Induction of auxin biosynthesis and WOX5 repression mediate changes in root development in Arabidopsis exposed to chitosan

[EN] Chitosan is a natural polymer with applications in agriculture, which causes plasma membrane permeabilisation and induction of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) in plants. Chitosan has been mostly applied in the phylloplane to control plant diseases and to enhance plant defences, but has also been considered for controlling root pests. However, the effect of chitosan on roots is virtually unknown. In this work, we show that chitosan interfered with auxin homeostasis in Arabidopsis roots, promoting a 2-3 fold accumulation of indole acetic acid (IAA). We observed chitosan dose-dependent alterations of auxin synthesis, transport and signalling in Arabidopsis roots. As a consequence, high doses of chitosan reduce WOX5 expression in the root apical meristem and arrest root growth. Chitosan also propitiates accumulation of salicylic (SA) and jasmonic (JA) acids in Arabidopsis roots by induction of genes involved in their biosynthesis and signalling. In addition, high-dose chitosan irrigation of tomato and barley plants also arrests root development. Tomato root apices treated with chitosan showed isodiametric cells respect to rectangular cells in the controls. We found that chitosan causes strong alterations in root cell morphology. Our results highlight the importance of considering chitosan dose during agronomical applications to the rhizosphere.This work was supported by AGL 2015 66833-R Grant from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness Grant AGL 2015. We would like to thank Drs Isabel Lopez-Diaz and Esther Carrera for plant hormone quantitation (IBMCP, Valencia, Spain). Part of this work was filed for a patent (P201431399) by L. V. Lopez-Llorca, F. Lopez-Moya and N. Escudero as inventors. We would like to thank Dr Michael Kershaw (University of Exeter) for his English revision and critical comments of the manuscript. We also thank Ms Marta Suarez-Fernandez (University of Alicante) and Mr Alfonso Prieto for their technical support. All the authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.Lopez-Moya, F.; Escudero, N.; Zavala-Gonzalez, EA.; Esteve-Bruna, D.; Blazquez Rodriguez, MA.; Alabadí Diego, D.; Lopez-Llorca, LV. (2017). Induction of auxin biosynthesis and WOX5 repression mediate changes in root development in Arabidopsis exposed to chitosan. Scientific Reports. 7:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16874-5S1147Savary, S., Ficke, A., Aubertot, J.-N. & Hollier, C. Crop losses due to diseases and their implications for global food production losses and food security. Food Sec. 4(4), 519–37 (2012).Pimentel, D., Zuniga, R. & Morrison, D. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol. Econ. 52(3), 273–88 (2005).El-Hadrami, A. & Adam, L. R. Hadrami El, I. & Daayf, F. Chitosan in plant protection. Mar. Drugs. 8(4), 968–987 (2010).Kumar, R. M. N. V. A review of chitin and chitosan applications. React. Funct. Poly. 46(1), 1–27 (2000).Mayakrishnan, V., Kannappan, P., Abdullah, N. & Ali, A. A. B. Cardioprotective activity of polysaccharides derived from marine algae: an overview. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 30, 98–104 (2013).Lopez-Moya, F. et al. Carbon and nitrogen limitation increase chitosan antifungal activity in Neurospora crassa and fungal human pathogens. Fun. Biol. 119(2-3), 154–69 (2015).Benhamou, N. & Theriault, G. Treatment with chitosan enhances resistance of tomato plants to the crown and root rot pathogen Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici. Physiol Mol Plant Path. 44(1), 33–52 (1992).Ohta, K., Taniguchi, A., Konishi, N. & Hosoki, T. Chitosan treatment affects plant growth and flower quality in Eustoma grandiflorum. HortScience. 34(2), 233–234 (1999).Van, S. N., Minh, H. D. & Anh, D. N. Study on chitosan nanoparticles on biophysical characteristics and growth of Robusta coffee in green house. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2(4), 289–294 (2013).Kananont, N., Pichvangkura, R., Chanprame, S., Chadchawan, S. & Limpanavech, P. Chitosan specificity for the in vitro seed germination of two Dendrobium orchids (Asparagales: Orchidaceae). Sci. Hortic. 124(2), 239–247 (2010).Malerba, M. & Cerana, R. Chitosan Effects on Plant Systems. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17(7), pii: E996 (2016).Uthairatanakij, A., da Silva, J. A. T. & Obsuwan, K. Chitosan for improving orchid production and quality. Orchid Sci. Biotechnol. 1(1), 1–5 (2007).Limpanavech, P. et al. Chitosan effects on floral production, gene expression, and anatomical changes in the Dendrobium orchid. Sci. Hortic. 