29 research outputs found
A Smart Wireless Car Ignition System for Vehicle Security
Copyright: Š 2017 Haider A, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.The paper proposes a novel car ignition system to replace the traditional wired technology and enhance vehicle security. This new system uses wireless transmissions to start the engine and hence eliminates the ignition wire behind the dashboard. It also allows the user to set a password of his/her choice to keep the system protected. A theft alarm that goes ââONââ when an unusual activity is sensed and/or when the wrong password is attempted to unlock the system is integrated in the system. Moreover, important factors such as economic feasibility, adaptability to the new vehicle technologies and customersâ preferences have been taken into consideration in the design of the proposed vehicle security system.Peer reviewedFinal Published versio
Increased lung inflammation with oxygen supplementation in tracheotomized spontaneously breathing rabbits: an experimental prospective randomized study
PReVENT - protective ventilation in patients without ARDS at start of ventilation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
The Association of Intraoperative driving pressure with postoperative pulmonary complications in open versus closed abdominal surgery patients - a posthoc propensity score-weighted cohort analysis of the LAS VEGAS study
Background It is uncertain whether the association of the intraoperative driving pressure (Delta P) with postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) depends on the surgical approach during abdominal surgery. Our primary objective was to determine and compare the association of time-weighted average Delta P (Delta P-TW) with PPCs. We also tested the association of Delta P-TW with intraoperative adverse events. Methods Posthoc retrospective propensity score-weighted cohort analysis of patients undergoing open or closed abdominal surgery in the 'Local ASsessment of Ventilatory management during General Anaesthesia for Surgery' (LAS VEGAS) study, that included patients in 146 hospitals across 29 countries. The primary endpoint was a composite of PPCs. The secondary endpoint was a composite of intraoperative adverse events. Results The analysis included 1128 and 906 patients undergoing open or closed abdominal surgery, respectively. The PPC rate was 5%. Delta P was lower in open abdominal surgery patients, but Delta P-TW was not different between groups. The association of Delta P-TW with PPCs was significant in both groups and had a higher risk ratio in closed compared to open abdominal surgery patients (1.11 [95%CI 1.10 to 1.20], P < 0.001 versus 1.05 [95%CI 1.05 to 1.05], P < 0.001; risk difference 0.05 [95%CI 0.04 to 0.06], P < 0.001). The association of Delta P-TW with intraoperative adverse events was also significant in both groups but had higher odds ratio in closed compared to open abdominal surgery patients (1.13 [95%CI 1.12- to 1.14], P < 0.001 versus 1.07 [95%CI 1.05 to 1.10], P < 0.001; risk difference 0.05 [95%CI 0.030.07], P < 0.001).Conclusions Delta P is associated with PPC and intraoperative adverse events in abdominal surgery, both in open and closed abdominal surgery.Trial registrationLAS VEGAS was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (trial identifier NCT01601223)
Geo-economic variations in epidemiology, ventilation management and outcome of patients receiving intraoperative ventilation during general anesthesia- posthoc analysis of an observational study in 29 countries
Background
The aim of this analysis is to determine geoâeconomic variations in epidemiology, ventilator settings and outcome in patients receiving general anesthesia for surgery.
Methods
Posthoc analysis of a worldwide study in 29 countries. Lower and upper middleâincome countries (LMIC and UMIC), and highâincome countries (HIC) were compared. The coprimary endpoint was the risk for and incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC); secondary endpoints were intraoperative ventilator settings, intraoperative complications, hospital stay and mortality.
Results
Of 9864 patients, 4% originated from LMIC, 11% from UMIC and 85% from HIC. The ARISCAT score was 17.5 [15.0â26.0] in LMIC, 16.0 [3.0â27.0] in UMIC and 15.0 [3.0â26.0] in HIC (Pâ=â.003). The incidence of PPC was 9.0% in LMIC, 3.2% in UMIC and 2.5% in HIC (Pâ<â.001). Median tidal volume in ml kgââ1 predicted bodyweight (PBW) was 8.6 [7.7â9.7] in LMIC, 8.4 [7.6â9.5] in UMIC and 8.1 [7.2â9.1] in HIC (Pâ<â.001). Median positive endâexpiratory pressure in cmH2O was 3.3 [2.0â5.0]) in LMIC, 4.0 [3.0â5.0] in UMIC and 5.0 [3.0â5.0] in HIC (Pâ<â.001). Median driving pressure in cmH2O was 14.0 [11.5â18.0] in LMIC, 13.5 [11.0â16.0] in UMIC and 12.0 [10.0â15.0] in HIC (Pâ<â.001). Median fraction of inspired oxygen in % was 75 [50â80] in LMIC, 50 [50â63] in UMIC and 53 [45â70] in HIC (Pâ<â.001). Intraoperative complications occurred in 25.9% in LMIC, in 18.7% in UMIC and in 37.1% in HIC (Pâ<â.001). Hospital mortality was 0.0% in LMIC, 1.3% in UMIC and 0.6% in HIC (Pâ=â.009).
Conclusion
The risk for and incidence of PPC is higher in LMIC than in UMIC and HIC. Ventilation management could be improved in LMIC and UMIC.
Trial registration
Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT01601223
The LAS VEGAS risk score for prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications An observational study
BACKGROUND Currently used pre-operative prediction scores for postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) use patient data and expected surgery characteristics exclusively. However, intra-operative events are also associated with the development of PPCs.OBJECTIVE We aimed to develop a new prediction score for PPCs that uses both pre-operative and intra-operative data.DESIGN This is a secondary analysis of the LAS VEGAS study, a large international, multicentre, prospective study.SETTINGS A total of 146 hospitals across 29 countries.PATIENTS Adult patients requiring intra-operative ventilation during general anaesthesia for surgery.INTERVENTIONS The cohort was randomly divided into a development subsample to construct a predictive model, and a subsample for validation.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Prediction performance of developed models for PPCs.RESULTS Of the 6063 patients analysed, 10.9% developed at least one PPC. Regression modelling identified 13 independent risk factors for PPCs: six patient characteristics [higher age, higher American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical score, pre-operative anaemia, pre-operative lower SpO(2) and a history of active cancer or obstructive sleep apnoea], two procedure-related features (urgent or emergency surgery and surgery lasting >= 1 h), and five intraoperative events [use of an airway other than a supraglottic device, the use of intravenous anaesthetic agents along with volatile agents (balanced anaesthesia), intra-operative desaturation, higher levels of positive end-expiratory pressures > 3 cmH(2)O and use of vasopressors]. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the LAS VEGAS risk score for prediction of PPCs was 0.78 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.76 to 0.80] for the development subsample and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.76) for the validation subsample.CONCLUSION The LAS VEGAS risk score including 13 peri-operative characteristics has a moderate discriminative ability for prediction of PPCs. External validation is needed before use in clinical practice
Association between night-time surgery and occurrence of intraoperative adverse events and postoperative pulmonary complications
Background: The aim of this post hoc analysis of a large cohort study was to evaluate the association between night-time surgery and the occurrence of intraoperative adverse events (AEs) and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). Methods: LAS VEGAS (Local Assessment of Ventilatory Management During General Anesthesia for Surgery) was a prospective international 1-week study that enrolled adult patients undergoing surgical procedures with general anaesthesia and mechanical ventilation in 146 hospitals across 29 countries. Surgeries were defined as occurring during âdaytimeâ when induction of anaesthesia was between 8:00 AM and 7:59 PM, and as ânight-timeâ when induction was between 8:00 PM and 7:59 AM. Results: Of 9861 included patients, 555 (5.6%) underwent surgery during night-time. The proportion of patients who developed intraoperative AEs was higher during night-time surgery in unmatched (43.6% vs 34.1%; P<0.001) and propensity-matched analyses (43.7% vs 36.8%; P=0.029). PPCs also occurred more often in patients who underwent night-time surgery (14% vs 10%; P=0.004) in an unmatched cohort analysis, although not in a propensity-matched analysis (13.8% vs 11.8%; P=0.39). In a multivariable regression model, including patient characteristics and types of surgery and anaesthesia, night-time surgery was independently associated with a higher incidence of intraoperative AEs (odds ratio: 1.44; 95% confidence interval: 1.09â1.90; P=0.01), but not with a higher incidence of PPCs (odds ratio: 1.32; 95% confidence interval: 0.89â1.90; P=0.15). Conclusions: Intraoperative adverse events and postoperative pulmonary complications occurred more often in patients undergoing night-time surgery. Imbalances in patientsâ clinical characteristics, types of surgery, and intraoperative management at night-time partially explained the higher incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications, but not the higher incidence of adverse events. Clinical trial registration: NCT01601223
The Association of Intraoperative driving pressure with postoperative pulmonary complications in open versus closed abdominal surgery patients â a posthoc propensity scoreâweighted cohort analysis of the LAS VEGAS study
Background: It is uncertain whether the association of the intraoperative driving pressure (ÎP) with postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) depends on the surgical approach during abdominal surgery. Our primary objective was to determine and compare the association of time-weighted average ÎP (ÎPTW) with PPCs. We also tested the association of ÎPTW with intraoperative adverse events.
