Disparities in Cause-Specific Cancer Survival by Census Tract Poverty Level in Idaho, U.S.

Objective. This population-based study compared cause-specific cancer survival by socioeconomic status using methods to more accurately assign cancer deaths to primary site. Methods. The current study analyzed Idaho data used in the Accuracy of Cancer Mortality Statistics Based on Death Certificates (ACM) study supplemented with additional information to measure cause-specific cancer survival by census tract poverty level. Results. The distribution of cases by primary site group differed significantly by poverty level (chi-square = 265.3, 100 df, p In the life table analyses, for 8 of 24 primary site groups investigated, and all sites combined, there was a significant gradient relating higher poverty with poorer survival. For all sites combined, the absolute difference in 5-year cause-specific survival rate was 13.6% between the lowest and highest poverty levels. Conclusions. This study shows striking disparities in cause-specific cancer survival related to the poverty level of the area a person resides in at the time of diagnosis

Predictors of pulmonary exacerbation treatment in cystic fibrosis

Background: Most studies of pulmonary exacerbations (PEx) in cystic fibrosis (CF) focus on intravenous (IV)-treated PEx, though most PEx are treated with oral antibiotics. Our objectives were to describe predictors of antibiotic choice and outcomes for PEx initially identified in clinic. Methods: For each patient in the U.S. CF Foundation Patient Registry, we selected the first PEx recorded at a clinic visit in 2013-14 following a clinic visit without a PEx. We used multivariable logistic regression to determine associations between clinical characteristics and antibiotic treatment choice. We determined outcomes in the 90 days after the first PEx. Results: Among 14,265 patients with a PEx initially identified in clinic, 21.4% received no antibiotics, 61.5% received new oral and/or inhaled antibiotics, and 17.0% had IV antibiotics within 14 days. Compared to IV antibiotics, patients more likely to receive new oral and/or inhaled antibiotics: were male, 10th percentile or 18.5 kg/m2, >90 days between clinic visits, FEV1 > 70% predicted at the PEx, no prior-year IV-treated PEx, FEV1 decline <10% predicted, and private insurance. Following the PEx, 30.3% of patients had no clinical encounters within 90 days. Treatment with IV antibiotics within 90 days occurred for 23.7% treated without antibiotics, 22.8% of new oral and/or inhaled antibiotics, and 27.1% of IV antibiotics. Conclusion: Most PEx identified in clinic are treated with new oral and/or inhaled antibiotics. Markers of disease severity are associated with antibiotic treatment choice. Many patients had no follow-up evaluation within 90 days of treatment

Lung function in children with cystic fibrosis in the USA and UK: a comparative longitudinal analysis of national registry data

RATIONALE: A previous analysis found significantly higher lung function in the US paediatric cystic fibrosis (CF) population compared with the UK with this difference apparently decreasing in adolescence and adulthood. However, the cross-sectional nature of the study makes it hard to interpret these results. OBJECTIVES: To compare longitudinal trajectories of lung function in children with CF between the USA and UK and to explore reasons for any differences. METHODS: We used mixed effects regression analysis to model lung function trajectories in the study populations. Using descriptive statistics, we compared early growth and nutrition (height, weight, body mass index), infections (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus) and treatments (rhDnase, hypertonic saline, inhaled antibiotics). RESULTS: We included 9463 children from the USA and 3055 children from the UK with homozygous F508del genotype. Lung function was higher in the USA than in the UK when first measured at age six and remained higher throughout childhood. We did not find important differences in early growth and nutrition, or P.aeruginosa infection. Prescription of rhDNase and hypertonic saline was more common in the USA. Inhaled antibiotics were prescribed at similar levels in both countries, but Tobramycin was prescribed more in the USA and colistin in the UK. S. aureus infection was more common in the USA than the UK. CONCLUSIONS: Children with CF and homozygous F508del genotype in the USA had better lung function than UK children. These differences do not appear to be explained by early growth or nutrition, but differences in the use of early treatments need further investigation

Patient beliefs and tamoxifen discontinuance in older women with estrogen receptor--positive breast cancer