116(1), 65–72 (2008).Nge, K. L., New, N., Chandrkrachang, S. & Stevens, W. F. Chitosan as a growth stimulator in orchid tissue culture. Plant Sci. 170(6), 1185–90 (2006).Khan, T. A., Peh, K. K. & Ch’ng, H. S. Reporting degree of deacetylation values of chitosan: the influence of analytical methods. J. Pharma. Sci. 5(3), 205–12 (2002).Iriti, M. & Faoro, F. Bioactivity of grape chemicals for human health. Nat. Prod. Commun. 4(5), 611–34 (2009).Pitta-Alvarez, S. I. & Giulietti, A. M. Influence of chitosan, acetic acid and citric acid on growth and tropane alkaloid production in transformed roots of Brugmansia candida effect of medium pH and growth phase. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 59(1), 31–38 (1999).Sivanandhan, G. et al. Chitosan enhances with anolides production in adventitious root cultures of Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal. Ind. Crops Prod. 37, 124–129 (2012).Chatelain, P. G., Pintado, M. E. & Vasconcelos, M. W. Evaluation of chitooligosaccharide application on mineral accumulation and plant growth in Phaseolus vulgaris. Plant Sci. 214(15), 134–40 (2014).El-Tantawi, E. M. Behaviour of tomato plants as affected by spraying with chitosan and aminofort as natural stimulator substances under application of soil organic amendments. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 12(17), 1164–73 (2009).Sharp, R. G. 2013. A review of the applications of chitin and its derivatives in agriculture to modify plant-microbial interactions and improve crop yields. Agronomy. 3, 757–793 (2013).Aranega-Bou, P., de la O Leyva, M., Finiti, I., García-Agustín, P. & González-Bosch, C. Priming of plant resistance by natural compounds. Hexanoic acid as a model. Front. Plant Sci. 1(5), 488 (2014).Kwak, J. M., Nguyen, V. & Schroeder, J. I. The role of reactive oxygen species in hormonal responses. Plant Physiol. 141(2), 323–9 (2006).Lopez-Moya, F. & Lopez-Llorca, L. V. Omics for investigating chitosan as an antifungal and gene modulator. J. Fungi. 2(1), 1–11 (2016).Issak, M. et al. Neither endogenous abscisic acid nor endogenous jasmonate is involved in salicylic acid-, yeast elicitor-, orchitosan-induced stomatal closure in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biosc. Biotechnol. Biochem. 77(5), 1111–3 (2013).Vidhyasekaran, P. Switching on Plant Innate Immunity Signaling Systems: Bioengineering and Molecular Manipulation Of PAMP PIMP PRR Signaling Complex. Signaling and Communication In Plants. Chapt. 3. Switching on Plant Immune Signaling Systems using Microbe-Associated Molecular Patterns/section 3.6 Manipulation of Plant Immune System using Chitosan 144–148, (Springer, 2016).Baque, Md. A., Shiragi, Md. H. K., Lee, E. J. & Paek, K.-Y. Elicitor effect of chitosan and pectin on the biosynthesis of anthraquinones, phenolics and flavonoids in adventitious root suspension cultures of Morinda citrifolia (L.). Aust. J. Crop Sci. 6(9), 1349–1355 (2012).Khalil, M. S. & Badawy, M. E. I. Nematicidal activity of a biopolymer chitosan at different molecular weights against root-knot nematode. Meloidogyne incognita. Plant Prot. Sci. 48(4), 170–178 (2012).Sarkar, A. K. et al. Conserved factors regulate signalling in Arabidopsis thaliana shoot and root stem cell organizers. Nature. 446(7137), 811–4 (2007).Ding, Z. & Friml, J. Auxin regulates distal stem cell differentiation in Arabidopsis roots. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107(26), 12046–12051 (2010).Tian, H. et al. WOX5-IAA17 feedback circuit-mediated cellular auxin response is crucial for the patterning of root stem cell niches in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant. 7(2), 277–89 (2014).Tiwari, S. B., Hagen, G. & Guilfoyle, T. The roles of auxin response factor domains in auxin-responsive transcription. Plant Cell. 15(2), 533–43 (2003).Doares, S. H., Syrovets, T., Weiler, E. W. & Ryan, C. A. Oligogalacturonides and chitosan activate plant defensive genes through the octadecanoid pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92(10), 4095–4098 (1995).Chandra, S. et al. Chitosan nanoparticles: A positive modulator of innate immune responses in plants. Sci. Rep. 5, 15195 (2015).Escudero, N. et al. Chitosan enhances parasitism of Meloidogyne javanica eggs by the nematophagous fungus Pochonia chlamydosporia. Fun. Biol. 120(4), 572–85 (2016).Escudero, N. et al. Chitosan Increases Tomato Root Colonization by Pochonia chlamydosporia and Their Combination Reduces Root-Knot Nematode Damage. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 1415 (2017).Atkinson, N. J., Lilley, C. J. & Urwin, P. E. Identification of Genes Involved in the Response of Arabidopsis to Simultaneous Biotic and Abiotic Stresses. Plant Physiol. 162(4), 2028–2041 (2013).Kazan, K. Auxin and the integration of environmental signals into plant root development. Ann Bot 112(9), 1655–1665 (2013).Overvoorde, P., Fukaki, H. & Beeckman, T. Auxin control of root development. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2(6), a001537 (2010).Petricka, J. J., Winter, C. M. & Benfey, P. N. Control of Arabidopsis Root Development. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 63, 563–590 (2012).Iriti, M. & Faoro, F. Chitosan as a MAMP, searching for a PRR. Plant Signal Behav. 4(1), 66–68 (2009).Jones, A. M. A new look at stress: abscisic acid patterns and dynamics at high-resolution. New Phytol. 210(1), 38–44 (2015).Wasternack, C. Jasmonates: An Update on Biosynthesis, Signal Transduction and Action in Plant Stress Response, Growth and Development. Ann. Bot. 100(4), 681–697 (2007).Wasternack, C. & Hause, B. Jasmonates: biosynthesis, perception, signal transduction and action in plant stress response, growth and development. Ann. Bot. 111(6), 1021–1058 (2013).Kazan, K. Diverse roles of jasmonates and ethylene in abiotic stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 20(4), 219–29 (2015).Ning, Y., Liu, W. & Wang, G. L. Balancing Immunity and Yield in Crop Plants. Trends Plant Sci., 1385(17), 30206–6 (2017). pii: S1360.Zhang, R. Q., Zhu, H. H., Zhao, H. Q. & Yao, Q. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inoculation increases phenolic synthesis in clover roots via hydrogen peroxide, salicylic acid and nitric oxide signaling pathways. J. Plant Physiol. 170(1), 74–9 (2013).Dar, T. A., Uddin, M., Masroor, A. M., Hakeem, K. R. & Jaleel, H. 2015. Jasmonates counter plant stress: A Review. Environ. Exp. Bot. 115, 49–57 (2015).Kazan, K. & Lyons, R. 2016. The link between flowering time and stress tolerance. J Exp Bot. 67(1), 47–60 (2016).Jeong, S. et al. Rootin, a compound that inhibits root development through modulating PIN-mediated auxin distribution. Plant Sci. 233, 116–26 (2015).Amborabé, B. E., Bonmort, J., Fleurat-Lessard, P. & Roblin, G. Early events induced by chitosan on plant cells. J. Exp. Bot. 59(9), 2317–2324 (2008).Chen, X. Y. & Kim, J. Y. Callose synthesis in higher plants. Plant Signal Behav. 4(6), 489–492 (2009).Vasil’ev, L. A. et al. Chitosan-induced programmed cell death in plants. Biochem (Mosc). 74(9), 1035–43 (2009).Friml, J. et al. Efflux-dependent auxin gradients establish the apical-basal axis of Arabidopsis. Nature. 426(6963), 147–153 (2003).Xu, J. et al. A molecular framework for plant regeneration. Science. 311(5759), 385–8 (2006).Cheng, Y., Dai, X. & Zhao, Y. Auxin biosynthesis by the YUCCA flavin monooxygenases controls the formation of floral organs and vascular tissues in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 20(13), 1790–1799 (2006).Cao, H., Bowling, S. A., Gordon, A. S. & Dong, X. Characterization of an Arabidopsis mutant that is nonresponsive to inducers of Systemic Acquired Resistance. Plant Cell. 6(11), 1583–92 (1994).Dobón, A., Wulff, B. B., Canet, J. V., Fort, P. & Tornero, P. An allele of Arabidopsis COI1 with hypo- and hypermorphic phenotypes in plant growth, defence and fertility. Plos One. 8(1), e55115 (2013).Fernández-Calvo, P. et al. The Arabidopsis bHLH transcription factors MYC3 and MYC4 are targets of JAZ repressors and act additively with MYC2 in the activation of jasmonate responses. Plant Cell. 23(2), 701–15 (2011).Ripoll, J. J., Ferrándiz, C., Martínez-Laborda, A. & Vera, A. PEPPER, a novel K-homology domain gene, regulates vegetative and gynoecium development in Arabidopsis. Dev. Biol. 289(2), 346–59 (2006).Bordallo, J. J. et al. Colonization of plant roots by egg-parasitic and nematode-trapping fungi. New Phytol. 154(2), 491–499 (2002).Palma-Guerrero, J., Jansson, H. B., Salinas, J. & Lopez-Llorca, L. V. Effect of chitosan on hyphal growth and spore germination of plant pathogenic and biocontrol fungi. J. App. Microbiol. 104(2), 541–53 (2008).Seo, M., Jikumaru, Y. & Kamiya, Y. Profiling of hormones and related metabolites in seed dormancy and germination studies. Methods Mol. Biol. 773, 99–111 (2011).Sabatini, S. et al. An auxin-dependent distal organizer of pattern and polarity in the Arabidopsis root. Cell. 99, 463–472 (1999).Weigel, D. & Glazebrook, J. Arabidopsis: A Laboratory Manual. (Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2002).Livak, K. J. & Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods. 25, 402–408 (2001).Escudero, N. & Lopez-Llorca, L. V. Effects on plant growth and root-knot nematode infection of an endophytic GFP transformant of the nematophagous fungus Pochonia chlamydosporia. Symbiosis. 57(1), 33–42 (2012).Maciá-Vicente, J. G., Jansson, H. B., Talbot, N. J. & Lopez-Llorca, L. V. Real-time PCR quantification and live-cell imaging of endophytic colonization of barley (Hordeum ytvulgare) roots by Fusarium equiseti and Pochonia chlamydosporia. New Phytolo. 182(1), 213–28 (2009).Underwood, A. J. Experiments in ecology: their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997).Bartlett, M. S. 1937. Properties of sufficiency and statistical tests. Proc. Royal. Soci. London Math. 160, 268–282 (1937)

