Efeito da eletronarcose e do método de insensibilização por atmosfera controlada no comportamento das aves ao abate, nos indicadores sanguíneos de estresse e nas características da carne

O Brasil é o maior exportador e terceiro maior produtor mundial de carne de frango. A fim de manter a competitividade, o setor produtivo deve estar sempre alerta às exigências dos consumidores e a preocupação com o bem-estar animal é uma tendência crescente. Aspectos envolvendo bem-estar animal são particularmente críticos no abate de frangos de corte. Este estudo avaliou a insensibilização de frangos em uma câmara com atmosfera enriquecida de CO2 para reduzir o estresse das aves, em comparação com a insensibilização elétrica em cuba d’água, o método de atordoamento mais usual no abate de frangos. Foi comparada a reação das aves quando expostas a uma alta concentração de CO2 (30%) ou a uma concentração inicial de 10% de CO2, elevada gradualmente até 30%. O efeito da mistura de argônio com CO2 também foi avaliado, sempre visando a redução das reações de desconforto das aves. Cerca de dois terços das aves apresentaram reações evidentes de desconforto antes do atordoamento, em todos os parâmetros de insensibilização gasosa utilizados, porém, as concentrações sanguíneas de corticosterona e glicose, usados como indicadores de estresse, indicaram que a insensibilização com CO2 promoveu o bem-estar das aves. O tempo de exposição ao CO2 necessário para o atordoamento das aves e o tempo de recuperação da consciência após a saída da câmara de gás apresentou ampla variação. A insensibilização por atmosfera controlada de CO2 facilitou o manejo das aves durante o abate, mas serão necessários mais estudos para desenvolver essa alternativa tecnológica, de forma a torná-la viável para aplicação industrial.Brazil is the world’s largest exporter and third largest producer of chicken meat. To maintain competitiveness, the productive sector must always be alert to consumer demands, and concern about animal welfare is a growing tendency. Aspects involving animal welfare are especially critical in the slaughter of broiler chickens. This study evaluated the stunning of chickens in a CO2-enriched atmosphere chamber to reduce bird stress, comparing with electrical water bath stunning, the most usual desensitization method used in chicken slaughter. The reaction of birds when exposed to a high CO2 concentration (30%) and to a 10% initial CO2 level, gradually elevated to 30% was compared. The effect of mixing argon with CO2 was also evaluated, always aiming to reduce the discomfort of birds. In all the gas stunning parameters evaluated, evident discomfort reactions before stunning were observed in about two thirds of the birds, but the blood levels of corticosterone and glucose, used as stress indicators, indicated that gas increased the birds’ welfare. Gas exposure time required to stun the birds and time to regain consciousness after exiting the gas chamber presented a wide variation. Controlled atmosphere stunning method facilitated bird handling during slaughter, but more studies will be necessary to develop this technological alternative and make it viable for industrial use

Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research

Biodiversity loss is one of the main challenges of our time,1,2 and attempts to address it require a clear un derstanding of how ecological communities respond to environmental change across time and space.3,4 While the increasing availability of global databases on ecological communities has advanced our knowledge of biodiversity sensitivity to environmental changes,5–7 vast areas of the tropics remain understudied.8–11 In the American tropics, Amazonia stands out as the world’s most diverse rainforest and the primary source of Neotropical biodiversity,12 but it remains among the least known forests in America and is often underrepre sented in biodiversity databases.13–15 To worsen this situation, human-induced modifications16,17 may elim inate pieces of the Amazon’s biodiversity puzzle before we can use them to understand how ecological com munities are responding. To increase generalization and applicability of biodiversity knowledge,18,19 it is thus crucial to reduce biases in ecological research, particularly in regions projected to face the most pronounced environmental changes. We integrate ecological community metadata of 7,694 sampling sites for multiple or ganism groups in a machine learning model framework to map the research probability across the Brazilian Amazonia, while identifying the region’s vulnerability to environmental change. 15%–18% of the most ne glected areas in ecological research are expected to experience severe climate or land use changes by 2050. This means that unless we take immediate action, we will not be able to establish their current status, much less monitor how it is changing and what is being lostinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research

