Study protocol : the empirical investigation of methods to correct for measurement error in biobanks with dietary assessment

Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Human papillomavirus types in cervical high-grade lesions or cancer among Nordic women - Potential for prevention

Publisher's version (útgefin grein)It is valuable to establish a population‐based prevaccination baseline distribution of human papillomavirus (HPV) types among women with high‐grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or 3 and cervical cancer in order to assess the potential impact of HPV vaccination. In four countries (Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and Iceland), we collected consecutive series of cervical cancers (n = 639) and high‐grade precancerous cervical lesions (n = 1240) during 2004‐2006 before implementation of HPV vaccination and subjected the specimens to standardized HPV genotyping. The HPV prevalence was 82.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 79.0‐86.4) in CIN2, 91.6% (95% CI 89.7‐93.5) in CIN3, and 86.4% (95% CI 83.7‐89.1) in cervical cancer. The most common HPV types in CIN2/3 were HPV16 (CIN2: 35.9%, 95% CI 31.2‐40.6; CIN3: 50.2%, 95% CI 46.8‐53.6) and HPV31 (CIN2: 10.9%, 95% CI 7.8‐13.9; CIN3: 12.1%, 95% CI 9.9‐14.3), while HPV16 and HPV18 were the most frequent types in cervical cancer (48.8%, 95% CI 44.9‐52.7 and 15.3%, 95% CI 12.5‐18.1, respectively). The prevalence of HPV16/18 decreased with increasing age at diagnosis in both CIN2/3 and cervical cancer (P < 0.0001). Elimination of HPV16/18 by vaccination is predicted to prevent 42% (95% CI 37.0‐46.7) of CIN2, 57% (95% CI 53.8‐60.5) of CIN3 and 64% (95% CI 60.3‐67.7) of cervical cancer. Prevention of the five additional HPV types HPV31/33/45/52/58 would increase the protection to 68% (95% CI 63.0‐72.2) in CIN2, 85% (95% CI 82.4‐87.2) in CIN3 and 80% (95% CI 77.0‐83.2) in cervical cancer. This study provides large‐scale and representative baselines for assessing and evaluating the population‐based preventive impact of HPV vaccination.We thank Cecilia Wahlström and Kia Sjölin for assistance with the HPV genotyping. SKK received lecture fee from Merck and Sanofi Pasteur MSD, scientific advisory board fee from Merck, and unrestricted research grants through her institution from Merck. JD reports having received research grants to his institution for the funding of the study. CM received lecture fees and travel grants from Sanofi Pasteur MSD. CL and MH report that their institution received a grant from Merck. KLL is a full‐time employee of Merck & Co. Inc and owns stocks and options of Merck. MN received research grants from MSD Norway/Merck through the affiliating institute. CDC, SG, LT, KS, and BTH report no conflicts of interest.Peer Reviewe

Ethnicity and incidence of Hodgkin lymphoma in Canadian population

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Research has shown that ethnicity is a significant predictor of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Variations in cancer incidence among ethnic groups in the same country can lead to important information in the search for etiological factors. Other risk factors important in the etiology of HL are medical history and exposure to pesticides. In this report we investigated the association between ethnicity and HL in the presence of medical history, and exposure to pesticides.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The data resulting from a matched population-based case-control study conducted in six provinces of Canada (Ontario, Quebec, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta, and British Columbia) was analyzed to determine whether or not there was any association between ethnicity and incidence of HL when adjusted for personal medical history and pesticide exposure. Information on ethnicity, personal medical history, and pesticide exposure was collected by questionnaires via mail on 316 men diagnosed with HL; and on 1506 controls. A conditional logistic regression was utilized and results were presented as odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In our study population, the distribution of ethnic groups was: 38.5% North American, 15% British, 8.4% Western European, 8.2% Eastern European, 1.7% Asian, 1.4% Scandinavian and 27% of other ethnic origin. Compared to North Americans (i) the risk of HL was greater among the Eastern European descendents (Odds Ratio (OR_adj): 1.82; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02, 3.25) and Western European (OR_adj: 1.62; 95% CI: 0.95–2.76) descent population (borderline significance at 5% level); and (ii) the risk of HL was lower in Asian descents. Diagnosis with measles (OR_adj: 0.72, 95% C.I.: 0.53–0.98) and/or positive history of allergy desensitization shots (OR_adj: 0.55, 95% C.I.: 0.30–0.99) were negatively associated with the incidence of HL, while diagnosis with acne (OR_adj: 2.12, 95% C.I.: 1.19–3.78), shingles (OR_adj: 2.41, 95% C.I.: 1.38–4.22) and positive family history of cancer (OR_adj: 1.93, 95% C.I.: 1.40–2.65) increased the risk of HL. Exposure to individual herbicide dichlorprop showed an increased risk of HL (OR_adj: 6.35, 95% C.I.: 1.56–25.92).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>In Canada, compared to North Americans descendents, the risk of HL was significantly greater among the Eastern European and Western European descent population. Our results related to association between ethnicity and HL support the findings reported by other researchers. Our data showed that subjects who were diagnosed with measles or had allergy desensitization shots negatively associated with the incidence of HL; and other medical conditions, ever diagnosed with acne, and positive family history of cancer were positively associated with the incidence of HL.</p

Second primary cancer risk - the impact of applying different definitions of multiple primaries: results from a retrospective population-based cancer registry study

Background: There is evidence that cancer survivors are at increased risk of second primary cancers. Changes in the prevalence of risk factors and diagnostic techniques may have affected more recent risks.&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt; Methods: We examined the incidence of second primary cancer among adults in the West of Scotland, UK, diagnosed with cancer between 2000 and 2004 (n = 57,393). We used National Cancer Institute Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results and International Agency for Research on Cancer definitions of multiple primary cancers and estimated indirectly standardised incidence ratios (SIR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt; Results: There was a high incidence of cancer during the first 60 days following diagnosis (SIR = 2.36, 95% CI = 2.12 to 2.63). When this period was excluded the risk was not raised, but it was high for some patient groups; in particular women aged &#60;50 years with breast cancer (SIR = 2.13, 95% CI = 1.58 to 2.78), patients with bladder (SIR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.19 to 1.67) and head &#38; neck (SIR = 1.93, 95% CI = 1.67 to 2.21) cancer. Head &#38; neck cancer patients had increased risks of lung cancer (SIR = 3.75, 95% CI = 3.01 to 4.62), oesophageal (SIR = 4.62, 95% CI = 2.73 to 7.29) and other head &#38; neck tumours (SIR = 6.10, 95% CI = 4.17 to 8.61). Patients with bladder cancer had raised risks of lung (SIR = 2.18, 95% CI = 1.62 to 2.88) and prostate (SIR = 2.41, 95% CI = 1.72 to 3.30) cancer.&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions: Relative risks of second primary cancers may be smaller than previously reported. Premenopausal women with breast cancer and patients with malignant melanomas, bladder and head &#38; neck cancers may benefit from increased surveillance and advice to avoid known risk factors

Cigarette use, comorbidities, and prognosis in a prospective head and neck squamous cell carcinoma population

BackgroundTo better understand the associations between a history of tobacco use and survival outcomes, cigarette use was prospectively surveyed in 687 previously untreated patients with cancer of the oral cavity (n = 271), oropharynx (n = 257), larynx (n = 135), or hypopharynx (n = 24).MethodsKaplan–Meier and Cox models explored the associations of tobacco use intensity (packs/day), duration (years of use), and timing before diagnosis with overall survival (OS), disease‐specific survival (DSS), and recurrence‐free survival (RFS).ResultsCigarette use duration, timing, and intensity were significant predictors for all outcomes in univariate analysis. Never smoking and pack‐years were not significantly associated with outcomes after adjustment for prognostic factors, such as stage, comorbidities, and human papillomavirus (HPV) status, which were strongly associated with clinical outcomes.ConclusionThe findings confirm the association between smoking history and survival and the importance of clinical variables in evaluating smoking as a prognostic factor. Timing, intensity, and duration of cigarette use should be considered with other prognostic factors when considering risk stratification for treatment planning. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: 1810–1820, 2016Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/134806/1/hed24515.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/134806/2/hed24515_am.pd

Systematic reviews as a “lens of evidence”: determinants of benefits and harms of breast cancer screening

This systematic review, stimulated by inconsistency in secondary evidence, reports the benefits and harms of breast cancer (BC) screening and their determinants according to systematic reviews. A systematic search, which identified 9,976 abstracts, led to the inclusion of 58 reviews. BC mortality reduction with screening mammography was 15–25% in trials and 28–56% in observational studies in all age groups, and the risk of stage III+ cancers was reduced for women older than 49 years. Overdiagnosis due to mammography was 1–60% in trials and 1–12% in studies with a low risk of bias, and cumulative false‐positive rates were lower with biennial than annual screening (3–17% vs 0.01–41%). There is no consistency in the reviews’ conclusions about the magnitude of BC mortality reduction among women younger than 50 years or older than 69 years, or determinants of benefits and harms of mammography, including the type of mammography (digital vs screen‐film), the number of views, and the screening interval. Similarly, there was no solid evidence on determinants of benefits and harms or BC mortality reduction with screening by ultrasonography or clinical breast examination (sensitivity ranges, 54–84% and 47–69%, respectively), and strong evidence of unfavourable benefit‐to‐harm ratio with breast self‐examination. The reviews’ conclusions were not dependent on the quality of the reviews or publication date. Systematic reviews on mammography screening, mainly from high‐income countries, systematically disagree on the interpretation of the benefit‐to‐harm ratio. Future reviews are unlikely to clarify the discrepancies unless new original studies are published

Atención al paciente oncológico en tiempos de COVID-19

Introduction: with the emergence of the new coronavirus and the wide worldwide distribution, its effects in people with some comorbidities are a global concern. Cancer is a disease with a high incidence and prevalence in society, included among the main causes of mortality.Objective: to describe the management of cancer patients during COVID-19Method: a literature review of articles published up to June 2020 was carried out, using the Pubmed / Medline, SCOPUS and SciELO databases. 28 references were selected for the preparation of the present.Development: cancer has variable clinical and prognostic behaviors that generally lead to states of immunosuppression caused by the therapeutics used for its treatment; Therefore, they are more vulnerable to infectious diseases. The proper care of this group of people is the responsibility of the health systems. Some measures are based on social distancing, either in reducing the number of companions of the patient in the consultation or chemotherapy sessions, the prohibition of visits to hospitalized patients and the use of technologies with the use of teleconsultations for routine follow-up, as well as the change from intravenous to oral treatmentsConclusions: the study of the behavior of COVID-19 in cancer patients is under development. The measures that the institutions take to achieve quality care for people with cancer are varied and are based mainly on social distancing.Introducción: con el surgimiento del nuevo coronavirus y la amplia distribución mundial, es una preocupación global sus efectos en personas con algunas comorbilidades. El cáncer es una enfermedad con alta incidencia y prevalencia en la sociedad, incluida entre las principales causas de mortalidad.Objetivo: describir el manejo del paciente oncológico durante la COVID-19Método: se realizó una revisión de la literatura de artículos publicados hasta junio del 2020, utilizando las bases de datos de Pubmed/Medline, SCOPUS y SciELO. Se seleccionaron 28 referencias para la elaboración de la presente.Desarrollo: el cáncer posee comportamientos clínicos y pronóstico variables que generalmente conllevan a estados de inmunosupresión causada por la terapéutica empleada para su tratamiento; por lo cual presentan mayor vulnerabilidad ante enfermedades infecciosas. Es responsabilidad de los sistemas de salud la correcta atención a este grupo de personas. Algunas medidas se basan en el distanciamiento social, ya sea en la reducción de la cantidad de acompañantes del paciente en la consulta o las sesiones de quimioterapia, la prohibición de las visitas a los pacientes hospitalizados y el empleo de las tecnologías con el uso de las teleconsultas para el seguimiento rutinario, así como el cambio de tratamientos por vía intravenosa a vía oralConclusiones: el estudio del comportamiento de la COVID-19 en pacientes oncológicos está en desarrollo. Las medidas que tomen las instituciones para lograr una atención de calidad a las personas que poseen cáncer son variadas y se basan sobre todo en el distanciamiento social

Interventions Targeting Child Undernutrition in Developing Countries May Be Undermined by Dietary Exposure to Aflatoxin

Child undernutrition, a form of malnutrition, is a major public health burden in developing countries. Supplementation interventions targeting the major micronutrient deficiencies have only reduced the burden of child undernutrition to a certain extent, indicating that there are other underlying determinants that need to be addressed. Aflatoxin exposure, which is also highly prevalent in developing countries, may be considered an aggravating factor for child undernutrition. Increasing evidence suggests that aflatoxin exposure can occur in any stage of life, including in utero through a trans-placental pathway and in early childhood (through contaminated weaning food and family food). Early life exposure to aflatoxin is associated with adverse effects on low birth weight, stunting, immune suppression, and the liver function damage. The mechanisms underlying impaired growth and aflatoxin exposure are still unclear but intestinal function damage, reduced immune function, and alteration in the insulin-like growth factor axis caused by the liver damage are the suggested hypotheses. Given the fact that both aflatoxin and child undernutrition are common in sub-Saharan Africa, effective interventions aimed at reducing undernutrition cannot be satisfactorily achieved until the interactive relationship between aflatoxin and child undernutrition is clearly understood, and an aflatoxin mitigation strategy takes effect in those vulnerable mothers and children

Factors associated with non-attendance, opportunistic attendance and reminded attendance to cervical screening in an organized screening program: a cross-sectional study of 12,058 Norwegian women

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Cervical cancer incidence and mortality may be reduced by organized screening. Participant compliance with the attendance recommendations of the screening program is necessary to achieve this. Knowledge about the predictors of compliance is needed in order to enhance screening attendance.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The Norwegian Co-ordinated Cervical Cancer Screening Program (NCCSP) registers all cervix cytology diagnoses in Norway and individually reminds women who have no registered smear for the past three years to make an appointment for screening. In the present study, a questionnaire on lifestyle and health was administered to a random sample of Norwegian women. The response rate was 68%. To address the predictors of screening attendance for the 12,058 women aged 25-45 who were eligible for this study, individual questionnaire data was linked to the cytology registry of the NCCSP. We distinguished between non-attendees, opportunistic attendees and reminded attendees to screening for a period of four years. Predictors of non-attendance versus attendance and reminded versus opportunistic attendance were established by multivariate logistic regression.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Women who attended screening were more likely than non-attendees to report that they were aware of the recommended screening interval, a history of sexually transmitted infections and a history of hormonal contraceptive and condom use. Attendance was also positively associated with being married/cohabiting, being a non-smoker and giving birth. Women who attended after being reminded were more likely than opportunistic attendees to be aware of cervical cancer and the recommended screening interval, but less likely to report a history of sexually transmitted infections and hormonal contraceptive use. Moreover, the likelihood of reminded attendance increased with age. Educational level did not significantly affect the women's attendance status in the fully adjusted models.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The likelihood of attendance in an organized screening program was higher among women who were aware of cervical screening, which suggests a potential for a higher attendance rate through improving the public knowledge of screening. Further, the lower awareness among opportunistic than reminded attendees suggests that physicians may inform their patients better when smears are taken at the physician's initiative.</p