The changing causal foundations of cancer-related symptom clustering during the final month of palliative care: A longitudinal study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Symptoms tend to occur in what have been called symptom clusters. Early symptom cluster research was imprecise regarding the causal foundations of the coordinations between specific symptoms, and was silent on whether the relationships between symptoms remained stable over time. This study develops a causal model of the relationships between symptoms in cancer palliative care patients as they approach death, and investigates the changing associations among the symptoms and between those symptoms and well-being.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Complete symptom assessment scores were obtained for 82 individuals from an existing palliative care database. The data included assessments of pain, anxiety, nausea, shortness of breath, drowsiness, loss of appetite, tiredness, depression and well-being, all collected using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS). Relationships between the symptoms and well-being were investigated using a structural equation model.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The model fit acceptably and explained between 26% and 83% of the variation in appetite, tiredness, depression, and well-being. Drowsiness displayed consistent effects on appetite, tiredness and well-being. In contrast, anxiety's effect on well-being shifted importantly, with a direct effect and an indirect effect through tiredness at one month, being replaced by an effect working exclusively through depression at one week.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Some of the causal forces explaining the variations in, and relationships among, palliative care patients' symptoms changed over the final month of life. This illustrates how investigating the causal foundations of symptom correlation or clustering can provide more detailed understandings that may contribute to improved control of patient comfort, quality of life, and quality of death.</p

Gender and respiratory factors associated with dyspnea in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

RATIONALE: We had shown that COPD women expressed more dyspnea than men for the same degree of airway obstruction. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate gender differences in respiratory factors associated with dyspnea in COPD patients. METHODS: In a FEV(1 )% matched population of 100 men and women with COPD we measured: age, MMRC, FEV(1), FVC, TLC, IC/TLC, PaO(2), PaCO(2), D(LCO), P(imax), P(0.1), Ti/Ttot, BMI, ffmi, 6MWD and VAS scale before and after the test, the Charlson score and the SGRQ. We estimated the association between these parameters and MMRC scores. Multivariate analysis determined the independent strength of those associations. RESULTS: MMRC correlated with: BMI (men:-0.29, p = 0.04; women:-0.28, p = 0.05), ffmi (men:-0.39, p = 0.01), FEV(1 )% (men:-0.64, p < 0.001; women:-0.29, p = 0.04), FVC % (men:-0.45, p = 0.001; women:-0.33, p = 0.02), IC/TLC (men:-0.52, p < 0.001; women: -0.27, p = 0.05), PaO(2 )(men:-0.59, p < 0.001), PaCO(2 )(men:0.27, p = 0.05), D(LCO )(men:-0.54, p < 0.001), P(0.1)/P(imax )(men:0.46, p = 0.002; women:0.47, p = 0.005), dyspnea measured with the Visual Analog Scale before (men:0.37, p = 0.04; women:0.52, p = 0.004) and after 6MWD (men:0.52, p = 0.002; women:0.48, p = 0.004) and SGRQ total (men:0.50, p < 0.001; women:0.59, p < 0.001). Regression analysis showed that P(0.1)/P(imax )in women (r(2 )= 0.30) and BMI, DL(CO), PaO(2 )and P(0.1)/P(imax )in men (r(2 )= 0.81) were the strongest predictors of MMRC scores. CONCLUSION: In mild to severe COPD patients attending a pulmonary clinic, P(0.1)/P(imax )was the unique predictor of MMRC scores only in women. Respiratory factors explain most of the variations of MMRC scores in men but not in women. Factors other than the respiratory ones should be included in the evaluation of dyspnea in women with COPD

Relação entre a magnitude de sintomas e a qualidade de vida: análise de agrupamentos de pacientes com câncer de pulmão no Brasil

