The potential role of thioredoxin 1 and CD30 systems as multiple pathway targets and biomarkers in tumor therapy

Our progress in understanding pathological disease mechanisms has led to the identification of biomarkers that have had a considerable impact on clinical practice. It is hoped that the move from generalized to stratified approaches, with the grouping of patients into clinical/therapeutic subgroups according to specific biomarkers, will lead to increasingly more effective clinical treatments in the near future. This success depends on the identification of biomarkers that reflect disease evolution and can be used to predict disease state and therapy response, or represent themselves a target for treatment. Biomarkers can be identified by studying relationships between serum, tissue, or tumor microenvironment parameters and clinical or therapeutic parameters at onset and during the progression of the disease, using systems biology. Given that multiple pathways, such as those responsible for redox and immune regulation, are deregulated or altered in tumors, the future of tumor therapy could lie in the simultaneous targeting of these pathways using extracellular and intracellular targets and biomarkers. With this aim in mind, we evaluated the role of thioredoxin 1, a key redox regulator, and CD30, a cell membrane receptor, in immune regulation. Our results lead us to suggest that the combined use of these biomarkers provides more detailed information concerning the multiple pathways affected in disease and hence the possibility of more effective treatment

Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker initiation on organ support-free days in patients hospitalized with COVID-19

IMPORTANCE Overactivation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) may contribute to poor clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Objective To determine whether angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) initiation improves outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In an ongoing, adaptive platform randomized clinical trial, 721 critically ill and 58 non–critically ill hospitalized adults were randomized to receive an RAS inhibitor or control between March 16, 2021, and February 25, 2022, at 69 sites in 7 countries (final follow-up on June 1, 2022). INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized to receive open-label initiation of an ACE inhibitor (n = 257), ARB (n = 248), ARB in combination with DMX-200 (a chemokine receptor-2 inhibitor; n = 10), or no RAS inhibitor (control; n = 264) for up to 10 days. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was organ support–free days, a composite of hospital survival and days alive without cardiovascular or respiratory organ support through 21 days. The primary analysis was a bayesian cumulative logistic model. Odds ratios (ORs) greater than 1 represent improved outcomes. RESULTS On February 25, 2022, enrollment was discontinued due to safety concerns. Among 679 critically ill patients with available primary outcome data, the median age was 56 years and 239 participants (35.2%) were women. Median (IQR) organ support–free days among critically ill patients was 10 (–1 to 16) in the ACE inhibitor group (n = 231), 8 (–1 to 17) in the ARB group (n = 217), and 12 (0 to 17) in the control group (n = 231) (median adjusted odds ratios of 0.77 [95% bayesian credible interval, 0.58-1.06] for improvement for ACE inhibitor and 0.76 [95% credible interval, 0.56-1.05] for ARB compared with control). The posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitors and ARBs worsened organ support–free days compared with control were 94.9% and 95.4%, respectively. Hospital survival occurred in 166 of 231 critically ill participants (71.9%) in the ACE inhibitor group, 152 of 217 (70.0%) in the ARB group, and 182 of 231 (78.8%) in the control group (posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitor and ARB worsened hospital survival compared with control were 95.3% and 98.1%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this trial, among critically ill adults with COVID-19, initiation of an ACE inhibitor or ARB did not improve, and likely worsened, clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0273570

An update on emerging drugs for Hodgkin lymphoma

Introduction: Most patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) are cured with modern combined modality first-line treatments. Even similar to 50% of patients with relapsed/refractory HL can be cured with high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous stem cell transplantation. However, chemotherapy and radiotherapy cause significant acute and long-term side effects and patients relapsing after HDCT have a dismal prognosis. New drugs are therefore needed to reduce the toxicity of first-line treatments and to increase the efficacy of relapse treatments. Moreover, new drugs are needed for the treatment of older patients with HL because results with current treatments are disappointing. Areas covered: This article discusses promising new drugs for the treatment of classical HL that have been evaluated in the last years. There is a focus on the antibody drug conjugate brentuximab vedotin and its potential for the future treatment of HL. Moreover, data on the histone deacetylase inhibitors panobinostat and mocetinostat, the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus, the Janus kinase 2 inhibitor SB1518 and the immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide are summarized. Expert opinion: Besides improving the prognosis of relapsed patients, new drugs should be used to replace the most toxic compounds in first-line therapy to reduce acute and long-term toxicities of the treatment

Pharmacotherapy of Hodgkin lymphoma: standard approaches and future perspectives

Introduction: Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a lymphoid malignancy with an incidence of 2 - 3/100,000/year. Young adults are most often affected. Due to the development of highly active multi-agent chemotherapy protocols and the optimization of radiotherapy (RT) fields and doses, HL has become one of the malignancies with the highest cure rates. As treatment efficacy can hardly be improved, the major goal of clinical HL research consists in decreasing therapy-associated acute and long-term toxicity. To this end, treatment stratification based on interim positron emission tomography and the implementation of targeted drugs such as the antibody-drug conjugate brentuximab vedotin are currently being evaluated in prospective trials. Areas covered: This article reviews recent randomized Phase III and larger Phase II trials including HL patients. Expert opinion: In early stage HL, excellent results are achieved with a brief chemotherapy followed by involved-field RT. Patients with advanced HL should receive six to eight cycles of chemotherapy optionally followed by localized RT. In relapsed disease, high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation represents the standard of care for most patients. The use of novel drugs and imaging tools that currently undergo evaluation may optimize HL treatment

Enantioselective Catalysts for the Synthesis of α-Substituted Allylboronates-An Accelerated Approach towards Isomerically Pure Homoallylic Alcohols

The use of a convenient protecting group for boronates allows a selective, catalyzed SN2′ reaction to generate allylboronates which are applied for the synthesis of enantiomerically pure homoallylic alcohols. Depending on the configuration of both catalyst and the protecting group any of the four possible stereoisomers can be formed. The rationale behind the selective addition is supported by density functional theory calculations