Comment on "Constraining the smoothness parameter and dark energy using observational H(z) data"

In this Comment we discuss a recent analysis by Yu et al. [RAA 11, 125 (2011)] about constraints on the smoothness $\alpha$ parameter and dark energy models using observational $H(z)$ data. It is argued here that their procedure is conceptually inconsistent with the basic assumptions underlying the adopted Dyer-Roeder approach. In order to properly quantify the influence of the $H(z)$ data on the smoothness $\alpha$ parameter, a $\chi^2$-test involving a sample of SNe Ia and $H(z)$ data in the context of a flat $\Lambda$CDM model is reanalyzed. This result is confronted with an earlier approach discussed by Santos et al. (2008) without $H(z)$ data. In the ($\Omega_m, \alpha$) plane, it is found that such parameters are now restricted on the intervals $0.66 \leq \alpha \leq 1.0$ and $0.27 \leq \Omega_m \leq 0.37$ within 95.4% confidence level (2$\sigma$), and, therefore, fully compatible with the homogeneous case. The basic conclusion is that a joint analysis involving $H(z)$ data can indirectly improve our knowledge about the influence of the inhomogeneities. However, this happens only because the $H(z)$ data provide tighter constraints on the matter density parameter $\Omega_m$.Comment: 3 pages, 1 figure, submitted to Research in Astronomy and Astrophysic

Constraining dark energy with Hubble parameter measurements: an analysis including future redshift-drift observations

Dark energy affects the Hubble expansion rate (namely, the expansion history) $H(z)$ by an integral over $w(z)$. However, the usual observables are the luminosity distances or the angular diameter distances, which measure the distance-redshift relation. Actually, dark energy affects the distances (and the growth factor) by a further integration over functions of $H(z)$. Thus, the direct measurements of the Hubble parameter $H(z)$ at different redshifts are of great importance for constraining the properties of dark energy. In this paper, we show how the typical dark energy models, for example, the $\Lambda$CDM, $w$CDM, CPL, and holographic dark energy (HDE) models, can be constrained by the current direct measurements of $H(z)$ (31 data in total, covering the redshift range of $z\in [0.07,2.34]$). In fact, the future redshift-drift observations (also referred to as the Sandage-Loeb test) can also directly measure $H(z)$ at higher redshifts, covering the range of $z\in [2,5]$. We thus discuss what role the redshift-drift observations can play in constraining dark energy with the Hubble parameter measurements. We show that the constraints on dark energy can be improved greatly with the $H(z)$ data from only a 10-year observation of redshift drift.Comment: 20 pages, 5 figures; final version published in EPJ

Interacting Energy Components and Observational H(z)H(z) Data

In this note, we extend our previous work [Phys. Lett. B 644, 7 (2007), astro-ph/0609597], and compare eleven interacting dark energy models with different couplings to the observational $H(z)$ data. However, none of these models is better than the simplest $\Lambda$CDM model. This implies that either more exotic couplings are needed in the cosmological models with interaction between dark energy and dust matter, or {\em there is no interaction at all}. We consider that this result is disadvantageous to the interacting dark energy models studied extensively in the literature.Comment: 15 pages, 5 figures, 3 tables, Latex2e; v2: references added; v3: discussions added, Phys. Lett. B in press; v4: published versio