Systemic Sclerosis: Results from a multicenter survey of Norwegian patients

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a serious multiorgan disease, characterized by progressive fibrosis, vasculopathy and distinct serum auto antibodies (1, 2). Patients with SSc have an increased mortality risk and reduced quality of life (3-5). Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common manifestation in SSc and the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the SSc population (3, 6). Classification of SSc was done with the 1980 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria until 2013, when EULAR and ACR launched unified new classification criteria for SSc (7, 8). The aim of the study was to estimate the prevalence of SSc in Norway, investigate survival and causes of deaths and to study fibrosis progression and lung function by serial assessments of high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and concurrent pulmonary function tests (PFT). Additionally, we wanted to confirm the true value of the 2013 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for SSc. We found a prevalence of SSc in Norway of 9.9/100 000, a value comparable to other Northern European countries, supporting the notion of a north-south gradient of SSc in Europe with the lowest prevalence in Northern Europe. Our data show that mortality in SSc is still increased compared to the background population and the major causes of death are pulmonary hypertension (PH) and ILD. When studying lung fibrosis and lung function in serial assessments, we demonstrate that a normal baseline HRCT was highly predictive against later fibrosis development, and that HRCT findings at baseline predicted fibrosis progression rates and the deterioration rates of pulmonary function. Male gender, SSc subtype, antibodies, baseline fibrosis and baseline lung function were main risk factors for fibrosis development and progression. The 2013 ACR/EULAR SSc criteria performed remarkably well in our cohort and the sensitivity was significantly better than the ACR1980 criteria using the combination of the ACR 1980 criteria and/or the Leroy & Medsger criteria as the “gold standard” for SSc. Our results reinforce the view that SSc is a rare but serious disease with increased morbidity and mortality and that pulmonary disease is a devastating complication. Our data support the notion that the 2013 ACR/EULAR criteria are a major step forward and that their application should improve the quality of clinical and epidemiological SSc research in the years to come

Preclinical/subclinical rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: misleading terms with potentially deleterious consequences

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a leading cause of mortality in patients with rheumatic diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis. The 5-year mortality rate is twice as high in patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated ILD than in patients with rheumatoid arthritis without ILD. Moreover, a report showed that mortality rates in patients with disease codes for rheumatoid arthritis-associated ILD remained unchanged from 2005–18, even though the overall rheumatoid arthritis mortality rate declined during this time period. Despite the evidence that ILD contributes to premature death in rheumatoid arthritis, screening for ILD in patients with rheumatoid arthritis is not routinely performed in clinical practice and numerous questions remain regarding the management of rheumatoid arthritis-associated ILD

AB0413 HIGH-RESOLUTION COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY FOR THE SCREENING, RE-SCREENING AND FOLLOW-UP OF SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS RELATED INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE: RESULTS OF A EUSTAR-SCTC SURVEY

