78 research outputs found

    Adaptations of the balloon analog risk task for neuroimaging settings: a systematic review

    Get PDF
    IntroductionThe Balloon Analog Risk Task (BART), a computerized behavioral paradigm, is one of the most common tools used to assess the risk-taking propensity of an individual. Since its initial behavioral version, the BART has been adapted to neuroimaging technique to explore brain networks of risk-taking behavior. However, while there are a variety of paradigms adapted to neuroimaging to date, no consensus has been reached on the best paradigm with the appropriate parameters to study the brain during risk-taking assessed by the BART. In this review of the literature, we aimed to identify the most appropriate BART parameters to adapt the initial paradigm to neuroimaging and increase the reliability of this tool.MethodsA systematic review focused on the BART versions adapted to neuroimaging was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.ResultsA total of 105 articles with 6,879 subjects identified from the PubMed database met the inclusion criteria. The BART was adapted in four neuroimaging techniques, mostly in functional magnetic resonance imaging or electroencephalography settings.DiscussionFirst, to adapt the BART to neuroimaging, a delay was included between each trial, the total number of inflations was reduced between 12 and 30 pumps, and the number of trials was increased between 80 and 100 balloons, enabling us to respect the recording constraints of neuroimaging. Second, explicit feedback about the balloon burst limited the decisions under ambiguity associated with the first trials. Third, employing an outcome index that provides more informative measures than the standard average pump score, along with a model incorporating an exponential monotonic increase in explosion probability and a maximum explosion probability between 50 and 75%, can yield a reliable estimation of risk profile. Additionally, enhancing participant motivation can be achieved by increasing the reward in line with the risk level and implementing payment based on their performance in the BART. Although there is no universal adaptation of the BART to neuroimaging, and depending on the objectives of a study, an adjustment of parameters optimizes its evaluation and clinical utility in assessing risk-taking

    Consensus classification of posterior cortical atrophy

    Get PDF
    INTRODUCTION: A classification framework for posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) is proposed to improve the uniformity of definition of the syndrome in a variety of research settings. METHODS: Consensus statements about PCA were developed through a detailed literature review, the formation of an international multidisciplinary working party which convened on four occasions, and a Web-based quantitative survey regarding symptom frequency and the conceptualization of PCA. RESULTS: A three-level classification framework for PCA is described comprising both syndrome- and disease-level descriptions. Classification level 1 (PCA) defines the core clinical, cognitive, and neuroimaging features and exclusion criteria of the clinico-radiological syndrome. Classification level 2 (PCA-pure, PCA-plus) establishes whether, in addition to the core PCA syndrome, the core features of any other neurodegenerative syndromes are present. Classification level 3 (PCA attributable to AD [PCA-AD], Lewy body disease [PCA-LBD], corticobasal degeneration [PCA-CBD], prion disease [PCA-prion]) provides a more formal determination of the underlying cause of the PCA syndrome, based on available pathophysiological biomarker evidence. The issue of additional syndrome-level descriptors is discussed in relation to the challenges of defining stages of syndrome severity and characterizing phenotypic heterogeneity within the PCA spectrum. DISCUSSION: There was strong agreement regarding the definition of the core clinico-radiological syndrome, meaning that the current consensus statement should be regarded as a refinement, development, and extension of previous single-center PCA criteria rather than any wholesale alteration or redescription of the syndrome. The framework and terminology may facilitate the interpretation of research data across studies, be applicable across a broad range of research scenarios (e.g., behavioral interventions, pharmacological trials), and provide a foundation for future collaborative work

    Neurodevelopmental and Neurodegenerative Similarities and Interactions: A Point of View About Lifelong Neurocognitive Trajectories

    No full text
    International audienceNeurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders are both growing major public health topics with similarities and frequent complex interactions with each other. Taking these aspects into account can provide a new point of view on lifelong neurocognitive trajectories. Assessing both neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative dimensions during cognitive and behavioral clinical assessments is challenging but might improve diagnostic accuracy and physiopathological understanding. It is therefore necessary to understand the lifelong specific neurocognitive trajectory of each patient in order to develop personalized precision cognitive medicine

    [Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease in current clinical practice].

    No full text
    International audienceThe cerebrospinal fluid levels of amyloid beta 1-42 (AÎČ1-42), total tau and tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (ptau181) are well established biomarkers of cerebral amyloid pathology and tau related neurodegeneration, two hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease. These biomarkers can help to improve diagnostic accuracy and consequent decisions on counseling, support, and therapy of patients with mild cognitive impairment and dementia. The use of biomarkers is part of the proposed new criteria of AD diagnosis. It may be particularly helpful in cases of atypical clinical presentation and uncertain diagnosis, and if an important benefit for the patient is expected. The ongoing development of new biomarkers based on less or non-invasive procedures will allow for a larger use of biomarkers to improve the diagnosis of cognitive impairment

    Les biomarqueurs du liquide cĂ©phalorachidien dans la maladie d’Alzheimer en pratique clinique courante

    No full text
    The cerebrospinal fluid levels of amyloid beta 1-42 (AÎČ1-42), total tau and tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (ptau181) are well established biomarkers of cerebral amyloid pathology and tau related neurodegeneration, two hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease. These biomarkers can help to improve diagnostic accuracy and consequent decisions on counseling, support, and therapy of patients with mild cognitive impairment and dementia. The use of biomarkers is part of the proposed new criteria of AD diagnosis. It may be particularly helpful in cases of atypical clinical presentation and uncertain diagnosis, and if an important benefit for the patient is expected. The ongoing development of new biomarkers based on less or non-invasive procedures will allow for a larger use of biomarkers to improve the diagnosis of cognitive impairment
    • 

    corecore