50 research outputs found
Magnetogenesis in non-local models during inflation
The generation of magnetic fields during inflation in an electromagnetic
model with a non-local form factor in Maxwell`s action is studied. The
equations of motion for the electromagnetic field are derived and solved. It is
found that the conformal symmetry breaking due to the non-local form factor
does not lead to the generation of magnetic fields during inflation in the
absence of interaction with the inflaton field. If such a coupling takes place,
then the presence of the form factor inhibits the generation of primordial
magnetic fields compared to the case where the non-local form factor is absent.Comment: 7 page
Induced vacuum energy density of quantum charged scalar matter in the background of an impenetrable magnetic tube with the Neumann boundary condition
We consider vacuum polarization of charged scalar matter field outside the
tube with magnetic flux inside. The tube is impenetrable for quantum matter and
the perfectly rigid (Neumann) boundary condition is imposed at its surface. We
write expressions for induced vacuum energy density for the case of a space of
arbitrary dimension and for an arbitrary value of the magnetic flux. We do the
numerical computation for the case of half-integer flux value in the London
flux units and (2+1)-dimensional space-time. We show that the induced vacuum
energy of the charged scalar matter field is induced if the Compton wavelength
of the matter field exceeds the transverse size of the tube considerably. We
show that vacuum energy is periodic in the value of the magnetic flux of the
tube, providing a quantum-field-theoretical manifestation of the Aharonov-Bohm
effect. The dependencies of the induced vacuum energy upon the distance from
the center of the tube under the different values of its thickness were
obtained. Obtained results are compared to the results obtained earlier in the
case of the perfectly reflecting (Dirichlet) boundary condition. It is shown
that the value of the induced vacuum energy density in the case of the Neumann
boundary condition is greater than in the case of the Dirichlet boundary
condition.Comment: 11 pages, 2 figure
Semiclassical gravitational effects near a singular magnetic flux
We consider the backreaction of the vacuum polarization effect for a massive
charged scalar field in the presence of a singular magnetic massless string on
the background metric. Using semiclassical approach, we find the first-order
(in units) metric modifications and the corresponding gravitational
potential and deficit angle. It is shown that, in certain region of values of
coupling constant and magnetic flux, the gravitational potential and deficit
angle can be positive as well as negative over all distances from the string
and can even change its sign. Unlike the case of massless scalar field, the
gravitational corrections were found to have short-range behavior.Comment: 14 pages, 4 figures, journal versio
ĐŃĐ”ĐœĐșĐ° ŃĐ”Ń ĐœĐŸĐ»ĐŸĐłĐžĐč Đ·ĐŽŃĐ°ĐČĐŸĐŸŃ ŃĐ°ĐœĐ”ĐœĐžŃ Đž ŃĐžŃŃĐ”ĐŒĐ° лДĐșĐ°ŃŃŃĐČĐ”ĐœĐœĐŸĐłĐŸ ĐČĐŸĐ·ĐŒĐ”ŃĐ”ĐœĐžŃ ĐČ ĐŃалОО