Biodiversity loss is one of the main challenges of our time,1,2 and attempts to address it require a clear understanding of how ecological communities respond to environmental change across time and space.3,4 While the increasing availability of global databases on ecological communities has advanced our knowledge of biodiversity sensitivity to environmental changes,5,6,7 vast areas of the tropics remain understudied.8,9,10,11 In the American tropics, Amazonia stands out as the world's most diverse rainforest and the primary source of Neotropical biodiversity,12 but it remains among the least known forests in America and is often underrepresented in biodiversity databases.13,14,15 To worsen this situation, human-induced modifications16,17 may eliminate pieces of the Amazon's biodiversity puzzle before we can use them to understand how ecological communities are responding. To increase generalization and applicability of biodiversity knowledge,18,19 it is thus crucial to reduce biases in ecological research, particularly in regions projected to face the most pronounced environmental changes. We integrate ecological community metadata of 7,694 sampling sites for multiple organism groups in a machine learning model framework to map the research probability across the Brazilian Amazonia, while identifying the region's vulnerability to environmental change. 15%–18% of the most neglected areas in ecological research are expected to experience severe climate or land use changes by 2050. This means that unless we take immediate action, we will not be able to establish their current status, much less monitor how it is changing and what is being lost

Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research

Biodiversity loss is one of the main challenges of our time,1,2 and attempts to address it require a clear understanding of how ecological communities respond to environmental change across time and space.3,4 While the increasing availability of global databases on ecological communities has advanced our knowledge of biodiversity sensitivity to environmental changes,5,6,7 vast areas of the tropics remain understudied.8,9,10,11 In the American tropics, Amazonia stands out as the world's most diverse rainforest and the primary source of Neotropical biodiversity,12 but it remains among the least known forests in America and is often underrepresented in biodiversity databases.13,14,15 To worsen this situation, human-induced modifications16,17 may eliminate pieces of the Amazon's biodiversity puzzle before we can use them to understand how ecological communities are responding. To increase generalization and applicability of biodiversity knowledge,18,19 it is thus crucial to reduce biases in ecological research, particularly in regions projected to face the most pronounced environmental changes. We integrate ecological community metadata of 7,694 sampling sites for multiple organism groups in a machine learning model framework to map the research probability across the Brazilian Amazonia, while identifying the region's vulnerability to environmental change. 15%–18% of the most neglected areas in ecological research are expected to experience severe climate or land use changes by 2050. This means that unless we take immediate action, we will not be able to establish their current status, much less monitor how it is changing and what is being lost

Catálogo Taxonômico da Fauna do Brasil: setting the baseline knowledge on the animal diversity in Brazil

The limited temporal completeness and taxonomic accuracy of species lists, made available in a traditional manner in scientific publications, has always represented a problem. These lists are invariably limited to a few taxonomic groups and do not represent up-to-date knowledge of all species and classifications. In this context, the Brazilian megadiverse fauna is no exception, and the Catálogo Taxonômico da Fauna do Brasil (CTFB) (http://fauna.jbrj.gov.br/), made public in 2015, represents a database on biodiversity anchored on a list of valid and expertly recognized scientific names of animals in Brazil. The CTFB is updated in near real time by a team of more than 800 specialists. By January 1, 2024, the CTFB compiled 133,691 nominal species, with 125,138 that were considered valid. Most of the valid species were arthropods (82.3%, with more than 102,000 species) and chordates (7.69%, with over 11,000 species). These taxa were followed by a cluster composed of Mollusca (3,567 species), Platyhelminthes (2,292 species), Annelida (1,833 species), and Nematoda (1,447 species). All remaining groups had less than 1,000 species reported in Brazil, with Cnidaria (831 species), Porifera (628 species), Rotifera (606 species), and Bryozoa (520 species) representing those with more than 500 species. Analysis of the CTFB database can facilitate and direct efforts towards the discovery of new species in Brazil, but it is also fundamental in providing the best available list of valid nominal species to users, including those in science, health, conservation efforts, and any initiative involving animals. The importance of the CTFB is evidenced by the elevated number of citations in the scientific literature in diverse areas of biology, law, anthropology, education, forensic science, and veterinary science, among others

