The Operative management in Bariatric Acute abdomen (OBA) Survey: long-term complications of bariatric surgery and the emergency surgeon\u27s point of view.

Background: The number of bariatric procedures is increasing worldwide. No consensus or guidelines about the emergency management of long-term complications following bariatric surgery are currently available. The aim of this study is to investigate by a web survey how an emergency surgeon approaches this unique group of patients in an emergency medical scenario and to report their personal experience. Method: An international web survey was sent to 197 emergency surgeons with the aim to collect data about emergency surgeons\u27 experience in the management of patients admitted in the emergency department for acute abdominal pain after bariatric surgery. The survey was conceived as a questionnaire composed by 26 (multiple choice and open) questions and approved by a steering committee. Results: One hundred seventeen international emergency surgeons decided to join the project and answered to the web survey with a response rate of 59.39%. Conclusions: The aim of this WSES web survey was to highlight the current management of patients previously submitted to bariatric surgical procedures by ES.Emergency surgeons must be mindful of postoperative bariatric surgery complications. CT scan with oral intestinal opacification may be useful in making a diagnosis if carefully interpreted by the radiologist and the surgeon.In case of inconclusive clinical and radiological findings, when symptoms fail to improve, surgical exploration for bariatric patients presenting acute abdominal pain, by laparoscopy if expertise is available, is mandatory in the first 12-24 h, to have good outcomes and decrease morbidity rate

Medical Oncology Professionals’ Perceptions of Telehealth Video Visits

IMPORTANCE: Telehealth has emerged as a means of improving access and reducing cost for medical oncology care; however, use by specialists prior to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic still remained low. Medical oncology professionals’ perceptions of telehealth for cancer care are largely unknown, but are critical to telehealth utilization and expansion efforts. OBJECTIVE: To identify medical oncology health professionals’ perceptions of the barriers to and benefits of telehealth video visits. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This qualitative study used interviews conducted from October 30, 2019, to March 5, 2020, of medical oncology health professionals at the Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, an urban academic health system in the US with a cancer center. All medical oncology physicians, physicians assistants, and nurse practitioners at the hospital were eligible to participate. A combination of volunteer and convenience sampling was used, resulting in the participation of 29 medical oncology health professionals, including 20 physicians and 9 advanced practice professionals, in semistructured interviews. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Medical oncology health professionals’ perceptions of barriers to and benefits of telehealth video visits as experienced by patients receiving cancer treatment. RESULTS: Of the 29 participants, 15 (52%) were women and 22 (76%) were White, with a mean (SD) age of 48.5 (12.0) years. Respondents’ perceptions were organized using the 4 domains of the National Quality Forum framework: clinical effectiveness, patient experience, access to care, and financial impact. Respondents disagreed on the clinical effectiveness and potential limitations of the virtual physical examination, as well as on the financial impact on patients. Respondents also largely recognized the convenience and improved access to care enabled by telehealth for patients. However, many reported concern regarding the health professional–patient relationship and their limited ability to comfort patients in a virtual setting. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Medical oncology health professionals shared conflicting opinions regarding the barriers to and benefits of telehealth in regard to clinical effectiveness, patient experience, access to care, and financial impact. Understanding oncologists’ perceptions of telehealth elucidates potential barriers that need to be further investigated or improved for telehealth expansion and continued utilization; further research is ongoing to assess current perceptions of health professionals and patients given the rapid expansion of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic

The Operative management in Bariatric Acute abdomen (OBA) Survey: long-term complications of bariatric surgery and the emergency surgeon's point of view

Background: The number of bariatric procedures is increasing worldwide. No consensus or guidelines about theemergency management of long-term complications following bariatric surgery are currently available. The aim ofthis study is to investigate by a web survey how an emergency surgeon approaches this unique group of patientsin an emergency medical scenario and to report their personal experience. Method: An international web survey was sent to 197 emergency surgeons with the aim to collect data aboutemergency surgeons\u2019experience in the management of patients admitted in the emergency department for acuteabdominal pain after bariatric surgery. The survey was conceived as a questionnaire composed by 26 (multiplechoice and open) questions and approved by a steering committee. Results: One hundred seventeen international emergency surgeons decided to join the project and answered tothe web survey with a response rate of 59.39%. Conclusions: The aim of this WSES web survey was to highlight the current management of patients previouslysubmitted to bariatric surgical procedures by ES.Emergency surgeons must be mindful of postoperative bariatric surgery complications. CT scan with oral intestinalopacification may be useful in making a diagnosis if carefully interpreted by the radiologist and the surgeon.In case of inconclusive clinical and radiological findings, when symptoms fail to improve, surgical exploration forbariatric patients presenting acute abdominal pain, by laparoscopy if expertise is available, is mandatory in the first12\u201324 h, to have good outcomes and decrease morbidity rate

Patient and provider experiences with CBT-I administered in-person or via telemedicine: A randomized non-inferiority trial

Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is an effective treatment in adults. However, access to care is limited. One potential solution is telemedicine. Though synchronous video-based telemedicine CBT-I has been shown to be non-inferior to in-person treatment, there is no study to date that evaluates patient and provider experiences with video-based treatment. Our study team evaluated patient and provider perceptions of CBT-I delivered via telemedicine versus an in-person format. As part of a larger randomized control trial, we interviewed patients and providers in both arms of the study (in-person and via telemedicine). 20 minute interviews were conducted over the phone and were transcribed and coded to identify themes. While patients shared initial concerns about telemedicine CBT-I, including privacy and technological issues, they were satisfied with the approach and had similar experiences as the patients receiving in-person treatment. Providers shared concerns about challenges establishing a strong therapeutic alliance, patient engagement, and accountability in CBT-I, but felt these did not interfere with their overall ability to deliver care. Patients and providers were satisfied with CBT-I treatment delivered via telemedicine when compared to those being treated in-person. Patients in both arms noted that virtual care could increase access and provide convenience

abdominal emergency surgery in patients over 90 years old is it worthwhile an italian multicenter retrospective study

Unlike other surgical fields, such as cardiac surgery, where many trials have been made about safety, feasibility and outcome of surgical procedures in the elderly, there is lack of literature about emergency abdominal surgery in very old patients, especially in people over 90 years of age. The available data reported survival of about 50% one year after the operation. The aim of the study is to determine the survival rate two years after emergency abdominal surgery in a nonagenarian population and to identify any demographic and surgical parameters that could predict a poor outcome in this type of patient. The study was a retrospective multicenter trial. Patient inclusion criteria were: age 90 years old or older, urgent abdominal surgery. The medical charts reviewed and data collected were: gender, age, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score and comorbidities, diagnosis, time elapsed between arrival to the Emergency Room and admission to the Operatory Room, surgical procedures, open versus laparoscopic procedure, type of anesthesia and outcomes with hospital length of stay. Phone call follow-up was performed for patient discharged alive and Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate survival. We identified 72 (20 males and 52 females) nonagenarian patients who underwent abdominal emergency surgery at 6 Italian hospitals (Parma, Bergamo, Bologna, Brescia, Chiari, Adria). Mean age was 92.5 years [range 90-100, standard deviation (SD) 2.6], median ASA score was 3 (range 2-5, mean 3.32) and only 7 patients were without comorbidities. Mean hospital length of stay was 13 days (range 1-60, SD 11.52); 56 patients (77.7%) were discharged alive; 2 years survival rate was 23% [mean follow-up=10 months (range 1-27)]. Among all the parameters analyzed, only ASA score was significantly correlated with survival. Neither the presence of malignancy nor the absence of comorbidities seems to correlate with survival. Nonagenarian patients undergoing emergent abdominal surgical procedures have a high overall in-hospital mortality rate (23%) and a low 2 years survival rate (51.4%). Except for ASA score, there are no other factors predicting poor outcome. Based on the present study emergency abdominal surgery in frail patients over 90 years of age has to be carefully evaluated: only 1 out 5 patients will be alive after 2 years

Common errors in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections: the irrational use of antimicrobial agents

Antimicrobial resistance (AR) is a global, emergent problem because an increasing numbers of serious community acquired and nosocomial infections are caused by resistant bacterial pathogens. It is a direct consequence of the excessive and irrational use of antibiotics. The use of antimicrobial agents – aimed to decrease morbidity and mortality rate related to intra-abdominal infections – is very high, often improper, in the Departments of General and Emergency Surgery and Intensive Cure Units. Source control and empiric antibiotic therapy have to be administrated as early as possible to decrease high mortality rates in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock and, in this, the general surgeon has a crucial role. Proper antimicrobial stewardship in selecting an appropriate antibiotic and optimizing its dose and duration to cure intraabdominal infections may prevent the emergence of AR and decrease costs for antibiotics

Acute appendicitis: Epidemiology, treatment and outcomes- analysis of 16544 consecutive cases

To investigate the epidemiology, treatment and outcomes of acute appendicitis (AA) in a large population study

Telehealth Use in Oncology: Provider Perspectives on Video Visits

Telehealth is increasingly used to improve healthcare access, cost, experience, and effectiveness. These public health issues are especially challenging for patients with cancer. Despite these advantages, telehealth use in oncology is uncommon nationally and provider perceptions regarding the benefits and barriers to its uptake are not well understood. We completed a qualitative study evaluating oncology providers’ perceptions of video visits at an institution with a system-wide telehealth program. We performed semi-structured interviews with oncology providers at Thomas Jefferson University (TJU) to assess current use, perceived barriers to use, and perceptions of telehealth impact on access, cost, experience, and effectiveness. All interviews were transcribed, and coded using a team-developed codebook. Intercoder reliability was assessed by the κ coefficient. Themes and subthemes emerged via directed content analysis. 29 providers (20 oncologists and 9 advanced practice providers) were interviewed, 26 of whom utilized video visits. Most viewed video visits favorably. Key perceived benefits included increased patient convenience and interactions, and the option to have multi-person visits. Patient access to technology, patient and provider comfort with video visits, provider licensing issues, and lack of physical exam capability were key perceived barriers. Providers had starkly differing opinions on the reliability of video visit technology, integration of telehealth in their work routine, administrative assistance, and effects on patient cost. Telehealth is generally viewed favorably by oncology providers within a system with widespread telehealth. There are several perceived barriers, most pertaining to logistics and knowledge limitations, which should be addressed to support increased telehealth uptake

Telehealth Use in Oncology: Patient Perspectives on Video Visits

Telehealth is used in medical oncology to increase rural access to care and clinical trials, improve hospice communication, and has recently experienced a rapid expansion due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite its uses, quantitative research demonstrates conflicting reports of patient satisfaction and no qualitative studies exist examining the patient acceptability of telehealth for cancer care. This study aims to investigate the patient perceptions and factors influencing telehealth acceptability for oncologic care. To accomplish this, a semi-structured interview guide was utilized to interview 20 patients who participated in a video visit with a Thomas Jefferson University Hospital medical oncology provider between October 31, 2019 and March 30, 2020. A codebook was developed using directed content analysis and applied to the interviews by one coder. Codes were organized into themes to create a conceptual model of the factors that influence patient acceptance of video visits. For the preliminary analysis, two thematic categories were identified: (1) factors influencing the initial acceptance of a video visit and (2) the acceptability of video visit use for the delivery of serious or bad news. Participants identified convenience, the COVID-19 pandemic, and the visit type as influencing the acceptability of their initial telehealth encounter. Participants were divided in the acceptability of telehealth use for the delivery of serious or bad news, with factors considered including in-person comfort and the privacy of telehealth. This study identifies factors influencing the acceptability of telehealth for cancer care, which is a critical element of telehealth’s success in increasing access to care