Feature-Based Change Detection Reveals Inconsistent Individual Differences in Visual Working Memory Capacity

Visual working memory (VWM) is a key cognitive system that enables people to hold visual information in mind after a stimulus has been removed and compare past and present to detect changes that have occurred. VWM is severely capacity limited to around 3–4 items, although there are robust individual differences in this limit. Importantly, these individual differences are evident in neural measures of VWM capacity. Here, we capitalized on recent work showing that capacity is lower for more complex stimulus dimension. In particular, we asked whether individual differences in capacity remain consistent if capacity is shifted by a more demanding task, and, further, whether the correspondence between behavioral and neural measures holds across a shift in VWM capacity. Participants completed a change detection (CD) task with simple colors and complex shapes in an fMRI experiment. As expected, capacity was significantly lower for the shape dimension. Moreover, there were robust individual differences in behavioral estimates of VWM capacity across dimensions. Similarly, participants with a stronger BOLD response for color also showed a strong neural response for shape within the lateral occipital cortex, intraparietal sulcus (IPS), and superior IPS. Although there were robust individual differences in the behavioral and neural measures, we found little evidence of systematic brain-behavior correlations across feature dimensions. This suggests that behavioral and neural measures of capacity provide different views onto the processes that underlie VWM and CD. Recent theoretical approaches that attempt to bridge between behavioral and neural measures are well positioned to address these findings in future work

The global burden of scabies: a cross-sectional analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.

Background Numerous population-based studies have documented high prevalence of scabies in overcrowded settings, particularly among children and in tropical regions. We provide an estimate of the global burden of scabies using data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Study 2015. Methods We identified scabies epidemiological data sources from an extensive literature search and hospital insurance data and analysed data sources with a Bayesian meta-regression modelling tool, DisMod-MR 2·1, to yield prevalence estimates. We combined prevalence estimates with a disability weight, measuring disfigurement, itch, and pain caused by scabies, to produce years lived with disability (YLDs). With an assumed zero mortality from scabies, YLDs were equivalent to disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs). We estimated DALYs for 195 countries divided into 21 world regions, in both sexes and 20 age groups, between 1990 and 2015. Findings Scabies was responsible for 0·21% of DALYs from all conditions studied by GBD 2015 worldwide. The world regions of east Asia (age-standardised DALYs 136·32), southeast Asia (134·57), Oceania (120·34), tropical Latin America (99·94), and south Asia (69·41) had the greatest burden of DALYs from scabies. Mean percent change of DALY rate from 1990 to 2015 was less than 8% in all world regions, except North America, which had a 23·9% increase. The five individual countries with greatest scabies burden were Indonesia (age-standardised DALYs 153·86), China (138·25), Timor-Leste (136·67), Vanuatu (131·59), and Fiji (130·91). The largest standard deviations of age-standardised DALYs between the 20 age groups were observed in southeast Asia (60·1), Oceania (58·3), and east Asia (56·5), with the greatest DALY burdens in children, adolescents, and the elderly. Interpretation The burden of scabies is greater in tropical regions, especially in children, adolescents, and elderly people. As a worldwide epidemiological assessment, GBD 2015 provides broad and frequently updated measures of scabies burden in terms of skin effects. These global data might help guide research protocols and prioritisation efforts and focus scabies treatment and control measures. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Treat-to-target in dermatology:A scoping review and International Eczema Council survey on the approach in atopic dermatitis

