The Early Evolution of Biting–Chewing Performance in Hexapoda

Insects show a plethora of different mandible shapes. It was advocated that these mandible shapes are mainly a function of different feeding habits. This hypothesis was tested on a larger sampling of non-holometabolan biting–chewing insects with additional tests to understand the interplay of mandible function, feeding guild, and phylogeny. The results show that at the studied systematic level, variation in mandible biting–chewing effectivity is regulated to a large extent by phylogenetic history and the configuration of the mandible joints rather than the food preference of a given taxon. Additionally, lineages with multiple mandibular joints such as primary wingless hexapods show a wider functional space occupation of mandibular effectivity than dicondylic insects (= silverfish + winged insects) at significantly different evolutionary rates. The evolution and occupation of a comparably narrow functional performance space of dicondylic insects is surprising given the low effectivity values of this food uptake solution. Possible reasons for this relative evolutionary “stasis” are discussed

Expanding anchored hybrid enrichment to resolve both deep and shallow relationships within the spider tree of life

BACKGROUND: Despite considerable effort, progress in spider molecular systematics has lagged behind many other comparable arthropod groups, thereby hindering family-level resolution, classification, and testing of important macroevolutionary hypotheses. Recently, alternative targeted sequence capture techniques have provided molecular systematics a powerful tool for resolving relationships across the Tree of Life. One of these approaches, Anchored Hybrid Enrichment (AHE), is designed to recover hundreds of unique orthologous loci from across the genome, for resolving both shallow and deep-scale evolutionary relationships within non-model systems. Herein we present a modification of the AHE approach that expands its use for application in spiders, with a particular emphasis on the infraorder Mygalomorphae. RESULTS: Our aim was to design a set of probes that effectively capture loci informative at a diversity of phylogenetic timescales. Following identification of putative arthropod-wide loci, we utilized homologous transcriptome sequences from 17 species across all spiders to identify exon boundaries. Conserved regions with variable flanking regions were then sought across the tick genome, three published araneomorph spider genomes, and raw genomic reads of two mygalomorph taxa. Following development of the 585 target loci in the Spider Probe Kit, we applied AHE across three taxonomic depths to evaluate performance: deep-level spider family relationships (33 taxa, 327 loci); family and generic relationships within the mygalomorph family Euctenizidae (25 taxa, 403 loci); and species relationships in the North American tarantula genus Aphonopelma (83 taxa, 581 loci). At the deepest level, all three major spider lineages (the Mesothelae, Mygalomorphae, and Araneomorphae) were supported with high bootstrap support. Strong support was also found throughout the Euctenizidae, including generic relationships within the family and species relationships within the genus Aptostichus. As in the Euctenizidae, virtually identical topologies were inferred with high support throughout Aphonopelma. CONCLUSIONS: The Spider Probe Kit, the first implementation of AHE methodology in Class Arachnida, holds great promise for gathering the types and quantities of molecular data needed to accelerate an understanding of the spider Tree of Life by providing a mechanism whereby different researchers can confidently and effectively use the same loci for independent projects, yet allowing synthesis of data across independent research groups. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12862-016-0769-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users

The spermatogenesis and sperm structure of Acerentomon microrhinus (Protura, Hexapoda) with considerations on the phylogenetic position of the taxon

The spermatogenesis of the proturan Acerentomon microrhinus Berlese, (Redia 6:1-182, 1909) is described for the first time with the aim of comparing the ultrastructure of the flagellated sperm of members of this taxon with that of the supposedly related group, Collembola. The apical region of testes consists of a series of large cells with giant polymorphic nuclei and several centrosomes with 14 microtubule doublets, whose origin is likely a template of a conventional 9-doublet centriole. Beneath this region, there are spermatogonial cells, whose centrosome has two centrioles, both with 14 microtubule doublets; the daughter centriole of the pair has an axial cylinder. Slender parietal cells in the testes have centrioles with nine doublet microtubules. Spermatocytes produce short primary cilia with 14 microtubule doublets. Spermatids have a single basal body with 14 microtubule doublets. Anteriorly, a conical dense material is present, surrounded by a microtubular basket, which can be seen by using an α-anti-tubulin antibody. Behind this region, the basal body expresses a long axoneme of 14 microtubule doublets with only inner arms. An acrosome is lacking. The nucleus is twisted around the apical conical dense structure and the axoneme; this coiling seems to be due to the rotation of the axoneme on its longitudinal axis. The posterior part of the axoneme forms three turns within the spermatid cytoplasm. Few unchanged mitochondria are scattered in the cytoplasm. Sperm consist of encysted, globular cells that descend along the deferent duct lumen. Some of them are engulfed by the epithelial cells, which thus have a spermiophagic activity. Sperm placed in a proper medium extend their flagellar axonemes and start beating. Protura sperm structure is quite different from that of Collembola sperm; and on the basis of sperm characters, a close relationship between the two taxa is not supported. © Springer-Verlag 2010