Lista de gêneros de Hymenoptera (Insecta) do Espírito Santo, Brasil

The first checklist of genera of Hymenoptera from Espírito Santo state, Brazil is presented. A total of 973 genera of Hymenoptera is listed, of which 555 (57%) are recorded for the first time from this state. Ichneumonoidea and Chalcidoidea are the two superfamilies with the most genera, 241 and 203 respectively. Braconidae, with 141 genera, are the richest family.The first checklist of genera of Hymenoptera from Espírito Santo state, Brazil is presented. A total of 973 genera of Hymenoptera is listed, of which 555 (57%) are recorded for the first time from this state. Ichneumonoidea and Chalcidoidea are the two superfamilies with the most genera, 241 and 203 respectively. Braconidae, with 141 genera, are the richest family.Fil: Azevedo, Celso O.. Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo; BrasilFil: Molin, Ana Dal. Texas A&M University; Estados UnidosFil: Penteado-Dias, Angelica. Universidade Federal do São Carlos; BrasilFil: Macedo, Antonio C. C.. Secretaria do Meio Ambiente do Estado de São Paulo; BrasilFil: Rodriguez-V, Beatriz. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; MéxicoFil: Dias, Bianca Z. K.. Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo; BrasilFil: Waichert, Cecilia. State University of Utah; Estados UnidosFil: Aquino, Daniel Alejandro. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo. División Entomología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Smith, David. Smithsonian Institution; Estados UnidosFil: Shimbori, Eduardo M.. Universidade Federal do São Carlos; BrasilFil: Noll, Fernando B.. Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho; BrasilFil: Gibson, Gary. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; CanadáFil: Onody, Helena. Universidade Federal do São Carlos; BrasilFil: Carpenter, James M.. American Museum of Natural History; Estados UnidosFil: Lattke, John. Universidad Nacional de Loja; EcuadorFil: Ramos, Kelli dos S.. Universidade de Sao Paulo; BrasilFil: Williams, Kevin. Florida State Collection of Arthropods; Estados UnidosFil: Masner, Lubomir. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; CanadáFil: Kimsey, Lynn. University of California; Estados UnidosFil: Tavares, Marcelo T.. Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo; BrasilFil: Olmi, Massimo. Università degli Studi della Tuscia; ItaliaFil: Buffington, Matthew L.. United States Department of Agriculture; Estados UnidosFil: Ohl, Michael. Staatliches Museum fur Naturkunde Stuttgart; AlemaniaFil: Sharkey, Michael. University of Kentucky; Estados UnidosFil: Johnson, Norman F.. Ohio State University; Estados UnidosFil: Kawada, Ricardo. Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo; BrasilFil: Gonçalves, Rodrigo B.. Universidade Federal do Paraná; BrasilFil: Feitosa, Rodrigo. Universidade Federal do Paraná; BrasilFil: Heydon, Steven. University of California; Estados UnidosFil: Guerra, Tânia M.. Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo; BrasilFil: da Silva, Thiago S. R.. Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo; BrasilFil: Costa, Valmir. Instituto Biológico; Brasi

National Psoriasis Foundation COVID-19 Task Force guidance for management of psoriatic disease during the pandemic: Version 2—Advances in psoriatic disease management, COVID-19 vaccines, and COVID-19 treatments

This article is made available for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.Objective To update guidance regarding the management of psoriatic disease during the COVID-19 pandemic. Study Design The task force (TF) includes 18 physician voting members with expertise in dermatology, rheumatology, epidemiology, infectious diseases, and critical care. The TF was supplemented by nonvoting members, which included fellows and National Psoriasis Foundation staff. Clinical questions relevant to the psoriatic disease community were informed by inquiries received by the National Psoriasis Foundation. A Delphi process was conducted. Results The TF updated evidence for the original 22 statements and added 5 new recommendations. The average of the votes was within the category of agreement for all statements, 13 with high consensus and 14 with moderate consensus. Limitations The evidence behind many guidance statements is variable in quality and/or quantity. Conclusions These statements provide guidance for the treatment of patients with psoriatic disease on topics including how the disease and its treatments affect COVID-19 risk, how medical care can be optimized during the pandemic, what patients should do to lower their risk of getting infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (including novel vaccination), and what they should do if they develop COVID-19. The guidance is a living document that is continuously updated by the TF as data emerge

Review of south temperate New World Coelocybinae (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae)

Heydon, Steven L. (2014): Review of south temperate New World Coelocybinae (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Zootaxa 3754 (4): 420-434, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3754.4.

