dMMR/BRAF+APC- (18% vs. 2.0%), dMMR/BRAF-APC- (8.3% vs. 1.2%) and MMR proficient (pMMR)/BRAF+APC- (12% vs. 4.0%) as compared to traditional-onset CRC.DiscussionIn summary, there was a higher rate of dMMR and BRAF p.V600E in late-onset CRC, independently or in combination. The higher incidence of dMMR in late-onset CRC in females is most likely predominantly driven by BRAF p.V600E induced hypermethylation. Prospective studies with treatment plans designed specifically for these older patients are warranted to improve their outcomes

Patient-derived Organoid Pharmacotyping is a Clinically Tractable Strategy for Precision Medicine in Pancreatic Cancer

Objective: PDAC patients who undergo surgical resection and receive effective chemotherapy have the best chance of long-term survival. Unfortunately, we lack predictive biomarkers to guide optimal systemic treatment. Ex-vivo generation of PDO for pharmacotyping may serve as predictive biomarkers in PDAC. The goal of the current study was to demonstrate the clinical feasibility of a PDO-guided precision medicine framework of care. Methods: PDO cultures were established from surgical specimens and endoscopic biopsies, expanded in Matrigel, and used for high-throughput drug testing (pharmacotyping). Efficacy of standard-of-care chemotherapeutics was assessed by measuring cell viability after drug exposure. Results: A framework for rapid pharmacotyping of PDOs was established across a multi-institutional consortium of academic medical centers. Specimens obtained remotely and shipped to a central biorepository maintain viability and allowed generation of PDOs with 77% success. Early cultures maintain the clonal heterogeneity seen in PDAC with similar phenotypes (cystic-solid). Late cultures exhibit a dominant clone with a pharmacotyping profile similar to early passages. The biomass required for accurate pharmacotyping can be minimized by leveraging a high-throughput technology. Twenty-nine cultures were pharmacotyped to derive a population distribution of chemotherapeutic sensitivity at our center. Pharmacotyping rapidly-expanded PDOs was completed in a median of 48 (range 18-102) days. Conclusions: Rapid development of PDOs from patients undergoing surgery for PDAC is eminently feasible within the perioperative recovery period, enabling the potential for pharmacotyping to guide postoperative adjuvant chemotherapeutic selection. Studies validating PDOs as a promising predictive biomarker are ongoing.Peer reviewe

Angiographic Findings and Outcome in Diabetec Patients Treated With Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction: The GUSTO-I Experience

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether diabetes mellitus, in the setting of thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction, affects 1) early infarct-related artery patency and reocclusion rates; and 2) global and regional ventricular function indexes. We also sought to assess whether angiographic or baseline clinical variables, or both, can account for the known excess mortality after myocardial infarction in the diabetic population. BACKGROUND: Mortality after acute myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes is approximately twice that of nondiabetic patients. It is uncertain whether this difference in mortality is due to a lower rate of successful thrombolysis, increased reocclusion after successful thrombolysis, greater ventricular injury or a more adverse angiographic or clinical profile in diabetic patients. METHODS: Patency rates and global and regional left ventricular function were determined in patients enrolled in the GUSTO-I Angiographic Trial. Thirty-day mortality differences between those with and without diabetes were compared. RESULTS: The diabetic cohort had a significantly higher proportion of female and elderly patients, and th

Defining the Critical Hurdles in Cancer Immunotherapy

ABSTRACT: Scientific discoveries that provide strong evidence of antitumor effects in preclinical models often encounter significant delays before being tested in patients with cancer. While some of these delays have a scientific basis, others do not. We need to do better. Innovative strategies need to move into early stage clinical trials as quickly as it is safe, and if successful, these therapies should efficiently obtain regulatory approval and widespread clinical application. In late 2009 and 2010 the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC), convened an "Immunotherapy Summit" with representatives from immunotherapy organizations representing Europe, Japan, China and North America to discuss collaborations to improve development and delivery of cancer immunotherapy. One of the concepts raised by SITC and defined as critical by all parties was the need to identify hurdles that impede effective translation of cancer immunotherapy. With consensus on these hurdles, international working groups could be developed to make recommendations vetted by the participating organizations. These recommendations could then be considered by regulatory bodies, governmental and private funding agencies, pharmaceutical companies and academic institutions to facilitate changes necessary to accelerate clinical translation of novel immune-based cancer therapies. The critical hurdles identified by representatives of the collaborating organizations, now organized as the World Immunotherapy Council, are presented and discussed in this report. Some of the identified hurdles impede all investigators, others hinder investigators only in certain regions or institutions or are more relevant to specific types of immunotherapy or first-in-humans studies. Each of these hurdles can significantly delay clinical translation of promising advances in immunotherapy yet be overcome to improve outcomes of patients with cancer

