276 research outputs found

    Robust Control Design of an Electro-Hydraulic Actuator

    Get PDF

    Big and little Lipschitz one sets

    Get PDF
    Given a continuous function f:RRf: {{\mathbb R}}\to {{\mathbb R}} we denote the so-called "big Lip" and "little lip" functions by Lipf {{\mathrm {Lip}}} f and lipf {{\mathrm {lip}}} f respectively}. In this paper we are interested in the following question. Given a set ERE {\subset} {{\mathbb R}} is it possible to find a continuous function ff such that lipf=1E {{\mathrm {lip}}} f=\mathbf{1}_E or Lipf=1E {{\mathrm {Lip}}} f=\mathbf{1}_E? For monotone continuous functions we provide the rather straightforward answer. For arbitrary continuous functions the answer is much more difficult to find. We introduce the concept of uniform density type (UDT) and show that if EE is GδG_\delta and UDT then there exists a continuous function ff satisfying Lipf=1E {{\mathrm {Lip}}} f =\mathbf{1}_E, that is, EE is a Lip1 {{\mathrm {Lip}}} 1 set. In the other direction we show that every Lip1{{\mathrm {Lip}}} 1 set is GδG_\delta and weakly dense. We also show that the converse of this statement is not true, namely that there exist weakly dense GδG_{{\delta}} sets which are not Lip1 {{\mathrm {Lip}}} 1. We say that a set ERE\subset \mathbb{R} is lip1{{\mathrm {lip}}} 1 if there is a continuous function ff such that lipf=1E{{\mathrm {lip}}} f=\mathbf{1}_E. We introduce the concept of strongly one-sided density and show that every lip1{{\mathrm {lip}}} 1 set is a strongly one-sided dense FσF_\sigma set.Comment: This is the final preprint version accepted to appear in European Journal of Mathematic

    Control Design of Variable-Geometry Suspension Considering the Construction System

    Get PDF

    Analysis and Control of Nonlinear Actuator Dynamics Based on the Sum of Squares Programming Method

    Get PDF

    Design of vehicle cruise control using road inclinations

    Get PDF

    Challenges and possibilities in variable geometry suspension systems

    Get PDF
    The variable-geometry suspension system is in the focus of the paper. The advantages of the variable-geometry system are the simple structure, low energy consumption and low cost. During maneuvers the variable-geometry system modifies the camber angle of the front wheels in order to improve road stability. The system affects both the chassis roll angle and the half-track change. Moreover, the tracking error of the reference yaw rate can also be reduced. In the paper the challenges and possibilities of the variable geometry suspension system are analyzed
    corecore