The Italian healthcare system is historically structured by the difference in economic development between the northern and southern parts of this country. The Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) is the national health technology assessment (HTA) authority in charge of the reimbursement and formulary-listing. Some regions have established their own HTA institutions to define the reimbursement policy for a specific region or organization. Because of that, the entire HTA system in Italy can be characterized by low inter-regional coherence and insufficient coordination. As a result, the access to medical services is not unified at the regional level; in addition, it is difficult to collect and analyze the data required for providing value-based healthcare. Although the cost-effectiveness of specific health technologies is taken into consideration for decision-making, in practice, the main focus rests on the budget impact and cost control. Along with that, the AIFA holds the leading positions in Europe in using such innovative approaches as the patient access schemes, early HTA and horizon scanning.ĐĄŃŃŃĐșŃŃŃĐ° ĐžŃĐ°Đ»ŃŃĐœŃĐșĐŸĐč ŃĐžŃŃĐ”ĐŒŃ Đ·ĐŽŃĐ°ĐČĐŸĐŸŃ
ŃĐ°ĐœĐ”ĐœĐžŃ ĐžŃŃĐŸŃĐžŃĐ”ŃĐșĐž ĐŸĐ±ŃŃĐ»ĐŸĐČĐ»Đ”ĐœĐ° ŃĐ°Đ·ĐœĐžŃĐ”Đč ĐČ ŃĐșĐŸĐœĐŸĐŒĐžŃĐ”ŃĐșĐŸĐŒ ŃĐ°Đ·ĐČĐžŃОО ĐŒĐ”Đ¶ĐŽŃ ŃĐ”ĐČĐ”ŃĐœŃĐŒĐž Đž ŃĐ¶ĐœŃĐŒĐž ŃĐ”ĐłĐžĐŸĐœĐ°ĐŒĐž ŃŃŃĐ°ĐœŃ. ĐДЎОŃĐžĐœŃĐșĐŸĐ” Đ°ĐłĐ”ĐœŃŃŃĐČĐŸ ĐŃалОО (Đ°ĐœĐłĐ». - TheItalianMedicinesAgency, ĐžŃĐ°Đ». - AgenziaItalianadelFarmaco, AIFA) ŃĐČĐ»ŃĐ”ŃŃŃ ĐœĐ°ŃĐžĐŸĐœĐ°Đ»ŃĐœŃĐŒ Đ°ĐłĐ”ĐœŃŃŃĐČĐŸĐŒ ĐżĐŸ ĐŸŃĐ”ĐœĐșĐ” ŃĐ”Ń
ĐœĐŸĐ»ĐŸĐłĐžĐč Đ·ĐŽŃĐ°ĐČĐŸĐŸŃ
ŃĐ°ĐœĐ”ĐœĐžŃ (ĐĐąĐ), ĐŸŃĐČĐ”ŃŃŃĐČĐ”ĐœĐœŃĐŒ Đ·Đ° ŃĐ”ŃĐ”ĐœĐžŃ ĐŸ ĐłĐŸŃŃĐŽĐ°ŃŃŃĐČĐ”ĐœĐœĐŸĐŒ ĐČĐŸĐ·ĐŒĐ”ŃĐ”ĐœĐžĐž ŃŃĐŸĐžĐŒĐŸŃŃĐž лДĐșĐ°ŃŃŃĐČĐ”ĐœĐœŃŃ
ĐżŃДпаŃĐ°ŃĐŸĐČ Đž ŃĐŸŃĐŒĐžŃĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžĐ” ĐœĐ°ŃĐžĐŸĐœĐ°Đ»ŃĐœĐŸĐłĐŸ пДŃĐ”ŃĐœŃ ĐČĐŸĐ·ĐŒĐ”ŃĐ°Đ”ĐŒŃŃ
ĐżŃДпаŃĐ°ŃĐŸĐČ. Đ ĐœĐ”ĐșĐŸŃĐŸŃŃŃ
ŃĐ”ĐłĐžĐŸĐœĐ°Ń
ĐŃалОО ŃŃŃĐ”ŃŃĐČŃŃŃ ŃĐŸĐ±ŃŃĐČĐ”ĐœĐœŃĐ” ĐйРŃŃŃĐ”Đ¶ĐŽĐ”ĐœĐžŃ, ĐČ ŃŃĐœĐșŃОО ĐșĐŸŃĐŸŃŃŃ
ĐČŃ
ĐŸĐŽĐžŃ ĐżŃĐŸĐČĐ”ĐŽĐ”ĐœĐžĐ” ĐĐąĐ ĐŽĐ»Ń ĐșĐŸĐœĐșŃĐ”ŃĐœĐŸĐłĐŸ ŃĐ”ĐłĐžĐŸĐœĐ° ОлО ŃŃŃĐ”Đ¶ĐŽĐ”ĐœĐžŃ. Đ ŃĐ”Đ»ĐŸĐŒ ŃĐžŃŃĐ”ĐŒĐ° ĐйРĐŃалОО Ń
Đ°ŃĐ°ĐșŃĐ”ŃОзŃĐ”ŃŃŃ ĐœĐ”ĐŽĐŸŃŃĐ°ŃĐŸŃĐœĐŸĐč ŃĐŸĐłĐ»Đ°ŃĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐœĐŸŃŃŃŃ ĐœĐ° ĐŒĐ”Đ¶ŃĐ”ĐłĐžĐŸĐœĐ°Đ»ŃĐœĐŸĐŒ ŃŃĐŸĐČĐœĐ” Оз-Đ·Đ° ĐœĐ”ĐŽĐŸŃŃĐ°ŃĐŸŃĐœĐŸĐč ŃĐœĐžŃĐžĐșĐ°ŃОО ĐżŃĐŸŃĐ”ŃŃĐŸĐČ Đž ĐșĐŸĐŸŃĐŽĐžĐœĐ°ŃОО ĐœĐ° ĐœĐ°ŃĐžĐŸĐœĐ°Đ»ŃĐœĐŸĐŒ ŃŃĐŸĐČĐœĐ”. ĐŃĐŸ ĐżŃĐžĐČĐŸĐŽĐžŃ Đș ĐœĐ”ŃĐ°ĐČĐ”ĐœŃŃĐČŃ ĐŽĐŸŃŃŃпа Đș ĐŒĐ”ĐŽĐžŃĐžĐœŃĐșĐžĐŒ ŃŃĐ»ŃĐłĐ°ĐŒ Đž ŃŃŃĐŽĐœĐŸŃŃŃĐŒ ĐČ ŃĐŸĐ·ĐŽĐ°ĐœĐžĐž ŃŃŃĐ”ĐșŃĐžĐČĐœĐŸĐč ŃĐžŃŃĐ”ĐŒŃ ŃĐ±ĐŸŃĐ° Đž Đ°ĐœĐ°Đ»ĐžĐ·Đ° ĐŽĐ°ĐœĐœŃŃ
ĐŽĐ»Ń ĐżŃĐ°ĐșŃĐžŃĐ”ŃĐșĐŸĐłĐŸ ĐżŃĐžĐŒĐ”ĐœŃŃ ŃĐ”ĐœĐœĐŸŃŃĐœĐŸĐŸŃĐžĐ”ĐœŃĐžŃĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐœĐŸĐłĐŸ ĐżĐŸĐŽŃ
ĐŸĐŽĐ°. Đ„ĐŸŃŃ ĐŸŃĐłĐ°ĐœĐ°ĐŒĐž ĐйРпŃĐž ĐżŃĐžĐœŃŃОО ŃĐ”ŃĐ”ĐœĐžĐč ŃŃĐžŃŃĐČĐ°Đ”ŃŃŃ ŃĐșĐŸĐœĐŸĐŒĐžŃĐ”ŃĐșĐ°Ń ŃŃŃĐ”ĐșŃĐžĐČĐœĐŸŃŃŃ ŃĐ”Ń
ĐœĐŸĐ»ĐŸĐłĐžĐč Đ·ĐŽŃĐ°ĐČĐŸĐŸŃ
ŃĐ°ĐœĐ”ĐœĐžŃ, ĐœĐ° ĐżŃĐ°ĐșŃĐžĐșĐ” ĐŸŃĐœĐŸĐČĐœĐŸĐ” ĐČĐœĐžĐŒĐ°ĐœĐžĐ” ŃЎДлŃĐ”ŃŃŃ ĐČлОŃĐœĐžŃ ĐœĐ° бŃĐŽĐ¶Đ”Ń Đž ĐșĐŸĐœŃŃĐŸĐ»Ń Đ·Đ°ŃŃĐ°Ń. йаĐșжД ĐŒĐŸĐ¶ĐœĐŸ ĐŸŃĐŒĐ”ŃĐžŃŃ, ŃŃĐŸ AIFA Đ·Đ°ĐœĐžĐŒĐ°Đ”Ń Đ»ĐžĐŽĐžŃŃŃŃОД ĐżĐŸĐ·ĐžŃОО ĐČ ĐĐČŃĐŸĐżĐ” ĐČ ĐżŃĐžĐŒĐ”ĐœĐ”ĐœĐžĐž ŃĐ°ĐșĐžŃ