Defining the critical hurdles in cancer immunotherapy

Scientific discoveries that provide strong evidence of antitumor effects in preclinical models often encounter significant delays before being tested in patients with cancer. While some of these delays have a scientific basis, others do not. We need to do better. Innovative strategies need to move into early stage clinical trials as quickly as it is safe, and if successful, these therapies should efficiently obtain regulatory approval and widespread clinical application. In late 2009 and 2010 the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC), convened an "Immunotherapy Summit" with representatives from immunotherapy organizations representing Europe, Japan, China and North America to discuss collaborations to improve development and delivery of cancer immunotherapy. One of the concepts raised by SITC and defined as critical by all parties was the need to identify hurdles that impede effective translation of cancer immunotherapy. With consensus on these hurdles, international working groups could be developed to make recommendations vetted by the participating organizations. These recommendations could then be considered by regulatory bodies, governmental and private funding agencies, pharmaceutical companies and academic institutions to facilitate changes necessary to accelerate clinical translation of novel immune-based cancer therapies. The critical hurdles identified by representatives of the collaborating organizations, now organized as the World Immunotherapy Council, are presented and discussed in this report. Some of the identified hurdles impede all investigators; others hinder investigators only in certain regions or institutions or are more relevant to specific types of immunotherapy or first-in-humans studies. Each of these hurdles can significantly delay clinical translation of promising advances in immunotherapy yet if overcome, have the potential to improve outcomes of patients with cancer

Innovation and Reputation: The Effect of Spin-outs on the Performance of Progenitors in the Hard Disk Drive Industry, 1963 to 1998

PRELIMINARY DRAFT-OK to cite but please do not quote without permission. • This research has been supported by a grant from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation to the Information Storage Industry Center at the University of California at San Diego. 2 ABSTRACT Reputation is an intangible asset that affects organizational performance. It is conferred on an organization by external audiences such as customers, competitors, analysts, or the media. Potential employees are also a salient external audience for organizations that want to have a positive reputation in the labor market. We argue that spin-outs (i.e., new ventures created by (former) employees of an incumbent firm) help an organization create a positive reputation in the technical labor market. We theorize that although spinouts initially lower the innovativeness of progenitors (i.e., the "parent" firm of the spinout) due to the loss of key personnel and disruption of existing routines, over time, they improve their innovative capabilities by creating a reputation as an incubator of talented entrepreneurs, which in turn attracts even more talented technical employees. We test our theory in the context of firm innovation in the hard disk drive industry from 1963 to 1998. Consistent with our theorizing, we find strong statistical support that spin-outs reduce rates of innovation for the progenitor for the first couple of years after a spin-out event, but that this initial decline is outweighed over time by the improved innovation that comes from having had spin-outs.

Not all bridging ties are equal: Network imprinting and firm growth in the nashville legal industry, 1933-1978

In this paper we focus on the temporal and historical conditions under which bridging ties from the past affect current organizational outcomes. Whereas previous research has shown that bridging ties have high decay rates and short-term effects, we explore the possibility that bridging ties may produce benefits over an extended period of time. In particular, we contrast the conventional view of bridging ties having rapidly decaying effects with two alternative network dynamics suggesting “accumulating” and “imprinting” effects. We propose that bridging ties have accumulating effects as a result of learning and redeployment of cumulated knowledge. We also predict that bridging ties exhibit an imprinted effect whereby the founding conditions surrounding the formation of some, but not all, ties yield long-lasting network benefits. We test our theory in the context of Nashville's legal industry, studying the formation and evolution of the professional network of lawyers' coemployment ties between 1933 and 1978. Consistent with our theory, we find that bridging ties produce network benefits over an extended period of time and trace back to the point of tie formation. Surprisingly, we also find that the imprinted effect is more robust than the rapidly decaying effect of bridging ties