Diurnal Variation in Mars Equatorial Odd Oxygen Species: Chemical Production and Loss Mechanisms

Odd oxygen (O, O(¹D), O₃) abundance and its variability in the Martian atmosphere results from complex physical and chemical interactions among atmospheric species, which are driven mainly by solar radiation and atmospheric conditions. Although our knowledge of Mars’ ozone distribution and variability has been significantly improved with the arrival of several recent orbiters, the data acquired by such missions is not enough to properly characterize its diurnal variation. Thus, photochemical models are useful tools to assist in such a characterization. Here, both the Martian ozone vertical distribution and its diurnal variation for equatorial latitudes are studied, using the JPL/Caltech one-dimensional photochemical model and diurnally-variable atmospheric profiles. The chosen equatorial latitude-region is based on the recent and future plans of NASA and other agencies to study this region by different surface missions. A production and loss analysis is performed in order to characterize the chemical mechanisms that drive odd oxygen's diurnal budget and variability on Mars making use of the comprehensive chemistry implemented in the model. The diurnal variation shows large differences in the abundance between daytime and nighttime; and variable behavior depending on the atmospheric layer. The photolysis-driven ozone diurnal profile is obtained at the surface, whilst a sharp decrease is obtained in the upper troposphere at daytime, which originates from the large differences in atomic oxygen abundances between atmospheric layers. Finally, no clear anticorrelation between ozone and water vapor is found in the diurnal cycle, contrary to the strong correlation observed by orbiters on a seasonal timescale

Meteorological predictions for Mars 2020 Perseverance rover landing site at Jezero crater

Correction to: Space Sci Rev (2020) 216:148 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-020-00763-xPeer reviewe

Pressure observations by the curiosity rover : Initial results

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the MSL and REMS instrument teams in making this wonderful Mars mission come true. Ari-Matti Harri and Hannu Savijarvi are thankful for the Finnish Academy grants 132825 and 131723.Peer reviewedPublisher PD

More than one martian year of meteorology observed by the Insight lander

InSight has been measuring atmospheric pressure, wind and temperature since December 10, 2018 (around Ls=304° of Martian Year 34), 14 sols after its landing. In particular, more than one Martian year of almost continuous measurements has been obtained in 2018-2020. InSight is located in Elysium Planitia, at 4.50238°N, 135.62345°E in planetocentric coordinates (-2614 m altitude below MOLA areoid). Hence, the geophysical lander is providing the best long-duration meteorological Mars station since Viking. In this work, we review the meteorological phenomena that characterize the pressure and wind measurements at timescales larger than 1000 seconds. A subset of the meteorological observations obtained at the beginning of the mission was previously reported in [1]. The analysis is helped by comparing the results with prediction from the LMD numerical global climate model (GCM, [2]) as re-ported before landing by [3]

Multi-model Meteorological and Aeolian Predictions for Mars 2020 and the Jezero Crater Region

Nine simulations are used to predict the meteorology and aeolian activity of the Mars 2020 landing site region. Predicted seasonal variations of pressure and surface and atmospheric temperature generally agree. Minimum and maximum pressure is predicted at Ls∼145° and 250°, respectively. Maximum and minimum surface and atmospheric temperature are predicted at Ls∼180° and 270°, respectively; i.e., are warmest at northern fall equinox not summer solstice. Daily pressure cycles vary more between simulations, possibly due to differences in atmospheric dust distributions. Jezero crater sits inside and close to the NW rim of the huge Isidis basin, whose daytime upslope (∼east-southeasterly) and nighttime downslope (∼northwesterly) winds are predicted to dominate except around summer solstice, when the global circulation produces more southerly wind directions. Wind predictions vary hugely, with annual maximum speeds varying from 11 to 19ms−1 and daily mean wind speeds peaking in the first half of summer for most simulations but in the second half of the year for two. Most simulations predict net annual sand transport toward the WNW, which is generally consistent with aeolian observations, and peak sand fluxes in the first half of summer, with the weakest fluxes around winter solstice due to opposition between the global circulation and daytime upslope winds. However, one simulation predicts transport toward the NW, while another predicts fluxes peaking later and transport toward the WSW. Vortex activity is predicted to peak in summer and dip around winter solstice, and to be greater than at InSight and much greater than in Gale crater

Field Measurements of Terrestrial and Martian Dust Devils

Surface-based measurements of terrestrial and martian dust devils/convective vortices provided from mobile and stationary platforms are discussed. Imaging of terrestrial dust devils has quantified their rotational and vertical wind speeds, translation speeds, dimensions, dust load, and frequency of occurrence. Imaging of martian dust devils has provided translation speeds and constraints on dimensions, but only limited constraints on vertical motion within a vortex. The longer mission durations on Mars afforded by long operating robotic landers and rovers have provided statistical quantification of vortex occurrence (time-of-sol, and recently seasonal) that has until recently not been a primary outcome of more temporally limited terrestrial dust devil measurement campaigns. Terrestrial measurement campaigns have included a more extensive range of measured vortex parameters (pressure, wind, morphology, etc.) than have martian opportunities, with electric field and direct measure of dust abundance not yet obtained on Mars. No martian robotic mission has yet provided contemporaneous high frequency wind and pressure measurements. Comparison of measured terrestrial and martian dust devil characteristics suggests that martian dust devils are larger and possess faster maximum rotational wind speeds, that the absolute magnitude of the pressure deficit within a terrestrial dust devil is an order of magnitude greater than a martian dust devil, and that the time-of-day variation in vortex frequency is similar. Recent terrestrial investigations have demonstrated the presence of diagnostic dust devil signals within seismic and infrasound measurements; an upcoming Mars robotic mission will obtain similar measurement types

Dust Devil Frequency of Occurrence and Radiative Effects at Jezero Crater, Mars, as Measured by MEDA Radiation and Dust Sensor (RDS)

The Mars Environmental Dynamics Analyzer, onboard the Perseverance rover, is a meteorological station that is operating on Mars and includes, among other sensors, the radiometer Radiation and Dust Sensor (RDS). From RDS irradiance observations, a total of 374 dust devils (DDs) were detected for the first 365 sols of the mission (Ls = 6°–182°), which along with wind and pressure measurements, we estimated a DD frequency of formation at Jezero between 1.3 and 3.4 DD km −2 sol −1 (increasing as we move from spring into summer). This frequency is found to be smaller than that estimated at the Spirit or Pathfinder landing sites but much greater than that derived at InSight landing site. The maximum in DD frequency occurs between 12:00 and 13:00 local true solar time, which is when the convective heat flux and lower planetary boundary layer IR heating are both predicted to peak in Jezero crater. DD diameter, minimum height, and trajectory were studied showing (a) an average diameter of 29 m (or a median of 25 m) and a maximum and minimum diameter of 132 ± 63.4 and 5.6 ± 5.5 m; (b) an average minimum DD height of 231 m and a maximum minimum-height of 872 m; and (c) the DD migration direction is in agreement with wind measurements. For all the cases, DDs decreased the UV irradiance, while at visible or near-IR wavelengths both increases and decreases were observed. Contrary to the frequency of formation, these results indicate similar DD characteristics in average for the studied period

Secular Climate Change on Mars: An Update Using One Mars Year of MSL Pressure Data

The South Polar Residual Cap (SPRC) on Mars is an icy reservoir of CO2. If all the CO2 trapped in the SPRC were released to the atmosphere the mean annual global surface pressure would rise by approximately 20 Pa. Repeated MOC and HiRISE imaging of scarp retreat within the SPRC led to suggestions that the SPRC is losing mass. Estimates for the loss rate vary between 0. 5 Pa per Mars Decade to 13 Pa per Mars Decade. Assuming 80% of this loss goes directly into the atmosphere, an estimate based on some modeling (Haberle and Kahre, 2010), and that the loss is monotonic, the global annual mean surface pressure should have increased between approximately 1-20 Pa since the Viking mission (approximately 20 Mars years ago). Surface pressure measurements by the Phoenix Lander only 2.5 Mars years ago were found to be consistent with these loss rates. Last year at this meeting we compared surface pressure data from the MSL mission through sol 360 with that from Viking Lander 2 (VL-2) for the same period to determine if the trend continues. The results were ambiguous. This year we have a full Mars year of MSL data to work with. Using the Ames GCM to compensate for dynamics and environmental differences, our analysis suggests that the mean annual pressure has decreased by approximately 8 Pa since Viking. This result implies that the SPRC has gained (not lost) mass since Viking. However, the estimated uncertainties in our analysis are easily at the 10 Pa level and possibly higher. Chief among these are the hydrostatic adjustment of surface pressure from grid point elevations to actual elevations and the simulated regional environmental conditions at the lander sites. For these reasons, the most reasonable conclusion is that there is no significant difference in the size of the atmosphere between now and Viking. This implies, but does not demand, that the mass of the SPRC has not changed since Viking. Of course, year-to-year variations are possible as implied by the Phoenix data. Given that there has been no unusual behavior in the climate system as observed by a variety of spacecraft at Mars since Phoenix, its seems more likely that the Phoenix data simply did not have a long enough record to accurately determine annual mean pressure changes as Haberle and Kahre (2010) cautioned. In the absence of a strong signal in the MSL data, we conclude that if the SPRC is loosing mass it is not going into the atmosphere reservoir