ĐžĐœĐœĐŸĐČĐ°ŃĐžĐŸĐœĐœŃŃ
ĐżĐŸĐŽŃ
ĐŸĐŽĐŸĐČ, ĐșĐ°Đș ŃĐŸĐłĐ»Đ°ŃĐ”ĐœĐžŃ ĐŸ ŃĐ°Đ·ĐŽĐ”Đ»Đ”ĐœĐžŃ ŃĐžŃĐșĐŸĐČ Đž Đ·Đ°ŃŃĐ°Ń, ŃĐ°ĐœĐœŃŃ ĐйРО ŃĐșĐ°ĐœĐžŃĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžĐ” ĐłĐŸŃĐžĐ·ĐŸĐœŃĐ°
РДалŃĐœĐ°Ń ĐșĐ»ĐžĐœĐžŃĐ”ŃĐșĐ°Ń ĐżŃĐ°ĐșŃĐžĐșĐ°: ĐżŃĐžĐœŃĐžĐżŃ ĐžŃĐżĐŸĐ»ŃĐ·ĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžŃ ĐČ ĐżŃĐžĐœŃŃОО ŃĐżŃĐ°ĐČĐ»Đ”ĐœŃĐ”ŃĐșĐžŃ ŃĐ”ŃĐ”ĐœĐžĐč Đž ĐŸŃĐ”ĐœĐșĐ” ŃĐ”Ń ĐœĐŸĐ»ĐŸĐłĐžĐč Đ·ĐŽŃĐ°ĐČĐŸĐŸŃ ŃĐ°ĐœĐ”ĐœĐžŃ
The use of real-world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE) in process of improving public health, their assessment, and use in decision making is a promising area. Discussions are actively underway about the possibility of using RWD and RWE in routine medical practice of doctors and health care organizers, the weaknesses of these matters and ways to overcome them. Taking into account the considerable amount of information, complexity, and inconsistency of issues under consideration, the article presents the basic principles of using RWD and RWE in decision making, classification of health technologies values, classification of RWE sources, position of RWD studies in the hierarchy of clinical study designs, as well as the ways of their use in complex drug assessment.ĐŃĐżĐŸĐ»ŃĐ·ĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžĐ” ĐŽĐ°ĐœĐœŃŃ
Đž ĐŽĐŸĐșĐ°Đ·Đ°ŃДлŃŃŃĐČ ŃДалŃĐœĐŸĐč ĐșĐ»ĐžĐœĐžŃĐ”ŃĐșĐŸĐč ĐżŃĐ°ĐșŃĐžĐșĐž (Đ ĐĐ) ĐżŃĐž ĐżĐŸĐŽĐłĐŸŃĐŸĐČĐșĐ” ĐżŃĐ”ĐŽĐ»ĐŸĐ¶Đ”ĐœĐžĐč ĐżĐŸ ŃĐŸĐČĐ”ŃŃĐ”ĐœŃŃĐČĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžŃ ŃĐžŃŃĐ”ĐŒŃ Đ·ĐŽŃĐ°ĐČĐŸĐŸŃ
ŃĐ°ĐœĐ”ĐœĐžŃ, ĐžŃ
ĐŸŃĐ”ĐœĐșĐ” Đž ĐżĐŸŃлДЎŃŃŃĐ”ĐŒ ĐżŃĐžĐœŃŃОО ĐœĐ° ĐžŃ
ĐŸŃĐœĐŸĐČĐ” ŃĐżŃĐ°ĐČĐ»Đ”ĐœŃĐ”ŃĐșĐžŃ
ŃĐ”ŃĐ”ĐœĐžĐč ŃĐČĐ»ŃĐ”ŃŃŃ ĐżĐ”ŃŃпДĐșŃĐžĐČĐœŃĐŒ Đž Đ°ĐșŃŃĐ°Đ»ŃĐœŃĐŒ ĐœĐ°ĐżŃĐ°ĐČĐ»Đ”ĐœĐžĐ”ĐŒ. ĐĐșŃĐžĐČĐœĐŸ ĐČДЎŃŃŃŃ ĐŽĐžŃĐșŃŃŃОО ĐŸ ĐČĐŸĐ·ĐŒĐŸĐ¶ĐœĐŸŃŃĐž ĐżŃĐžĐŒĐ”ĐœĐ”ĐœĐžŃ ĐČ ĐżŃĐ°ĐșŃĐžŃĐ”ŃĐșĐŸĐč ĐŽĐ”ŃŃДлŃĐœĐŸŃŃĐž ĐČŃĐ°ŃĐ”Đč Đž ĐŸŃĐłĐ°ĐœĐžĐ·Đ°ŃĐŸŃĐŸĐČ Đ·ĐŽŃĐ°ĐČĐŸĐŸŃ
ŃĐ°ĐœĐ”ĐœĐžŃ ĐŽĐ°ĐœĐœŃŃ
Đž ĐŽĐŸĐșĐ°Đ·Đ°ŃДлŃŃŃĐČ Đ ĐĐ, ĐŸ ŃлабŃŃ
ŃŃĐŸŃĐŸĐœĐ°Ń
ŃŃĐžŃ
ĐŽĐ°ĐœĐœŃŃ
Đž ĐżŃŃŃŃ
ĐžŃ
ĐżŃĐ”ĐŸĐŽĐŸĐ»Đ”ĐœĐžŃ. ĐŁŃĐžŃŃĐČĐ°Ń Đ·ĐœĐ°ŃĐžŃДлŃĐœŃĐč ĐŸĐ±ŃĐ”ĐŒ ĐžĐœŃĐŸŃĐŒĐ°ŃОО, ĐșĐŸĐŒĐżĐ»Đ”ĐșŃĐœĐŸŃŃŃ Đž ĐżŃĐŸŃĐžĐČĐŸŃĐ”ŃĐžĐČĐŸŃŃŃ ŃĐ°ŃŃĐŒĐ°ŃŃĐžĐČĐ°Đ”ĐŒĐŸĐłĐŸ ĐČĐŸĐżŃĐŸŃĐ°, ĐČ ŃŃĐ°ŃŃĐ” ĐżŃĐžĐČĐ”ĐŽĐ”ĐœŃ ĐŸŃĐœĐŸĐČĐœŃĐ” ĐżŃĐžĐœŃĐžĐżŃ ĐžŃĐżĐŸĐ»ŃĐ·ĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžŃ ĐŽĐ°ĐœĐœŃŃ
Đž ĐŽĐŸĐșĐ°Đ·Đ°ŃДлŃŃŃĐČ Đ ĐĐ ĐżŃĐž ĐżŃĐžĐœŃŃОО ŃĐżŃĐ°ĐČĐ»Đ”ĐœŃĐ”ŃĐșĐžŃ
ŃĐ”ŃĐ”ĐœĐžĐč ĐČ Đ·ĐŽŃĐ°ĐČĐŸĐŸŃ
ŃĐ°ĐœĐ”ĐœĐžĐž, ĐșлаŃŃĐžŃĐžĐșĐ°ŃĐžŃ ĐČĐžĐŽĐŸĐČ ŃĐ”ĐœĐœĐŸŃŃĐž ĐŒĐ”ĐŽĐžŃĐžĐœŃĐșĐžŃ
ŃĐ”Ń
ĐœĐŸĐ»ĐŸĐłĐžĐč, ĐșлаŃŃĐžŃĐžĐșĐ°ŃĐžŃ ĐžŃŃĐŸŃĐœĐžĐșĐŸĐČ ĐŽĐŸĐșĐ°Đ·Đ°ŃДлŃŃŃĐČ, ĐŸŃĐœĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐœŃŃ
ĐœĐ° ĐŽĐ°ĐœĐœŃŃ
Đ ĐĐ, ĐżĐŸĐ»ĐŸĐ¶Đ”ĐœĐžĐ” ĐžŃŃĐ»Đ”ĐŽĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžĐč Đ ĐĐ ĐČ ĐžĐ”ŃĐ°ŃŃ
ОО ЎОзаĐčĐœĐŸĐČ ĐșĐ»ĐžĐœĐžŃĐ”ŃĐșĐžŃ
ĐžŃŃĐ»Đ”ĐŽĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžĐč, Đ° ŃĐ°ĐșжД ĐČĐŸĐ·ĐŒĐŸĐ¶ĐœĐŸŃŃĐž ĐžŃ
ĐżŃĐžĐŒĐ”ĐœĐ”ĐœĐžŃ ĐČ ĐșĐŸĐŒĐżĐ»Đ”ĐșŃĐœĐŸĐč ĐŸŃĐ”ĐœĐșĐ” лДĐșĐ°ŃŃŃĐČĐ”ĐœĐœŃŃ
ĐżŃДпаŃĐ°ŃĐŸĐČ
