DET1 and COP1 Modulate the Coordination of Growth and Immunity in Response to Key Seasonal Signals in Arabidopsis

This is the final version. Available from Elsevier via the DOI in this record.Plant growth and development and outcomes of plant-microbe interactions are defined by coordinated responses to seasonal signals. The mechanisms that control the coordinated regulation of growth and immunity are not well understood. Here, we show that a common signaling module integrates environmental signals, such as photoperiod and temperature, to regulate the growth-defense balance. Key light-signaling components De-Etiolated 1 (DET1) and Constitutive Photomorphogenic 1 (COP1) negatively regulate immunity and are essential for immune modulation by photoperiod and temperature. Our results show that this is regulated by the transcription factor Phytochrome Interacting Factor 4 (PIF4), suggesting that the DET1/COP1-PIF4 module acts as a central hub for the control of growth and immunity in response to seasonal signals. These findings provide a regulatory framework for environmental signal integration. In plants, adaptive traits such as growth and immunity are strongly influenced by the environment. How multiple seasonal signals are integrated is not well understood. Gangappa and Kumar show that a common signaling module comprising DET1, COP1, and PIF4 coordinates growth and immunity in response to key seasonal signals

DET1 and HY5 Control PIF4-Mediated Thermosensory Elongation Growth through Distinct Mechanisms

This is the final version. Available from Elsevier via the DOI in this record.Plant growth and development are defined by environmental cues. The transcription factor PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR 4 (PIF4) is the central signaling hub that integrates environmental cues, including light and temperature, to regulate growth and development. The thermosensory mechanisms controlling the PIF4-mediated temperature response, and its integration with other environmental responses, remain poorly understood. DE-ETIOLATED 1 (DET1) and CONSTITUTIVE PHOTOMORPHOGENESIS 1 (COP1), key regulators of light signaling, have been proposed to control thermosensory growth by transcriptional regulation of PIF4, through ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL 5 (HY5). Here, we show that DET1/COP1 and HY5 regulate thermosensory elongation through distinct mechanisms. DET1 and COP1 are essential for promoting PIF4 expression and stabilizing PIF4 protein. Furthermore, HY5 inhibits elongation growth through competitive chromatin binding to PIF4 targets, not through transcriptional regulation of PIF4. Our findings reveal a mechanistic framework in which DET1/COP1 and HY5 regulatory modules act independently to regulate growth through the environmental signal integrator PIF4.Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Counci

SWR1 Chromatin-Remodeling Complex Subunits and H2A.Z Have Non-overlapping Functions in Immunity and Gene Regulation in Arabidopsis

This is the final version. Available from Elsevier via the DOI in this record.Incorporation of the histone variant H2A.Z into nucleosomes by the SWR1 chromatin remodeling complex is a critical step in eukaryotic gene regulation. In Arabidopsis, SWR1c and H2A.Z have been shown to control gene expression underlying development and environmental responses. Although they have been implicated in defense, the specific roles of the complex subunits and H2A.Z in immunity are not well understood. In this study, we analyzed the roles of the SWR1c subunits, PHOTOPERIOD-INDEPENDENT EARLY FLOWERING1 (PIE1), ACTIN-RELATED PROTEIN6 (ARP6), and SWR1 COMPLEX 6 (SWC6), as well as H2A.Z, in defense and gene regulation. We found that SWR1c components play different roles in resistance to different pathogens. Loss of PIE1 and SWC6 function as well as depletion of H2A.Z led to reduced basal resistance, while loss of ARP6 fucntion resulted in enhanced resistance. We found that mutations in PIE1 and SWC6 resulted in impaired effector-triggered immunity. Mutation in SWR1c components and H2A.Z also resulted in compromised jasmonic acid/ethylene-mediated immunity. Genome-wide expression analyses similarly reveal distinct roles for H2A.Z and SWR1c components in gene regulation, and suggest a potential role for PIE1 in the regulation of the cross talk between defense signaling pathways. Our data show that although they are part of the same complex, Arabidopsis SWR1c components could have non-redundant functions in plant immunity and gene regulation

The transcriptional regulator BBX24 impairs DELLA activity to promote shade avoidance in Arabidopsis thaliana

[EN] In response to canopy shade, plant vegetative structures elongate to gain access to light. However, the mechanism that allows a plastic transcriptional response to canopy shade light is not fully elucidated. Here we propose that the activity of PIF4, a key transcription factor in the shade signalling network, is modulated by the interplay between the BBX24 transcriptional regulator and DELLA proteins, which are negative regulators of the gibberellin (GA) signalling pathway. We show that GA-related targets are enriched among genes responsive to BBX24 under shade and that the shade-response defect in bbx24 mutants is rescued by a GA treatment that promotes DELLA degradation. BBX24 physically interacts with DELLA proteins and alleviates DELLA-mediated repression of PIF4 activity. The proposed molecular mechanism provides reversible regulation of the activity of a key transcription factor that may prove especially relevant under fluctuating light conditions.We thank Santiago Mora Garcia for valuable initial discussions and Peter Quail for the PIL1::LUC construct. This work was supported by grants from Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica, and Universidad de Buenos Aires (to J.F.B), and the Spanish Ministry of Science, BIO2010-15071 (to M.A.B.).Crocco, C.; Locascio ., AAM.; Escudero, CM.; Alabadí Diego, D.; Blazquez Rodriguez, MA.; Botto, J. (2015). The transcriptional regulator BBX24 impairs DELLA activity to promote shade avoidance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature Communications. 6:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7202S1106Valladares, F. & Niinemets, U. Shade tolerance, a key plant feature of complex nature and consequences. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 39, 237–257 (2008).Casal, J. J. Photoreceptor signaling networks in plant responses to shade. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 64, 403–427 (2013).Botto, J. F. & Coluccio, M. P. Seasonal and plant-density dependency for quantitative trait loci affecting flowering time in multiple populations of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Environ. 30, 1465–1479 (2007).Coluccio, M. P., Sánchez, S., Kasulin, L., Yanovsky, M. J. & Botto, J. F. Genetic mapping of natural variation in a shade avoidance response: ELF3 is the candidate gene for a QTL in hypocotyl growth regulation. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 167–176 (2011).Filiault, D. L. & Maloof, J. N. A genome-wide association study identifies variants underlying the Arabidopsis thaliana shade avoidance response. PLoS. Genet. 8, e1002589 (2012).Kasulin, L., Agrofoglio, Y. & Botto, J. F. The receptor-like kinase ERECTA contributes to the shade-avoidance syndrome in a background-dependent manner. Ann. Bot. 111, 811–819 (2013).Leivar, P. & Monte, E. PIFs: systems integrators in plant development. Plant Cell 26, 56–78 (2014).Lorrain, S., Allen, T., Duek, P. D., Whitelam, G. C. & Fankhauser, C. Phytochrome-mediated inhibition of shade avoidance involves degradation of growth-promoting bHLH transcription factors. Plant J. 53, 312–323 (2008).Hornitschek, P., Lorrain, S., Zoete, V., Michielin, O. & Fankhauser, C. Inhibition of the shade avoidance response by formation of non-DNA binding bHLH heterodimers. EMBO J. 28, 3893–3902 (2009).Gangappa, S. N. & Botto, J. F. The BBX family of plant transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 19, 460–470 (2014).Crocco, C. D., Holm, M., Yanovsky, M. J. & Botto, J. F. AtBBX21 and COP1 genetically interact in the regulation of shade avoidance. Plant J. 64, 551–562 (2010).Gangappa, S. N. et al. The Arabidopsis B-BOX protein BBX25 interacts with HY5, negatively regulating BBX22 expression to suppress seedling photomorphogenesis. Plant Cell 25, 1243–1257 (2013).Devlin, F. P., Yanovsky, M. J. & Kay, S. A. A genomic analysis of the shade avoidance response in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 133, 1–13 (2003).Hisamatsu, T., King, R. W., Helliwell, C. A. & Koshioka, M. The involvement of gibberellin 20-oxidase genes in phytochrome-regulated petiole elongation of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 138, 1106–1116 (2005).Locascio, A., Blázquez, M. A. & Alabadí, D. Genomic analysis of DELLA protein activity. Plant Cell Physiol. 54, 1229–1237 (2013).de Lucas, M. et al. A molecular framework for light and gibberellin control of cell elongation. Nature 451, 480–486 (2008).Feng, S. et al. Coordinated regulation of Arabidopsis thaliana development by light and gibberellins. Nature 451, 475–480 (2008).Djakovic-Petrovic, T., de Wit, M., Voesenek, L. A. C. J. & Pierik, R. DELLA protein function in growth responses to canopy signals. Plant J. 51, 117–126 (2007).Pierik, R., de Wit, M. & Voesenek, L. A. C. J. Growth-mediated stress escape: convergence of signal transduction pathways activated upon exposure to two different environmental stresses. New Phytol. 189, 122–134 (2011).Colebrook, E. H., Thomas, S. G., Phillips, A. L. & Hedden, P. The role of gibberellin signalling in plant responses to abiotic stress. J. Exp. Biol. 217, 67–75 (2014).Holtan, H. E. et al. BBX32, an Arabidopsis B-Box protein, functions in light signaling by suppressing HY5-regulated gene expression and interacting with STH2/BBX21. Plant Physiol. 156, 2109–2123 (2011).Xu, D. et al. Convergence of light and ABA signaling on the ABI5 promoter. PLoS. Genet. 10, e1004197 (2014).Pierik, R., Djakovic-Petrovic, T., Keuskamp, D. H., de Wit, M. & Voesenek, L. A. C. J. Auxin and ethylene regulate elongation responses to neighbor proximity signals independent of gibberellin and DELLA proteins in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 149, 1701–1712 (2009).Keuskamp, D. H. et al. Blue-light-mediated shade avoidance requires combined auxin and brassinosteroid action in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant J. 67, 208–217 (2011).Li, L. et al. Linking photoreceptor excitation to changes in plant architecture. Genes Dev. 26, 785–790 (2012).Hornitschek, P. et al. Phytochrome interacting factors 4 and 5 control seedling growth in changing light conditions by directly controlling auxin signaling. Plant J. 71, 699–711 (2012).Leivar, P. et al. Dynamic antagonism between phytochromes and PIF family basic helix-loop-helix factors induces selective reciprocal responses to light and shade in a rapidly responsive transcriptional network in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24, 1398–1419 (2012).Oh, E., Zhu, J.-Y. & Wang, Z.-Y. Interaction between BZR1 and PIF4 integrates brassinosteroid and environmental responses. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 802–809 (2012).Dill, A. & Sun, T. P. Synergistic derepression of gibberellin signaling by removing RGA and GAI function in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 159, 777–785 (2001).Cole, B., Kay, S. A. & Chory, J. Automated analysis of hypocotyl growth dynamics during shade avoidance in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 65, 991–1000 (2011).Zhang, Y. et al. A quartet of PIF bHLH factors provides a transcriptionally centered signaling hub that regulates seedling morphogenesis through differential expression-patterning of shared target genes in Arabidopsis. PLoS. Genet. 9, e1003244 (2013).Leivar, P. et al. Definition of early transcriptional circuitry involved in light-induced reversal of PIF-imposed repression of photomorphogenesis in young Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Cell 21, 3535–3553 (2009).Willige, B. C. et al. The DELLA domain of GA INSENSITIVE mediates the interaction with the GA INSENSITIVE DWARF1A gibberellin receptor of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19, 1209–1220 (2007).Davière, J.-M. & Achard, P. Gibberellin signaling in plants. Develop 140, 1147–1151 (2013).Lim, S. et al. ABA-INSENSITIVE3, ABA-INSENSITIVE5, and DELLAs interact to activate the expression of SOMNUS and other high-temperature-inducible genes in imbibed seeds in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 25, 4863–4878 (2013).Yoshida, H. et al. DELLA protein functions as a transcriptional activator through the DNA binding of the indeterminate domain family proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 7861–7866 (2014).Yamaguchi, N. et al. Gibberellin acts positively then negatively to control onset of flower formation in Arabidopsis. Science 344, 638–641 (2014).Stavang, J. et al. Hormonal regulation of temperature-induced growth in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 60, 589–601 (2009).Achard, P. et al. DELLAs contribute to plant photomorphogenesis. Plant Physiol. 143, 1163–1172 (2007).Arana, M. V., Marín-de la Rosa, N., Maloof, J. N., Blázquez, M. A. & Alabadí, D. Circadian oscillation of gibberellin signaling in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 9292–9297 (2011).Bai, M.-Y., Fan, M., Oh, E. & Wang, Z.-Y. A triple helix-loop-helix/basic helix-loop-helix cascade controls cell elongation downstream of multiple hormonal and environmental signaling pathways in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24, 4917–4929 (2012).Ikeda, M., Fujiwara, S., Mitsuda, N. & Ohme-Takagi, M. A triantagonistic basic helix-loop-helix system regulates cell elongation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24, 4483–4497 (2012).Yang, D.-L. et al. Plant hormone jasmonate prioritizes defense over growth by interfering with gibberellin signaling cascade. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E1192–E1200 (2012).Ciolfi, A. et al. Dynamics of the shade-avoidance response in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 163, 331–353 (2013).Indorf, M., Cordero, J., Neuhaus, G. & Rodríguez-Franco, M. Salt tolerance (STO), a stress-related protein, has a major role in light signalling. Plant J. 51, 563–574 (2007).Gallego-Bartolomé, J., Kami, C., Fankhauser, C., Alabadí, D. & Blázquez, M. A. A hormonal regulatory module that provides flexibility to tropic responses. Plant Physiol. 156, 1819–1825 (2011).Earley, K. W. et al. Gateway-compatible vectors for plant functional genomics and proteomics. Plant J. 45, 616–629 (2006).Tusher, V. G., Tibshirani, R. & Chu, G. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 5116–5121 (2001).Gallego-Bartolomé, J. et al. Molecular mechanism for the interaction between gibberellin and brassinosteroid signaling pathways in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 13446–13451 (2012).Belda-Palazón, B. et al. Aminopropyltransferases involved in polyamine biosynthesis localize preferentially in the nucleus of plant cells. PLoS ONE 7, e46907 (2012).Gallego-Bartolomé, J., Alabadí, D. & Blázquez, M. A. DELLA-induced early transcriptional changes during etiolated development in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE 6, e23918 (2011).Piskurewicz, U. et al. The gibberellic acid signaling repressor RGL2 inhibits Arabidopsis seed germination by stimulating abscisic acid synthesis and ABI5 activity. Plant Cell 20, 2729–2745 (2008).Paz-Ares, J. REGIA, an EU project on functional genomics of transcription factors from Arabidopsis thaliana. Comp. Funct. Genomics 3, 102–108 (2002)