OBJECTIVE: Lung cancer patients often experience profound physical and psychosocial changes as a result of disease progression or treatment side effects. Fatigue, pain, dyspnea, depression, and sleep disturbances appear to be the most common symptoms in such patients. The objective of the present study was to examine the prevalence of symptoms in lung cancer patients in order to identify subgroups (clusters) of patients, grouped according to the magnitude of the symptoms, as well as to compare the quality of life among the identified subgroups. METHODS: A cross-sectional study involving agglomerative hierarchical clustering. A total of 50 lung cancer patients were evaluated in terms of their demographic characteristics and their scores on three quality of life questionnaires, namely the 30-item European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung, and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-form Survey. The cluster analysis took into account the magnitude of the most prevalent symptoms as assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 symptom scale scores; those symptoms were fatigue, pain, dyspnea, and insomnia. RESULTS: Three clusters (subgroups)_of patients were identified on the basis of the magnitude of the four most prevalent symptoms. The three subgroups of patients were as follows: patients with mild symptoms (n = 30; 60%); patients with moderate symptoms (n = 14; 28%); and patients with severe symptoms (n = 6; 12%). The subgroup of patients with severe symptoms had the worst quality of life, as assessed by the total scores and by the integrated domains of all three instruments. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the importance of symptom cluster assessment as an important tool to assess the quality of life of patients with chronic diseases, such as lung cancer.OBJETIVO: Muitas vezes pacientes com câncer de pulmão vivenciam mudanças físicas e psicossociais profundas que resultam da progressão da doença ou dos efeitos colaterais do tratamento. Fadiga, dor, dispneia, depressão e distúrbios do sono parecem ser os sintomas mais comuns nesses pacientes. O objetivo deste estudo foi examinar a prevalência de sintomas em pacientes com câncer de pulmão a fim de identificar subgrupos (clusters) de pacientes, agrupados de acordo com a magnitude dos sintomas, bem como comparar os subgrupos quanto à qualidade de vida. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal utilizando agrupamento hierárquico aglomerativo. Foram avaliadas as características demográficas de 50 pacientes com câncer de pulmão, bem como sua pontuação em três questionários de qualidade de vida: o 30-item European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), o Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung e o Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-form Survey. A análise de agrupamentos (clusters) levou em conta a magnitude dos sintomas de maior prevalência de acordo com as escalas de sintomas do EORTC QLQC-30; esses sintomas foram fadiga, dor, dispneia e insônia. RESULTADOS: Foram identificados três agrupamentos (subgrupos) de pacientes, baseados na magnitude dos quatro sintomas mais prevalentes. Os três subgrupos de pacientes foram os seguintes: pacientes com sintomas leves (n = 30; 60%); pacientes com sintomas moderados (n = 14; 28%) e pacientes com sintomas graves (n = 6; 12%). O subgrupo de pacientes com sintomas graves apresentou a pior qualidade de vida, conforme mensurada pelos escores totais e pelas dimensões integradas dos três instrumentos. CONCLUSÕES: Este estudo destaca a importância da avaliação de agrupamentos de sintomas como uma ferramenta relevante para medir a qualidade de vida de pacientes com doenças crônicas, como o câncer de pulmão.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)UNIFESPSciEL

Changes in symptom clusters in patients undergoing radiation therapy

The goals of the study were to determine the occurrence rates for and the severity of symptoms at the middle, end, and 1 month after the completion of radiation therapy (RT), to determine the number and types of symptom clusters at these three time points, and to evaluate for changes over time in these symptom clusters. Symptom occurrence and severity were evaluated using the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS) in a sample of patients (n = 160) who underwent RT for breast or prostate cancer. At each time point, an exploratory factor analysis was done to determine the number of symptom clusters (i.e., symptom factors) based on the MSAS symptom severity ratings. The majority of the patients were male and married with a mean age of 61.1 years. The five symptoms with the highest occurrence rates across all three time points were lack of energy, pain, difficulty sleeping, feeling drowsy, and sweats. Although the number of symptoms and the specific symptoms within each symptom cluster were not identical across the three time points, three relatively similar symptom clusters (i.e., “mood-cognitive” symptom cluster, “sickness-behavior” symptom cluster, “treatment-related”, or “pain” symptom cluster) were identified in this sample. The internal consistency coefficients for the mood-cognitive symptom cluster and sickness-behavior symptom cluster were adequate at ≥0.68. Three relatively stable symptom clusters were found across RT. The majority of the symptom cluster severity scores were significantly higher in patients with breast cancer compared to patients with prostate cancer

Lung cancer diagnosed following an emergency admission: exploring patient and carer perspectives on delay in seeking help

Purpose Compared to others, patients diagnosed with lung cancer following an emergency, unplanned admission to hospital (DFEA) have more advanced disease and poorer prognosis. Little is known about DFEA patients’ beliefs about cancer and its symptoms or about their help-seeking behaviours prior to admission. Methods As part of a larger single-centre, prospective mixed-methods study conducted in one University hospital, we undertook qualitative interviews with patients DFEA and their carers to obtain their understanding of symptoms and experiences of trying to access healthcare services before admission to hospital. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Framework analysis was employed. Results Thirteen patients and 10 carers plus 3 bereaved carers took part in interviews. Three patient/carer dyads were interviewed together. Participants spoke about their symptoms and why they did not seek help sooner. They described complex and nuanced experiences. Some (n = 12) had what they recalled as the wrong symptoms for lung cancer and attributed them either to a pre-existing condition or to ageing. In other cases (n = 9), patients or carers realised with hindsight that their symptoms were signs of lung cancer, but at the time had made other attributions to account for them. In some cases (n = 3), a sudden onset of symptoms was reported. Some GPs (n = 6) were also reported to have made incorrect attributions about cause. Conclusion Late diagnosis meant that patients DFEA needed palliative support sooner after diagnosis than patients not DFEA. Professionals and lay people interpret health and illness experiences differently