ĐĐ»ĐžĐœĐžĐșĐŸ-ŃĐșĐŸĐœĐŸĐŒĐžŃĐ”ŃĐșĐžĐč Đ°ĐœĐ°Đ»ĐžĐ· Đž ĐŸŃĐ”ĐœĐșĐ° ĐČлОŃĐœĐžŃ ĐœĐ° бŃĐŽĐ¶Đ”Ń ĐżŃĐžĐŒĐ”ĐœĐ”ĐœĐžŃ ĐžĐŒĐżĐ»Đ°ĐœŃĐžŃŃĐ”ĐŒŃŃ ĐșĐ°ŃĐŽĐžĐŸĐČĐ”ŃŃĐ”ŃĐŸĐČ-ĐŽĐ”ŃОбŃОллŃŃĐŸŃĐŸĐČ ĐČ Đ ĐŸŃŃĐžĐčŃĐșĐŸĐč ЀДЎДŃĐ°ŃОО
Objective: to evaluate cost-effectiveness and budget impact of using single and dual chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) adjunctive to the standard drug therapy (DT) compared to the standard DT alone for the primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD).Material and methods. Original partitioned survival analysis model was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of using ICD within the modelling horizon of 8 years. The following model outcomes were used: life years and quality-adjusted life years (QALY). Primary prevention model was focused on patients after myocardial infarction with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) â€30%, whilst secondary prevention model considered cardiac arrest survivors and/or patients diagnosed with ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation with LVEF â€35%. The model summarizes treatment effect and costs for ICD and DT specific to the healthcare system of the Russian Federation (RF). The main scenario accounted for ICD implantation cost in accordance with general reimbursement price asserted in the high technology medical care list part 2 (HĐąMC 2). Additionally, alternative scenario of ICD reimbursement level was developed to account for general tariff split onto singleand dual-chamber ICD implantation reimbursement tariffs which can be financed through high technology medical care list part 1 (HĐąMC 1). Budget impact analysis compared the costs of using ICD within the current volume of the annual increase in ICD implantations and a threefold increased volume of ICD implantations.Results. By the end of the modelling period, additional 34% of patients survived in the ICD group compared to the DT group. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per 1 QALY constituted 2.8 and 2.2 million rubles for primary and secondary prevention, respectively. ICER values are slightly above or lower than the willingness-to-pay threshold of 2.5 million rubles per 1 QALY in the RF in the segment of primary and secondary SCD prevention, respectively. Additional HĐąMC 1 scenario incorporating lower ICD implantation prices resulted in an average ICER drop by 13% compared to HTMC 2. Overall patient population requiring SCD prevention comprised of 7,161 and 3,341 patients in primary and secondary prevention, respectively. Budget impact analysis showed that threefold rise in the ICD implantations rate will require additional 648 million rubles for primary prevention cohort to provide additional 573 patients with ICD, and 230 million rubles for secondary prevention cohort with additional 267 patients covered with ICD. ICD reimbursement price drop within the HĐąMC 1 scenario will save 133 million rubles and allow to provide additional 143 patients with ICDs for a given budget.Conclusion. ICD is a cost-effective option of secondary prevention of SCD. Additional analysis of ICD reimbursement price drop drives ICER downwards to a considerable extent which in turn increases the accessibility of ICDs to patients. In scenario of ICD implantation financing within HĐąMC 1, ICD is established to be a cost-effective option for primary and secondary prevention of SCD in the RF.ЊДлŃ: ĐŸŃĐ”ĐœĐșĐ° ĐșĐ»ĐžĐœĐžĐșĐŸ-ŃĐșĐŸĐœĐŸĐŒĐžŃĐ”ŃĐșĐŸĐč ŃŃŃĐ”ĐșŃĐžĐČĐœĐŸŃŃĐž Đž Đ°ĐœĐ°Đ»ĐžĐ· ĐČлОŃĐœĐžŃ ĐœĐ° бŃĐŽĐ¶Đ”Ń (ĐĐĐ) ĐżŃĐžĐŒĐ”ĐœĐ”ĐœĐžŃ ĐŸĐŽĐœĐŸ- Đž ĐŽĐČŃŃ