Background:High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is the gold standard diagnostic test for Interstitial lung disease (ILD), a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Different algorithms have been proposed for the screening of SSc-ILD, including the use of pulmonary function tests (Forced Vital Capacity - FVC, Lung Diffusion of Carbone Monoxyde - DLCO). A prior survey reported that 50-66% of general rheumatologists and SSc experts ordered HRCT for ILD screening in newly diagnosed SSc patients (1).Objectives:Given the recent availability of on-label treatment for SSc-ILD (2), the publication of consensus recommendations for the identification of SSc-ILD (3) and recent awareness programs for the use of HRCT to detect SSc-ILD, we aimed to re-evaluate the use of HRCT for screening, re-screening and follow-up of SSc-ILD.Methods:An invitation was sent to the European Scleroderma Trials and Research (EUSTAR) and Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium (SCTC) members, also advertised through social media. Answers were recorded between Nov 25th and Dec 31st 2020. Questions were asked on the use of chest HRCT at baseline, the re-screening of patients with a negative baseline HRCT and the follow-up of HRCT positive SSc-ILD patients. When HRCT was not routinely requested, additional details were collected about the parameters guiding its use. The results of the survey were tested for association with geographical origin, medical specialty, working environment, SSc referral institute and scientific group membership of the responders, using Chi-squared test.Results:205/630 (32.5%) physicians replied to the survey. Participants were widely distributed in terms of geographical origin (130 Europe, 23 Asia, 23 North America, 31 other continents), medical specialty (156 rheumatology, 21 internal medicine, 14 clinical immunology, 14 other), working environment (176 University Hospital, 12 community hospital, 17 other), SSc dedicated clinic (179 referral and 26 non-referral) and scientific group membership (98 EUSTAR, 42 SCTC, 42 EUSTAR and SCTC, 23 not declared).At SSc diagnosis, 95.7% of responders would perform HRCT: 66.7% as routine screening for ILD (67,4% of SSc referral and 62% for non-referral physicians) and 29% for diagnostic purposes (among the latter, if crackles on auscultation – 92.5%, FVC<80% predicted - 86.6%, FVC±DLCO relative decline reaching the current definition of ILD progression, 86.6% or dyspnea at rest/exercise - 85.1/83.3%).During follow-up, 78.8% of responders would repeat an HRCT in baseline negative cases: 20.3% as a yearly routine screening and 64.5% for diagnostic aims (decision on the latter group was more frequently driven by FVC±DLCO relative decline indicative of ILD progression– 90.6%, new onset or worsening of dyspnoea at rest/exercise – 80.5/86.6%, new onset or worsening of lung crackles on auscultation – 82.6%).Finally, 94.5% of responders would repeat a chest HRCT after SSc-ILD diagnosis: 36.8% as a yearly routine and 56.7% according to clinical evaluation (driven by new FVC±DLCO relative decline based ILD progression – 90.8%, new onset or worsening of dyspnoea at rest/exercise – 83.2/81.7%; 5.2% to evaluate treatment effects). We found no difference in the distribution of answers among groups.Conclusion:The use of baseline HRCT for the screening of SSc-ILD has slightly increased in non-referral and remained stable in referral centers compared to previous surveys, indicating that the implementation of guidelines might be successful and awareness programs should be continued. In addition, we provide new data on use of HRCT in re-screening and follow-up. The development of validated algorithms to further support the appropriate application of HRCT at follow-up is highly needed.References:[1]Bernstein EJ et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018 Jun;70(6):971-972.[2]Distler O et al. N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 27;380(26):2518-2528.[3]Hoffmann-Vold AM et al. The Lancet Rheumatology, Volume 2, Issue 2, e71 - e83.Disclosure of Interests:Cosimo Bruni Speakers bureau: Actelion, Consultant of: Eli Lilly, Grant/research support from: Foundation for Research in Rheumatology (FOREUM), Gruppo Italiano Lotta alla Sclerodermia (GILS), Fondazione Italiana per la Ricerca sull'Artrite (FIRA), New Horizon Fellowship, European Sclerodermia Trial and Reserach (EUSTAR) Group., Lorinda Chung Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Eicos, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Reata., Anna-Maria Hoffmann-Vold Consultant of: Actelion, ARXX therapeutics, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Medscape, MSD, Lilly, Roche, Shervin Assassi Speakers bureau: Integrity Continuing Education, Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and Corbus, Armando Gabrielli: None declared, Dinesh Khanna Consultant of: Acceleron, Actelion, Abbvie, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, CSL Behring, Corbus, Gilead, Galapagos, Genentech/Roche, GSK, Horizon, Merck, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Sanofi-Aventis, and United Therapeutics Leadership, Grant/research support from: NIH, Immune Tolerance Network, Bayer, BMS, Horizon, Pfizer, Employee of: Equity position – Chief Medical Officer, Eicos Sciences, Inc., Elana Bernstein Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Oliver Distler Consultant of: Abbvie, Acceleron Pharma, Amgen, AnaMar, Arxx Therapeutics, Baecon Discovery, Blade Therapeutics, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, ChemomAb, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, CSL Behring, Galapagos NV, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, GSK, Horizon (Curzion) Pharmaceuticals, Inventiva, iQvia, Italfarmaco, iQone, Kymera Therapeutics, Lilly, Medac, Medscape, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Serodapharm, Topadur, Target Bioscience and UCB., Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Acceleron Pharma, Amgen, AnaMar, Arxx Therapeutics, Baecon Discovery, Blade Therapeutics, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, ChemomAb, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, CSL Behring, Galapagos NV, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, GSK, Horizon (Curzion) Pharmaceuticals, Inventiva, iQvia, Italfarmaco, iQone, Kymera Therapeutics, Lilly, Medac, Medscape, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Serodapharm, Topadur, Target Bioscience and UCB. Patent issued "mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis" (US8247389, EP2331143)

Systemic sclerosis is associated with specific alterations in gastrointestinal microbiota in two independent cohorts.