Rationale, study design, and analysis plan of the Alveolar Recruitment for ARDS Trial (ART): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is associated with high in-hospital mortality. Alveolar recruitment followed by ventilation at optimal titrated PEEP may reduce ventilator-induced lung injury and improve oxygenation in patients with ARDS, but the effects on mortality and other clinical outcomes remain unknown. This article reports the rationale, study design, and analysis plan of the Alveolar Recruitment for ARDS Trial (ART). Methods/Design: ART is a pragmatic, multicenter, randomized (concealed), controlled trial, which aims to determine if maximum stepwise alveolar recruitment associated with PEEP titration is able to increase 28-day survival in patients with ARDS compared to conventional treatment (ARDSNet strategy). We will enroll adult patients with ARDS of less than 72 h duration. The intervention group will receive an alveolar recruitment maneuver, with stepwise increases of PEEP achieving 45 cmH(2)O and peak pressure of 60 cmH2O, followed by ventilation with optimal PEEP titrated according to the static compliance of the respiratory system. In the control group, mechanical ventilation will follow a conventional protocol (ARDSNet). In both groups, we will use controlled volume mode with low tidal volumes (4 to 6 mL/kg of predicted body weight) and targeting plateau pressure <= 30 cmH2O. The primary outcome is 28-day survival, and the secondary outcomes are: length of ICU stay; length of hospital stay; pneumothorax requiring chest tube during first 7 days; barotrauma during first 7 days; mechanical ventilation-free days from days 1 to 28; ICU, in-hospital, and 6-month survival. ART is an event-guided trial planned to last until 520 events (deaths within 28 days) are observed. These events allow detection of a hazard ratio of 0.75, with 90% power and two-tailed type I error of 5%. All analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle. Discussion: If the ART strategy with maximum recruitment and PEEP titration improves 28-day survival, this will represent a notable advance to the care of ARDS patients. Conversely, if the ART strategy is similar or inferior to the current evidence-based strategy (ARDSNet), this should also change current practice as many institutions routinely employ recruitment maneuvers and set PEEP levels according to some titration method.Hospital do Coracao (HCor) as part of the Program 'Hospitais de Excelencia a Servico do SUS (PROADI-SUS)'Brazilian Ministry of Healt

Avaliação do perfil dos consumidores de carne de frango no município de Araçatuba - SP

O Brasil é, atualmente, o maior exportador mundial de carne de frango, mas a manutenção dessa posição no mercado internacional exige uma constante evolução. Na busca pela melhoria da qualidade, é essencial conhecer o público consumidor, pois a qualidade traduz-se como o atendimento das expectativas dos consumidores. Assim, este trabalho teve por objetivo estudar o perfil do consumidor de carne de frango, a fim de gerar informações que possam orientar o setor produtivo na busca de qualidade e competitividade. Foram aplicados 482 questionários, que foram preenchidos manualmente ou enviados via e-mail pelos entrevistados. O questionário era composto por perguntas relacionadas à identificação dos consumidores; aos seus hábitos de consumo; seu conhecimento sobre os aspectos sanitários, sistemas de produção e bem-estar animal; sustentabilidade e sua opinião sobre a aparência do produto. Dos entrevistados, 62% dos consumidores foram mulheres, em sua maioria apresentando de 20 a 50 anos e 50% do total de entrevistados declararam renda entre R$1000,00 e R$ 5000,00. A maioria dos entrevistados prefere carne bovina, a carne de frango ficou empatada com a carne suína como a segunda mais consumida. Do total de entrevistados apenas 2% não gostam da carne de frango. A maioria dos consumidores (66,66%) costumam comprar peito e coxa com sobre-coxa, e somente 11,11% compram o frangos inteiros. Mais de 60% dos entrevistados já consumiram frango caipira, mas a maioria (88,88%) costuma consumir frango de granja. Cerca de 75% dos consumidores acreditam que é utilizado hormônio na produção do frango de granja. Mais de 80% das pessoas observa o prazo de validade durante a compra do produto, porém apenas 55% delas verificam se o produto possui o carimbo de inspeção sanitária oficial. A cor e a aparência do produto são os fatores mais importantes na decisão de compra do consumidor. A quantidade de água na bandeja é um fator de rejeição para 88% dos entrevistados. A maioria (66%) prefere carne mais clara. Somente 27% dos entrevistados acreditam que a produção de carne de frango causa impacto ambiental, 48% relataram não saber o significado de bem-estar animal e mais da metade dos entrevistados responderam que não pensam nesta definição antes de consumir qualquer tipo de carne. Com esses resultados, é possível concluir que qualquer iniciativa visando melhorar a qualidade do produto, principalmente nos aspectos de sustentabilidade e bem-estar animal, deve ser acompanhada de campanhas de esclarecimento dos consumidores.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq