Targeting HSP90 dimerization via the C-terminus is effective in imatinib resistant CML and lacks heat shock response

Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) stabilizes many client proteins including BCR-ABL1 oncoprotein. BCR-ABL1 is the hallmark of CML in which treatment-free remission (TFR) is limited with clinical and economic consequences. Thus, there is an urgent need for novel therapeutics, which synergize with current treatment approaches. Several inhibitors targeting the N-terminal domain (NTD) of HSP90 are under investigation; however, side effects such as induction of heat shock response (HSR) and toxicity have so far precluded their FDA approval. We have developed a novel inhibitor (referred to as aminoxyrone) of HSP90 function by targeting HSP90 dimerization via the C-terminal domain (CTD). This was achieved by structure-based molecular design, chemical synthesis, and functional pre-clinical in vitro and in vivo validation using CML cell lines and patient-derived CML cells. Aminoxyrone (AX) is a promising potential candidate, which induces apoptosis in leukemic stem cells (LSCs) fraction (CD34+CD38-) as well as the leukemic bulk (CD34+CD38+) of primary CML and in TKI-resistant cells. Furthermore, BCR-ABL1 oncoprotein and related pro-oncogenic cellular responses are downregulated and targeting HSP90 C-terminus by AX does not induce HSR in vitro and in vivo. We also probed the potential of AX in other therapy refractory leukemia such as BCR-ABL1+ BCP-ALL, FLT3-ITD+ AML and Ph-like BCP-ALL. Therefore, AX is the first peptidometic C-terminal HSP90 inhibitor with the potential to increase TFR in TKI sensitive and refractory CML patients and also offers a novel therapeutic option for patients with other therapy-refractory leukemia, due to its low toxicity profile and lack of HSR

The burden of mild asthma: Clinical burden and healthcare resource utilisation in the NOVELTY study

Background: Patients with mild asthma represent a substantial proportion of the population with asthma, yet there are limited data on their true burden of disease. We aimed to describe the clinical and healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU) burden of physician-assessed mild asthma.Methods: Patients with mild asthma were included from the NOVEL observational longiTudinal studY (NOVELTY; NCT02760329), a global, 3-year, real-world prospective study of patients with asthma and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease from community practice (specialised and primary care). Diagnosis and severity were based on physician discretion. Clinical burden included physician-reported exacerbations and patient-reported measures. HCRU included inpatient and outpatient visits.Results: Overall, 2004 patients with mild asthma were included; 22.8% experienced ≥1 exacerbation in the previous 12 months, of whom 72.3% experienced ≥1 severe exacerbation. Of 625 exacerbations reported, 48.0% lasted >1 week, 27.7% were preceded by symptomatic worsening lasting >3 days, and 50.1% required oral corticosteroid treatment. Health status was moderately impacted (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire score: 23.5 [standard deviation ± 17.9]). At baseline, 29.7% of patients had asthma symptoms that were not well controlled or very poorly controlled (Asthma Control Test score <20), increasing to 55.6% for those with ≥2 exacerbations in the previous year. In terms of HCRU, at least one unscheduled ambulatory visit for exacerbations was required by 9.5% of patients, including 9.2% requiring ≥1 emergency department visit and 1.1% requiring ≥1 hospital admission.Conclusions: In this global sample representing community practice, a significant proportion of patients with physician-assessed mild asthma had considerable clinical burden and HCRU

Treatable traits in the NOVELTY study

CorrigendumVolume 27, Issue 12, Respirology, pages: 1095-1095. First Published online: November 6, 2022 10.1111/resp.14406International audienceAsthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are two prevalent and complex diseases that require personalized management. Although a strategy based on treatable traits (TTs) has been proposed, the prevalence and relationship of TTs to the diagnostic label and disease severity established by the attending physician in a real-world setting are unknown. We assessed how the presence/absence of specific TTs relate to the diagnosis and severity of 'asthma', 'COPD' or 'asthma + COPD'