School based screening for tuberculosis infection in Norway: comparison of positive tuberculin skin test with interferon-gamma release assay

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In Norway, screening for tuberculosis infection by tuberculin skin test (TST) has been offered for several decades to all children in 9th grade of school, prior to BCG-vaccination. The incidence of tuberculosis in Norway is low and infection with <it>M. tuberculosis </it>is considered rare. QuantiFERON^®TB Gold (QFT) is a new and specific blood test for tuberculosis infection. So far, there have been few reports of QFT used in screening of predominantly unexposed, healthy, TST-positive children, including first and second generation immigrants. In order to evaluate the current TST screening and BCG-vaccination programme we aimed to (1) measure the prevalence of QFT positivity among TST positive children identified in the school based screening, and (2) measure the association between demographic and clinical risk factors for tuberculosis infection and QFT positivity.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This cross-sectional multi-centre study was conducted during the school year 2005–6 and the TST positive children were recruited from seven public hospitals covering rural and urban areas in Norway. Participation included a QFT test and a questionnaire regarding demographic and clinical risk factors for latent infection. All positive QFT results were confirmed by re-analysis of the same plasma sample. If the confirmatory test was negative the result was reported as non-conclusive and the participant was offered a new test.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Among 511 TST positive children only 9% (44) had a confirmed positive QFT result. QFT positivity was associated with larger TST induration, origin outside Western countries and known exposure to tuberculosis. Most children (79%) had TST reactions in the range of 6–14 mm; 5% of these were QFT positive. Discrepant results between the tests were common even for TST reactions above 15 mm, as only 22 % had a positive QFT.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The results support the assumption that factors other than tuberculosis infection are widely contributing to positive TST results in this group and indicate the improved specificity of QFT for latent tuberculosis. Our study suggests a very low prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection among 9th grade school children in Norway. The result will inform the discussion in Norway of the usefulness of the current TST screening and BCG-policy.</p

What is the recovery rate and risk of long-term consequences following a diagnosis of COVID-19?:A harmonised, global longitudinal observational study protocol

Introduction: Very little is known about possible clinical sequelae that may persist after resolution of acute COVID-19. A recent longitudinal cohort from Italy including 143 patients followed up after hospitalisation with COVID-19 reported that 87% had at least one ongoing symptom at 60-day follow-up. Early indications suggest that patients with COVID-19 may need even more psychological support than typical intensive care unit patients. The assessment of risk factors for longer term consequences requires a longitudinal study linked to data on pre-existing conditions and care received during the acute phase of illness. The primary aim of this study is to characterise physical and psychosocial sequelae in patients post-COVID-19 hospital discharge. Methods and analysis: This is an international open-access prospective, observational multisite study. This protocol is linked with the International Severe Acute Respiratory and emerging Infection Consortium (ISARIC) and the WHO’s Clinical Characterisation Protocol, which includes patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 during hospitalisation. This protocol will follow-up a subset of patients with confirmed COVID-19 using standardised surveys to measure longer term physical and psychosocial sequelae. The data will be linked with the acute phase data. Statistical analyses will be undertaken to characterise groups most likely to be affected by sequelae of COVID-19. The open-access follow-up survey can be used as a data collection tool by other follow-up studies, to facilitate data harmonisation and to identify subsets of patients for further in-depth follow-up. The outcomes of this study will inform strategies to prevent long-term consequences; inform clinical management, interventional studies, rehabilitation and public health management to reduce overall morbidity; and improve long-term outcomes of COVID-19. Ethics and dissemination: The protocol and survey are open access to enable low-resourced sites to join the study to facilitate global standardised, longitudinal data collection. Ethical approval has been given by sites in Colombia, Ghana, Italy, Norway, Russia, the UK and South Africa. New sites are welcome to join this collaborative study at any time. Sites interested in adopting the protocol as it is or in an adapted version are responsible for ensuring that local sponsorship and ethical approvals in place as appropriate. The tools are available on the ISARIC website (www.isaric.org)

COVID-19 symptoms at hospital admission vary with age and sex: results from the ISARIC prospective multinational observational study

Background: The ISARIC prospective multinational observational study is the largest cohort of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. We present relationships of age, sex, and nationality to presenting symptoms. Methods: International, prospective observational study of 60 109 hospitalized symptomatic patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 recruited from 43 countries between 30 January and 3 August 2020. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate relationships of age and sex to published COVID-19 case definitions and the most commonly reported symptoms. Results: ‘Typical’ symptoms of fever (69%), cough (68%) and shortness of breath (66%) were the most commonly reported. 92% of patients experienced at least one of these. Prevalence of typical symptoms was greatest in 30- to 60-year-olds (respectively 80, 79, 69%; at least one 95%). They were reported less frequently in children (≤ 18 years: 69, 48, 23; 85%), older adults (≥ 70 years: 61, 62, 65; 90%), and women (66, 66, 64; 90%; vs. men 71, 70, 67; 93%, each P &lt; 0.001). The most common atypical presentations under 60 years of age were nausea and vomiting and abdominal pain, and over 60 years was confusion. Regression models showed significant differences in symptoms with sex, age and country. Interpretation: This international collaboration has allowed us to report reliable symptom data from the largest cohort of patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19. Adults over 60 and children admitted to hospital with COVID-19 are less likely to present with typical symptoms. Nausea and vomiting are common atypical presentations under 30 years. Confusion is a frequent atypical presentation of COVID-19 in adults over 60 years. Women are less likely to experience typical symptoms than men

TBCOX2 - A phase I/II randomized trial on Safety and Immunogenicity of the Therapeutic H56:IC31 Vaccine and adjunctive Cyclooxygenase-2-inhibitor in patients with Tuberculosis

This first-in-human randomized clinical trial at Oslo University Hospital, Norway on patients with tuberculosis shows that the vaccine H56:I31 developed by Statens Serum Institut is safe and immunogenic during active tuberculosis disease and could serve as host-directed-therapy to improve prognosis and combat the tuberculosis pandemi

Serum ACE as a prognostic biomarker in COVID-19: A Case series

We have earlier proposed that serum ACE (s‐ACE) could be used as a biomarker for severity in COVID‐19 due to an assumed inverse relationship between ACE and ACE2. High s‐ACE could indicate lower ACE2 activity and therefore more widespread and severe SARS‐CoV2 infection, owing to virally mediated downregulation of ACE2 (1). Dysregulation of the Renin‐Angiotensin‐Aldosterone system (RAAS) are found in comorbidities known as risk factors for increased morbidity and mortality, such as hypertension and cardiovascular disease (2)

Serum ACE as a prognostic biomarker in COVID-19: A Case series

We have earlier proposed that serum ACE (s‐ACE) could be used as a biomarker for severity in COVID‐19 due to an assumed inverse relationship between ACE and ACE2. High s‐ACE could indicate lower ACE2 activity and therefore more widespread and severe SARS‐CoV2 infection, owing to virally mediated downregulation of ACE2 (1). Dysregulation of the Renin‐Angiotensin‐Aldosterone system (RAAS) are found in comorbidities known as risk factors for increased morbidity and mortality, such as hypertension and cardiovascular disease (2)

Clinical characteristics and outcomes in hospitalized adult influenza patients: an observational study from Norway 2014-2018

Background Seasonal influenza causes substantial numbers of hospitalizations annually. We have characterized the clinical picture and treatment practice in hospitalized adult influenza patients and assessed whether clinical risk scores on admission or influenza type were associated with severe outcomes. Methods Clinical characteristics and risk scores on admission (CRB65, CRB, SIRS and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [qSOFA]), treatment and severe outcomes (defined as: stay in intensive care unit (ICU), receiving oxygen supplementation or staying ≥5 days in hospital), were recorded in patients hospitalized with influenza at Oslo University Hospital, Norway, between 2014 and 2018. Results Among the 156 included patients, 52.6% had influenza A(H3N2), 32.6% influenza B and 12.8% influenza A(H1N1). Median age was 70 years and 59.6% of patients were ≥65 years. Nine (5.8%) of the patients were treated in ICU, 43.0% received oxygen and 47.4% stayed ≥5 days in hospital. Overall, 34.6% of the patients had a high CRB score on admission which was associated with stay in ICU and oxygen supplementation. Multivariate analyses identified age, and pneumonia (46.8%), but not influenza type, to be associated with severe outcomes. Antiviral treatment was given to 37.2% of the patients, while 77.6% received antibiotics. Only 25.5% of patients with influenza B received antiviral therapy. Conclusions The influenza patients were mostly elderly, and few patients were treated in ICU. A high CRB score was associated with severe outcomes with possible implications for patient monitoring. Less than 40% of the patients received antiviral therapy, whereas the majority were treated with antibiotics, indicating potential for optimising treatment strategies

SARS-CoV-2 in the Air Surrounding Patients during Nebulizer Therapy

Nebulizer therapy is commonly used for patients with obstructive pulmonary disease or acute pulmonary infections with signs of obstruction. It is considered a “potential aerosol-generating procedure,” and the risk of disease transmission to health care workers is uncertain. The aim of this pilot study was to assess whether nebulizer therapy in hospitalized COVID-19 patients is associated with increased dispersion of SARS-CoV-2. Air samples collected prior to and during nebulizer therapy were analyzed by RT-PCR and cell culture. Total aerosol particle concentrations were also quantified. Of 13 patients, seven had quantifiable virus in oropharynx samples, and only two had RT-PCR positive air samples. For both these patients, air samples collected during nebulizer therapy had higher SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentrations compared to control air samples. Also, for particle sizes 0.3–5 µm, particle concentrations were significantly higher during nebulizer therapy than in controls. We were unable to cultivate virus from any of the RT-PCR positive air samples, and it is therefore unknown if the detected virus were replication-competent; however, the significant increase in smaller particles, which can remain airborne for extended periods of time, and increased viral RNA concentrations during treatment may indicate that nebulizer therapy is associated with increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission.publishedVersio