PURPOSE: To investigate the patterns and predictors of tamoxifen discontinuance throughout a 2-year period in a cohort of women 65 years or older with newly diagnosed, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer, focusing on the role of patients\u27 beliefs about the risks and benefits of tamoxifen therapy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We enrolled a convenience sample of women cared for in four geographic regions of the United States with stage 1 (\u3e/= 1 cm), stage II, or stage IIIA disease; no prior history of breast cancer; and no simultaneously diagnosed second primary breast cancer. Data sources included medical records and telephone interviews with patients at 3, 6, 15, and 27 months following definitive surgery. RESULTS: Of the 597 women with ER-positive tumors, 516 women (86%) were prescribed tamoxifen, and of these, 88 (17%) stopped taking tamoxifen during the 2-year follow-up period. Of the women who stopped taking tamoxifen, the majority (68%) took it for less than 1 year. Women with neutral or negative beliefs about the value of tamoxifen (3.0; 95% CI, 1.6 to 5.6) and those with positive nodes (odds ratio = 2.5; 95% CI, 1.0 to 6.3) were more likely to discontinue tamoxifen therapy. CONCLUSION: How women with early-stage breast cancer perceive the risks and benefits of tamoxifen therapy seems critical for sustaining adherence to adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. Interventions designed to educate women about the benefits and risks of tamoxifen therapy may help to reduce discontinuance

The relationship among physicians\u27 specialty, perceptions of the risks and benefits of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy, and its recommendation in older patients with breast cancer

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to determine whether tamoxifen recommendation differs by physician specialty, to determine whether perception affects tamoxifen recommendation, and to investigate the association between the physician\u27s specialty and the perception of risks and benefits of tamoxifen. METHODS: We enrolled a cohort of geographically diverse women aged 65 and older with stage I through IIIa breast cancer in a prospective cohort study. We recruited their surgeons and, when applicable, their medical oncologists to provide patient-specific information about their perceptions of the risks and benefits of tamoxifen and whether they recommended tamoxifen. Each physician also completed a questionnaire regarding his or her demographic and practice characteristics. Patient data were collected through medical record review and a patient interview 3 months after definitive breast cancer surgery. RESULTS: We collected physician treatment recommendation forms for 585 women. Oncologists were 2.5 times more likely to recommend tamoxifen, compared with surgeons, after adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics (95% confidence interval, 1.5-4.2). For both specialties, their perceptions of the risks and benefits of tamoxifen were strong predictors of tamoxifen recommendation. However, there were differences in perception by physician specialty. Distant metastases and tolerance of tamoxifen side effects were more important to oncologists, whereas local recurrence and risk of cataracts were more important to surgeons. CONCLUSION: Physicians\u27 perceptions of the risks and benefits of tamoxifen therapy for older women are important in their decision-making process

Cost Effectiveness of Screening Individuals With Cystic Fibrosis for Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Individuals with cystic fibrosis are at increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) compared with the general population, and risk is higher among those who received an organ transplant. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis to determine optimal CRC screening strategies for patients with cystic fibrosis. METHODS: We adjusted the existing Microsimulation Screening Analysis-Colon model to reflect increased CRC risk and lower life expectancy in patients with cystic fibrosis. Modeling was performed separately for individuals who never received an organ transplant and patients who had received an organ transplant. We modeled 76 colonoscopy screening strategies that varied the age range and screening interval. The optimal screening strategy was determined based on a willingness to pay threshold of $100,000 per life-year gained. Sensitivity and supplementary analyses were performed, including fecal immunochemical test (FIT) as an alternative test, earlier ages of transplantation, and increased rates of colonoscopy complications, to assess if optimal screening strategies would change. RESULTS: Colonoscopy every 5 years, starting at an age of 40 years, was the optimal colonoscopy strategy for patients with cystic fibrosis who never received an organ transplant; this strategy prevented 79% of deaths from CRC. Among patients with cystic fibrosis who had received an organ transplant, optimal colonoscopy screening should start at an age of 30 or 35 years, depending on the patient\u27s age at time of transplantation. Annual FIT screening was predicted to be cost-effective for patients with cystic fibrosis. However, the level of accuracy of the FIT in this population is not clear. CONCLUSIONS: Using a Microsimulation Screening Analysis-Colon model, we found screening of patients with cystic fibrosis for CRC to be cost effective. Because of the higher risk of CRC in these patients, screening should start at an earlier age with a shorter screening interval. The findings of this study (especially those on FIT screening) may be limited by restricted evidence available for patients with cystic fibrosis