ĐșĐ°ĐŒĐ”ŃĐœŃŃ
ĐžĐŒĐżĐ»Đ°ĐœŃĐžŃŃĐ”ĐŒŃŃ
ĐșĐ°ŃĐŽĐžĐŸĐČĐ”ŃŃĐ”ŃĐŸĐČ-ĐŽĐ”ŃОбŃОллŃŃĐŸŃĐŸĐČ (ĐĐĐ) ĐČ ŃĐŸŃĐ”ŃĐ°ĐœĐžĐž ŃĐŸ ŃŃĐ°ĐœĐŽĐ°ŃŃĐœĐŸĐč лДĐșĐ°ŃŃŃĐČĐ”ĐœĐœĐŸĐč ŃĐ”ŃапОДĐč (ĐĐą) ĐżĐŸ ŃŃĐ°ĐČĐœĐ”ĐœĐžŃ ŃĐŸ ŃŃĐ°ĐœĐŽĐ°ŃŃĐœĐŸĐč ĐĐą ĐŽĐ»Ń ĐżĐ”ŃĐČĐžŃĐœĐŸĐč Đž ĐČŃĐŸŃĐžŃĐœĐŸĐč ĐżŃĐŸŃОлаĐșŃĐžĐșĐž ĐČĐœĐ”Đ·Đ°ĐżĐœĐŸĐč ŃĐ”ŃĐŽĐ”ŃĐœĐŸĐč ŃĐŒĐ”ŃŃĐž (ĐĐĄĐĄ).ĐĐ°ŃĐ”ŃОал Đž ĐŒĐ”ŃĐŸĐŽŃ. ĐĐŸŃŃŃĐŸĐ”ĐœĐ° ĐŸŃĐžĐłĐžĐœĐ°Đ»ŃĐœĐ°Ń ĐŒĐŸĐŽĐ”Đ»Ń ŃĐ°ŃĐżŃĐ”ĐŽĐ”Đ»Đ”ĐœĐœĐŸĐč ĐČŃжОĐČĐ°Đ”ĐŒĐŸŃŃĐž паŃĐžĐ”ĐœŃĐŸĐČ Ń ŃĐžŃĐșĐŸĐŒ ĐĐĄĐĄ ĐŽĐ»Ń ĐżŃĐŸĐČĐ”ĐŽĐ”ĐœĐžŃ Đ°ĐœĐ°Đ»ĐžĐ·Đ° «заŃŃĐ°ŃŃâŃŃŃĐ”ĐșŃĐžĐČĐœĐŸŃŃŃ» Ń ĐłĐŸŃĐžĐ·ĐŸĐœŃĐŸĐŒ ĐŒĐŸĐŽĐ”Đ»ĐžŃĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžŃ 8 лДŃ. Đ ĐșĐ°ŃĐ”ŃŃĐČĐ” ĐžŃŃ
ĐŸĐŽĐŸĐČ ĐŒĐŸĐŽĐ”Đ»Đž бŃлО ĐžŃĐżĐŸĐ»ŃĐ·ĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœŃ ĐłĐŸĐŽŃ Đ¶ĐžĐ·ĐœĐž Đž ĐłĐŸĐŽŃ Đ¶ĐžĐ·ĐœĐž Ń ĐżĐŸĐżŃĐ°ĐČĐșĐŸĐč ĐœĐ° ĐșĐ°ŃĐ”ŃŃĐČĐŸ (Đ°ĐœĐłĐ». quality-adjusted life year, QALY). ĐĐŸĐŽĐ”Đ»Ń ĐżĐ”ŃĐČĐžŃĐœĐŸĐč ĐżŃĐŸŃОлаĐșŃĐžĐșĐž ĐĐĄĐĄ ĐČĐșĐ»ŃŃала паŃĐžĐ”ĐœŃĐŸĐČ ĐżĐŸŃлД ĐžĐœŃĐ°ŃĐșŃĐ° ĐŒĐžĐŸĐșĐ°ŃĐŽĐ° Ń ŃŃĐ°ĐșŃОДĐč ĐČŃбŃĐŸŃĐ° лДĐČĐŸĐłĐŸ жДлŃĐŽĐŸŃĐșĐ° (Đ€ĐĐĐ) 30% Đž ĐŒĐ”ĐœĐ”Đ”, ĐŒĐŸĐŽĐ”Đ»Ń ĐČŃĐŸŃĐžŃĐœĐŸĐč ĐżŃĐŸŃОлаĐșŃĐžĐșĐž ĐĐĄĐĄ â Đ±ĐŸĐ»ŃĐœŃŃ
ĐżĐŸŃлД ĐŸŃŃĐ°ĐœĐŸĐČĐșĐž ŃĐ”ŃĐŽŃĐ° Đž/ОлО ĐžĐŒĐ”ŃŃĐžŃ
жДлŃĐŽĐŸŃĐșĐŸĐČŃŃ ŃĐ°Ń
ĐžĐșĐ°ŃĐŽĐžŃ ĐžĐ»Đž ŃОбŃОллŃŃĐžŃ Đ¶Đ”Đ»ŃĐŽĐŸŃĐșĐŸĐČ Ń Đ€ĐĐĐ 35% Đž ĐŒĐ”ĐœĐ”Đ”. ĐĐŸĐŽĐ”Đ»Ń ĐżĐŸĐ·ĐČĐŸĐ»ŃĐ”Ń ĐżŃĐŸĐłĐœĐŸĐ·ĐžŃĐŸĐČĐ°ŃŃ Đ·Đ°ŃŃĐ°ŃŃ ĐœĐ° лДŃĐ”ĐœĐžĐ” Đž ĐžŃŃ
ĐŸĐŽŃ ĐżĐ°ŃĐžĐ”ĐœŃĐŸĐČ, ĐžŃĐżĐŸĐ»ŃĐ·ŃŃŃĐžŃ
ĐĐРОлО ĐĐą ĐČ ŃŃĐ»ĐŸĐČĐžŃŃ
ŃĐžŃŃĐ”ĐŒŃ Đ·ĐŽŃĐ°ĐČĐŸĐŸŃ
ŃĐ°ĐœĐ”ĐœĐžŃ Đ ĐŸŃŃĐžĐčŃĐșĐŸĐč ЀДЎДŃĐ°ŃОО (РЀ). ĐŃĐœĐŸĐČĐœĐŸĐč ŃŃĐ”ĐœĐ°ŃĐžĐč ŃŃĐžŃŃĐČĐ°Đ”Ń ŃŃĐŸĐžĐŒĐŸŃŃŃ ĐžĐŒĐżĐ»Đ°ĐœŃĐ°ŃОО ĐżŃĐžĐ±ĐŸŃĐ° ĐżĐŸ Đ”ĐŽĐžĐœĐŸĐŒŃ ŃĐ°ŃĐžŃŃ ĐŽĐ»Ń ĐČŃĐ”Ń
ŃĐžĐżĐŸĐČ ĐĐĐ ĐČ ŃĐ°ĐŒĐșĐ°Ń
ĐČŃĐŸŃĐŸĐłĐŸ пДŃĐ”ŃĐœŃ ĐČŃŃĐŸĐșĐŸŃĐ”Ń
ĐœĐŸĐ»ĐŸĐłĐžŃĐœĐŸĐč ĐŒĐ”ĐŽĐžŃĐžĐœŃĐșĐŸĐč ĐżĐŸĐŒĐŸŃĐž (ĐĐĐ 2). ĐĐŸĐżĐŸĐ»ĐœĐžŃДлŃĐœĐŸ ĐŒĐŸĐŽĐ”Đ»ĐžŃĐŸĐČалО ŃŃĐ”ĐœĐ°ŃĐžĐč ŃĐŸ ŃĐœĐžĐ¶Đ”ĐœĐžĐ”ĐŒ ŃĐ°ŃĐžŃĐ° ĐœĐ° ĐžĐŒĐżĐ»Đ°ĐœŃĐ°ŃĐžŃ ĐĐĐ Đ·Đ° ŃŃĐ”Ń ŃĐ°Đ·ĐłŃŃппОŃĐŸĐČĐșĐž ŃŃŃĐ”ŃŃĐČŃŃŃĐ”ĐłĐŸ Đ”ĐŽĐžĐœĐŸĐłĐŸ ŃĐ°ŃĐžŃĐ° ĐœĐ° ĐŽĐČĐ°: ĐŽĐ»Ń ĐŸĐŽĐœĐŸĐž ĐŽĐČŃŃ
ĐșĐ°ĐŒĐ”ŃĐœŃŃ
ĐĐĐ ĐČ ĐŸŃЎДлŃĐœĐŸŃŃĐž ĐČ ŃĐ°ĐŒĐșĐ°Ń
пДŃĐČĐŸĐłĐŸ пДŃĐ”ŃĐœŃ ĐĐĐ (ĐĐĐ 1). ĐĄ ĐżĐŸĐŒĐŸŃŃŃ ĐĐĐ ŃŃĐ°ĐČĐœĐžĐČалО Đ·Đ°ŃŃĐ°ŃŃ ĐœĐ° ĐžŃĐżĐŸĐ»ŃĐ·ĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžĐ” ĐĐĐ ĐČ ŃĐ°ĐŒĐșĐ°Ń
ŃĐ”ĐșŃŃĐ”ĐłĐŸ ĐŸĐ±ŃĐ”ĐŒĐ° Đ”Đ¶Đ”ĐłĐŸĐŽĐœĐŸĐłĐŸ ĐżŃĐžŃĐŸŃŃĐ° ĐžĐŒĐżĐ»Đ°ĐœŃĐ°ŃĐžĐč ĐĐĐ Đž ĐżĐŸĐČŃŃĐ”ĐœĐœĐŸĐłĐŸ (ŃŃĐ”Ń
ĐșŃĐ°ŃĐœĐŸĐłĐŸ) ĐŸĐ±ŃĐ”ĐŒĐ° ĐżŃĐžŃĐŸŃŃĐ°.РДзŃĐ»ŃŃĐ°ŃŃ. ĐĐ° ĐșĐŸĐœĐ”Ń ĐłĐŸŃĐžĐ·ĐŸĐœŃĐ° ĐŒĐŸĐŽĐ”Đ»ĐžŃĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžŃ ĐŽĐŸĐżĐŸĐ»ĐœĐžŃДлŃĐœŃĐč ĐżŃĐžŃĐŸŃŃ ĐČŃжОĐČĐ°Đ”ĐŒĐŸŃŃĐž ĐČ ĐłŃŃппД ĐĐĐ ĐżĐŸ ŃŃĐ°ĐČĐœĐ”ĐœĐžŃ Ń ĐłŃŃĐżĐżĐŸĐč ĐĐą ŃĐŸŃŃĐ°ĐČОл 34%. ĐĐœĐșŃĐ”ĐŒĐ”ĐœŃĐ°Đ»ŃĐœŃĐč ĐżĐŸĐșĐ°Đ·Đ°ŃĐ”Đ»Ń Â«Đ·Đ°ŃŃĐ°ŃŃâŃŃŃĐ”ĐșŃĐžĐČĐœĐŸŃŃŃ» (Đ°ĐœĐłĐ». incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, ICER) Đ·Đ° 1 QALY ĐČ ĐŸŃĐœĐŸĐČĐœĐŸĐŒ ŃŃĐ”ĐœĐ°ŃОО ŃĐŸŃŃĐ°ĐČОл 2,8 Đž 2,2 ĐŒĐ»Đœ ŃŃб. ĐČ ŃĐ”ĐłĐŒĐ”ĐœŃĐ°Ń
пДŃĐČĐžŃĐœĐŸĐč Đž ĐČŃĐŸŃĐžŃĐœĐŸĐč ĐżŃĐŸŃОлаĐșŃĐžĐșĐž ĐĐĄĐĄ ŃĐŸĐŸŃĐČĐ”ŃŃŃĐČĐ”ĐœĐœĐŸ. ĐĐŸĐ»ŃŃĐ”ĐœĐœĐŸĐ” Đ·ĐœĐ°ŃĐ”ĐœĐžĐ” ĐżĐŸ пДŃĐČĐžŃĐœĐŸĐč ĐżŃĐŸŃОлаĐșŃĐžĐșĐ” ĐœĐ”Đ·ĐœĐ°ŃĐžŃДлŃĐœĐŸ ĐżŃĐ”ĐČŃŃĐ°Đ”Ń, Đ° ĐżĐŸ ĐČŃĐŸŃĐžŃĐœĐŸĐč ĐżŃĐŸŃОлаĐșŃĐžĐșĐ” ĐœĐ°Ń
ĐŸĐŽĐžŃŃŃ ĐœĐžĐ¶Đ” ŃĐ”ŃĐ”ŃĐ”ĐœŃĐœĐŸĐłĐŸ Đ·ĐœĐ°ŃĐ”ĐœĐžŃ ICER (ĐżĐŸŃĐŸĐłĐ° ĐłĐŸŃĐŸĐČĐœĐŸŃŃĐž плаŃĐžŃŃ), ŃĐŸŃŃĐ°ĐČĐ»ŃŃŃĐ”ĐłĐŸ ĐČ Đ Đ€ 2,5 ĐŒĐ»Đœ ŃŃб. Đ·Đ° 1 QALY. ĐĐŸĐŽĐ”Đ»ĐžŃŃĐ”ĐŒĐŸĐ” ŃĐœĐžĐ¶Đ”ĐœĐžĐ” ŃŃĐŸĐžĐŒĐŸŃŃĐž ŃĐ°ŃĐžŃĐ° ĐœĐ° ŃŃŃĐ°ĐœĐŸĐČĐșŃ ĐĐĐ ĐČ ŃĐ°ĐŒĐșĐ°Ń
пДŃĐ”ŃĐœŃ ĐĐĐ 1 ŃĐ»ŃŃŃĐ°Đ”Ń Đ·Đ°ŃŃĐ°ŃĐœŃŃ ŃŃŃĐ”ĐșŃĐžĐČĐœĐŸŃŃŃ (ŃĐœĐžĐ¶Đ°Đ”Ń ICER) ĐČ ŃŃĐ”ĐŽĐœĐ”ĐŒ ĐœĐ° 13% ĐŸŃ ŃŃĐ”ĐœĐ°ŃĐžŃ ĐĐĐ 2. ĐĄŃĐŒĐŒĐ°ŃĐœĐ°Ń ĐżĐŸĐżŃĐ»ŃŃĐžŃ ĐżĐ°ŃĐžĐ”ĐœŃĐŸĐČ, ĐœŃжЎаŃŃĐžŃ
ŃŃ ĐČ ĐżĐ”ŃĐČĐžŃĐœĐŸĐč Đž ĐČŃĐŸŃĐžŃĐœĐŸĐč ĐżŃĐŸŃОлаĐșŃĐžĐșĐ” ĐĐĄĐĄ, ŃĐŸŃŃĐ°ĐČĐ»ŃĐ”Ń ĐŸĐșĐŸĐ»ĐŸ 7161 Đž 3341 ŃĐ”Đ»ĐŸĐČĐ”ĐșĐ° ŃĐŸĐŸŃĐČĐ”ŃŃŃĐČĐ”ĐœĐœĐŸ. ĐĐŸĐŽĐ”Đ»ĐžŃĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžĐ” ŃŃĐ”Ń
ĐșŃĐ°ŃĐœĐŸĐłĐŸ ĐżŃĐžŃĐŸŃŃĐ° ŃĐžŃла ĐĐĐ ĐżĐŸ ĐŸŃĐœĐŸŃĐ”ĐœĐžŃ Đș ŃĐ”ĐșŃŃĐžĐŒ ĐŸĐ±ŃĐ”ĐŒĐ°ĐŒ ĐŸĐ±Đ”ŃпДŃĐ”ĐœĐœĐŸŃŃĐž ĐČ ĐĐĐ ĐżĐŸĐ·ĐČĐŸĐ»ŃĐ”Ń ĐŽĐŸĐżĐŸĐ»ĐœĐžŃДлŃĐœĐŸ ĐŸĐ±Đ”ŃпДŃĐžŃŃ 573 паŃĐžĐ”ĐœŃĐ° ĐČ ŃĐ°ĐŒĐșĐ°Ń
пДŃĐČĐžŃĐœĐŸĐč ĐżŃĐŸŃОлаĐșŃĐžĐșĐž ĐĐĄĐĄ, Đ·Đ°ŃŃĐ°ŃĐžĐČ ĐŽĐŸĐżĐŸĐ»ĐœĐžŃДлŃĐœĐŸ 638 ĐŒĐ»Đœ ŃŃб., Đž 267 паŃĐžĐ”ĐœŃĐŸĐČ ĐČ ŃĐ°ĐŒĐșĐ°Ń
ĐČŃĐŸŃĐžŃĐœĐŸĐč ĐżŃĐŸŃОлаĐșŃĐžĐșĐž ĐĐĄĐĄ ĐżŃĐž ŃĐ°Đ·ĐŒĐ”ŃĐ” ĐŽĐŸĐżĐŸĐ»ĐœĐžŃДлŃĐœŃŃ
Đ·Đ°ŃŃĐ°Ń 230 ĐŒĐ»Đœ ŃŃб. ĐĄĐœĐžĐ¶Đ”ĐœĐžĐ” ŃŃĐŸĐžĐŒĐŸŃŃĐž ĐžĐŒĐżĐ»Đ°ĐœŃĐ°ŃОО ĐĐĐ ĐČ ŃŃĐ”ĐœĐ°ŃОО ĐĐĐ 1 ŃĐżĐŸŃĐŸĐ±ŃŃĐČŃĐ”Ń ĐżĐŸĐČŃŃĐ”ĐœĐžŃ ĐŽĐŸŃŃŃĐżĐœĐŸŃŃĐž ĐŽĐ°ĐœĐœĐŸĐč ŃĐ”Ń
ĐœĐŸĐ»ĐŸĐłĐžĐž Đ·Đ° ŃŃĐ”Ń ĐČŃŃĐČĐŸĐ±ĐŸĐ¶ĐŽĐ”ĐœĐžŃ ĐŽĐŸĐżĐŸĐ»ĐœĐžŃДлŃĐœŃŃ
ŃŃДЎŃŃĐČ ĐČ ŃĐ°Đ·ĐŒĐ”ŃĐ” 133 ĐŒĐ»Đœ ŃŃб., ĐżĐŸĐ·ĐČĐŸĐ»ŃŃŃĐžŃ
ĐČŃĐżĐŸĐ»ĐœĐžŃŃ ĐŽĐŸĐżĐŸĐ»ĐœĐžŃДлŃĐœŃĐ” ĐŸĐżĐ”ŃĐ°ŃОО ĐżĐŸ ŃŃŃĐ°ĐœĐŸĐČĐșĐ” ĐżŃĐžĐ±ĐŸŃĐŸĐČ ĐĐĐ 143 паŃĐžĐ”ĐœŃĐ°ĐŒ ĐżŃĐž пДŃĐČĐžŃĐœĐŸĐč Đž ĐČŃĐŸŃĐžŃĐœĐŸĐč ĐżŃĐŸŃОлаĐșŃĐžĐșĐ” ĐĐĄĐĄ ŃŃĐŒĐŒĐ°ŃĐœĐŸ.ĐĐ°ĐșĐ»ŃŃĐ”ĐœĐžĐ”. ĐĐĐ ŃĐČĐ»ŃĐ”ŃŃŃ Đ·Đ°ŃŃĐ°ŃĐœĐŸ-ŃŃŃĐ”ĐșŃĐžĐČĐœĐŸĐč ŃĐ”Ń
ĐœĐŸĐ»ĐŸĐłĐžĐ”Đč ĐČ ŃĐ”ĐłĐŒĐ”ĐœŃĐ” ĐČŃĐŸŃĐžŃĐœĐŸĐč ĐżŃĐŸŃОлаĐșŃĐžĐșĐž ĐĐĄĐĄ. ĐĄĐœĐžĐ¶Đ”ĐœĐžĐ” ŃŃĐŸĐžĐŒĐŸŃŃĐž ĐĐĐ ĐČ ŃДзŃĐ»ŃŃĐ°ŃĐ” ŃĐ°Đ·ĐłŃŃппОŃĐŸĐČĐșĐž ŃĐ°ŃĐžŃĐ° ĐĐĐ 2 Đ·ĐœĐ°ŃĐžŃДлŃĐœĐŸ ĐżĐŸĐČŃŃĐ°Đ”Ń ĐșĐ»ĐžĐœĐžĐșĐŸ-ŃĐșĐŸĐœĐŸĐŒĐžŃĐ”ŃĐșŃŃ ŃŃŃĐ”ĐșŃĐžĐČĐœĐŸŃŃŃ ĐŽĐ°ĐœĐœĐŸĐč ŃĐ”Ń
ĐœĐŸĐ»ĐŸĐłĐžĐž Đž ŃĐżĐŸŃĐŸĐ±ŃŃĐČŃĐ”Ń Đ”Đ” ĐŽĐŸŃŃŃĐżĐœĐŸŃŃĐž ĐŽĐ»Ń ĐżĐ°ŃĐžĐ”ĐœŃĐŸĐČ. йаĐșĐžĐŒ ĐŸĐ±ŃĐ°Đ·ĐŸĐŒ, ĐżŃĐž ŃĐžĐœĐ°ĐœŃĐžŃĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžĐž ĐžĐŒĐżĐ»Đ°ĐœŃĐ°ŃĐžĐč ĐżĐŸ ŃĐ°Đ·ĐłŃŃппОŃĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐœŃĐŒ ŃĐ°ŃĐžŃĐ°ĐŒ ĐČ ŃĐ°ĐŒĐșĐ°Ń
пДŃĐ”ŃĐœŃ ĐĐĐ 1 ĐĐĐ ŃĐČĐ»ŃĐ”ŃŃŃ Đ·Đ°ŃŃĐ°ŃĐœĐŸ-ŃŃŃĐ”ĐșŃĐžĐČĐœĐŸĐč ĐŸĐżŃОДĐč пДŃĐČĐžŃĐœĐŸĐč Đž ĐČŃĐŸŃĐžŃĐœĐŸĐč ĐżŃĐŸŃОлаĐșŃĐžĐșĐž ĐĐĄĐĄ ĐČ Đ Đ€
Experimental bounds on sterile neutrino mixing angles
We derive bounds on the mixing between the left-chiral ("active") and the
right-chiral ("sterile") neutrinos, provided from the combination of neutrino
oscillation data and direct experimental searches for sterile neutrinos. We
demonstrate that the mixing of sterile neutrinos with any flavour can be