Treat-to-target (T2T) is a pragmatic therapeutic strategy being gradually introduced into dermatology after adoption in several other clinical areas. Atopic dermatitis (AD), one of the most common inflammatory skin diseases, may also benefit from this structured and practical therapeutic approach. We aimed to evaluate existing data regarding the T2T approach in dermatology, with a specific focus on AD, as well as the views of International Eczema Council (IEC) members on the potential application of a T2T approach to AD management. To do so, we systematically searched for peer-reviewed publications on the T2T approach for any skin disease in the PubMed and Scopus databases up to February 2022 and conducted a survey among IEC members regarding various components to potentially include in a T2T approach in AD. We identified 21 relevant T2T-related reports in dermatology, of which 14 were related to psoriasis, five to AD, one for juvenile dermatomyositis and one for urticaria. In the IEC member survey, respondents proposed treatable traits (with itch, disease severity and sleep problems getting the highest scores), relevant comorbidities (with asthma being selected most commonly, followed by anxiety and depression in adults), recommended specialists that should define the approach in AD (dermatologists, allergists and primary care physicians were most commonly selected in adults), and applicable assessment tools (both physician- and patient-reported), in both adult and paediatric patients, for potential future utilization of the T2T approach in AD. In conclusion, while the T2T approach may become a useful tool to simplify therapeutic goals and AD management, its foundation in AD is only starting to build. A multidisciplinary approach, including a wide range of stakeholders, including patients, is needed to further define the essential components needed to utilize T2T in AD.</p

When does atopic dermatitis warrant systemic therapy? Recommendations from an expert panel of the International Eczema Council

BackgroundAlthough most patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) are effectively managed with topical medication, a significant minority require systemic therapy. Guidelines for decision making about advancement to systemic therapy are lacking.ObjectiveTo guide those considering use of systemic therapy in AD and provide a framework for evaluation before making this therapeutic decision with the patient.MethodsA subgroup of the International Eczema Council determined aspects to consider before prescribing systemic therapy. Topics were assigned to expert reviewers who performed a topic-specific literature review, referred to guidelines when available, and provided interpretation and expert opinion.ResultsWe recommend a systematic and holistic approach to assess patients with severe signs and symptoms of AD and impact on quality of life before systemic therapy. Steps taken before commencing systemic therapy include considering alternate or concomitant diagnoses, avoiding trigger factors, optimizing topical therapy, ensuring adequate patient/caregiver education, treating coexistent infection, assessing the impact on quality of life, and considering phototherapy.LimitationsOur work is a consensus statement, not a systematic review.ConclusionThe decision to start systemic medication should include assessment of severity and quality of life while considering the individual's general health status, psychologic needs, and personal attitudes toward systemic therapies

Agreement and Correlation Between Different Topical Corticosteroid Potency Classification Systems

Importance: Topical corticosteroids (TCSs) are available in multiple potencies that alter their effectiveness and safety. Pharmacoepidemiologic studies on TCSs are hampered by the absence of a universal potency classification system, limiting comparisons across studies, robust exposure classification, and clinical interpretation. Objective: To classify TCSs into 3 commonly used potency classification systems and evaluate the agreement and correlation between the 3 systems. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this classification study, a comprehensive list of TCS formulations was compiled using sources identified in the literature, the Ontario Drug Benefit Formulary, a recent Cochrane review on the use of TCSs in people with eczema, and the Anatomical Therapeutic Classification (ATC) of the World Health Organization from August 11, 2021, to January 6, 2022. Topical corticosteroid potency classifications were assigned and compared using the 7-category US classification system, a 4-category classification from a recent Cochrane review largely based on the UK formulary, and the 4-category ATC classification. To facilitate comparisons across systems, the 7-category US system was consolidated into 4 categories. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cohen weighted ? (?w) and Spearman rank correlation coefficients (r) were computed to examine agreement and correlation between the classification systems. Results: A total of 232 unique TCS formulations (ATC, n = 231; US classification, n = 232; Cochrane review, n = 89) were included. Overall, there was low-to-moderate agreement but strong correlation between the classification systems. The US classification had weak agreement with the ATC system (?w, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.45-0.60) and moderate agreement with the Cochrane review classification (?w, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.48-0.73); there was weak agreement between the ATC and Cochrane review classifications (?w, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.46-0.71). The US classification strongly correlated with the ATC system (r, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.71-0.82) and Cochrane review classification (r, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62-0.82). There was also a strong correlation between the Cochrane review and ATC classifications (r, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.58-0.80). Conclusions and Relevance: This classification study used multiple resources to classify 232 TCS formulations into 3 potency classifications. Because these systems are often incongruent, they may yield different results in pharmacoepidemiologic studies; investigators need to be transparent in their classification approach and consider alternative potency definitions in sensitivity analyses.