ObjectiveTo compare faecal microbial composition in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) from 2 independent cohorts with controls and to determine whether certain genera are associated with SSc-gastrointestinal tract (GIT) symptoms.DesignAdult patients with SSc from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) and Oslo University Hospital (OUH) and healthy controls participated in this study (1:1:1). All participants provided stool specimens for 16S rRNA sequencing. Linear discriminant analysis effect size demonstrated genera with differential expression in SSc. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data identified specific genera associated with GIT symptoms as assessed by the GIT 2.0 questionnaire.ResultsThe UCLA-SSc and OUH-SSc cohorts were similar in age (52.1 and 60.5 years, respectively), disease duration (median (IQR): 6.6 (2.5-16.4) and 7.0 (1.0-19.2) years, respectively), gender distribution (88% and 71%, respectively), and GIT symptoms (mean (SD) total GIT 2.0 scores of 0.7 (0.6) and 0.6 (0.5), respectively). Principal coordinate analysis illustrated significant microbial community differences between SSc and controls (UCLA: p=0.001; OUH: p=0.002). Patients with SSc had significantly lower levels of commensal genera deemed to protect against inflammation, such as Bacteroides (UCLA and OUH), Faecalibacterium (UCLA), Clostridium (OUH); and significantly higher levels of pathobiont genera, such as Fusobacterium (UCLA), compared with controls. Increased abundance of Clostridium was associated with less severe GIT symptoms in both cohorts.ConclusionsThe present analysis detected specific aberrations in the lower GIT microbiota of patients with SSc from 2 geographically and ethnically distinct cohorts. These findings suggest that GIT dysbiosis may be a pathological feature of the SSc disease state

Modeling Complex Disease Trajectories using Deep Generative Models with Semi-Supervised Latent Processes

In this paper, we propose a deep generative time series approach using latent temporal processes for modeling and holistically analyzing complex disease trajectories. We aim to find meaningful temporal latent representations of an underlying generative process that explain the observed disease trajectories in an interpretable and comprehensive way. To enhance the interpretability of these latent temporal processes, we develop a semi-supervised approach for disentangling the latent space using established medical concepts. By combining the generative approach with medical knowledge, we leverage the ability to discover novel aspects of the disease while integrating medical concepts into the model. We show that the learned temporal latent processes can be utilized for further data analysis and clinical hypothesis testing, including finding similar patients and clustering the disease into new sub-types. Moreover, our method enables personalized online monitoring and prediction of multivariate time series including uncertainty quantification. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in modeling systemic sclerosis, showcasing the potential of our machine learning model to capture complex disease trajectories and acquire new medical knowledge.Comment: Extended Abstract presented at Machine Learning for Health (ML4H) symposium 2023, December 10th, 2023, New Orleans, United States, 23 page

Impact of lung function and baseline clinical characteristics on patient-reported outcome measures in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease.

OBJECTIVE: The SENSCIS® trial demonstrated a significant reduction of lung function decline in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc)-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) treated with nintedanib, but no significant effect on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). To assess whether SSc/SSc-ILD severity and large changes in lung function correlate with HRQoL, a post-hoc analysis of SENSCIS®, aggregating treatment arms, was undertaken. METHODS: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures (St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ], Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy [FACIT]-Dyspnoea, and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index [HAQ-DI], incorporating the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire visual analogue scale [SHAQ VAS]) at baseline and week 52 were assessed for associations to SSc-ILD severity. RESULTS: At baseline and at week 52, forced vital capacity (FVC) 30% fibrosis on high-resolution computed tomography at baseline demonstrated worse PRO measure scores at week 52. After 1 year, patients with a major (>10%) improvement/worsening in FVC demonstrated corresponding improvement/worsening in SGRQ and other PRO measures, significant for the SGRQ symptom domain (p< 0.001). CONCLUSION: Severe SSc-ILD and major deteriorations in lung function have important impacts on HRQoL. Treatments that slow lung function decline and prevent severe SSc-ILD are important to preserve HRQoL. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02597933

A validation of register-derived diagnoses of interstitial lung disease in patients with inflammatory arthritis: data from the NOR-DMARD study

OBJECTIVE There is a lack of knowledge concerning the validity of the interstitial lung disease (ILD) diagnoses used in epidemiological studies on rheumatic diseases. This paper seeks to verify register-derived ILD diagnoses using chest computed tomography (CT) and medical records as a gold standard. METHOD The Norwegian Anti-Rheumatic Drug Register (NOR-DMARD) is a multicentre prospective observational study of patients with inflammatory arthritis who start treatment with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. NOR-DMARD is linked to the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR) and Cause of Death Registry. We searched registers for ILD coded by ICD-10 J84 or J99 among patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, or spondyloarthritis. We extracted chest CT reports and medical records from participating hospitals. Two expert thoracic radiologists scored examinations to confirm the ILD diagnosis. We also searched medical records to find justifications for the diagnosis following multidisciplinary evaluations. We calculated the positive predictive values (PPVs) for ILD across subsets. RESULTS We identified 71 cases with an ILD diagnosis. CT examinations were available in 65/71 patients (91.5%), of whom ILD was confirmed on CT in 29/65 (44.6%). In a further 10 patients, medical records confirmed the diagnosis, giving a total of 39/71 verified cases. The PPV of a register-derived ILD diagnosis was thus 54.9%. In a subset of patients who had received an ILD code at two or more time-points and had a CT scan taken within a relevant period, the PPV was 72.2%. CONCLUSION The validity of register-based diagnoses of ILD must be carefully considered in epidemiological studies

Identifying unmet needs in SSc-ILD by semi-qualitative in-depth interviews

Objectives Interstitial lung disease is frequent in SSc (SSc-ILD) and associates with significantly reduced quality of life. Here we aimed to analyse patient pathways, and experiences of patients and healthcare providers (HCPs) in order to identify unmet needs in the management of SSc-ILD patients. Methods Semi-structured qualitative interviews conducted in eight European countries looked at HCP (n = 95) and patient perspectives (n = 47) using two sets of 70 research questions. Pre-diagnostic, diagnostic and post-diagnostic phases of the patient pathway were systematically explored. Results (i) In the pre-diagnostic phase several gaps were identified by HCPs and patients in all participating countries: limited disease knowledge among primary care physicians and specialists, lack of accurate patient information, and delayed and/or inappropriate referral. (ii) The diagnostic phase is in most countries coordinated by rheumatologists, who are also the main point of care. Depending on the local health system, organization of multidisciplinary collaboration varies. HCPs issued lack of national guidelines, while patients stated difficulties obtaining disease-related information. (iii) In the post-diagnostic phase, HCPs and patients indicated lack of curative treatment, specialized nurses, and paramedical and psychological support. Patients and caregivers additionally expressed the need for clear information on SSc-ILD. Conclusion Lack of disease specific knowledge, gaps in national healthcare systems and insufficient information and support for patients and caregivers were identified as unmet needs to ensure timely diagnosis, provide better patient management and to improve quality of life in SSc-ILD patients.Peer reviewe

Estimation of the Prevalence of Progressive Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Diseases: Systematic Literature Review and Data from a Physician Survey

Some patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis exhibit a progressive clinical phenotype. These chronic progressive fibrosing ILDs have a variety of underlying diseases, and their prevalence is currently unknown. Here we carry out the first systematic review of literature on the prevalence of fibrosing ILDs and progressive fibrosing ILDs using data from physician surveys to estimate frequency of progression among different ILDs. We searched MEDLINE and Embase for studies assessing prevalence of ILD, individual ILDs associated with fibrosis and progressive fibrosing ILDs. These were combined with data from previously published physician surveys to obtain prevalence estimates of each chronic fibrosing ILD with a progressive phenotype and of progressive fibrosing ILDs overall. We identified 16 publications, including five reporting overall ILD prevalence, estimated at 6.3\u201376.0 per 100,000 people in Europe (four studies) and 74.3 per 100,000 in the USA (one study). In total, 13\u201340% of ILDs were estimated to develop a progressive fibrosing phenotype, with overall prevalence estimates for progressive fibrosing ILDs of 2.2\u201320.0 per 100,000 in Europe and 28.0 per 100,000 in the USA. Prevalence estimates for individual progressive fibrosing ILDs varied up to 16.7 per 100,000 people. These conditions represent a sizeable fraction of chronic respiratory disorders and have a high unmet need

Effects of nintedanib in patients with limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis and interstitial lung disease

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the course of interstitial lung disease (ILD) and the effects of nintedanib in patients with limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis (lcSSc). METHODS: In the SENSCIS trial, patients with SSc-ILD were randomised to receive nintedanib or placebo. Patients who completed the SENSCIS trial were eligible to enter SENSCIS-ON, in which all patients received open-label nintedanib. RESULTS: Among 277 patients with lcSSc treated in the SENSCIS trial, the rate (SE) of decline in FVC (mL/year) over 52 weeks was -74.5 (19.2) in the placebo group and -49.1 (19.8) in the nintedanib group (difference: 25.3 [95% CI -28.9, 79.6]). Among 249 patients with data at week 52, mean (SE) changes in FVC at week 52 were -86.4 (21.1) mL in the placebo group and -39.1 (22.2) mL in the nintedanib group. Among 183 patients with lcSSc who participated in SENSCIS-ON and had data at week 52, mean (SE) changes in FVC from baseline to week 52 of SENSCIS-ON were -41.5 (24.0) mL in patients who took placebo in the SENSCIS trial and initiated nintedanib in SENSCIS-ON and -45.1 (19.1) mL in patients who took nintedanib in the SENSCIS trial and continued it in SENSCIS-ON. CONCLUSION: Patients with lcSSc may develop progressive fibrosing ILD. By targeting pulmonary fibrosis, nintedanib slows decline in lung function in patients with lcSSc and ILD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov), NCT02597933 and NCT03313180