A review of the North American species of Thinodytes Graham and Mauleus Graham (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae)

Volume: 4Start Page: 1End Page: 2

FIGURES 5–8. Ambogaster and Ariasina spp. 5 in Review of south temperate New World Coelocybinae (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae)

FIGURES 5–8. Ambogaster and Ariasina spp. 5. Ambogaster wibawae Heydon, ♀ body. 6. Ambogaster wibawae Heydon, ♀ propodeum and first gastral tergite. 7. Ariasina adusta n. sp., ♀ PT body. 8. Ariasina gigas n. sp., ♀ PT body

The Sphegigasterini: A Cladistic Analysis and Generic Classification With Reviews of Selected Genera (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae)

175 p.Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1988.The Sphegigasterini sensu strictu (Boucek, 1988) is defined by the possession of a basal flange on the petiole. The history of the genera belonging to the Sphegigasterini sensu strictu is reviewed. The author's intuitive classification of the genera is given.Rhicnocoelia Graham and Callimerismus Graham are redefined and their relationships with other genera of the Miscogasterinae are discussed. Rhicnocoelia and Callimerismus each have two North American species.Bubekia Dalla Torre is redefined and a key is given to distinguish the three Neartic species.The Cyrtogaster-group, which includes Cyrtogaster Walker, Novitzkyanus Boucek, Tricyclomischus Graham, and Callicarolynia n.g., is defined herein and a phylogenetic analysis of relationships among these genera and their relationships to other miscogasterine genera is presented. Polycystus Westwood is synonymized with Cyrtogaster Walker. Keys are given to the seven Nearctic Cyrtogaster species, and a summary of the biology of the genus and each species is presented. A new Hawaiian Cyrtogaster species is described. Polycystus clypeatus Girault is transferred to Thinodytes Graham and Polycystus luteipes Howard is transferred to Halticoptera Spinola. A new genus, Callicarolynia, is described for a new Nearctic species, C. eruga.The Halticoptera-group is defined and includes the genera Halticoptera Spinola, Halticopterina Erdos, Syntomopus Walker, Notoglyptus Masi, Thinodytes Graham, the new genus Protohalticoptera, and the Ethiopian genus Ploskana Boucek. The world species of Protohalticoptera and Thinodytes and Nearctic species of Syntomopus are reviewed. A phylogenetic analysis of the genera of the Halticoptera-group is presented.Notoglyptus is redescribed, its relationships to other genera of the Miscogasterinae are discussed, and a key is given for distinguishing the known world species. The distribution of Notoglyptus virescens Masi is extended to the Nearctic region and four new species of Notoglyptus from the New World are described.A phylogenetic analysis, using PAUP, of the 17 genera in the Sphegigasterina sensu strictu and six outgroup taxa from the Miscogasterini and Ormocerini is presented. Ten equally parsimonious trees of 169 steps with a consistency index of 0.396 were produced by the analysis. Characters defining the generic groups are discussed and a comparison is made of the results of the analysis with the authors intuitive classification. The low consistency index is compared with that found in similar studies.U of I OnlyRestricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETD

Oregon Humanities Center Newsletter ; 2008 : 2 (Spring)

4 p

Insect biodiversity of the Algodones Dunes of California.

Over a nine year period beginning in 2007 we surveyed the insects of the Algodones Dunes, Imperial Count, California, as part of a study undertaken for the U.S. Bureau of Land Management. In a series of 22 collecting trips ranging in duration from 2 to 8 days we thus far have accumulated records of 1,840 species, 21 orders and 244 families from the dunes. Hymenoptera constituted the most diverse order, comprising about 45% of all the species recovered. Insect diversity and abundance peaked during the hottest part of the year between the months of May and September. Life history traits of the insects sampled included herbivores (29.6%), parasitoids (28.7%), predators (18.1%), pollen/nectar feeders (10.9%), detritivores (6.2%) and scavengers (2.4%). Seventy-nine or 4% of the insect species collected in the dunes have been solely recorded from there, and 3% of the species almost certainly derive from adjacent aquatic habitats or agricultural ecosystems, as their life histories could not be completed in Algodones Dunes habitat. The insect fauna of the Algodones Dunes is unexpectedly rich and diverse