Online supplementary file 1 - Supplemental material for The Therapeutic Applications of Machine Learning in Atopic Dermatitis: A Scoping Review

Supplemental material, Online supplementary file 1, for The Therapeutic Applications of Machine Learning in Atopic Dermatitis: A Scoping Review by Eric P. McMullen, Saad A. Syed, Kristopher D. Espiritu, Rajan S. Grewal, Geoffrey A. Elder, Plinio P. Morita and Aaron M. Drucker in Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery</p

Systemic Therapy for Atopic Dermatitis in Older Adults and Adults With Comorbidities:A Scoping Review and International Eczema Council Survey

Clinical trials of systemic therapies for atopic dermatitis (AD) often exclude patients based on age and comorbidities. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a scoping review of observational studies and survey of International Eczema Council (IEC) members on the treatment of AD in patients with liver disease, renal disease, viral hepatitis, HIV, or history of malignancy. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE via Ovid, Embase via Ovid, and Web of Science from inception to September 14, 2020. We mapped the available evidence on the use of cyclosporine, methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate, systemic corticosteroids, and dupilumab for AD in older adults (≥65 years) and adults with the previously mentioned comorbidities. We surveyed IEC members on their preferred systemic medications for each patient population. RESULTS: We identified 25 studies on the use of systemic medications in special populations of adults with AD. Although IEC members preferred dupilumab as the first-line systemic agent across all special populations, many could not identify viable third-line systemic therapy options for some populations. CONCLUSIONS: Data on systemic therapy for AD for older adults and adults with comorbidities are limited. Although IEC members' access to systemic therapies differs geographically, expert opinion suggests that dupilumab is preferred for those patients

Development of a Website for a Living Network Meta-analysis of Atopic Dermatitis Treatments Using a User-Centered Design: Multimethod Study

BackgroundA rapid expansion of systemic immunological treatment options for atopic dermatitis (AD) has created a need for clinically relevant and understandable comparative efficacy and safety information for patients and clinicians. Given the scarcity of head-to-head trials, network meta-analysis (NMA) is an alternative way to enable robust comparisons among treatment options; however, NMA results are often complex and difficult to directly implement in shared decision-making. ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to develop a website that effectively presents the results of a living systematic review and NMA on AD treatments to patient and clinician users. MethodsWe conducted a multimethod study using iterative feedback from adults with AD, adult caregivers of children with AD, dermatologists, and allergists within a user-centered design framework. We used questionnaires followed by workshops among patients and clinicians to develop and improve the website interface. Usability testing was done with a caregiver of a patient with eczema. ResultsQuestionnaires were completed by 31 adults with AD or caregivers and 94 clinicians. Patients and caregivers felt it was very important to know about new treatments (20/31, 65%). Clinicians felt the lack of evidence-based comparisons between treatments was a barrier to care (55/93, 59%). “Avoiding dangerous side effects” was ranked as the most important priority for patients (weighted ranking 5.2/7, with higher ranking being more important), and “improving patients’ overall symptoms” was the most important priority for clinicians (weighted ranking 5.0/6). A total of 4 patients and 7 clinicians participated in workshops; they appreciated visualizations of the NMA results and found the website valuable for comparing different treatments. The patients suggested changes to simplify the interface and clarify terminology related to comparative efficacy. The user in the usability testing found the website intuitive to navigate. ConclusionsWe developed a website, “eczematherapies.com,” with a user-centered design approach. Visualizations of NMA results enable users to compare treatments as part of their shared decision-making process