253 research outputs found

    Toxic Mixtures in Time—The Sequence Makes the Poison

    Get PDF
    “The dose makes the poison”. This principle assumes that once a chemical is cleared out of the organism (toxicokinetic recovery), it no longer has any effect. However, it overlooks the other process of re-establishing homeostasis, toxicodynamic recovery, which can be fast or slow depending on the chemical. Therefore, when organisms are exposed to two toxicants in sequence, the toxicity can differ if their order is reversed. We test this hypothesis with the freshwater crustacean Gammarus pulex and four toxicants that act on different targets (diazinon, propiconazole, 4,6-dinitro-o-cresol, 4-nitrobenzyl chloride). We found clearly different toxicity when the exposure order of two toxicants was reversed, while maintaining the same dose. Slow toxicodynamic recovery caused carry-over toxicity in subsequent exposures, thereby resulting in a sequence effect–but only when toxicodynamic recovery was slow relative to the interval between exposures. This suggests that carry-over toxicity is a useful proxy for organism fitness and that risk assessment methods should be revised as they currently could underestimate risk. We provide the first evidence that carry-over toxicity occurs among chemicals acting on different targets and when exposure is several days apart. It is therefore not only the dose that makes the poison but also the exposure sequence

    Experimental exposure assessment of designed chemical mixtures in cell-based in vitro bioassays

    Get PDF
    Cell-based bioassays are useful tools for the effect assessment of complex mixtures, but so far exposure assessment has not been performed for mixtures of chemicals. In the present study, cytotoxicity and activation of oxidative stress response were measured for three designed chemical mixtures with up to twelve components. The measurements of biological responses were complemented by concentration measurements using solid-phase microextraction to derive the freely dissolved concentrations of the mixtures (Cfree,mix). The tested mixtures showed slightly higher cytotoxic effects than predicted by the concentration addition model. Nominal and freely dissolved effect concentrations of the mixtures were very similar (within a factor of 1.5), but nominal concentrations (Cnom) and Cfree of the individual mixture components were only similar for the hydrophilic chemicals (e.g., caffeine, coumarin, lamotrigine). For hydrophobic (e.g., fluoranthene) and acidic chemicals (e.g., diclofenac, naproxen) Cfree was up to 648 times lower than Cnom. Chemicals were dosed in equipotent nominal concentration ratios and therefore contributed equally to the detected effects. Hydrophilic chemicals with low potency dominated Cnom,mix (up to 95%) and Cfree,mix (up to 99%). Several mixture components (e.g., diclofenac, ibuprofen, naproxen and warfarin) showed increasing free fractions with increasing Cnom,mix and therefore also a concentration-dependent contribution to Cfree,mix. Based on the findings of this study, we concluded that Cnom,mix will be sufficient for evaluating the toxicity of mixtures that contain chemicals with diverse physicochemical properties at low concentration levels. In contrast, for risk assessment purposes and quantitative in vitro to in vivo extrapolations, Cfree,mix is a better parameter because the in vitro responses can be related to freely dissolved concentrations in human plasma

    Molecular Mechanisms in Ecotoxicology: An Interplay between Environmental Chemistry and Biology

    Get PDF
    A close collaboration between environmental chemistry and biological sciences is required for a complete understanding of ecotoxicological effects. Bioavailability and uptake of pollutants cannot be regarded as isolated chemical or biological questions. Knowledge of the effective concentrations in the organism or at the target site(s) is essential to link the fate and effects of a chemical and is a prerequisite for quantitative investigation of the modes of toxic action. These modes of action need to be unraveled using whole-organism or in vitro systems in order to be able to develop specific biomarkers and biosensors that can be applied as early warning systems. Our mode-of-action-based approaches, in which chemical and biological analytical tools are combined, should improve the understanding of ecotoxicological effects and should be implemented in the future in risk assessment

    Antimicrobial Transformation Products in the Aquatic Environment: Global Occurrence, Ecotoxicological Risks, and Potential of Antibiotic Resistance

