Relación entre Clima y Productividad Laboral en los Trabajadores de la Dirección Regional de Transportes y Comunicaciones de Madre de Dios – 2016

El presente estudio , titulado “Relación entre Clima y Productividad Laboral en los Trabajadores de la Dirección Regional de Transportes y Comunicaciones de Madre de Dios – 2016, indaga fijar la relación que pueda existir entre el Clima Laboral y la Productividad Laboral. Para este estudio se ha utilizado el diseño investigativo no experimental, transversal y nivel Correlacional, tomándose una muestra de 55 trabajadores de la DRTC - MDD. Por lo que se determinó las siguientes conclusiones: De acuerdo a los datos que se obtuvieron en esta tesis el promedio del Clima Laboral de toda la muestra se ubica en 123.15 puntos, en el nivel de medianamente adecuado, lo cual significa que los trabajadores de la DRTC-MDD consideran que la estructura organizativa y las relaciones laborales son favorables, permitiendo que se establezca una dinámica de grupo entre los trabajadores. Cabe indicar que el ideal a alcanzar se encuentra en el nivel de adecuado, el cual se ubica entre el intervalo de 151 – 200, lo que significaría que los trabajadores estén motivados y se establezca una adecuada dinámica de grupo. De acuerdo a los datos que se obtuvieron el promedio de la Productividad Laboral de toda la muestra se ubica en 58.78 puntos, en el rango alto, lo cual denota que los trabajadores tienen la intención de cumplir con sus tareas cotidianas; sin embargo, no manifiestan convicción para realizar mejor su trabajo cada día, cumpliendo de forma limitada con los ratios ó índices de la productividad como son la eficiencia, efectividad y la eficacia. Cabe indicar que el ideal a alcanzar se encuentra en el nivel de muy alto, el cual se sitúa entre el intervalo de 73 – 96, lo que significaría que Los trabajadores demuestran esfuerzo continuo en su tareas cotidianas. El indicador de correlación de Pearson entre las variables de Clima Laboral y Productividad Laboral, según la percepción es 0.838, que señala la existencia de una correlación positiva alta. Asimismo, el coeficiente de determinación es igual a 0.679, lo cual indica que el 67.9% de los casos están correlacionados. Por último, Siendo el p-valor calculado igual a 0.00, menor al 0.05 se refuta la hipótesis nula y se confirma la hipótesis alterna, concluyendo que sí hay relación entre las variables de Clima Laboral y la Productividad Labora en los colaboradores de la DRTC-MDD

Early goal-directed therapy using a physiological holistic view: the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK—a randomized controlled trial

Septic shock is a highly lethal condition. Early recognition of tissue hypoperfusion and its reversion are key factors for limiting progression to multiple organ dysfunction and death. Lactate‐targeted resuscitation is the gold‐standard under current guidelines, although it has several pitfalls including that non‐hypoxic sources of lactate might predominate in an unknown proportion of patients. Peripheral perfusion‐targeted resuscitation might provide a real‐time response to increases in ow that could lead to a more timely decision to stop resuscitation, thus avoiding uid overload and the risks of over‐resuscitation. This article reports the rationale, study design and analysis plan of the ANDROMEDA‐SHOCK Study. Methods: ANDROMEDA‐SHOCK is a randomized controlled trial which aims to determine if a peripheral perfusion‐ targeted resuscitation is associated with lower 28‐day mortality compared to a lactate‐targeted resuscitation in patients with septic shock with less than 4 h of diagnosis. Both groups will be treated with the same sequential approach during the 8‐hour study period pursuing normalization of capillary re ll time versus normalization or a decrease of more than 20% of lactate every 2 h. The common protocol starts with uid responsiveness assessment and uid loading in responders, followed by a vasopressor and an inodilator test if necessary. The primary outcome is 28‐day mortality, and the secondary outcomes are: free days of mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy and vasopressor support during the rst 28 days after randomization; multiple organ dysfunction during the rst 72 h after randomization; intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay; and all‐cause mortality at 90‐day. A sample size of 422 patients was calculated to detect a 15% absolute reduction in mortality in the peripheral perfusion group with 90% power and two‐tailed type I error of 5%. All analysis will follow the intention‐to‐treat principle. Conclusions: If peripheral perfusion‐targeted resuscitation improves 28‐day mortality, this could lead to simpli ed algorithms, assessing almost in real‐time the reperfusion process, and pursuing more physiologically sound objec‐ tives. At the end, it might prevent the risk of over‐resuscitation and lead to a better utilization of intensive care unit resources

The practice of intensive care in Latin America: a survey of academic intensivists

Intensive care medicine is a relatively young discipline that has rapidly grown into a full-fledged medical subspecialty. Intensivists are responsible for managing an ever-increasing number of patients with complex, life-threatening diseases. Several factors may influence their performance, including age, training, experience, workload, and socioeconomic context. The aim of this study was to examine individual- and work-related aspects of the Latin American intensivist workforce, mainly with academic appointments, which might influence the quality of care provided. In consequence, we conducted a cross-sectional study of intensivists at public and private academic and nonacademic Latin American intensive care units (ICUs) through a web-based electronic survey submitted by email. Questions about personal aspects, work-related topics, and general clinical workflow were incorporated. RESULTS: Our study comprised 735 survey respondents (53% return rate) with the following country-specific breakdown: Brazil (29%); Argentina (19%); Chile (17%); Uruguay (12%); Ecuador (9%); Mexico (7%); Colombia (5%); and Bolivia, Peru, Guatemala, and Paraguay combined (2%). Latin American intensivists were predominantly male (68%) young adults (median age, 40 [IQR, 35-48] years) with a median clinical ICU experience of 10 (IQR, 5-20) years. The median weekly workload was 60 (IQR, 47-70) h. ICU formal training was between 2 and 4 years. Only 63% of academic ICUs performed multidisciplinary rounds. Most intensivists (85%) reported adequate conditions to manage patients with septic shock in their units. Unsatisfactory conditions were attributed to insufficient technology (11%), laboratory support (5%), imaging resources (5%), and drug shortages (5%). Seventy percent of intensivists participated in research, and 54% read scientific studies regularly, whereas 32% read no more than one scientific study per month. Research grants and pharmaceutical sponsorship are unusual funding sources in Latin America. Although Latin American intensivists are mostly unsatisfied with their income (81%), only a minority (27%) considered changing to another specialty before retirement. CONCLUSIONS: Latin American intensivists constitute a predominantly young adult workforce, mostly formally trained, have a high workload, and most are interested in research. They are under important limitations owing to resource constraints and overt dissatisfaction. Latin America may be representative of other world areas with similar challenges for intensivists. Specific initiatives aimed at addressing these situations need to be devised to improve the quality of critical care delivery in Latin America

Effect of a Resuscitation Strategy Targeting Peripheral Perfusion Status vs Serum Lactate Levels on 28-Day Mortality Among Patients With Septic Shock The ANDROMEDA-SHOCK Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance Abnormal peripheral perfusion after septic shock resuscitation has been associated with organ dysfunction and mortality. The potential role of the clinical assessment of peripheral perfusion as a target during resuscitation in early septic shock has not been established. Objective To determine if a peripheral perfusion–targeted resuscitation during early septic shock in adults is more effective than a lactate level–targeted resuscitation for reducing mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants Multicenter, randomized trial conducted at 28 intensive care units in 5 countries. Four-hundred twenty-four patients with septic shock were included between March 2017 and March 2018. The last date of follow-up was June 12, 2018. Interventions Patients were randomized to a step-by-step resuscitation protocol aimed at either normalizing capillary refill time (n = 212) or normalizing or decreasing lactate levels at rates greater than 20% per 2 hours (n = 212), during an 8-hour intervention period. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 28 days. Secondary outcomes were organ dysfunction at 72 hours after randomization, as assessed by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (range, 0 [best] to 24 [worst]); death within 90 days; mechanical ventilation–, renal replacement therapy–, and vasopressor-free days within 28 days; intensive care unit and hospital length of stay. Results Among 424 patients randomized (mean age, 63 years; 226 [53%] women), 416 (98%) completed the trial. By day 28, 74 patients (34.9%) in the peripheral perfusion group and 92 patients (43.4%) in the lactate group had died (hazard ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.55 to 1.02]; P = .06; risk difference, −8.5% [95% CI, −18.2% to 1.2%]). Peripheral perfusion–targeted resuscitation was associated with less organ dysfunction at 72 hours (mean SOFA score, 5.6 [SD, 4.3] vs 6.6 [SD, 4.7]; mean difference, −1.00 [95% CI, −1.97 to −0.02]; P = .045). There were no significant differences in the other 6 secondary outcomes. No protocol-related serious adverse reactions were confirmed. Conclusions and Relevance Among patients with septic shock, a resuscitation strategy targeting normalization of capillary refill time, compared with a strategy targeting serum lactate levels, did not reduce all-cause 28-day mortality

Effect of a Resuscitation Strategy Targeting Peripheral Perfusion Status vs Serum Lactate Levels on 28-Day Mortality Among Patients With Septic Shock : The ANDROMEDA-SHOCK Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE: Abnormal peripheral perfusion after septic shock resuscitation has been associated with organ dysfunction and mortality. The potential role of the clinical assessment of peripheral perfusion as a target during resuscitation in early septic shock has not been established. OBJECTIVE: To determine if a peripheral perfusion–targeted resuscitation during early septic shock in adults is more effective than a lactate level–targeted resuscitation for reducing mortality. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Multicenter, randomized trial conducted at 28 intensive care units in 5 countries. Four-hundred twenty-four patients with septic shock were included between March 2017 and March 2018. The last date of follow-up was June 12, 2018. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to a step-by-step resuscitation protocol aimed at either normalizing capillary refill time (n = 212) or normalizing or decreasing lactate levels at rates greater than 20% per 2 hours (n = 212), during an 8-hour intervention period. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 28 days. Secondary outcomes were organ dysfunction at 72 hours after randomization, as assessed by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (range, 0 [best] to 24 [worst]); death within 90 days; mechanical ventilation–, renal replacement therapy–, and vasopressor-free days within 28 days; intensive care unit and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: Among 424 patients randomized (mean age, 63 years; 226 [53%] women), 416 (98%) completed the trial. By day 28, 74 patients (34.9%) in the peripheral perfusion group and 92 patients (43.4%) in the lactate group had died (hazard ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.55 to 1.02]; P = .06; risk difference, −8.5% [95% CI, −18.2% to 1.2%]). Peripheral perfusion–targeted resuscitation was associated with less organ dysfunction at 72 hours (mean SOFA score, 5.6 [SD, 4.3] vs 6.6 [SD, 4.7]; mean difference, −1.00 [95% CI, −1.97 to −0.02]; P = .045). There were no significant differences in the other 6 secondary outcomes. No protocol-related serious adverse reactions were confirmed. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with septic shock, a resuscitation strategy targeting normalization of capillary refill time, compared with a strategy targeting serum lactate levels, did not reduce all-cause 28-day mortality.Facultad de Ciencias Médica

The practice of intensive care in Latin America: a survey of academic intensivists

Background: Intensive care medicine is a relatively young discipline that has rapidly grown into a full-fledged medical subspecialty. Intensivists are responsible for managing an ever-increasing number of patients with complex, lifethreatening diseases. Several factors may influence their performance, including age, training, experience, workload, and socioeconomic context. The aim of this study was to examine individual- and work-related aspects of the Latin American intensivist workforce, mainly with academic appointments, which might influence the quality of care provided. In consequence, we conducted a cross-sectional study of intensivists at public and private academic and nonacademic Latin American intensive care units (ICUs) through a web-based electronic survey submitted by email. Questions about personal aspects, work-related topics, and general clinical workflow were incorporated. Results: Our study comprised 735 survey respondents (53% return rate) with the following country-specific breakdown: Brazil (29%); Argentina (19%); Chile (17%); Uruguay (12%); Ecuador (9%); Mexico (7%); Colombia (5%); and Bolivia, Peru, Guatemala, and Paraguay combined (2%). Latin American intensivists were predominantly male (68%) young adults (median age, 40 [IQR, 35–48] years) with a median clinical ICU experience of 10 (IQR, 5–20) years. The median weekly workload was 60 (IQR, 47–70) h. ICU formal training was between 2 and 4 years. Only 63% of academic ICUs performed multidisciplinary rounds. Most intensivists (85%) reported adequate conditions to manage patients with septic shock in their units. Unsatisfactory conditions were attributed to insufficient technology (11%), laboratory support (5%), imaging resources (5%), and drug shortages (5%). Seventy percent of intensivists participated in research, and 54% read scientific studies regularly, whereas 32% read no more than one scientific study per month. Research grants and pharmaceutical sponsorship are unusual funding sources in Latin America. Although Latin American intensivists are mostly unsatisfied with their income (81%), only a minority (27%) considered changing to another specialty before retirement. Conclusions: Latin American intensivists constitute a predominantly young adult workforce, mostly formally trained, have a high workload, and most are interested in research. They are under important limitations owing to resource constraints and overt dissatisfaction. Latin America may be representative of other world areas with similar challenges for intensivists. Specific initiatives aimed at addressing these situations need to be devised to improve the quality of critical care delivery in Latin America.Facultad de Ciencias Médica

Measuring progress and projecting attainment on the basis of past trends of the health-related Sustainable Development Goals in 188 countries: an analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016

The UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are grounded in the global ambition of “leaving no one behind”. Understanding today’s gains and gaps for the health-related SDGs is essential for decision makers as they aim to improve the health of populations. As part of the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2016 (GBD 2016), we measured 37 of the 50 health-related SDG indicators over the period 1990–2016 for 188 countries, and then on the basis of these past trends, we projected indicators to 2030

Geoeconomic variations in epidemiology, ventilation management, and outcomes in invasively ventilated intensive care unit patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: a pooled analysis of four observational studies

Background: Geoeconomic variations in epidemiology, the practice of ventilation, and outcome in invasively ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remain unexplored. In this analysis we aim to address these gaps using individual patient data of four large observational studies. Methods: In this pooled analysis we harmonised individual patient data from the ERICC, LUNG SAFE, PRoVENT, and PRoVENT-iMiC prospective observational studies, which were conducted from June, 2011, to December, 2018, in 534 ICUs in 54 countries. We used the 2016 World Bank classification to define two geoeconomic regions: middle-income countries (MICs) and high-income countries (HICs). ARDS was defined according to the Berlin criteria. Descriptive statistics were used to compare patients in MICs versus HICs. The primary outcome was the use of low tidal volume ventilation (LTVV) for the first 3 days of mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes were key ventilation parameters (tidal volume size, positive end-expiratory pressure, fraction of inspired oxygen, peak pressure, plateau pressure, driving pressure, and respiratory rate), patient characteristics, the risk for and actual development of acute respiratory distress syndrome after the first day of ventilation, duration of ventilation, ICU length of stay, and ICU mortality. Findings: Of the 7608 patients included in the original studies, this analysis included 3852 patients without ARDS, of whom 2345 were from MICs and 1507 were from HICs. Patients in MICs were younger, shorter and with a slightly lower body-mass index, more often had diabetes and active cancer, but less often chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure than patients from HICs. Sequential organ failure assessment scores were similar in MICs and HICs. Use of LTVV in MICs and HICs was comparable (42\ub74% vs 44\ub72%; absolute difference \u20131\ub769 [\u20139\ub758 to 6\ub711] p=0\ub767; data available in 3174 [82%] of 3852 patients). The median applied positive end expiratory pressure was lower in MICs than in HICs (5 [IQR 5\u20138] vs 6 [5\u20138] cm H2O; p=0\ub70011). ICU mortality was higher in MICs than in HICs (30\ub75% vs 19\ub79%; p=0\ub70004; adjusted effect 16\ub741% [95% CI 9\ub752\u201323\ub752]; p<0\ub70001) and was inversely associated with gross domestic product (adjusted odds ratio for a US$10 000 increase per capita 0\ub780 [95% CI 0\ub775\u20130\ub786]; p<0\ub70001). Interpretation: Despite similar disease severity and ventilation management, ICU mortality in patients without ARDS is higher in MICs than in HICs, with a strong association with country-level economic status. Funding: No funding

Relación entre Clima y Productividad Laboral en los Trabajadores de la Dirección Regional de Transportes y Comunicaciones de Madre de Dios – 2016

El presente estudio , titulado “Relación entre Clima y Productividad Laboral en los Trabajadores de la Dirección Regional de Transportes y Comunicaciones de Madre de Dios – 2016, indaga fijar la relación que pueda existir entre el Clima Laboral y la Productividad Laboral. Para este estudio se ha utilizado el diseño investigativo no experimental, transversal y nivel Correlacional, tomándose una muestra de 55 trabajadores de la DRTC - MDD. Por lo que se determinó las siguientes conclusiones: De acuerdo a los datos que se obtuvieron en esta tesis el promedio del Clima Laboral de toda la muestra se ubica en 123.15 puntos, en el nivel de medianamente adecuado, lo cual significa que los trabajadores de la DRTC-MDD consideran que la estructura organizativa y las relaciones laborales son favorables, permitiendo que se establezca una dinámica de grupo entre los trabajadores. Cabe indicar que el ideal a alcanzar se encuentra en el nivel de adecuado, el cual se ubica entre el intervalo de 151 – 200, lo que significaría que los trabajadores estén motivados y se establezca una adecuada dinámica de grupo. De acuerdo a los datos que se obtuvieron el promedio de la Productividad Laboral de toda la muestra se ubica en 58.78 puntos, en el rango alto, lo cual denota que los trabajadores tienen la intención de cumplir con sus tareas cotidianas; sin embargo, no manifiestan convicción para realizar mejor su trabajo cada día, cumpliendo de forma limitada con los ratios ó índices de la productividad como son la eficiencia, efectividad y la eficacia. Cabe indicar que el ideal a alcanzar se encuentra en el nivel de muy alto, el cual se sitúa entre el intervalo de 73 – 96, lo que significaría que Los trabajadores demuestran esfuerzo continuo en su tareas cotidianas. El indicador de correlación de Pearson entre las variables de Clima Laboral y Productividad Laboral, según la percepción es 0.838, que señala la existencia de una correlación positiva alta. Asimismo, el coeficiente de determinación es igual a 0.679, lo cual indica que el 67.9% de los casos están correlacionados. Por último, Siendo el p-valor calculado igual a 0.00, menor al 0.05 se refuta la hipótesis nula y se confirma la hipótesis alterna, concluyendo que sí hay relación entre las variables de Clima Laboral y la Productividad Labora en los colaboradores de la DRTC-MDD