Methods: Posthoc retrospective propensity score-weighted cohort analysis of patients undergoing open or closed abdominal surgery in the 'Local ASsessment of Ventilatory management during General Anaesthesia for Surgery' (LAS VEGAS) study, that included patients in 146 hospitals across 29 countries. The primary endpoint was a composite of PPCs. The secondary endpoint was a composite of intraoperative adverse events.
Results: The analysis included 1128 and 906 patients undergoing open or closed abdominal surgery, respectively. The PPC rate was 5%. ÎP was lower in open abdominal surgery patients, but ÎPTW was not different between groups. The association of ÎPTW with PPCs was significant in both groups and had a higher risk ratio in closed compared to open abdominal surgery patients (1.11 [95%CI 1.10 to 1.20], P < 0.001 versus 1.05 [95%CI 1.05 to 1.05], P < 0.001; risk difference 0.05 [95%CI 0.04 to 0.06], P < 0.001). The association of ÎPTW with intraoperative adverse events was also significant in both groups but had higher odds ratio in closed compared to open abdominal surgery patients (1.13 [95%CI 1.12- to 1.14], P < 0.001 versus 1.07 [95%CI 1.05 to 1.10], P < 0.001; risk difference 0.05 [95%CI 0.030.07], P < 0.001).
Conclusions: ÎP is associated with PPC and intraoperative adverse events in abdominal surgery, both in open and closed abdominal surgery.
Trial registration: LAS VEGAS was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (trial identifier NCT01601223 )
The Association of Intraoperative driving pressure with postoperative pulmonary complications in open versus closed abdominal surgery patients - a posthoc propensity score-weighted cohort analysis of the Las Vegas study
Background
It is uncertain whether the association of the intraoperative driving pressure (ÎP) with postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) depends on the surgical approach during abdominal surgery. Our primary objective was to determine and compare the association of timeâweighted average ÎP (ÎPTW) with PPCs. We also tested the association of ÎPTW with intraoperative adverse events.
Methods
Posthoc retrospective propensity scoreâweighted cohort analysis of patients undergoing open or closed abdominal surgery in the âLocal ASsessment of Ventilatory management during General Anaesthesia for Surgeryâ (LAS VEGAS) study, that included patients in 146 hospitals across 29 countries. The primary endpoint was a composite of PPCs. The secondary endpoint was a composite of intraoperative adverse events.
Results
The analysis included 1128 and 906 patients undergoing open or closed abdominal surgery, respectively. The PPC rate was 5%. ÎP was lower in open abdominal surgery patients, but ÎPTW was not different between groups. The association of ÎPTW with PPCs was significant in both groups and had a higher risk ratio in closed compared to open abdominal surgery patients (1.11 [95%CI 1.10 to 1.20], P <â 0.001 versus 1.05 [95%CI 1.05 to 1.05], P <â 0.001; risk difference 0.05 [95%CI 0.04 to 0.06], P <â 0.001). The association of ÎPTW with intraoperative adverse events was also significant in both groups but had higher odds ratio in closed compared to open abdominal surgery patients (1.13 [95%CI 1.12â to 1.14], P <â 0.001 versus 1.07 [95%CI 1.05 to 1.10], P <â 0.001; risk difference 0.05 [95%CI 0.030.07], P <â 0.001).
Conclusions
ÎP is associated with PPC and intraoperative adverse events in abdominal surgery, both in open and closed abdominal surgery.
Trial registration
LAS VEGAS was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (trial identifier NCT01601223)