Prefoldins contribute to maintaining the levels of the spliceosome LSM2–8 complex through Hsp90 in Arabidopsis

Although originally identified as the components of the complex aiding the cytosolic chaperonin CCT in the folding of actins and tubulins in the cytosol, prefoldins (PFDs) are emerging as novel regulators influencing gene expression in the nucleus. Work conducted mainly in yeast and animals showed that PFDs act as transcriptional regulators and participate in the nuclear proteostasis. To investigate new functions of PFDs, we performed a co-expression analysis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Results revealed co-expression between PFD and the Sm-like (LSM) genes, which encode the LSM2–8 spliceosome core complex, in this model organism. Here, we show that PFDs interact with and are required to maintain adequate levels of the LSM2–8 complex. Our data indicate that levels of the LSM8 protein, which defines and confers the functional specificity of the complex, are reduced in pfd mutants and in response to the Hsp90 inhibitor geldanamycin. We provide biochemical evidence showing that LSM8 is a client of Hsp90 and that PFD4 mediates the interaction between both proteins. Consistent with our results and with the role of the LSM2–8 complex in splicing through the stabilization of the U6 snRNA, pfd mutants showed reduced levels of this snRNA and altered pre-mRNA splicing patterns.Fil: Esteve Bruna, David. Universidad Politécnica de Valencia; EspañaFil: Carrasco López, Cristian. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; EspañaFil: Blanco Touriñán, Noel. Universidad Politécnica de Valencia; EspañaFil: Iserte, Javier Alonso. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Buenos Aires. Fundación Instituto Leloir. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Calleja Cabrera, Julián. Universidad Politécnica de Valencia; EspañaFil: Perea Resa, Carlos. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; EspañaFil: Úrbez, Cristina. Universidad Politécnica de Valencia; EspañaFil: Carrasco, Pedro. Universidad Politécnica de Valencia; EspañaFil: Yanovsky, Marcelo Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Buenos Aires. Fundación Instituto Leloir. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Blázquez, Miguel A.. Universidad Politécnica de Valencia; EspañaFil: Salinas, Julio. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; EspañaFil: Alabadí, David. Universidad Politécnica de Valencia; Españ