significantly suppressed, provided that the angle theta_13 is non-zero. This
means that the lower bounds on sterile neutrino lifetime, coming from the
negative results of direct experimental searches can be relaxed (by as much as
the order of magnitude at some masses). We also demonstrate that the results of
the negative searches of sterile neutrinos with PS191 and CHARM experiments are
not applicable directly to the see-saw models. The reinterpretation of these
results provides up to the order of magnitude stronger bounds on sterile
neutrino lifetime than previously discussed in the literature. We discuss the
implications of our results for the Neutrino Minimal Standard Model (the
NuMSM).Comment: 18 pages + Appendices. Journal version with updated figure
The SHiP experiment at the proposed CERN SPS Beam Dump Facility
The Search for Hidden Particles (SHiP) Collaboration has proposed a general-purpose experimental facility operating in beam-dump mode at the CERN SPS accelerator to search for light, feebly interacting particles. In the baseline configuration, the SHiP experiment incorporates two complementary detectors. The upstream detector is designed for recoil signatures of light dark matter (LDM) scattering and for neutrino physics, in particular with tau neutrinos. It consists of a spectrometer magnet housing a layered detector system with high-density LDM/neutrino target plates, emulsion-film technology and electronic high-precision tracking. The total detector target mass amounts to about eight tonnes. The downstream detector system aims at measuring visible decays of feebly interacting particles to both fully reconstructed final states and to partially reconstructed final states with neutrinos, in a nearly background-free environment. The detector consists of a 50 m long decay volume under vacuum followed by a spectrometer and particle identification system with a rectangular acceptance of 5 m in width and 10 m in height. Using the high-intensity beam of 400 GeV protons, the experiment aims at profiting from the 4 x 10(19) protons per year that are currently unexploited at the SPS, over a period of 5-10 years. This allows probing dark photons, dark scalars and pseudo-scalars, and heavy neutral leptons with GeV-scale masses in the direct searches at sensitivities that largely exceed those of existing and projected experiments. The sensitivity to light dark matter through scattering reaches well below the dark matter relic density limits in the range from a few MeV/c(2) up to 100 MeV-scale masses, and it will be possible to study tau neutrino interactions with unprecedented statistics. This paper describes the SHiP experiment baseline setup and the detector systems, together with performance results from prototypes in test beams, as it was prepared for the 2020 Update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics. The expected detector performance from simulation is summarised at the end
Fast simulation of muons produced at the SHiP experiment using generative adversarial networks
This paper presents a fast approach to simulating muons produced in interactions of the SPS proton beams with the target of the SHiP experiment. The SHiP experiment will be able to search for new long-lived particles produced in a 400 GeV/c SPS proton beam dump and which travel distances between fifty metres and tens of kilometers. The SHiP detector needs to operate under ultra-low background conditions and requires large simulated samples of muon induced background processes. Through the use of Generative Adversarial Networks it is possible to emulate the simulation of the interaction of 400 GeV/c proton beams with the SHiP target, an otherwise computationally intensive process. For the simulation requirements of the SHiP experiment, generative networks are capable of approximating the full simulation of the dense fixed target, offering a speed increase by a factor of Script O(106). To evaluate the performance of such an approach, comparisons of the distributions of reconstructed muon momenta in SHiP's spectrometer between samples using the full simulation and samples produced through generative models are presented. The methods discussed in this paper can be generalised and applied to modelling any non-discrete multi-dimensional distribution
The experimental facility for the Search for Hidden Particles at the CERN SPS
The International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA) logo The International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA) logo The following article is OPEN ACCESS The experimental facility for the Search for Hidden Particles at the CERN SPS C. Ahdida44, R. Albanese14,a, A. Alexandrov14, A. Anokhina39, S. Aoki18, G. Arduini44, E. Atkin38, N. Azorskiy29, J.J. Back54, A. Bagulya32Show full author list Published 25 March 2019 ⹠© 2019 CERN Journal of Instrumentation, Volume 14, March 2019 Download Article PDF References Download PDF 543 Total downloads 7 7 total citations on Dimensions. Article has an altmetric score of 1 Turn on MathJax Share this article Share this content via email Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Mendeley Article information Abstract The Search for Hidden Particles (SHiP) Collaboration has shown that the CERN SPS accelerator with its 400 GeV/c proton beam offers a unique opportunity to explore the Hidden Sector [1â3]. The proposed experiment is an intensity frontier experiment which is capable of searching for hidden particles through both visible decays and through scattering signatures from recoil of electrons or nuclei. The high-intensity experimental facility developed by the SHiP Collaboration is based on a number of key features and developments which provide the possibility of probing a large part of the parameter space for a wide range of models with light long-lived super-weakly interacting particles with masses up to Script O(10) GeV/c2 in an environment of extremely clean background conditions. This paper describes the proposal for the experimental facility together with the most important feasibility studies. The paper focuses on the challenging new ideas behind the beam extraction and beam delivery, the proton beam dump, and the suppression of beam-induced background