Assessment of the molecular mechanisms of action of novel 4-phenylpyridine-2-one and 6-phenylpyrimidin-4-one allosteric modulators at the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors

Positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) that target the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine (ACh) receptor (M1 mAChR) are potential treatments for cognitive deficits in conditions such as Alzheimer's disease and schizophrenia. We recently reported novel 4-phenylpyridine-2-one and 6-phenylpyrimidin-4-one M1 mAChR PAMs with the potential to display different modes of positive allosteric modulation and/or agonism (Mistry et al., 2016), but their molecular mechanisms of action remain undetermined. The current study compared the pharmacology of three such novel PAMs with the prototypical first-generation PAM, BQCA, in a recombinant Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line stably expressing the human M1 mAChR. Interactions between the orthosteric agonists and the novel PAMs or BQCA suggested their allosteric effects were solely governed by modulation of agonist affinity. The greatest degree of positive co-operativity was observed with higher efficacy agonists, whereas minimal potentiation was observed when the modulators were tested against the lower efficacy agonist, xanomeline. Each PAM was investigated for its effects on the endogenous agonist, ACh, on three different signalling pathways, (ERK1/2 phosphorylation, IP1 accumulation and β-arrestin-2 recruitment), revealing that the allosteric potentiation generally tracked with the efficiency of stimulus-response coupling and that there was little pathway bias in the allosteric effects. Thus, despite the identification of novel allosteric scaffolds targeting the M1 mAChR, the molecular mechanism of action of these compounds is largely consistent with a model of allostery previously described for BQCA, suggesting that this may be a more generalized mechanism for M1 mAChR PAM effects than previously appreciated

Exploring use of unsupervised clustering to associate signaling profiles of GPCR ligands to clinical response.

Signaling diversity of G protein-coupled (GPCR) ligands provides novel opportunities to develop more effective, better-tolerated therapeutics. Taking advantage of these opportunities requires identifying which effectors should be specifically activated or avoided so as to promote desired clinical responses and avoid side effects. However, identifying signaling profiles that support desired clinical outcomes remains challenging. This study describes signaling diversity of mu opioid receptor (MOR) ligands in terms of logistic and operational parameters for ten different in vitro readouts. It then uses unsupervised clustering of curve parameters to: classify MOR ligands according to similarities in type and magnitude of response, associate resulting ligand categories with frequency of undesired events reported to the pharmacovigilance program of the Food and Drug Administration and associate signals to side effects. The ability of the classification method to associate specific in vitro signaling profiles to clinically relevant responses was corroborated using β2-adrenergic receptor ligands.This research was supported by a research contract from Pfizer Inc. and grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Grant 311997 to G.P.) and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP 324876 (to G.P.), MOP 102630 (to M.B. and O.L.) and Foundation grant (FDN-148431) to MB. MB holds a Canada Research Chair in Signal Transduction and Molecular Pharmacology. Dr Lichtarge’s research was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH 2R01 GM066099; NIH 5R01 GM079656). B.B. was supported by a studentship from Fonds de Recherche en Santé du Québec. P.D. was supported by a MITACS fellowship

Development of novel 4‐arylpyridin‐2‐one and 6‐arylpyrimidin‐4‐one positive allosteric modulators of the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor

This study investigated the structure‐activity relationships of 4‐phenylpyridin‐2‐one and 6‐phenylpyrimidin‐4‐one muscarinic M1 acetylcholine receptor (M1 mAChRs) positive allosteric modulators (PAMs). The presented series focuses on modifications to the core and top motif of the reported leads, MIPS1650 (1) and MIPS1780 (2). Profiling of our novel analogues showed that these modifications result in more nuanced effects on the allosteric properties compared to our previous compounds with alterations to the biaryl pendant. Further pharmacological characterisation of the selected compounds in radioligand binding, IP1 accumulation and β‐arrestin 2 recruitment assays demonstrated that despite primarily acting as affinity modulators, the PAMs displayed different pharmacological properties across the two cellular assays. The novel PAM 7f is a potential lead candidate for further development of peripherally‐restricted M1 PAMs, due to its lower blood‐brain‐barrier (BBB) permeability and improved exposure in the periphery compared to lead 2

In Vitro Pharmacological Characterization of RXFP3 Allosterism: An Example of Probe Dependency

