Overview of Cellular Immunotherapy for Patients with Glioblastoma

High grade gliomas (HGG) including glioblastomas (GBM) are the most common and devastating primary brain tumours. Despite important progresses in GBM treatment that currently includes surgery combined to radio- and chemotherapy, GBM patients' prognosis remains very poor. Immunotherapy is one of the new promising therapeutic approaches that can specifically target tumour cells. Such an approach could also maintain long term antitumour responses without inducing neurologic defects. Since the past 25 years, adoptive and active immunotherapies using lymphokine-activated killer cells, cytotoxic T cells, tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes, autologous tumour cells, and dendritic cells have been tested in phase I/II clinical trials with HGG patients. This paper inventories these cellular immunotherapeutic strategies and discusses their efficacy, limits, and future perspectives for optimizing the treatment to achieve clinical benefits for GBM patients

DGKI Methylation Status Modulates the Prognostic Value of MGMT in Glioblastoma Patients Treated with Combined Radio-Chemotherapy with Temozolomide

International audienceBackgroundConsistently reported prognostic factors for glioblastoma (GBM) are age, extent of surgery, performance status, IDH1 mutational status, and MGMT promoter methylation status. We aimed to integrate biological and clinical prognostic factors into a nomogram intended to predict the survival time of an individual GBM patient treated with a standard regimen. In a previous study we showed that the methylation status of the DGKI promoter identified patients with MGMT-methylated tumors that responded poorly to the standard regimen. We further evaluated the potential prognostic value of DGKI methylation status.Methods399 patients with newly diagnosed GBM and treated with a standard regimen were retrospectively included in this study. Survival modelling was performed on two patient populations: intention-to-treat population of all included patients (population 1) and MGMT-methylated patients (population 2). Cox proportional hazard models were fitted to identify the main prognostic factors. A nomogram was developed for population 1. The prognostic value of DGKI promoter methylation status was evaluated on population 1 and population 2.ResultsThe nomogram-based stratification of the cohort identified two risk groups (high/low) with significantly different median survival. We validated the prognostic value of DGKI methylation status for MGMT-methylated patients. We also demonstrated that the DGKI methylation status identified 22% of poorly responding patients in the low-risk group defined by the nomogram.ConclusionsOur results improve the conventional MGMT stratification of GBM patients receiving standard treatment. These results could help the interpretation of published or ongoing clinical trial outcomes and refine patient recruitment in the future

Memory in low-grade glioma patients treated with radiotherapy or temozolomide: a correlative analysis of EORTC study 22033-26033

Background: EORTC study 22033-26033 showed no difference in progression-free survival between high-risk low-grade glioma receiving either radiotherapy (RT) or temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy alone as primary treatment. Considering the potential long-term deleterious impact of RT on memory functioning, this study aims to determine whether TMZ is associated with less impaired memory functioning. Methods: Using the Visual Verbal Learning Test (VVLT), memory functioning was evaluated at baseline and subsequently every 6 months. Minimal compliance for statistical analyses was set at 60%. Conventional indices of memory performance (VVLT Immediate Recall, Total Recall, Learning Capacity, and Delayed Recall) were used as outcome measures. Using a mixed linear model, memory functioning was compared between treatment arms and over time. Results: Neuropsychological assessment was performed in 98 patients (53 RT, 46 TMZ). At 12 months, compliance had dropped to 66%, restricting analyses to baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. At baseline, patients in either treatment arm did not differ in memory functioning, sex, age, or educational level. Over time, patients in both arms showed improvement in Immediate Recall (P = 0.017) and total number of words recalled (Total Recall; P < 0.001, albeit with delayed improvement in RT patients (group by time; P = 0.011). Memory functioning was not associated with RT gross, clinical, or planned target volumes. Conclusion: In patients with high-risk low-grade glioma there is no indication that in the first year after treatment, RT has a deleterious effect on memory function compared with TMZ chemotherapy. Keywords: chemotherapy; low-grade glioma; memory functioning; radiotherapy

