Paradoxic activation of the renin-angiotensin system in twin-twin transfusion syndrome: An explanation for cardiovascular disturbances in the recipient

Despite advances in treatment, twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) still carries a high risk for perinatal mortality and morbidity. Simple blood transfer from the donor to the recipient twin cannot explain all of the features of this disease, in particular the recipient's hypertensive cardiomyopathy. We report a case in which TTTS resulted in preterm delivery with early neonatal death of both twins, allowing assessment of the renin angiotensin system (RAS) status of each fetus, both by cord blood renin and aldosterone assay and by renal immunohistochemistry. The donor had severe oliguria/oligohydramnios, whereas the recipient, in addition to severe polyuria/polyhydramnios, had cardiomyopathy, atrioventricular regurgitation, and ascites. Although immunohistochemistry demonstrated that renal secretion of renin was up-regulated in the donor and down-regulated in the recipient, cord blood levels of renin and aldosterone were similar, with high renin levels in both twins. This observation supports the hypothesis that despite renal RAS down-regulation, the recipient is exposed to RAS effectors elaborated in the donor and transferred via placental shunts. This may contribute to cardiomyopathy and hypertension in the recipient, which cannot be accounted for by hypervolemia alone. We thus hypothesized that in TTTS, the recipient's hypertensive cardiomyopathy could be due to a mechanism similar to the classical model of hypertension referred to as "2 kidneys-1 clip." Thus the hypovolemic donor twin, comparable to the clipped kidney, produces vasoactive hormones that compromise the recipient, comparable to the normal kidney, causing hypertension and cardiomyopathy

Maintenance darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy to prevent perinatal HIV transmission, ANRS-MIE 168 MONOGEST study

International audienceObjectives: Because NRTIs can have fetal toxicities, we evaluated a perinatal NRTI-sparing strategy to prevent perinatal HIV transmission. Our primary objective was to determine the proportion maintaining a viral load (VL) of 50 copies/mL. Neonates received nevirapine prophylaxis for 14 days.Results: Of 89 patients switching to darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy, 4 miscarried before 22 weeks' gestation, 2 changed treatment for elevated liver enzymes without virological failure, and 83 were evaluable for the main outcome. Six had virological failure confirmed on a repeat sample (median VL=193 copies/mL; range 78-644), including two before switching to monotherapy. In these six cases, ART was intensified with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine. The success rate was 75/83, 90.4% (95% CI, 81.9%-95.7%) considering two patients with VL missing at delivery as failures, and 77/83, 92.8% (95% CI, 84.9%-97.3%) when considering them as successes since both had undetectable VL on darunavir/ritonavir throughout pregnancy. In ITT, the last available VL before delivery was <50 copies/mL in all of the patients. There was no case of perinatal HIV transmission.Conclusions: Darunavir/ritonavir maintenance monotherapy required intensification in nearly 10% of cases. This limits its widespread use, thus other regimens should be evaluated in order to limit exposure to antiretrovirals, particularly NRTIs, during pregnancy

Rilpivirine in HIV-1-positive women initiating pregnancy: to switch or not to switch?

International audienceBackgroundSafety data about rilpivirine use during pregnancy remain scarce, and rilpivirine plasma concentrations are reduced during second/third trimesters, with a potential risk of viral breakthroughs. Thus, French guidelines recommend switching to rilpivirine-free combinations (RFCs) during pregnancy.ObjectivesTo describe the characteristics of women initiating pregnancy while on rilpivirine and to compare the outcomes for virologically suppressed subjects continuing rilpivirine until delivery versus switching to an RFC.MethodsIn the ANRS-EPF French Perinatal cohort, we included women on rilpivirine at conception in 2010–18. Pregnancy outcomes were compared between patients continuing versus interrupting rilpivirine. In women with documented viral suppression (<50 copies/mL) before 14 weeks of gestation (WG) while on rilpivirine, we compared the probability of viral rebound (≥50 copies/mL) during pregnancy between subjects continuing rilpivirine versus those switching to RFC.ResultsAmong 247 women included, 88.7% had viral suppression at the beginning of pregnancy. Overall, 184 women (74.5%) switched to an RFC (mostly PI/ritonavir-based regimens) at a median gestational age of 8.0 WG. Plasma HIV-1 RNA nearest delivery was <50 copies/mL in 95.6% of women. Among 69 women with documented viral suppression before 14 WG, the risk of viral rebound was higher when switching to RFCs than when continuing rilpivirine (20.0% versus 0.0%, P = 0.046). Delivery outcomes were similar between groups (overall birth defects, 3.8/100 live births; pregnancy losses, 2.0%; preterm deliveries, 10.6%). No HIV transmission occurred.ConclusionsIn virologically suppressed women initiating pregnancy, continuing rilpivirine was associated with better virological outcome than changing regimen. We did not observe a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes