Children and Their Parents: A Comparative Study of the Legal Position of Children with Regard to Their Intentional and Biological Parents in English and Dutch Law

This is a book about children and their parents. There are many different kinds of children and at least about as many different kinds of parents. In addition to the many different disciplines that study children and their parents, such as sociology, psychology, child studies and gender studies, to name but a few, this study concerns a legal question with regard to the parent-child relationship, namely how the law assigns parents to children. This subject is approached in a comparative legal perspective and covers England and The Netherlands. The book contains a detailed comparison and analysis of the manner in which the law in the two jurisdictions assigns the status of legal parent and/or attributes parental responsibility to the child’s biological and intentional parents. The concept ‘procreational responsibility’, which is introduced in the concluding chapter of the book, may be used as a tool to assess and reform existing regulations on legal parent-child relationships. The structure of the book, which is based on a categorisation of different family types in a ‘family tree’, enables the reader to have easy access to family-specific information.FdR – Publicaties zonder aanstelling Universiteit Leide

Users of the Koninklijke Bibliotheek ( Royal Library, The Hague ) 1985

Composition of user group of Royal Library ( KB ), nature of use, opinions of users about services offered. Frequency of visiting the royal library / purpose of visit / scientific discipline / satisfaction with facilities and service. Background variables: basic characteristics/ residence/ occupation/employment/ educatio

Het publiek van de Koninklijke Bibliotheek 1985

Composition of user group of Royal Library ( KB ), nature of use, opinions of users about services offered. Frequency of visiting the royal library / purpose of visit / scientific discipline / satisfaction with facilities and service. Background variables: basic characteristics/ residence/ occupation/employment/ educatio

Additional file 1 of Minimizing population health loss due to scarcity in OR capacity: validation of quality of life input

Additional file 1: Fig. S1. Calibrated visual analog scale based on the Global burden of disease study. Table S1. Description of input parameters. Table S2. Form for participants in the Delphi rounds in the developmental study

Additional file 3 of Minimizing population health loss due to scarcity in OR capacity: validation of quality of life input

Additional file 3: Fig. S1. The structure of the previously developed cohort state-transition model. Preop: preoperative state; Postop: postoperative state (6). Fig. S2. The model estimates for urgency based on the original quality of life estimates (upper panel) and the updated scores from both the original and the validation study (bottom panel). Fig. S3. The random effects of procedure on the standard deviation of the QoL estimates. These estimates are the random intercept values for procedure in a model with as independent variable the standard deviations of surgical procedures, also including hospital and pre- or postoperative as fixed effects (supplementary table 2). A random intercept above 0 indicates a higher than expected standard deviation, which we interpret as lower consensus between experts. A random intercept below 0 indicates a lower than expected standard deviation, which we interpret as higher consensus between experts. The overall standard deviation of the random effect was 0.005. Table S1. The estimates from the first mixed effects linear regression model. The dependent variable is the utility scores scored by the expert panel. Table S2. The estimates from the second mixed effects linear regression model. The dependent variable is the standard deviation of the utility scores per study center, pre- and postoperative state, and procedure. Table S3. The quality of life estimates and 95% CI derived from the original study and the validation study, stratified for preoperative and postoperative state, corresponding to figure 1 in the manuscript. Table S4. The difference in urgency of surgical procedures between the original and the updated quality of life estimates. Only the diseases which now include the new scores from the validation study are shown. This table corresponds to figure 4 in the manuscript

Additional file 2 of Minimizing population health loss due to scarcity in OR capacity: validation of quality of life input

Additional file 2: Table S1. Descriptions in the Delphi round to introduce the procedures