DNA methylation in glioblastoma: impact on gene expression and clinical outcome

International audienceBACKGROUND: Changes in promoter DNA methylation pattern of genes involved in key biological pathways have been reported in glioblastoma. Genome-wide assessments of DNA methylation levels are now required to decipher the epigenetic events involved in the aggressive phenotype of glioblastoma, and to guide new treatment strategies. RESULTS: We performed a whole-genome integrative analysis of methylation and gene expression profiles in 40 newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients. We also screened for associations between the level of methylation of CpG sites and overall survival in a cohort of 50 patients uniformly treated by surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (STUPP protocol). The methylation analysis identified 616 CpG sites differentially methylated between glioblastoma and control brain, a quarter of which was differentially expressed in a concordant way. Thirteen of the genes with concordant CpG sites displayed an inverse correlation between promoter methylation and expression level in glioblastomas: B3GNT5, FABP7, ZNF217, BST2, OAS1, SLC13A5, GSTM5, ME1, UBXD3, TSPYL5, FAAH, C7orf13, and C3orf14. Survival analysis identified six CpG sites associated with overall survival. SOX10 promoter methylation status (two CpG sites) stratified patients similarly to MGMT status, but with a higher Area Under the Curve (0.78 vs. 0.71, p-value < 5e-04). The methylation status of the FNDC3B, TBX3, DGKI, and FSD1 promoters identified patients with MGMT-methylated tumors that did not respond to STUPP treatment (p-value < 1e-04). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first genome-wide integrative analysis of DNA methylation and gene expression profiles obtained from the same GBM cohort. We also present a methylome-based survival analysis for one of the largest uniformly treated GBM cohort ever studied, for more than 27,000 CpG sites. We have identified genes whose expression may be tightly regulated by epigenetic mechanisms and markers that may guide treatment decisions

Implications of immune-associated genes and immune cells in glioblastoma.

Introduction : Le glioblastome (GBM) est la tumeur cérébrale primitive la plus fréquente et la plus grave de l’adulte. Des études épidémiologiques ont mis en évidence que les antécédents d’allergie sont un facteur protecteur, soulignant le possible impact de l’immunité sur le GBM. Plusieurs études transcriptomiques ont également mis en évidence des signatures immunes plus ou moins associées à la survie. Matériel et méthodes : Pour clarifier ce lien et déterminer quels gènes immuns étaient les plus impliqués dans le GBM, nous avons étudié l’expression de 791 gènes immuns dans des échantillons de GBM et de cerveaux normaux. Les interactions entre les gènes immuns ont été étudiées par une analyse de co-expression. Nous avons ensuite recherché une association entre les gènes immuns et la survie selon 3 méthodes statistiques, avant d’établir un modèle de risque mathématique validé sur plusieurs jeux de données. Enfin, nous avons étudié les cellules immunes infiltrantes sur des échantillons de gliomes dont 73 GBM par cytométrie de flux. Résultats : Un profil d’expression génique différent significativement entre le cerveau normal et le GBM a été établi de manière robuste, mais pas au sein des GBM. L’analyse de co-expression a mis en évidence 6 modules dont 5 sont enrichis en gènes ayant un lien avec la survie. Cent huit gènes immuns ont une association significative avec la survie et un prédicteur de risque à 6 gènes immuns a permis de distinguer deux groupes de patients en fonction de leur survie, y compris chez les patients dont la tumeur a un promoteur MGMT méthylé et dans le sous-groupe de GBM proneuraux. Enfin, nous avons mis en évidence, dans tous les échantillons de GBM analysés, une infiltration leucocytaire par des cellules macrophagiques/microgliales et parfois par des cellules lymphocytaires ou granulocytaires. L’infiltration de lymphocytes uniquement est associée significativement avec la survie dans notre cohorte. Conclusion : Des gènes, impliqués dans diverses fonctions immunes, sont différentiellement exprimés entre le cerveau normal et le GBM et au sein des GBM. Un prédicteur à 6 gènes robuste a été établi, il sépare les patients en 2 groupes bas et haut risque y compris ceux ayant un bon pronostic. Nous avons enfin mis en évidence dans une série de GBM une infiltration de cellules immunes, dont une infiltration lymphocytaire associée positivement à la survie.Background: Glioblastoma is the most common and lethal primary brain tumor in adults. Epidemiological studies have revealed that a history of allergies is a protective factor, thereby underlining the likely impact of the immune system on GBM. A number of transcriptomic studies have also identified immune signatures more or less associated with patient survival. Methods: In order to clarify and identify which immune-associated (IA) genes were the most involved in GBM, we studied the expression of 791 immune genes in GBM and normal brains samples. Interactions between IA genes were studied through an analysis of co-expression network. We then searched for a link between IA genes and patient survival according to 3 statistical methods, before defining a mathematical risk model based on different data sets. Finally, we studied the infiltrative immune population of 73 GBM by cytometry. Results: A significantly different profile of IA genes expression between healthy brains and GBM was consistently defined, but not among GBM. The analysis of co-expression network revealed 6 modules, 5 of which were enriched by genes associated with patient survival. 108 IA genes have a significant association with patient survival and the 6-IA gene risk predictor allowed us to distinguish two groups of patients according to their survival, including patients whose tumor had a methylated MGMT gene promoter and in the subset of proneural GBM. Finally, in every analyzed GBM sample, we have shown that there was a leukocyte infiltration by macrophages/microglial cells and sometimes by lymphocytes or granulocytes. Only the lymphocytes infiltration was significantly associated with the survival in our group of patients. Conclusion: IA genes that are involved in various immune functions are expressed differentially between healthy brains and GBM and amongst GBM. A robust 6-IA gene risk predictor was defined: it divides patients into two low and high risk groups, including those who have a good prognosis. Finally, we revealed an infiltration of immune cells in a series of GBM, only the lymphocytic infiltration was positively associated with patient survival

Implications des gènes immuns et des cellules immunes dans le glioblastome

Background: Glioblastoma is the most common and lethal primary brain tumor in adults. Epidemiological studies have revealed that a history of allergies is a protective factor, thereby underlining the likely impact of the immune system on GBM. A number of transcriptomic studies have also identified immune signatures more or less associated with patient survival. Methods: In order to clarify and identify which immune-associated (IA) genes were the most involved in GBM, we studied the expression of 791 immune genes in GBM and normal brains samples. Interactions between IA genes were studied through an analysis of co-expression network. We then searched for a link between IA genes and patient survival according to 3 statistical methods, before defining a mathematical risk model based on different data sets. Finally, we studied the infiltrative immune population of 73 GBM by cytometry. Results: A significantly different profile of IA genes expression between healthy brains and GBM was consistently defined, but not among GBM. The analysis of co-expression network revealed 6 modules, 5 of which were enriched by genes associated with patient survival. 108 IA genes have a significant association with patient survival and the 6-IA gene risk predictor allowed us to distinguish two groups of patients according to their survival, including patients whose tumor had a methylated MGMT gene promoter and in the subset of proneural GBM. Finally, in every analyzed GBM sample, we have shown that there was a leukocyte infiltration by macrophages/microglial cells and sometimes by lymphocytes or granulocytes. Only the lymphocytes infiltration was significantly associated with the survival in our group of patients. Conclusion: IA genes that are involved in various immune functions are expressed differentially between healthy brains and GBM and amongst GBM. A robust 6-IA gene risk predictor was defined: it divides patients into two low and high risk groups, including those who have a good prognosis. Finally, we revealed an infiltration of immune cells in a series of GBM, only the lymphocytic infiltration was positively associated with patient survival.Introduction : Le glioblastome (GBM) est la tumeur cérébrale primitive la plus fréquente et la plus grave de l’adulte. Des études épidémiologiques ont mis en évidence que les antécédents d’allergie sont un facteur protecteur, soulignant le possible impact de l’immunité sur le GBM. Plusieurs études transcriptomiques ont également mis en évidence des signatures immunes plus ou moins associées à la survie. Matériel et méthodes : Pour clarifier ce lien et déterminer quels gènes immuns étaient les plus impliqués dans le GBM, nous avons étudié l’expression de 791 gènes immuns dans des échantillons de GBM et de cerveaux normaux. Les interactions entre les gènes immuns ont été étudiées par une analyse de co-expression. Nous avons ensuite recherché une association entre les gènes immuns et la survie selon 3 méthodes statistiques, avant d’établir un modèle de risque mathématique validé sur plusieurs jeux de données. Enfin, nous avons étudié les cellules immunes infiltrantes sur des échantillons de gliomes dont 73 GBM par cytométrie de flux. Résultats : Un profil d’expression génique différent significativement entre le cerveau normal et le GBM a été établi de manière robuste, mais pas au sein des GBM. L’analyse de co-expression a mis en évidence 6 modules dont 5 sont enrichis en gènes ayant un lien avec la survie. Cent huit gènes immuns ont une association significative avec la survie et un prédicteur de risque à 6 gènes immuns a permis de distinguer deux groupes de patients en fonction de leur survie, y compris chez les patients dont la tumeur a un promoteur MGMT méthylé et dans le sous-groupe de GBM proneuraux. Enfin, nous avons mis en évidence, dans tous les échantillons de GBM analysés, une infiltration leucocytaire par des cellules macrophagiques/microgliales et parfois par des cellules lymphocytaires ou granulocytaires. L’infiltration de lymphocytes uniquement est associée significativement avec la survie dans notre cohorte. Conclusion : Des gènes, impliqués dans diverses fonctions immunes, sont différentiellement exprimés entre le cerveau normal et le GBM et au sein des GBM. Un prédicteur à 6 gènes robuste a été établi, il sépare les patients en 2 groupes bas et haut risque y compris ceux ayant un bon pronostic. Nous avons enfin mis en évidence dans une série de GBM une infiltration de cellules immunes, dont une infiltration lymphocytaire associée positivement à la survie

Cancer du sein métastatique : "intérêt" de la chimiothérapie au delà de la 2ème ligne

RENNES1-BU Hôpital Sud (352382126) / SudocPARIS-BIUM (751062103) / SudocSudocFranceF

Rethinking Alkylating(-Like) Agents for Solid Tumor Management

International audienceAlthough old molecules, alkylating agents and platinum derivatives are still widely used in the treatment of various solid tumors. However, systemic toxicity and cellular resistance mechanisms impede their efficacy. Innovative strategies, including local administration, optimization of treatment schedule/dosage, synergistic combinations, and the encapsulation of bioactive molecules in smart, multifunctional drug delivery systems, have shown promising results in potentiating anticancer activity while circumventing such hurdles. Furthermore, questioning of the old paradigm according to which nuclear DNA is the critical target of their anticancer activity has shed light on subcellular alternative and neglected targets that obviously participate in the mediation of cytotoxicity or resistance. Thus, rethinking of the use of these pivotal antineoplastic agents appears critical to improve clinical outcomes in the management of solid tumors

FLOW CYTOMETRY ANALYSIS OF TUMOR-INFILTRATING CELLS IN A LARGE SERIES OF GLIOBLASTOMA PATIENTS: IMPACT OF LYMPHOCYTE INFILTRATION ON SURVIVAL

4th Quadrennial Meeting of the World-Federation-of-Neuro-Oncology (WFNO) held in conjunction with the 18th Annual Meeting of the Society-for-Neuro-Oncology (SNO), San Francisco, CA, NOV 21-24, 2013International audienceno abstrac