Management of von Willebrand disease with a factor VIII‐poor von Willebrand factor concentrate: Results from a prospective observational post‐marketing study

International audienceBackground A triple-secured plasma-derived von Willebrand factor (pdVWF) almost devoid of factor VIII (FVIII):WILFACTIN(R), was approved in France in 2003, and then in other countries for the treatment of patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD). Objective To investigate long-term safety and efficacy of the product in real-life over the first 5 post-approval years. Patients/Methods This prospective, observational, national post-marketing study (PMS) enrolled patients of all ages and VWD types. Patients were observed for up to 3 years and treated for one or more occasions. Efficacy was assessed for each major event. Breakthrough bleeding rate 3 days post-infusion and annualized bleeding rate (ABR) were also evaluated for long-term prophylaxis. Results Overall, 155 of 174 patients enrolled from 31 centers were eligible for efficacy assessment. Most patients (76.8%) were severely affected (VWF:RCo = 12 months. Excellent tolerability was confirmed with no safety concerns. No thrombotic events were observed. Conclusions Results from this PMS increase the clinical experience of a FVIII-poor pdVWF in patients of all ages and VWD types including those with thrombotic risk factors and emphasize that giving FVIII is not always mandatory to effectively treat patients with severe VWD

Relapse of acquired von Willebrand syndrome in a patient non-compliant with Crohn's disease

International audienc

Relapse of acquired von Willebrand syndrome in a patient non-compliant with Crohn's disease

International audienceWe report a case of acquired von Willebrand syndrome relapse in association with Crohn's disease, in a context of non-compliance in a 85-year-old woman suffering from epistaxis and melena. The acquired von Willebrand syndrome is a rare bleeding disorder. This case underlines the importance of maintaining the corticosteroid therapy in order to prevent the reappearance of autoantibodies and the recurrence of this syndrome

Differences in von Willebrand factor function in type 2A von Willebrand disease and left ventricular assist device-induced acquired von Willebrand syndrome

Background: Patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD) type 2A or acquired von Willebrand syndrome (aVWS) as a consequence of implantation of left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are both characterized by a loss of von Willebrand factor (VWF) function. Loss of VWF function is however more severe in VWD type 2A than in LVAD patients. Objectives: To compare VWF function in patients with VWD type 2A and LVAD-induced aVWS to highlight the differences in VWF activity and to stress the importance of VWF multimer analysis for correct diagnosis of aVWS in LVAD patients. Patients/Methods: Plasma samples from nine VWD type 2A, nine LVAD patients, and 20 healthy donors (HD) were analyzed for VWF function (VWF:CB/VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag) and loss of high molecular weight (HMW) VWF multimers. Results: A severely impaired VWF function was indeed confirmed in all VWD 2A patients. HMW VWF multimers were severely reduced compared to HD (0% [0, 12.29] vs 34.19% [31.68, 38.88] for HD, P 0.7). Conclusions: VWF:CB/VWF:Ag or VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag analysis allows detection of impaired VWF function in VWD type 2A but not always in LVAD-induced aVWS patients. In contrast, VWF multimeric analysis allows detection of the loss of HMW VWF multimers in both groups of patients. Hence, performing VWF multimer analysis is crucial to detect aVWS in LVAD patients.status: publishe

A Laboratory Phenotype/Genotype Correlation of 1167 French Patients From 670 Families With von Willebrand Disease

International audiencevon Willebrand disease (VWD) is a genetic bleeding disease due to a defect of von Willebrand factor (VWF), a glycoprotein crucial for platelet adhesion to the subendothelium after vascular injury. VWD include quantitative defects of VWF, either partial (type 1 with VWF levels <50 IU/dL) or virtually total (type 3 with undetectable VWF levels) and also qualitative defects of VWF (type 2 variants with discrepant antigenic and functional VWF levels). The most bleeding forms of VWD usually do not concern type 1 patients with the mildest VWF defects (VWF levels between 30 and 50 IU/dL). The French reference center for VWD performed a laboratory phenotypic and genotypic analysis in 1167 VWD patients (670 families) selected by their basic biologic phenotype: type 3, type 2, and type 1 with VWF levels <30 IU/dL. In these patients indeed, to achieve an accurate diagnosis of VWD type and subtype is crucial for the management (treatment and genetic counseling). A phenotype/genotype correlation was present in 99.3% of cases; 323 distinct VWF sequence variations (58% of novel) were identified (missense 67% versus truncating 33%). The distribution of VWD types was: 25% of type 1, 8% of type 3, 66% of type 2 (2A: 18%, 2B: 17%, 2M: 19%, 2N: 12%), and 1% of undetermined type. Type 1 VWD was related either to a defective synthesis/secretion or to an accelerated clearance of VWF. In type 3 VWD, bi-allelic mutations of VWF were found in almost all patients. In type 2A, the most frequent mechanism was a hyper-proteolysis of VWF. Type 2B showed 85% of patients with deleterious mutations (distinct from type 2B New York). Type 2M was linked to a defective binding of VWF to platelet glycoprotein Ib or to collagen. Type 2N VWD included almost half type 2N/3. This biologic study emphasizes the complex mechanisms for both quantitative and qualitative VWF defects in VWD. In addition, this study provides a new epidemiologic picture of the most bleeding forms of VWD in which qualitative defects are predominant