Viral Control of Mitochondrial Apoptosis

Throughout the process of pathogen–host co-evolution, viruses have developed a battery of distinct strategies to overcome biochemical and immunological defenses of the host. Thus, viruses have acquired the capacity to subvert host cell apoptosis, control inflammatory responses, and evade immune reactions. Since the elimination of infected cells via programmed cell death is one of the most ancestral defense mechanisms against infection, disabling host cell apoptosis might represent an almost obligate step in the viral life cycle. Conversely, viruses may take advantage of stimulating apoptosis, either to kill uninfected cells from the immune system, or to induce the breakdown of infected cells, thereby favoring viral dissemination. Several viral polypeptides are homologs of host-derived apoptosis-regulatory proteins, such as members of the Bcl-2 family. Moreover, viral factors with no homology to host proteins specifically target key components of the apoptotic machinery. Here, we summarize the current knowledge on the viral modulation of mitochondrial apoptosis, by focusing in particular on the mechanisms by which viral proteins control the host cell death apparatus

NUCLEAR FACTOR Y, Subunit C (NF-YC) Transcription Factors Are Positive Regulators of Photomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana

We thank Dr. Ben Smith (University of Oklahoma) for assistance with FLIM-FRET measurements and Dr. Min Ni (University of Minnesota) for critical reading of the manuscript. The cop1-4 mutant allele and cop1-4 co-9 cross were kindly provided by George Coupland (Max Planck Institute).Author Summary Light perception is critically important for the fitness of plants in both natural and agricultural settings. Plants not only use light for photosynthesis, but also as a cue for proper development. As a seedling emerges from soil it must determine the light environment and adopt an appropriate growth habit. When blue and red wavelengths are the dominant sources of light, plants will undergo photomorphogenesis. Photomorphogenesis describes a number of developmental responses initiated by light in a seedling, and includes shortened stems and establishing the ability to photosynthesize. The genes regulating photomorphogenesis have been studied extensively, but a complete picture remains elusive. Here we describe the finding that NUCLEAR FACTOR-Y (NF-Y) genes are positive regulators of photomorphogenesis—i.e., in plants where NF-Y genes are mutated, they display some characteristics of dark grown plants, even though they are in the light. Our data suggests that the roles of NF-Y genes in light perception do not fit in easily with those of other described pathways. Thus, studying these genes promises to help develop a more complete picture of how light drives plant development.Yeshttp://www.plosgenetics.org/static/editorial#pee