Coordination between growth and stress responses by DELLA in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha

Plant survival depends on the optimal use of resources under variable environmental conditions. Among the mechanisms that mediate the balance between growth, differentiation, and stress responses, the regulation of transcriptional activity by DELLA proteins stands out. In angiosperms, DELLA accumulation promotes defense against biotic and abiotic stress and represses cell division and expansion, while the loss of DELLA function is associated with increased plant size and sensitivity toward stress.1 Given that DELLA protein stability is dependent on gibberellin (GA) levels2 and GA metabolism is influenced by the environment,3 this pathway is proposed to relay environmental information to the transcriptional programs that regulate growth and stress responses in angiosperms.4,5 However, DELLA genes are also found in bryophytes, whereas canonical GA receptors have been identified only in vascular plants.6, 7, 8, 9, 10 Thus, it is not clear whether these regulatory functions of DELLA predated or emerged with typical GA signaling. Here, we show that, as in vascular plants, the only DELLA in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha also participates in the regulation of growth and key developmental processes and promotes oxidative stress tolerance. Moreover, part of these effects is likely caused by the conserved physical interaction with the MpPIF transcription factor. Therefore, we suggest that the role in the coordination of growth and stress responses was already encoded in the DELLA protein of the common ancestor of land plants, and the importance of this function is underscored by its conservation over the past 450 million years

A genetic approach reveals different modes of action of prefoldins

[EN] The prefoldin complex (PFDc) was identified in humans as a co-chaperone of the cytosolic chaperonin T-COMPLEX PROTEIN RING COMPLEX (TRiC)/CHAPERONIN CONTAINING TCP-1 (CCT). PFDc is conserved in eukaryotes and is composed of subunits PFD1-6, and PFDc-TRiC/CCT folds actin and tubulins. PFDs also participate in a wide range of cellular processes, both in the cytoplasm and in the nucleus, and their malfunction causes developmental alterations and disease in animals and altered growth and environmental responses in yeast and plants. Genetic analyses in yeast indicate that not all of their functions require the canonical complex. The lack of systematic genetic analyses in plants and animals, however, makes it difficult to discern whether PFDs participate in a process as the canonical complex or in alternative configurations, which is necessary to understand their mode of action. To tackle this question, and on the premise that the canonical complex cannot be formed if one subunit is missing, we generated an Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutant deficient in the six PFDs and compared various growth and environmental responses with those of the individual mutants. In this way, we demonstrate that the PFDc is required for seed germination, to delay flowering, or to respond to high salt stress or low temperature, whereas at least two PFDs redundantly attenuate the response to osmotic stress. A coexpression analysis of differentially expressed genes in the sextuple mutant identified several transcription factors, including ABA INSENSITIVE 5 (ABI5) and PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTOR 4, acting downstream of PFDs. Furthermore, the transcriptomic analysis allowed assigning additional roles for PFDs, for instance, in response to higher temperature.This work was supported by grants from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and "Agencia Estatal de Investigacion"/FEDER/European Union (BIO2013-43184-P to D.A. and M.A.B., and BIO2016-79133-P and PID2019-109925GB-I00 to D.A.). N.B.-T., A.S.-M., and A.P.-A. were recipient of Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (BES-2014-068868), EU MSCA-IF (H2020-MSCA-IF-2016746396) and Ministerio de Educacion (FPU17/05186) fellowships, respectively.Esteve-Bruna, D.; Blanco-Touriñán, N.; Serrano-Mislata, A.; Esquinas-Ariza, RM.; Resentini, F.; Forment Millet, JJ.; Carrasco-López, C.... (2021). A genetic approach reveals different modes of action of prefoldins. Plant Physiology. 187(3):1534-1550. https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiab348S15341550187