Recent findings suggest that the relaxin-3 neural network may represent a new ascending arousal pathway able to modulate a range of neural circuits including those affecting circadian rhythm and sleep/wake states, spatial and emotional memory, motivation and reward, the response to stress, and feeding and metabolism. Therefore, the relaxin-3 receptor (RXFP3) is a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of various CNS diseases. Here we describe a novel selective RXFP3 receptor positive allosteric modulator (PAM), 3-[3,5-Bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-1-(3,4-dichlorobenzyl)-1-[2-(5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]urea (135PAM1). Calcium mobilization and cAMP accumulation assays in cell lines expressing the cloned human RXFP3 receptor show the compound does not directly activate RXFP3 receptor but increases functional responses to amidated relaxin-3 or R3/I5, a chimera of the INSL5 A chain and the Relaxin-3 B chain. 135PAM1 increases calcium mobilization in the presence of relaxin-3NH2 and R3/I5NH2 with pEC50 values of 6.54 (6.46 to 6.64) and 6.07 (5.94 to 6.20), respectively. In the cAMP accumulation assay, 135PAM1 inhibits the CRE response to forskolin with a pIC50 of 6.12 (5.98 to 6.27) in the presence of a probe (10 nM) concentration of relaxin-3NH2. 135PAM1 does not compete for binding with the orthosteric radioligand, [125I] R3I5 (amide), in membranes prepared from cells expressing the cloned human RXFP3 receptor. 135PAM1 is selective for RXFP3 over RXFP4, which also responds to relaxin-3. However, when using the free acid (native) form of relaxin-3 or R3/I5, 135PAM1 doesn't activate RXFP3 indicating that the compound's effect is probe dependent. Thus one can exchange the entire A-chain of the probe peptide while retaining PAM activity, but the state of the probe's c-terminus is crucial to allosteric activity of the PAM. These data demonstrate the existence of an allosteric site for modulation of this GPCR as well as the subtlety of changes in probe molecules that can affect allosteric modulation of RXFP3

Impedance Responses Reveal β2-Adrenergic Receptor Signaling Pluridimensionality and Allow Classification of Ligands with Distinct Signaling Profiles

The discovery that drugs targeting a single G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) can differentially modulate distinct subsets of the receptor signaling repertoire has created a challenge for drug discovery at these important therapeutic targets. Here, we demonstrate that a single label-free assay based on cellular impedance provides a real-time integration of multiple signaling events engaged upon GPCR activation. Stimulation of the β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR) in living cells with the prototypical agonist isoproterenol generated a complex, multi-featured impedance response over time. Selective pharmacological inhibition of specific arms of the β2AR signaling network revealed the differential contribution of Gs-, Gi- and Gβγ-dependent signaling events, including activation of the canonical cAMP and ERK1/2 pathways, to specific components of the impedance response. Further dissection revealed the essential role of intracellular Ca2+ in the impedance response and led to the discovery of a novel β2AR-promoted Ca2+ mobilization event. Recognizing that impedance responses provide an integrative assessment of ligand activity, we screened a collection of β-adrenergic ligands to determine if differences in the signaling repertoire engaged by compounds would lead to distinct impedance signatures. An unsupervised clustering analysis of the impedance responses revealed the existence of 5 distinct compound classes, revealing a richer signaling texture than previously recognized for this receptor. Taken together, these data indicate that the pluridimensionality of GPCR signaling can be captured using integrative approaches to provide a comprehensive readout of drug activity

Ligand-induced changes in impedance are multi-featured and concentration-dependent.

<p>(<b>A</b>) Impedance measurements were obtained in 6HisHA-β₂AR-HEK293S cells following treatment with isoproterenol (ISO) at the concentrations indicated. Impedance responses (represented as changes in Cell Index) were normalized and baseline-corrected as described in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0029420#s4" target="_blank"><i>Materials and Methods</i></a> and <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0029420#pone.0029420.s009" target="_blank">Figure S9</a>. Inset: Enlargement of the transient negative phase of the response. (<b>B</b>) Features of the ISO impedance signature with the inset showing an enlargement of the first 10 minutes post-stimulation. (<b>C,D</b>) Concentration-response curves describing the maximum impedance response generated (<b>C</b>) and the slope of the rapid ascending phase (<b>D</b>) reveal distinct EC₅₀ values. Data represent means of at least three independent experiments (± SEM for C and D). For clarity, error bars are not shown for impedance responses. Typical experimental variability in the impedance responses is demonstrated in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0029420#pone.0029420.s005" target="_blank">Figure S5</a>.</p