Challenges for the balanced attribution of livestock’s environmental impacts: the art of conveying simple messages around complex realities

Meat production is often listed among the largest contributors to climate change, and is usually associated with biodiversity damage, feed-food competition, and water scarcity. This assumption is largely based on the biogenic methane (CH4) emissions of the global herd of ruminants and its occupation of land. Environmental assessments of the livestock sector are all too frequently stated in simplistic terms, making use of a myopic selection of metrics, and overlooking underlying heterogeneity and complexities. One example of such oversimplification is the comparison of the warming effect of different greenhouse gases (CO2, CH4, and N2O), which are associated with a series of challenges due to their own heterogeneous atmospheric ‘behavior’. Whilst useful for certain research questions, standardizations such as the commonly used GWP100 hide many complex issues. These issues include considering different emission profiles of production systems (e.g., low-methane porcine vs. high-methane ruminant), the need to factor in CO2 and CH4 sinks, the different atmospheric lifetimes of each gas and subsequent atmospheric warming potential, and compensatory background emissions in alternative rewilding scenarios. Whilst poorly managed land negatively affects biodiversity, well-managed land strategies, including those pertaining to livestock production, can lead to favorable outcomes (e.g., biodiverse swards that encourage pollination and beneficial microfauna). Similarly, the assessment of water wastage and land use requires contextualized approaches. This highlights the importance of addressing agricultural heterogeneity in systems analysis, including Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). To further reflect the food-environment nexus, nutritional LCA (nLCA) incorporates considerations of food. optimizing e.g. nutritional sustenance and reducing, in theory, the amount of food we consume through meal-level assessment - rather than focusing on a single product.• Being more recent than the wider LCA ‘umbrella’ (e.g., Life Cycle Cost Analyses), one current drawback of nLCA is that it can be easily manipulated to favour one product over another, whether plant- or animal sourced, by singling out specific nutrients (e.g., fiber or vitamin C vs. vitamin B12 or digestible amino acid balanced protein). When considering the value of livestock products against their environmental impact, a holistic assessment is needed using balanced metrics and avoiding tunnel vision. Besides factoring in nutrition and co-product benefits, other natural capitals, and societal assets that result from well-managed farm enterprises need to be acknowledged, even if no empirical metric can currently fully account for their true value. Examples include: biodiversity, soil health, land stewardship, and rural community support; especially in a time of extreme variability due to climate, social unrest, and economic crises

Plant-plant competition influences temporal dynamism of soil microbial enzyme activity.

Root-derived compounds can change rates of soil organic matter decomposition (rhizosphere priming effects) through microbial production of extracellular enzymes. Such soil priming can be affected by plant identity and soil nutrient status. However, the effect of plant-plant competition on the temporal dynamics of soil organic matter turnover processes is not well understood. This study used zymography to detect the spatial and temporal pattern of cellulase and leucine aminopeptidase activity, two enzyme classes involved in soil organic matter turnover. The effect of plant-plant competition on enzyme activity was examined using barley (Hordeum vulgare) plants grown in i) isolation, ii) intra- and iii) inter-cultivar competition. The enzyme activities of leucine aminopeptidase and cellulase were measured from portions of the root system at 18, 25 and 33 days after planting, both along the root axis and in the root associated area with detectable enzyme activity. The activities of cellulase and leucine aminopeptidase were both strongly associated with plant roots, and increased over time. An increase in the area of cellulase activity around roots was delayed when plants were in competition compared to in isolation. A similar response was found for leucine aminopeptidase activity, but only when in intra-cultivar competition, and not when in inter-cultivar competition. Therefore, plant-plant competition had a differential effect on enzyme classes, which was potentially mediated through root exudate composition. This study demonstrates the influence of plant-plant competition on soil microbial activity and provides a potential mechanism by which temporal dynamism in plant resource capture can be mediated