COP1 destabilizes DELLA proteins in Arabidopsis

DELLA transcriptional regulators are central components in the control of plant growth responses to the environment. This control is considered to be mediated by changes in the metabolism of the hormones gibberellins (GAs), which promote the degradation of DELLAs. However, here we show that warm temperature or shade reduced the stability of a GA-insensitive DELLA allele in Arabidopsis thaliana. Furthermore, the degradation of DELLA induced by the warmth preceded changes in GA levels and depended on the E3 ubiquitin ligase CONSTITUTIVELY PHOTOMORPHOGENIC1 (COP1). COP1 enhanced the degradation of normal and GA-insensitive DELLA alleles when coexpressed in Nicotiana benthamiana. DELLA proteins physically interacted with COP1 in yeast, mammalian, and plant cells. This interaction was enhanced by the COP1 complex partner SUPRESSOR OF phyA-105 1 (SPA1). The level of ubiquitination of DELLA was enhanced by COP1 and COP1 ubiquitinated DELLA proteins in vitro. We propose that DELLAs are destabilized not only by the canonical GA-dependent pathway but also by COP1 and that this control is relevant for growth responses to shade and warm temperature.This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness and Agencia Española de Investigación/Fondo Europeo para el Desarrollo Regional/Unión Europea (grants BIO2016-79133-P to D.A. and BIO2013-46539-R and BIO2016-80551-R to V.R.); the European Union SIGNAT-Research and Innovation Staff Exchange (Grant H2020-MSCA-RISE-2014-644435 to M.A.B., D.A., and J.J.C.); the Argentinian Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (Grant Proyectos de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica-2016-1459 to J.J.C.); Universidad de Buenos Aires (grant 20020170100505BA to J.J.C.); the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (awards R01GM067837 and R01GM056006 to S.A.K.); the German Research Foundation (DFG) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy/Initiative (Cluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences – Excellence Cluster EXC-2048/1, Project ID 390686111 to M.D.Z.); the International Max Planck Research School of the Max Planck Society; the Universities of Düsseldorf and of Cologne to T.B.; Nordrhein Westfalen Bioeconomy Science Center-FocusLabs CombiCom to N.H. and M.D.Z.; and Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic (Project LQ1601 Central European Institute of Technology 2020 to B.B. and M.C.). N.B.-T., E.I., and M.G.-L. were supported by Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad-Formación de Personal Investigador Program fellowships

COP1 destabilizes DELLA proteins in Arabidopsis

DELLA transcriptional regulators are central components in the control of plant growth responses to the environment. This control is considered to be mediated by changes in the metabolism of the hormones gibberellins (GAs), which promote the degradation of DELLAs. However, here we show that warm temperature or shade reduced the stability of a GA-insensitive DELLA allele in Arabidopsis thaliana. Furthermore, the degradation of DELLA induced by the warmth preceded changes in GA levels and depended on the E3 ubiquitin ligase CONSTITUTIVELY PHOTOMORPHOGENIC1 (COP1). COP1 enhanced the degradation of normal and GAinsensitive DELLA alleles when coexpressed in Nicotiana benthamiana. DELLA proteins physically interacted with COP1 in yeast, mammalian, and plant cells. This interaction was enhanced by the COP1 complex partner SUPRESSOR OF phyA-105 1 (SPA1). The level of ubiquitination of DELLA was enhanced by COP1 and COP1 ubiquitinated DELLA proteins in vitro. We propose that DELLAs are destabilized not only by the canonical GA-dependent pathway but also by COP1 and that this control is relevant for growth responses to shade and warm temperature.Fil: Blanco Touriñán, Noel. Universidad Politécnica de Valencia; EspañaFil: Legris, Martina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Buenos Aires. Fundación Instituto Leloir. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Minguet, Eugenio G.. Universidad Politécnica de Valencia; EspañaFil: Costigliolo Rojas, María Cecilia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Buenos Aires. Fundación Instituto Leloir. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Nohales, María A.. University of Southern California; Estados UnidosFil: Iniesto, Elisa. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; EspañaFil: García León, Marta. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; EspañaFil: Pacín, Manuel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; ArgentinaFil: Heucken, Nicole. Universitat Dusseldorf; AlemaniaFil: Blomeier, Tim. Universitat Dusseldorf; AlemaniaFil: Locascio, Antonella. Universidad Politécnica de Valencia; EspañaFil: Cerný, Martin. Mendel University in Brno; República ChecaFil: Esteve Bruna, David. Universidad Politécnica de Valencia; EspañaFil: Díez Díaz, Mónica. Univerdiad Catolica de Valencia; EspañaFil: Brzobohatý, Bretislav. Mendel University in Brno; República ChecaFil: Frerigmann, Henning. Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research; AlemaniaFil: Zurbriggen, Matías D.. Universitat Dusseldorf; AlemaniaFil: Kay, Steve A.. University of Southern California; Estados UnidosFil: Rubio, Vicente. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; EspañaFil: Blázquez, Miguel A.. Universidad Politécnica de Valencia; EspañaFil: Casal, Jorge José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Buenos Aires. Fundación Instituto Leloir. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; ArgentinaFil: Alabadí, David. Universidad Politécnica de Valencia; Españ

Induction of auxin biosynthesis and WOX5 repression mediate changes in root development in Arabidopsis exposed to chitosan

Chitosan is a natural polymer with applications in agriculture, which causes plasma membrane permeabilisation and induction of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) in plants. Chitosan has been mostly applied in the phylloplane to control plant diseases and to enhance plant defences, but has also been considered for controlling root pests. However, the effect of chitosan on roots is virtually unknown. In this work, we show that chitosan interfered with auxin homeostasis in Arabidopsis roots, promoting a 2-3 fold accumulation of indole acetic acid (IAA). We observed chitosan dose-dependent alterations of auxin synthesis, transport and signalling in Arabidopsis roots. As a consequence, high doses of chitosan reduce WOX5 expression in the root apical meristem and arrest root growth. Chitosan also propitiates accumulation of salicylic (SA) and jasmonic (JA) acids in Arabidopsis roots by induction of genes involved in their biosynthesis and signalling. In addition, high-dose chitosan irrigation of tomato and barley plants also arrests root development. Tomato root apices treated with chitosan showed isodiametric cells respect to rectangular cells in the controls. We found that chitosan causes strong alterations in root cell morphology. Our results highlight the importance of considering chitosan dose during agronomical applications to the rhizosphere

PICLN modulates alternative splicing and light/temperature responses in plants

Mateos J, Sanchez SE, Legris M, et al. PICLN modulates alternative splicing and light/temperature responses in plants. Plant Physiology. 2023.Plants undergo transcriptome reprograming to adapt to daily and seasonal fluctuations in light and temperature conditions. While most efforts have focused on the role of master transcription factors, the importance of splicing factors modulating these processes is now emerging. Efficient pre-mRNA splicing depends on proper spliceosome assembly, which in plants and animals requires the methylosome complex. Ion Chloride nucleotide-sensitive protein (PICLN) is part of the methylosome complex in both humans and Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), and we show here that the human PICLN ortholog rescues phenotypes of Arabidopsis picln mutants. Altered photomorphogenic and photoperiodic responses in Arabidopsis picln mutants are associated with changes in pre-mRNA splicing that partially overlap with those in PROTEIN ARGININE METHYL TRANSFERASE5 (prmt5) mutants. Mammalian PICLN also acts in concert with the Survival Motor Neuron (SMN) complex component GEMIN2 to modulate the late steps of UsnRNP assembly, and many alternative splicing events regulated by PICLN but not PRMT5, the main protein of the methylosome, are controlled by Arabidopsis GEMIN2. As with GEMIN2 and SM PROTEIN E1/PORCUPINE (SME1/PCP), low temperature, which increases PICLN expression, aggravates morphological and molecular defects of picln mutants. Taken together, these results establish a key role for PICLN in the regulation of pre-mRNA splicing and in mediating plant adaptation to daily and seasonal fluctuations in environmental conditions