Cultural Adaptation and Reliability Analysis of the Modified Dyspnea Index for the Brazilian Culture

This study aims to present the cross-cultural adaptation process of the Modified Dyspnea Index to the Brazilian culture and to investigate its content validity and reliability. This process included the steps of translation, back translation and review by two experts to assess semantic, conceptual, idiomatic, cultural and metabolic equivalence. The Index of Content Validity was used to evaluate the extent of inter-observer agreement. A Guide to implement the Modified Dyspnea Index was developed and validated. Two different professionals assessed the reliability of the Brazilian version of the Modified Dyspnea Index, according to the inter-observer equivalence criterion, with 31 patients, indicating a Kappa coefficient=0.960 (pEste estudio presenta el proceso de adaptación cultural del Modified Dyspnea Index para la cultura brasileña y la evaluación de su validad de contenido y confiabilidad. Este proceso incluyó las etapas de traducción, retrotraducción y evaluación de la equivalencia semántica, idiomática, conceptual, cultural/experimental y metabólica. El Índice de Validad de Contenido fue utilizado para evaluar la proporción de concordancia entre los jueces. Fue desarrollado y validado un guión para orientar la aplicación del Modified Dyspnea Index. Dos diferentes profesionales evaluaron la confiabilidad de la versión brasileña del Modified Dyspnea Index, de acuerdo con el criterio de la equivalencia inter-observador, en 31 pacientes, apuntando para un coeficiente Kappa=0,960 (pEste estudo apresenta o processo de adaptação cultural do Modified Dyspnea Index para a cultura brasileira e a avaliação de sua validade de conteúdo e confiabilidade. Esse processo incluiu as etapas de tradução, retrotradução e avaliação da equivalência semântica, idiomática, conceitual, cultural/experimental e metabólica. Utilizou-se o Índice de Validade de Conteúdo para avaliar a proporção de concordância entre os juízes. Foi desenvolvido e validado um roteiro para nortear a aplicação do Modified Dyspnea Index. Dois diferentes profissionais avaliaram a confiabilidade da versão brasileira do Modified Dyspnea Index, de acordo com o critério da equivalência interobservador, em 31 pacientes, apontando para um coeficiente Kappa=0,960 (p<0,001). A versão brasileira do Modified Dyspnea Index apresentou provas de equivalência interobservador em amostra de pacientes cardíacos

Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF): properties and frontier of current knowledge

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) is well known internationally and widely used for scoring the severity of illness in psychiatry. Problems with GAF show a need for its further development (for example validity and reliability problems). The aim of the present study was to identify gaps in current knowledge about properties of GAF that are of interest for further development. Properties of GAF are defined as characteristic traits or attributes that serve to define GAF (or may have a role to define a future updated GAF). METHODS: A thorough literature search was conducted. RESULTS: A number of gaps in knowledge about the properties of GAF were identified: for example, the current GAF has a continuous scale, but is a continuous or categorical scale better? Scoring is not performed by setting a mark directly on a visual scale, but could this improve scoring? Would new anchor points, including key words and examples, improve GAF (anchor points for symptoms, functioning, positive mental health, prognosis, improvement of generic properties, exclusion criteria for scoring in 10-point intervals, and anchor points at the endpoints of the scale)? Is a change in the number of anchor points and their distribution over the total scale important? Could better instructions for scoring within 10-point intervals improve scoring? Internationally, both single and dual scales for GAF are used, but what is the advantage of having separate symptom and functioning scales? Symptom (GAF-S) and functioning (GAF-F) scales should score different dimensions and still be correlated, but what is the best combination of definitions for GAF-S and GAF-F? For GAF with more than two scales there is limited empirical testing, but what is gained or lost by using more than two scales? CONCLUSIONS: In the history of GAF, its basic properties have undergone limited changes. Problems with GAF may, in part, be due to lack of a research programme testing the effects of different changes in basic properties. Given the widespread use, research-based development of GAF has not been especially strong. Further research could improve GAF