36 research outputs found

    Assessing the carcinogenic potential of low-dose exposures to chemical mixtures in the environment: the challenge ahead

    Get PDF
    Lifestyle factors are responsible for a considerable portion of cancer incidence worldwide, but credible estimates from the World Health Organization and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) suggest that the fraction of cancers attributable to toxic environmental exposures is between 7% and 19%. To explore the hypothesis that low-dose exposures to mixtures of chemicals in the environment may be combining to contribute to environmental carcinogenesis, we reviewed 11 hallmark phenotypes of cancer, multiple priority target sites for disruption in each area and prototypical chemical disruptors for all targets, this included dose-response characterizations, evidence of low-dose effects and cross-hallmark effects for all targets and chemicals. In total, 85 examples of chemicals were reviewed for actions on key pathways/mechanisms related to carcinogenesis. Only 15% (13/85) were found to have evidence of a dose-response threshold, whereas 59% (50/85) exerted low-dose effects. No dose-response information was found for the remaining 26% (22/85). Our analysis suggests that the cumulative effects of individual (non-carcinogenic) chemicals acting on different pathways, and a variety of related systems, organs, tissues and cells could plausibly conspire to produce carcinogenic synergies. Additional basic research on carcinogenesis and research focused on low-dose effects of chemical mixtures needs to be rigorously pursued before the merits of this hypothesis can be further advanced. However, the structure of the World Health Organization International Programme on Chemical Safety ‘Mode of Action’ framework should be revisited as it has inherent weaknesses that are not fully aligned with our current understanding of cancer biology

    ”Jag skulle önska att de lyssnade mer på mig, på mina behov än på mallens behov” : Unga kvinnor med självskadebeteende och deras levda erfarenhet av svensk psykiatrivård

    No full text
    Denna uppsats syftar till att lyfta fram unga kvinnor med självskadebeteende och deras levda erfarenheter och upplevelser av svensk psykiatrivård. Vi ämnar undersöka hur kvinnorna upplever bemötandet av vårdpersonalen, vilka handlingsalternativ de upplever har varit möjliga i kontakten med densamma och hur detta påverkat deras syn på sig själva. Vidare vill vi förstå hur kvinnorna upplever att deras vård påverkat deras syn på framtiden. Materialet har vi samlat in genom kvalitativa intervjuer med tre unga kvinnor som varit i kontakt med psykiatrin på grund av deras självskadebeteende. Både teori och metod tar i stor utsträckning avstamp i det fenomenologiska perspektivet. I analysen framkom det att kvinnorna ofta upplevde att de inte blev tagna på allvar eller lyssnade till. Kvinnorna upplevde att handlingsalternativen till en början var begränsade och att de därför överlämnade vården i läkarnas händer. Diagnoserna de fick gav dem med tiden en viss motmakt i mötet med personalen. Diagnoserna gav dem även ökad förståelse för dem själva och möjliggjorde en distinktion mellan dem och deras sjukdomar. Två, av de tre kvinnorna, ser ljust på framtiden medan den tredje kvinnan har svårt att veta vad hon kan förvänta sig av framtiden

    Characterization and intercomparison of aerosol absorption photometers: result of two intercomparison workshops

    Get PDF
    Absorption photometers for real time application have been available since the 1980s, but the use of filterbased instruments to derive information on aerosol properties (absorption coefficient and black carbon, BC) is still a matter of debate. Several workshops have been conducted to investigate the performance of individual instruments over the intervening years. Two workshops with large sets of aerosol absorption photometers were conducted in 2005 and 2007. The data from these instruments were corrected using existing methods before further analysis. The intercomparison shows a large variation between the responses to absorbing aerosol particles for different types of instruments. The unit to unit variability between instruments can be up to 30% for Particle Soot Absorption Photometers (PSAPs) and Aethalometers. Multi Angle Absorption Photometers (MAAPs) showed a variability of less than 5%. Reasons for the high variability were identified to be variations in sample flow and spot size. It was observed that different flow rates influence system performance with respect to response to absorption and instrumental noise. Measurements with non absorbing particles showed that the current corrections of a cross sensitivity to particle scattering are not sufficient. Remaining cross sensitivities were found to be a function of the total particle load on the filter. The large variation between the response to absorbing aerosol particles for different types of instruments indicates that current correction functions for absorption photometers are not adequate.
    corecore