17 research outputs found

    Assessing knowledge conveyed in gesture: Do teachers have the upper hand?

    Get PDF
    Children's gestures can reveal important information about their problem-solving strategies. This study investigated whether the information children express only in gesture is accessible to adults not trained in gesture coding. Twenty teachers and 20 undergraduates viewed videotaped vignettes of 12 children explaining their solutions to equations. Six children expressed the same strategy in speech and gesture, and 6 expressed different strategies. After each vignette, adults described the child's reasoning. For children who expressed different strategies in speech and gesture, both teachers and undergraduates frequently described strategies that children had not expressed in speech. These additional strategies could often be traced to the children's gestures. Sensitivity to gesture was comparable for teachers and undergraduates. Thus, even without training, adults glean information, not only from children's words but also from their hands

    An Evolutionary Upgrade of Cognitive Load Theory: Using the Human Motor System and Collaboration to Support the Learning of Complex Cognitive Tasks

    Get PDF
    Cognitive load theory is intended to provide instructional strategies derived from experimental, cognitive load effects. Each effect is based on our knowledge of human cognitive architecture, primarily the limited capacity and duration of a human working memory. These limitations are ameliorated by changes in long-term memory associated with learning. Initially, cognitive load theory's view of human cognitive architecture was assumed to apply to all categories of information. Based on Geary's (Educational Psychologist 43, 179-195 2008; 2011) evolutionary account of educational psychology, this interpretation of human cognitive architecture requires amendment. Working memory limitations may be critical only when acquiring novel information based on culturally important knowledge that we have not specifically evolved to acquire. Cultural knowledge is known as biologically secondary information. Working memory limitations may have reduced significance when acquiring novel

    Learning to Represent Mathematics: The Negotiation of Meanings of Mathematical Symbols in First Grade

    No full text
    95 p.Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2004.Instructional moments are not all created equal. This project documented the characteristics of a class of events ("teachable moments") that may have particular power in affecting student learning. To investigate students' acquisition of mathematical representation, I examined teacher-student discourse in 45 first-grade lessons, focusing on episodes of teachable moments: errors, confusion, disagreements, and spontaneous contributions. In the lessons errors and confusion occurred most often. Teachers responded to errors and confusion by increasing their use of multiple representations, more often than prior to them. Teachers especially responded to errors with reference to written symbols, and they responded to confusion with concrete manipulatives. Students referenced visual forms at a low rate overall but did so more during errors than confusion and received explicit encouragement to reference visual forms more prior to errors than confusion. Few mathematical disagreements occurred. The rate of spontaneous contributions varied greatly by classroom, but representational processes did not vary significantly during those episodes. These results provide evidence for the role of multiple representations of mathematical ideas during key instructional moments.U of I OnlyRestricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETD

    Learning to Represent Mathematics: The Negotiation of Meanings of Mathematical Symbols in First Grade

    No full text
    95 p.Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2004.Instructional moments are not all created equal. This project documented the characteristics of a class of events ("teachable moments") that may have particular power in affecting student learning. To investigate students' acquisition of mathematical representation, I examined teacher-student discourse in 45 first-grade lessons, focusing on episodes of teachable moments: errors, confusion, disagreements, and spontaneous contributions. In the lessons errors and confusion occurred most often. Teachers responded to errors and confusion by increasing their use of multiple representations, more often than prior to them. Teachers especially responded to errors with reference to written symbols, and they responded to confusion with concrete manipulatives. Students referenced visual forms at a low rate overall but did so more during errors than confusion and received explicit encouragement to reference visual forms more prior to errors than confusion. Few mathematical disagreements occurred. The rate of spontaneous contributions varied greatly by classroom, but representational processes did not vary significantly during those episodes. These results provide evidence for the role of multiple representations of mathematical ideas during key instructional moments.U of I OnlyRestricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETD
    corecore