    Get PDF
    The global spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) isconcerningfor the health of humans, animals, and the environment in a One Healthperspective. Assessments of AMR and associated environmental hazardsmostly focus on antimicrobial parent compounds, while largely overlookingtheir transformation products (TPs). This review lists antimicrobialTPs identified in surface water environments and examines their potentialfor AMR promotion, ecological risk, as well as human health and environmentalhazards using in silico models. Our review also summarizesthe key transformation compartments of TPs, related pathways for TPsreaching surface waters and methodologies for studying the fate ofTPs. The 56 antimicrobial TPs covered by the review were prioritizedvia scoring and ranking of various risk and hazard parameters. Mostdata on occurrences to date have been reported in Europe, while littleis known about antibiotic TPs in Africa, Central and South America,Asia, and Oceania. Occurrence data on antiviral TPs and other antibacterialTPs are even scarcer. We propose evaluation of structural similaritybetween parent compounds and TPs for TP risk assessment. We predicteda risk of AMR for 13 TPs, especially TPs of tetracyclines and macrolides.We estimated the ecotoxicological effect concentrations of TPs fromthe experimental effect data of the parent chemical for bacteria,algae and water fleas, scaled by potency differences predicted byquantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for baselinetoxicity and a scaling factor for structural similarity. Inclusionof TPs in mixtures with their parent increased the ecological riskquotient over the threshold of one for 7 of the 24 antimicrobialsincluded in this analysis, while only one parent had a risk quotientabove one. Thirteen TPs, from which 6 were macrolide TPs, posed arisk to at least one of the three tested species. There were 12/21TPs identified that are likely to exhibit a similar or higher levelof mutagenicity/carcinogenicity, respectively, than their parent compound,with tetracycline TPs often showing increased mutagenicity. Most TPswith increased carcinogenicity belonged to sulfonamides. Most of theTPs were predicted to be mobile but not bioaccumulative, and 14 werepredicted to be persistent. The six highest-priority TPs originatedfrom the tetracycline antibiotic family and antivirals. This review,and in particular our ranking of antimicrobial TPs of concern, cansupport authorities in planning related intervention strategies andsource mitigation of antimicrobials toward a sustainable future

    Death Dilemma and Organism Recovery in Ecotoxicology

    Get PDF
    Why do some individuals survive after exposure to chemicals while others die? Either, the tolerance threshold is distributed among the individuals in a population, and its exceedance leads to certain death, or all individuals share the same threshold above which death occurs stochastically. The previously published General Unified Threshold model of Survival (GUTS) established a mathematical relationship between the two assumptions. According to this model stochastic death would result in systematically faster compensation and damage repair mechanisms than individual tolerance. Thus, we face a circular conclusion dilemma because inference about the death mechanism is inherently linked to the speed of damage recovery. We provide empirical evidence that the stochastic death model consistently infers much faster toxicodynamic recovery than the individual tolerance model. Survival data can be explained by either, slower damage recovery and a wider individual tolerance distribution, or faster damage recovery paired with a narrow tolerance distribution. The toxicodynamic model parameters exhibited meaningful patterns in chemical space, which is why we suggest toxicodynamic model parameters as novel phenotypic anchors for in vitro to in vivo toxicity extrapolation. GUTS appears to be a promising refinement of traditional survival curve analysis and dose response models

    Significance of Xenobiotic Metabolism for Bioaccumulation Kinetics of Organic Chemicals in Gammarus pulex

    Get PDF
    Bioaccumulation and biotransformation are key toxicokinetic processes that modify toxicity of chemicals and sensitivity of organisms. Bioaccumulation kinetics vary greatly among organisms and chemicals; thus, we investigated the influence of biotransformation kinetics on bioaccumulation in a model aquatic invertebrate using fifteen C-14-labeled organic xenobiotics from diverse chemical classes and physicochemical properties (1,2,3-trichlorobenzene, imidacloprid, 4,6-dinitro-o-cresol, ethylacrylate, malathion, chlorpyrifos, aldicarb, carbofuran, carbaryl, 2,4-dichlorophenol, 2,4,5-trichlorophenol, pentachlorophenol, 4-nitrobenzyl-chloride, 2,4-dichloroaniline, and sea-nine (4,5-dichloro-2-octyl-3-isothiazolone)). We detected and identified metabolites using HPLC with UV and radio-detection as well as high resolution mass spectrometry (LTQ-Orbitrap). Kinetics of uptake, biotransformation, and elimination of parent compounds and metabolites were modeled with a first-order one-compartment model. Bioaccumulation factors were calculated for parent compounds and metabolite enrichment factors for metabolites. Out of 19 detected metabolites, we identified seven by standards or accurate mass measurements and two via pathway analysis and analogies to other compounds. 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene, imidacloprid, and 4,6-dinitro-o-cresol were not biotransformed. Dietary uptake contributed little to overall uptake. Differentiation between parent and metabolites increased accuracy of bioaccumulation parameters compared to total C-14 measurements. Biotransformation dominated toxicokinetics and strongly affected internal concentrations of parent compounds and metabolites. Many metabolites reached higher internal concentrations than their parents, characterized by large metabolite enrichment factors

    Applying mixture toxicity modelling to predict bacterial bioluminescence inhibition by non-specifically acting pharmaceuticals and specifically acting antibiotics

    Get PDF
    Pharmaceuticals and antibiotics co-occur in the aquatic environment but mixture studies to date have mainly focused on pharmaceuticals alone or antibiotics alone, although differences in mode of action may lead to different effects in mixtures. In this study we used the Bacterial Luminescence Toxicity Screen (BLT-Screen) after acute (0.5 h) and chronic (16 h) exposure to evaluate how non-specifically acting pharmaceuticals and specifically acting antibiotics act together in mixtures. Three models were applied to predict mixture toxicity including concentration addition, independent action and the two-step prediction (TSP) model, which groups similarly acting chemicals together using concentration addition, followed by independent action to combine the two groups. All non-antibiotic pharmaceuticals had similar EC50 values at both 0.5 and 16 h, indicating together with a QSAR (Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship) analysis that they act as baseline toxicants. In contrast, the antibiotics’ EC50 values decreased by up to three orders of magnitude after 16 h, which can be explained by their specific effect on bacteria. Equipotent mixtures of non-antibiotic pharmaceuticals only, antibiotics only and both non-antibiotic pharmaceuticals and antibiotics were prepared based on the single chemical results. The mixture toxicity models were all in close agreement with the experimental results, with predicted EC50 values within a factor of two of the experimental results. This suggests that concentration addition can be applied to bacterial assays to model the mixture effects of environmental samples containing both specifically and non-specifically acting chemicals

    Resilience of Micropollutant and Biological Effect Removal in an Aerated Horizontal Flow Treatment Wetland

    Get PDF
    The performance of an aerated horizontal subsurface flow treatment wetland was investigated before, during and after a simulated aeration failure. Conventional wastewater parameters (e.g., carbonaceous biological oxygen demand, total nitrogen, and Escherichia coli) as well as selected micropollutants (caffeine, ibuprofen, naproxen, benzotriazole, diclofenac, acesulfame, and carbamazepine) were investigated. Furthermore, the removal of biological effects was investigated using in vitro bioassays. The six bioassays selected covered environmentally relevant endpoints (indicative of activation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor, AhR; binding to the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, PPARγ; activation of estrogen receptor alpha, ERα; activation of glucocorticoid receptor, GR; oxidative stress response, AREc32; combined algae test, CAT). During the aeration interruption phase, the water quality deteriorated to a degree comparable to that of a conventional (non-aerated) horizontal subsurface flow wetland. After the end of the aeration interruption, the analytical and biological parameters investigated recovered at different time periods until their initial treatment performance. Treatment efficacy for conventional parameters was recovered within a few days, but no complete recovery of treatment efficacy could be observed for bioassays AhR, AREc32 and CAT in the 21 days following re-start of the aeration system. Furthermore, the removal efficacy along the flow path for most of the chemicals and bioassays recovered as it was observed in the baseline phase. Only for the activation of AhR and AREc32 there was a shift of the internal treatment profile from 12.5% to 25% (AhR) and 50% (AREc32) of the fractional length
    corecore