Effects of antiplatelet therapy on stroke risk by brain imaging features of intracerebral haemorrhage and cerebral small vessel diseases: subgroup analyses of the RESTART randomised, open-label trial

Background Findings from the RESTART trial suggest that starting antiplatelet therapy might reduce the risk of recurrent symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage compared with avoiding antiplatelet therapy. Brain imaging features of intracerebral haemorrhage and cerebral small vessel diseases (such as cerebral microbleeds) are associated with greater risks of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage. We did subgroup analyses of the RESTART trial to explore whether these brain imaging features modify the effects of antiplatelet therapy

Effects of antiplatelet therapy after stroke due to intracerebral haemorrhage (RESTART): a randomised, open-label trial

Background: Antiplatelet therapy reduces the risk of major vascular events for people with occlusive vascular disease, although it might increase the risk of intracranial haemorrhage. Patients surviving the commonest subtype of intracranial haemorrhage, intracerebral haemorrhage, are at risk of both haemorrhagic and occlusive vascular events, but whether antiplatelet therapy can be used safely is unclear. We aimed to estimate the relative and absolute effects of antiplatelet therapy on recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage and whether this risk might exceed any reduction of occlusive vascular events. Methods: The REstart or STop Antithrombotics Randomised Trial (RESTART) was a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint, parallel-group trial at 122 hospitals in the UK. We recruited adults (≥18 years) who were taking antithrombotic (antiplatelet or anticoagulant) therapy for the prevention of occlusive vascular disease when they developed intracerebral haemorrhage, discontinued antithrombotic therapy, and survived for 24 h. Computerised randomisation incorporating minimisation allocated participants (1:1) to start or avoid antiplatelet therapy. We followed participants for the primary outcome (recurrent symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage) for up to 5 years. We analysed data from all randomised participants using Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusted for minimisation covariates. This trial is registered with ISRCTN (number ISRCTN71907627). Findings: Between May 22, 2013, and May 31, 2018, 537 participants were recruited a median of 76 days (IQR 29–146) after intracerebral haemorrhage onset: 268 were assigned to start and 269 (one withdrew) to avoid antiplatelet therapy. Participants were followed for a median of 2·0 years (IQR [1·0– 3·0]; completeness 99·3%). 12 (4%) of 268 participants allocated to antiplatelet therapy had recurrence of intracerebral haemorrhage compared with 23 (9%) of 268 participants allocated to avoid antiplatelet therapy (adjusted hazard ratio 0·51 [95% CI 0·25–1·03]; p=0·060). 18 (7%) participants allocated to antiplatelet therapy experienced major haemorrhagic events compared with 25 (9%) participants allocated to avoid antiplatelet therapy (0·71 [0·39–1·30]; p=0·27), and 39 [15%] participants allocated to antiplatelet therapy had major occlusive vascular events compared with 38 [14%] allocated to avoid antiplatelet therapy (1·02 [0·65–1·60]; p=0·92). Interpretation: These results exclude all but a very modest increase in the risk of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage with antiplatelet therapy for patients on antithrombotic therapy for the prevention of occlusive vascular disease when they developed intracerebral haemorrhage. The risk of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage is probably too small to exceed the established benefits of antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention

Effects of antiplatelet therapy after stroke due to intracerebral haemorrhage (RESTART): a randomised, open-label trial

Background: Antiplatelet therapy reduces the risk of major vascular events for people with occlusive vascular disease, although it might increase the risk of intracranial haemorrhage. Patients surviving the commonest subtype of intracranial haemorrhage, intracerebral haemorrhage, are at risk of both haemorrhagic and occlusive vascular events, but whether antiplatelet therapy can be used safely is unclear. We aimed to estimate the relative and absolute effects of antiplatelet therapy on recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage and whether this risk might exceed any reduction of occlusive vascular events. Methods: The REstart or STop Antithrombotics Randomised Trial (RESTART) was a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint, parallel-group trial at 122 hospitals in the UK. We recruited adults (≥18 years) who were taking antithrombotic (antiplatelet or anticoagulant) therapy for the prevention of occlusive vascular disease when they developed intracerebral haemorrhage, discontinued antithrombotic therapy, and survived for 24 h. Computerised randomisation incorporating minimisation allocated participants (1:1) to start or avoid antiplatelet therapy. We followed participants for the primary outcome (recurrent symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage) for up to 5 years. We analysed data from all randomised participants using Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusted for minimisation covariates. This trial is registered with ISRCTN (number ISRCTN71907627). Findings: Between May 22, 2013, and May 31, 2018, 537 participants were recruited a median of 76 days (IQR 29–146) after intracerebral haemorrhage onset: 268 were assigned to start and 269 (one withdrew) to avoid antiplatelet therapy. Participants were followed for a median of 2·0 years (IQR [1·0– 3·0]; completeness 99·3%). 12 (4%) of 268 participants allocated to antiplatelet therapy had recurrence of intracerebral haemorrhage compared with 23 (9%) of 268 participants allocated to avoid antiplatelet therapy (adjusted hazard ratio 0·51 [95% CI 0·25–1·03]; p=0·060). 18 (7%) participants allocated to antiplatelet therapy experienced major haemorrhagic events compared with 25 (9%) participants allocated to avoid antiplatelet therapy (0·71 [0·39–1·30]; p=0·27), and 39 [15%] participants allocated to antiplatelet therapy had major occlusive vascular events compared with 38 [14%] allocated to avoid antiplatelet therapy (1·02 [0·65–1·60]; p=0·92). Interpretation: These results exclude all but a very modest increase in the risk of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage with antiplatelet therapy for patients on antithrombotic therapy for the prevention of occlusive vascular disease when they developed intracerebral haemorrhage. The risk of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage is probably too small to exceed the established benefits of antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention

Effects of antiplatelet therapy after stroke due to intracerebral haemorrhage (RESTART): a randomised, open-label trial

BACKGROUND: Antiplatelet therapy reduces the risk of major vascular events for people with occlusive vascular disease, although it might increase the risk of intracranial haemorrhage. Patients surviving the commonest subtype of intracranial haemorrhage, intracerebral haemorrhage, are at risk of both haemorrhagic and occlusive vascular events, but whether antiplatelet therapy can be used safely is unclear. We aimed to estimate the relative and absolute effects of antiplatelet therapy on recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage and whether this risk might exceed any reduction of occlusive vascular events. METHODS: The REstart or STop Antithrombotics Randomised Trial (RESTART) was a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint, parallel-group trial at 122 hospitals in the UK. We recruited adults (≥18 years) who were taking antithrombotic (antiplatelet or anticoagulant) therapy for the prevention of occlusive vascular disease when they developed intracerebral haemorrhage, discontinued antithrombotic therapy, and survived for 24 h. Computerised randomisation incorporating minimisation allocated participants (1:1) to start or avoid antiplatelet therapy. We followed participants for the primary outcome (recurrent symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage) for up to 5 years. We analysed data from all randomised participants using Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusted for minimisation covariates. This trial is registered with ISRCTN (number ISRCTN71907627). FINDINGS: Between May 22, 2013, and May 31, 2018, 537 participants were recruited a median of 76 days (IQR 29-146) after intracerebral haemorrhage onset: 268 were assigned to start and 269 (one withdrew) to avoid antiplatelet therapy. Participants were followed for a median of 2·0 years (IQR [1·0- 3·0]; completeness 99·3%). 12 (4%) of 268 participants allocated to antiplatelet therapy had recurrence of intracerebral haemorrhage compared with 23 (9%) of 268 participants allocated to avoid antiplatelet therapy (adjusted hazard ratio 0·51 [95% CI 0·25-1·03]; p=0·060). 18 (7%) participants allocated to antiplatelet therapy experienced major haemorrhagic events compared with 25 (9%) participants allocated to avoid antiplatelet therapy (0·71 [0·39-1·30]; p=0·27), and 39 [15%] participants allocated to antiplatelet therapy had major occlusive vascular events compared with 38 [14%] allocated to avoid antiplatelet therapy (1·02 [0·65-1·60]; p=0·92). INTERPRETATION: These results exclude all but a very modest increase in the risk of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage with antiplatelet therapy for patients on antithrombotic therapy for the prevention of occlusive vascular disease when they developed intracerebral haemorrhage. The risk of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage is probably too small to exceed the established benefits of antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention. FUNDING: British Heart Foundation

The haemodynamic and vascular effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition following acute stroke

Stroke is the third commonest cause of adult death and the commonest cause of adult disability in the UK. Arterial stiffness is a recognised independent risk factor for cerebrovascular disease. Phase I of the thesis examines arterial stiffness in the context of stroke, evaluating its role as a risk factor and relevance to other abnormalities of cardiovascular regulation during the acute stroke phase. Central, but not peripheral, arterial stiffness was increased in acute ischaemic stroke, particularly in lacunar and atherothrombotic but not cardioembolic subtypes compared to matched controls. Prognostically-important haemodynamic parameters following stroke, for example impaired cardiac baroreceptor sensitivity and increased beat-to-beat blood pressure (BP) variability, were related to central arterial stiffness.;There is uncertainty over the treatment of elevated BP levels following acute stroke. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) have not been tested in the immediate post-stroke phase, but studies suggest beneficial effects in secondary stroke prevention. Phase II of the thesis presents pilot work evaluating the oral ACEI, Lisinopril, for hypertension treatment immediately following acute stroke. A single 5mg dose resulted in prompt BP reduction within the first 4 hours of administration and a once-daily regimen over the subsequent 14 days lead to sustained BP reduction. Measures of patient outcome in the short and medium-term showed a neutral effect of treatment. However, no drug-related improvement was shown in other cardiovascular variables such as arterial stiffness, BP variability and cardiac baroreceptor sensitivity despite the hypotensive effect.;Reduction of arterial stiffness might be a valid therapeutic target in the primary prevention of stroke and in the acute phase of stroke. Lisinopril administered early in the acute stroke phase appears to be an effective hypotensive agent and is well-tolerated. On the basis of these findings, larger multicentre studies are now ongoing evaluating the effects of ACEI and other drugs on outcome immediately following acute stroke

The haemodynamic and vascular effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition following acute stroke

Stroke is the third commonest cause of adult death and the commonest cause of adult disability in the UK. Arterial stiffness is a recognised independent risk factor for cerebrovascular disease. Phase I of the thesis examines arterial stiffness in the context of stroke, evaluating its role as a risk factor and relevance to other abnormalities of cardiovascular regulation during the acute stroke phase. Central, but not peripheral, arterial stiffness was increased in acute ischaemic stroke, particularly in lacunar and atherothrombotic but not cardioembolic subtypes compared to matched controls. Prognostically-important haemodynamic parameters following stroke, for example impaired cardiac baroreceptor sensitivity and increased beat-to-beat blood pressure (BP) variability, were related to central arterial stiffness.;There is uncertainty over the treatment of elevated BP levels following acute stroke. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) have not been tested in the immediate post-stroke phase, but studies suggest beneficial effects in secondary stroke prevention. Phase II of the thesis presents pilot work evaluating the oral ACEI, Lisinopril, for hypertension treatment immediately following acute stroke. A single 5mg dose resulted in prompt BP reduction within the first 4 hours of administration and a once-daily regimen over the subsequent 14 days lead to sustained BP reduction. Measures of patient outcome in the short and medium-term showed a neutral effect of treatment. However, no drug-related improvement was shown in other cardiovascular variables such as arterial stiffness, BP variability and cardiac baroreceptor sensitivity despite the hypotensive effect.;Reduction of arterial stiffness might be a valid therapeutic target in the primary prevention of stroke and in the acute phase of stroke. Lisinopril administered early in the acute stroke phase appears to be an effective hypotensive agent and is well-tolerated. On the basis of these findings, larger multicentre studies are now ongoing evaluating the effects of ACEI and other drugs on outcome immediately following acute stroke

Mortality in a Multiethnic Population Attending a One-Stop TIA Clinic

Introduction: Studies indicate a 13–27% mortality rate following a transient ischaemic attack (TIA). However, outcomes following TIA/minor stroke since the introduction of rapid-access TIA clinics and prompt vascular risk factor intervention are not known. Specifically, there is paucity of data comparing outcomes between people who are diagnosed with an “acute cerebrovascular” (CV) event or an alternative non-cardiovascular diagnosis (non-CV) in a rapid-access TIA clinic. We aimed to assess the mortality in such a setting. Methods: A retrospective observational study was undertaken at the Leicester rapid-access secondary care TIA clinic. Data included information collected at the first clinic visit (including comorbidities, and primary diagnosis, categorized as CV and non-CV) and the date of death for people dying during follow-up. Results: 11,524 subjects were included with 33,164 years of follow-up data; 4,746 (41.2%) received a CV diagnosis. The median follow-up time was 2.75 years (interquartile range 1.36–4.32). The crude mortality rate was 37.3 (95% CI: 35.3–39.5) per 1,000 person-years (PTPY). The mortality rate was higher following a CV diagnosis (50.8 [47.2–54.7] PTPY) compared to a non-CV diagnosis (27.9 [25.7–30.4] PTPY), and for males, older people, those of white ethnicity, and people with orthostatic hypotension (OH). Discussion: This study identified possible risk factors associated with a higher mortality in TIA clinic attendees, who may benefit from specific intervention. Future research should explore the underlying causes and the effect of specific targeted management strategies.</p