11 research outputs found
Explorations, Vol. 4, No. 2
Articles include:
Cover: Maya—painted clay figure from Jaina Island, Campeche, Mexico, 500-700A. D., approximately 100 percent. The clay figure is from a superb assemblage of pre-Hispanic materials from Mexico and Central America donated to the University of Maine’s Hudson Museum from the estate of William P Palmer III. In addition to this fine collection, Palmer donated an extensive array of objects from the Northwest Coast. Palmer earned his undergraduate degree in history and government from the University of Maine, and remained a strong, active supporter of the institution throughout his lifetime. More examples of objects from the Palmer Collection, including some pre-Columbian goldwork from Central America, may be found on page 10.
Editorial Reflections, by Carole J. Bombard
A Living Educational Experience: The Hudson Museum, by Richard G. Emerick
Molly in the Museum
Other Wonders, Other Ways
From Classroom Walls to High Tech Museum
Sharing Our Strengths: the development of youth conservation clubs in Pakistan, by James A. Sherburne
Up Close and Personal
Objects, Signs, and Symbols from Scafell to Chamonix: Visions of Mont Blanc, by Robert Brinkley
Public Service in Special Places: Music Education as Empowerment, by Susan Grindel Cosset Lambs, Floods and Stars, by Roberta Chester
Tuning the Immune System Fighting AIDS, Cancer and Other Diseases, by Anne P. Sherblom and Charles E. Moody
Why do they do it? One Graduate Student Explains, by Diane Carroll
Nutrition and Reproduction in Cows, by Barbara Barton and Diane Carroll
Diane Carroll: former graduate student Research News
Research New
Rhythm, Sound and Movement: The Guitarist as Participant-Observer in Jamaica's Studio Culture
PaCTS 1.0: a crowdsourced reporting standard for paleoclimate data
The progress of science is tied to the standardization of measurements, instruments, and data. This is especially true in the Big Data age, where analyzing large data volumes critically hinges on the data being standardized. Accordingly, the lack of community‐sanctioned data standards in paleoclimatology has largely precluded the benefits of Big Data advances in the field. Building upon recent efforts to standardize the format and terminology of paleoclimate data, this article describes the Paleoclimate Community reporTing Standard (PaCTS), a crowdsourced reporting standard for such data. PaCTS captures which information should be included when reporting paleoclimate data, with the goal of maximizing the reuse value of paleoclimate data sets, particularly for synthesis work and comparison to climate model simulations. Initiated by the LinkedEarth project, the process to elicit a reporting standard involved an international workshop in 2016, various forms of digital community engagement over the next few years, and grassroots working groups. Participants in this process identified important properties across paleoclimate archives, in addition to the reporting of uncertainties and chronologies; they also identified archive‐specific properties and distinguished reporting standards for new versus legacy data sets. This work shows that at least 135 respondents overwhelmingly support a drastic increase in the amount of metadata accompanying paleoclimate data sets. Since such goals are at odds with present practices, we discuss a transparent path toward implementing or revising these recommendations in the near future, using both bottom‐up and top‐down approaches
A global benchmark study using affinity-based biosensors
International audienceTo explore the variability in biosensor studies, 150 participants from 20 countries were given the same protein samples and asked to determine kinetic rate constants for the interaction. We chose a protein system that was amenable to analysis using different biosensor platforms as well as by users of different expertise levels. The two proteins (a 50-kDa Fab and a 60-kDa glutathione S-transferase [GST] antigen) form a relatively high-affinity complex, so participants needed to optimize several experimental parameters, including ligand immobilization and regeneration conditions as well as analyte concentrations and injection/dissociation times. Although most participants collected binding responses that could be fit to yield kinetic parameters, the quality of a few data sets could have been improved by optimizing the assay design. Once these outliers were removed, the average reported affinity across the remaining panel of participants was 620 pM with a standard deviation of 980 pM. These results demonstrate that when this biosensor assay was designed and executed appropriately, the reported rate constants were consistent, and independent of which protein was immobilized and which biosensor was used. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved